US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Did you get your understanding of time from the Zybourne Clock? You overlaid an immigration graph that begins at 1930 with a SIDS graph that begins in 1980. I can only conclude from this that you are mentally retarded.

Mass vaccination of the host population really took off in 1980s, right when SIDS started falling. Yellow bars are the USA.

Ver archivo adjunto 8227472

SIDS and vaccination rates are not correlated. If anything, they're inversely correlated.
You're right, I screwed that one up.
 
This is one of the gayest, most homosexual excuses ever for doing your job, you know he was just waiting for a terrible excuse to pretend like he's not even more retarded than his daughter. Many would say it is peak faggotry:
kek I sincerely hope he understands just how many people are going to call him fucking retarded now.
 
This thread has been so slow over the past week (aside from the National Guard shooting). Let's spice it up a bit.

You're tasked with removing all immigrants currently illegally in the US or on a temporary visa. They all have to go for the sake of the economy and to reduce government spending waste. How do you do it? What's your timeline?

Edit: Grammar
I don't have a grand plan or anything but I'd definitely target every weigh station for long distance truckers, Uber, Lyft, Uber eats, doordash, meat packing plant, and agricultural farms across the country. Basically the hot beds of illegals.

The I'd make the 100k fee for H1Bs annual, not one time, and I'd raise the pay floor to the median wage of that position so they have to pay median + 100k if they want a Jeet doing it.

The I'd tax remittances at 100%, target the employers of illegals and institute heavy fines for employing them, and look at e-verify to make it stricter so they can't play dumb.

I'd also make sure strict measures were in place for getting any kind of government assistance applying it only to citizens and excluding green card holders and illegals. Proof of citizenship required to get it and checks on the federal level to verify they're not being redeemed under the same SSN in different states.

I'd prioritize stolen identity reports for immediate follow-up, too. Plenty of illegals use stolen SSN to get employment. I'd add harsh penalties for any illegal caught doing it, including an immediate permanent ban on future citizenship or visa opportunities unless they self reported and self deported before they got caught.

I'd also institute penalties for providing housing to illegals as well. And I'd sieze any property an illegal bought while in the country. House, car, furniture, all seized and sold since it was bought while committing a crime.

A lot of that would take a magic wand and I'm sure at the least congressional approval but at least I can dream.

Basically I'd want to use every avenue possible to make their life and any perks of being here impossible to get, the punishments harsh, and the risk of getting caught much higher than the downsides of just leaving. Plus punish anyone aiding and abetting them. Housing, employers, federal aide, all of then, at every level.
 
This thread has been so slow over the past week (aside from the National Guard shooting). Let's spice it up a bit.

You're tasked with removing all immigrants currently illegally in the US or on a temporary visa. They all have to go for the sake of the economy and to reduce government spending waste. How do you do it? What's your timeline?

Edit: Grammar
1764370062473.png

You hold one of these up to someone's face. If their skin is darker than this, you deport them. That's it. That's the plan.
 
I'd also institute penalties for providing housing to illegals as well. And I'd sieze any property an illegal bought while in the country. House, car, furniture, all seized and sold since it was bought while committing a crime.

As other posters have pointed out. You need to lock them out of the benifits like schooling for thier children etc.

I was fond of the saying if hire someone not allowed to work here then your never hiring anyone again.

I would also argue you need to ban non native citizens from holding office

It's dicey with 2nd generation. But having immigrants able to stand for office in any capacity is a threat.
 
I'd add to these ideas that judges need to be removed from office for letting criminals off without sentences (and/or out on low bond) when they violently resist arrest, flee from police, or endanger others during their capture. It should be an automatic hold-and-verify on people who pull that shit; there's always a good reason, and it's either warrants, crime in progress, or illegal status. No judge should be allowed to let people go when they've proven they're willing to fight just to escape, and any judge who does should be impeached immediately.
 
You're tasked with removing all immigrants currently illegally in the US or on a temporary visa. They all have to go for the sake of the economy and to reduce government spending waste. How do you do it? What's your timeline?
I would dial P3W-451 and start sending the illegals through the gate.

Time doesn't matter once they're through.

:cunningpepe:
 
Here's what it looks like (NG hurricane Katrina gun confiscation sweeps) (archive)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kf8trl69kzo
Wow, never knew about this. Crazy stuff
I would rather be in Iraq
Modernized letters of marque, also 10 percent of whatever property they had when that shit is put up for a public government auction. Also 2500 bucks for every person deported.
Privatization is an interesting choice but I think that may be too exploitable. Too many opportunities for bad actors to fuck with the system.
Ver archivo adjunto 8227530

You hold one of these up to someone's face. If their skin is darker than this, you deport them. That's it. That's the plan.
RIP to anyone with a tan.
Basically I'd want to use every avenue possible to make their life and any perks of being here impossible to get, the punishments harsh, and the risk of getting caught much higher than the downsides of just leaving. Plus punish anyone aiding and abetting them. Housing, employers, federal aide, all of then, at every level.
Honestly that should be the status quo. Probably the most reasonable proposal so far. This entire situation we've gotten into is from lawmakers enabling illegals to ingratiate into the systems designed to serve citizens, so by creating preventative checks it disincentivizes them from attempting to stay in America.
 
You're tasked with removing all immigrants currently illegally in the US or on a temporary visa. They all have to go for the sake of the economy and to reduce government spending waste. How do you do it? What's your timeline?

Every illegal immigrant found would be audited to find out how much debt they owe from using public services, fraud, and harm against citizens. From there we have two options.

If it is a relatively small debt then we take advantage of the 13th amendments exception for punishment of a crime and have then literally be indentured servants until they pay off their debt before being deported.

If they rack up a massive debt or commit awful crimes then they will be exicuted and the people that enabled them (landlords, employers, banks providing loans, legal family members, state goverment, etc) will become liable and they will need to pay back their debts.
 
Every illegal immigrant found would be audited to find out how much debt they owe from using public services, fraud, and harm against citizens. From there we have two options.

If it is a relatively small debt then we take advantage of the 13th amendments exception for punishment of a crime and have then literally be indentured servants until they pay off their debt before being deported.

If they rack up a massive debt or commit awful crimes then they will be exicuted and the people that enabled them (landlords, employers, banks providing loans, legal family members, state goverment, etc) will become liable and they will need to pay back their debts.
Modern wage slavery then. Wonder if the Saudis already have that as part of their imported labor system. Debt-based execution and inheritable debt is... interesting. Use their organs and biomass for fuel lol
 
I had a patient last night. Dude was from Ecuador. Said he had been in this country for 20 years. Barely spoke a word of English. Illegal immigrant. Crying about ICE, etc.

So this dude was drunk (got his license literally the day before, fuck DMV swine) and got in a very minor fender bender. Him and his illegal buddy start threatening the women they hit. Threaten to throw one of them off the turnpike.

Just as they were doing that, the brother of the woman being accosted (an off duty police officer) pulls up. The illegals take a swing at him. The off duty cop beat the fucking daylights out of them. It was a complete beat down.

So anyway, illegal ends up in my ambulance singing a sob story about getting deported and crying in handcuffs looking like he lost a fight with 90s Mike Tyson. Honestly, it was a lovely Thanksgiving.
 
Wasn't it a judge that forced the guard to be unarmed while in DC? Or is my hatred just making things up?
This black wamen is why our boys were unarmed. :mad:

U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb ruled on November 20, 2025, that President Trump's deployment of over 2,000 National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., was unlawful under federal laws like the Posse Comitatus Act. This act prohibits federal armed forces, including federalized National Guard units, from engaging in domestic law enforcement activities such as routine patrols, searches, or arrests. She found the deployment violated D.C.'s Home Rule Act by undermining local governance and ordered it to end by December 11, 2025, while staying the ruling for appeals. Her 61-page opinion emphasized that these troops, once federalized, are subject to restrictions on armed involvement in civilian policing, effectively barring them from carrying weapons for such roles in the city.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo