US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Illinois national guard, for one. you don’t need a ton of training to point a gun at someone and say, give me your food. If we look at the most recent cases of city sieges like Syrian civil war or Yugoslavia. Local police and militias DID form requisition teams. Because training or not no one wants to starve to death

Sorry I ruined your fan fiction of le epic invasion of Chicago that only lasts 3 days
They won't.
First, the feds will federalize them, then it becomes a situation of "whose orders do you follow" and I'd wager that the majority go to defending the outlying land, not the city. This isn't going to be "Chicago versus the hapless countryfolk" it's partisan vs. partisan and the siege would easily hold. How the fuck are the coasts going to supply them with supplies and manpower? Chicago sits mostly alone in the middle of the country.
The US military and all other national guards would be involved.
 
Like any rational person I realize that an actual civil war in the US would be catastrophic even if it's just the DOW waffle stomping some turds down the shower drain.

However, a "civil war" against what is essentially just Chicago would be unfathomably based. There would be a few days of total annihilation and then 50 years of no voting rights during "Reconstruction".

Ver archivo adjunto 8052631

Do it, JB! I'm begging you.
Hyatt Hotels are all over the place. Don't underestimate his reach.
 
They won't.
First, the feds will federalize them, then it becomes a situation of "whose orders do you follow" and I'd wager that the majority go to defending the outlying land, not the city. This isn't going to be "Chicago versus the hapless countryfolk" it's partisan vs. partisan and the siege would easily hold. How the fuck are the coasts going to supply them with supplies and manpower? Chicago sits mostly alone in the middle of the country.
Oregon nat guard said openly they would resist federalization. Illinois national guard I can’t imagine is much better. If even 1/10 of national guard resist federalization you have a war.

You would wager wrong the Illinois national guard is 65% from the greater Chicago area

Nor did I say the siege wouldn’t hold, it just wouldn’t be as simple and take two weeks like a lot of posters seem to think

Who said anything about the coasts?
 
They won't.
First, the feds will federalize them, then it becomes a situation of "whose orders do you follow" and I'd wager that the majority go to defending the outlying land, not the city. This isn't going to be "Chicago versus the hapless countryfolk" it's partisan vs. partisan and the siege would easily hold. How the fuck are the coasts going to supply them with supplies and manpower? Chicago sits mostly alone in the middle of the country.
The US military and all other national guards would be involved.
Do you think the Pacific and North East will try and save Minneapolis-St Paul and Chicagoland? I doubt it.
 
No Kings is an astroturfed movement created by the Dems and their globalist NGO's and globo-homo corpos. They even have choreographed tiktok dances is hilarious.

Modern Progressives really are just shit eating nodding monkeys who need to be told how to feel and what to think.
 
No city in history under siege just sat there and starved to death if there wasn’t a alternative
Yeah, no fucking shit, smartypants. The point is to laugh our asses off as they try to "shake down" the surrounding areas for food. Bug men crawling out of their bug hives (often under oppression of gun bans, meaning "not well armed") demanding food from the growers at gun-point.

Growers outnumber them and have more guns.

Fucking try it.
 
Oregon nat guard said openly they would resist federalization. Illinois national guard I can’t imagine is much better. If even 1/10 of national guard resist federalization you have a war.
The commander, not the troops. At least 20% wouldn't follow, which is enough to really fuck them
You would wager wrong the Illinois national guard is 65% from the greater Chicago area
And? Just joining the military is right-coded, so at WORST, you get a 50/50 split with those numbers
Who said anything about the coasts?
I did, because Illinois national guard can't stand alone against the actual military.
Do you think the Pacific and North East will try and save Minneapolis-St Paul and Chicagoland? I doubt it.
No, which is my point.
 
Illinois national guard, for one. you don’t need a ton of training to point a gun at someone and say, give me your food. If we look at the most recent cases of city sieges like Syrian civil war or Yugoslavia. Local police and militias DID form requisition teams. Because training or not no one wants to starve to death. Food requisition units historically had little to no training to begin with

Sorry I ruined your fan fiction of le epic invasion of Chicago that only lasts 3 days while they just sit and starve. but the vast majority of the time it’s just not the case. And we will whip them Christmas fags end up with egg on their face like they do in literally 99% of conflicts because reality never matches people predictions
You can bomb strategic targets in the city during a siege with modern aircraft. The point of a siege is psychological warfare and making the people desperate and terrorized enough to surrender. Timur the Lame would have pyramids of skulls built outside of cities to terrorize them into surrendering and in many cases they would. People are more susceptible to terrorism than you think. The illinois national guard would probably side with the rest of the military, most of them are from those red counties outside of cook county.
 
And? Just joining the military is right-coded,
lol lmao do you think it’s 2005? Most people just want Bennie’s

The illinois national guard would probably side with the rest of the military, most of them are from those red counties outside of cook county.
they literally are not 65% plus are from Chicago
 
Yeah, no fucking shit, smartypants. The point is to laugh our asses off as they try to "shake down" the surrounding areas for food try
Yeah yeah tell that to the Russian peasantry, rural areas around major cities during Yugoslav war. Sedentary rural arabs during the Syrian civil war. It was just a huge laugh

Also in the vast majority of the world no, the people who grow food are not the majority of the population. we had this crazy thing happen called industrialization
 
lol lmao do you think it’s 2005? Most people just want Bennie’s


they literally are not 65% plus are from Chicago
I can't find recent data, but I remember people flipping their shit when it was only 60/40 R/D in the last election cycle which is still a pretty big majority. You're doing the thing where you find one point to pick at rather than addressing the actual argument.
My point is mostly that, no, Chicago will not raid the entire countryside unopposed, and they're not prepared for such action.
 
lol lmao do you think it’s 2005? Most people just want Bennie’s


they literally are not 65% plus are from Chicago
Where are you getting that number from? That would be backwards from here, the cities supply the least amount of recruits. Even if so that's not that many, there may be some fighting but I don't see it being that difficult. Air makes this a lot easier than it used to be.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo