US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I feel like what cements that Kagan might vote with the Conservative wing is just how fucking dumb KBJ is. There was a 3-5 minute dialogue where it just was the NAACP lawyer and KBJ agreeing with each other. Everyone else was silent and it was the most masturbatory sequence I’ve heard in oral arguments. Every oral argument I’ve heard typically will have a Justice pry or give an at length example to better understand the argument. KBJ just wants to argue the issue for her side.

I’ll give Kagan this, she is the best at appearing fair while Sotomayor and KBJ cannot.
 
Do you write these yourself or are you copying it from some website?
Pretty weird projection/derail from a CatParty wannabe clone such as yourself. :thinking:

Anyway, CNN oughta do a better job of screening questioners for its townhalls. Student Rohan Naval just blew a hole in the hull of the Democrat narrative regarding the Schumer Shutdown: https://xcancel.com/RapidResponse47/status/1978641695760662647
1760636193376.png


Kamala Harris is evidently not the only Democrat spent force to suffer from delusions.

Burnt Weenie Sandwich isn't having a good way, one way or the other. Here is a nice one from student Nicole Plewicka, who may be a Democrat but looks smart enough to grow out of it: https://xcancel.com/WhiteHouse/status/1978656690368123386
1760636371991.png


We are told that Republicans are better at social media messaging because “they have friends on all of the major social media platforms.” Yet only a few years ago, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat all banned Donald Trump — while he was sitting President of the United States.

But then, you couldn’t expect the crusty old commie to admit that the other side are better at messaging because they have a better message, considering that Burnt Weenie is no longer under the good graces of actual left-wingers: https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2025/09/19/bernie-sanders-is-a-ghoulish-zionist/
1760636585214.png 1760636919686.jpeg
 
Most of them believe that if they were called to take up arms against their own friends, family, and neighbors due to a national political issue, they would in a heartbeat.

Ver archivo adjunto 8042907

They 100% would, remember many of them happily participated in those COVID snitch lines against their neighbors and even strangers they saw not being good little fags and wearing their masks, if Biden said people needed to go out and shoot anyone not masked they would've been mowing people down No Russian style

These guys shouldn't even be acknowledging or giving lip service to these sudden 'nazi' accusations, just ignore it.

They have to, too many perpetual losers hold power in the party.

Grand Old Party? More like Groveling Old Pussies

Eh, the guy has been a complete Trump hater for this term, has tried to thwart Trump's agenda multiple times. The sooner he leaves, the better.

It also depends on who gets his seat next year since he's stepping down.

The two main Republican frontrunners I believe are Nate Morris and Andy Barr. Barr was generally loyal to Trump in the House and voted against impeaching him, Morris got Charlie Kirk's endorsement before his assassination and he's a business outsider that hasn't been a politician before
 
he wanted to do more progressive things in office than he let on during his campaign, he was a liar.
Slight disagree: Clinton wanted to be more progressive, but Newt stopped him. Republicans rallied in Clinton's first term and forced him to the center, which was a surprise because the GOP usually didn't control the House.
But he did do one thing that lasted, the assault weapons ban.
It went along with a ton of buffs to law enforcement, welcomed after the 80's crime issues and a few high-profile mass shootings, and had an expiration on it anyway.
 
Country Singer Bryan Andrews melts down over people ‘laughing at families being torn apart’
ssstwitter.com_1760633090045.mp4
“You are not Christian. You use Christianity as a shield to hide behind when you need to justify the hate that you have scolded into this world,” he continued.

This is the second country singer to speak out against the current government.
  1. He's just some guy
  2. Fat
1760635550973.png
1760635855012.png
And his music sucks. He's trying to be controversial for views and do libtard "country."
 
This is a nice jab at Obama, but there were a few presidents, including some considered decent or good who had last names ending in a vowel.
This is the kind of in-depth autism I come to the farms for. Who knew my throwaway comment would result in such a detailed response (I did!) Thanks, Obama!
 

Trump says he’ll meet with Putin in Hungary. He first meets Friday with Zelenskyy at the White House​

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Thursday he will meet again with Russia’s Vladimir Putin in an effort to end the war in Ukraine. A date has not been set, but Trump wrote on social media that the meeting would take place in Budapest, Hungary.

“I believe great progress was made with today’s telephone conversation,” Trump wrote after talking to Putin. They previously met in Alaska in August, which did not produce a diplomatic breakthrough.

Before Trump and Putin meet, U.S. officials led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio will sit down with Russian representatives next week. It’s unclear where that meeting will take place.

The call came ahead of Trump’s meeting on Friday at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has been pressing Trump to sell Kyiv Tomahawk missiles that would allow Ukrainian forces to strike deeper into Russian territory. Zelenskyy has argued such strikes would help compel Putin to take Trump’s calls for direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine to end the war more seriously.


Trump had told reporters traveling with him to Israel on Sunday that he had planned to discuss the Tomahawks with Putin as a way to pressure him to end Russia’s war in Ukraine. “Do they want to have Tomahawks going in that direction? I don’t think so,” Trump said on Sunday. “I think I might speak to Russia about that.”


With a fragile Israel-Hamas ceasefire and hostage deal holding, Trump has said he’s now turning his attention to bringing the war in Ukraine to an end and is weighing providing Kyiv long-range weaponry as he looks to prod Moscow to the negotiating table.


Ending the wars in Ukraine and Gaza was central to Trump’s 2024 reelection pitch, in which he persistently pilloried President Joe Biden for his handling of the conflicts. Yet, like his predecessor, Trump also has been stymied by Putin as he’s unsuccessfully pressed the Russian leader to hold direct talks with Zelenskyy to end the war, which is nearing its fourth year.


But fresh off the Gaza ceasefire, Trump is showing new confidence that he can finally make headway on ending the Russian invasion. He’s also signaling that he’s ready to step up pressure on Putin if he doesn’t come to the table soon.

“Interestingly we made progress today, because of what’s happened in the Middle East,” Trump said of the Russia-Ukraine war on Wednesday evening as he welcomed supporters of his White House ballroom project to a glitzy dinner.

Earlier this week in Jerusalem, in a speech to the Knesset, Trump predicted the truce in Gaza would lay the groundwork for the U.S. to help Israel and many of its Middle East neighbors normalize relations. But Trump also made clear his top foreign policy priority now is ending the largest armed conflict in Europe since World War II.


“First we have to get Russia done,” Trump said, turning to his special envoy Steve Witkoff, who has also served as his administration’s chief interlocutor with Putin. “We gotta get that one done. If you don’t mind, Steve, let’s focus on Russia first. All right?”


Trump weighs Tomahawks for Ukraine​

Trump is set to host Zelenskyy for talks Friday, their fourth face-to-face meeting this year.

Ahead of the meeting, Trump has said he’s weighing selling Kyiv long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles. Putin has made clear that providing Ukraine with Tomahawks would cross a red line and further damage relations between Moscow and Washington.

But Trump has been undeterred.

“He’d like to have Tomahawks,” Trump said of Zelenskyy on Tuesday. “We have a lot of Tomahawks.”

Agreeing to sell Ukraine Tomahawks would be a splashy move, said Mark Montgomery, an analyst at the conservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington. But it could take years to supply and train Kyiv on the Tomahawk system.

Montgomery said Ukraine could be better served in the near term with a surge of Extended Range Attack Munition, or ERAM, missiles and Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS. The U.S. already approved the sale of up to 3,350 ERAMs to Kyiv earlier this year.


The Tomahawk, with a range of about 995 miles (1,600 kilometers), would allow Ukraine to strike far deeper in Russian territory than either the ERAM (about 285 miles, or 460 km) or ATACMS (about 186 miles, or 300 kilometers).


“To provide Tomahawks is as much a political decision as it is a military decision,” Montgomery said. “The ERAM is shorter range, but this can help them put pressure on Russia operationally, on their logistics, the command and control, and its force disbursement within several hundred kilometers of the front line. It can be very effective.”

Signs of White House interest in new Russia sanctions​

Zelenskyy is expected to reiterate his plea to Trump to hit Russia’s economy with further sanctions, something the Republican, to date, has appeared reluctant to do.

Congress has weighed legislation that would lead to tougher sanctions on Moscow, but Trump has largely focused his attention on pressuring NATO members and other allies to cut off their purchases of Russian oil, the engine fueling Moscow’s war machine. To that end, Trump said Wednesday that India, which became one of Russia’s biggest crude buyers after the Ukraine invasion, had agreed to stop buying oil from Moscow.

Waiting for Trump’s blessing is legislation in the Senate that would impose steep tariffs on countries that purchase Russia’s oil, gas, uranium and other exports in an attempt to cripple Moscow economically.

Though the president hasn’t formally endorsed it — and Republican leaders do not plan to move forward without his support — the White House has shown, behind the scenes, more interest in the bill in recent weeks.

Administration officials have gone through the legislation in depth, offering line edits and requesting technical changes, according to two officials with knowledge of the discussions between the White House and the Senate. That has been interpreted on Capitol Hill as a sign that Trump is getting more serious about the legislation, sponsored by close ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., along with Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn.

A White House official said the administration is working with lawmakers to make sure that “introduced bills advance the president’s foreign policy objectives and authorities.” The official, who was granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations, said any sanctions package needs to give the president “complete flexibility.”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday the administration is waiting for greater buy-in from Europe, which he noted faces a bigger threat from Russian aggression than the U.S. does.

“So all I hear from the Europeans is that Putin is coming to Warsaw,” Bessent said. “There are very few things in life I’m sure about. I’m sure he’s not coming to Boston. So, we will respond ... if our European partners will join us.”

L / A
Trump is meeting king zigger again
 
that’s why I don’t get all The Democrats are finished! Posting.
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/202...ts-winning-the-house-in-2026-plummeting-down/

On Wednesday, CNN network data analyst Harry Enten painted a bleak picture for Democrats as the 2026 election cycle approaches.

Enten cited the Kalshi Prediction Market, noting in April that Democrats had an 83% of winning the House of Representatives, and as of today, the chances have dropped to 63%.

Partial transcript as follows:

BOLDUAN: OK, you’re tracking the odds. What is the change that you’re seeing?

ENTEN: Yes. OK. So, you know, if you go back six months ago, you go back to April, Kate Bolduan, what were we looking at? Well, we were looking at the Democrats with a very clear shot of taking control of the U.S. House of Representatives according to the Kalshi Prediction Market Odds. We saw them at an 83% chance.

But those odds have gone plummeting down. Now we’re talking about just a 63% chance, while the GOP’s chances up like a rocket, up like gold, up from 17% to now a 37% chance. So, it will look like a pretty clear Democratic — likely Democratic win in the House come next year has become much closer to a toss-up at this point, although still slightly leaning Democratic.

BOLDUAN: What’s changed? What are you seeing?

ENTEN: OK, what has changed? Well, why don’t we just take a look at the national picture first, take a look at voters and how they’re feeling about things. And we can take a look at the generic congressional ballot. And I want to take a look and compare it to 2017, 2018, right, because that’s sort of the baseline. That was, of course, the first Trump term. That was where Democrats were sort of keeping pace.

You go back to April, look at the generic congressional ballot. What’d you see? You see plus three Democrats in 2025 in April. You see plus three Democrats back in April of 2017. Now, jump over to this side of the screen. What happens? Well, the

Democrats are no longer keeping pace with the pace that they were setting back in 2017, 2018. You look back in 2017, you saw that the Democrats had leaped up to an eight-point advantage. I remember covering this. I remember a lot of folks, including myself, saying, you know what, Republicans look pretty decent right now in terms of the fact that they had the House, they had the Senate, they had the presidency, but things were likely going to flip. And I was looking for the same signs this year.

The bottom line is, it hasn’t happened, Kate Bolduan. It hasn’t happened. Democrats have stayed basically steady. They have fallen off the pace. Democrats were way out ahead back in 2017 on the generic congressional ballot. And now we’re basically looking at Democrats ahead. But again, they are so far in back of the pace that they set back there. And so, I think what a lot of folks are seeing, folks like myself, are saying, wait a minute, given what we might be seeing in redistricting, is this plus three going to be enough, Kate Bolduan?
 
We are told that Republicans are better at social media messaging because “they have friends on all of the major social media platforms.” Yet only a few years ago, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat all banned Donald Trump — while he was sitting President of the United States.
That was some insane cope from Bernie Sanders, lifelong and professional coper. As you say, the "friends" in "all of" the major social media platforms is a very recent development, it was less than a year ago that Facebook was working hand in hand with the Biden administration to silence people.
Even then, the crux of it is that the left can't meme. That's the real answer.
 
I think he's staying in power because he gets better healthcare coverage than if he retired. Dying is expensive. Also, as much as McConnell pisses people off, he has been an important Republican in the 21st century. He helped block Merrick Garland from the Supreme Court and voted for all of Trump's Supreme Court picks. For these things, we should be at least a little grateful to the bastard.
McConnell is one of those guys that you know is slimy, but sometimes that slime works for your needs. I've never gotten anything but "smug asshole with a punchable face" vibes from him, whether he was refusing to do his job and approve bills for floor discussion or working with Trump (on again/off again style) on whatever Trump could convince him to vote for.

Hard to know a person from all the way up in the cheap seats, but he doesn't seem like a person I'd trust or have a beer with.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo