US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

Destacado
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Presiona para expandir...
I just want to point out that tofu has some uses that don't turn you into a faggot type soy boy.

For example I use it in my chocolate cream pie. Silky tofu gives it a very smooth and creamy texture without have to use a lot of cornstarch or gelatin.

Ok that out of the way onto the Chinks. You have to recall Chairman Meow's one child policy that pretty much devastated the general chink pop. As you might know in Chinkland sons are faaaaaar more valuable then daughters so a woman who was pregnant with a female child would most likely abort. You want to talk about population implosion, talk about the Chinks
 
whoishomermynameis dijo:

Ver archivo adjunto 7986297

indian.mp4
Presiona para expandir...
"you have ruined my already difficult life" is some top tier TXT

Dude is ragemaxxing in a phone while sitting in a car, what a humble downtrodden soul.

Listen bucko, my latest goal has been to eliminate hate from my life but holy fuck, as someone who might have some allegedly hypothetically background in IT work you cannot fathom the depths of anger and suffering you have to be in for EXTENDED TIME to be able to learn that Pakistanis are in fact better people than Indians on an individual level.

Hypothetically ive had "senior network admins" (these fuckers make up their own titles and promote themselves at will) tell me my mother fucks goats WHILE IM IN THE MIDDLE OF ATTEMPTING TO REBOOT THEIR WHOLE CORE SERVER RACK, then get mad and play victim when I told them what the son of the goat fucker was going to do to their NAS if they dident apologize. For all their Muslim malarkey the dang Pakis were super polite and patient EVERY TIME.

Let me give you an example
1759364774004.png
Nearly 700,000 is quite a bit, I wont try and sugarcoat it but thats over more than half a century AND whats more important is it was 99% LEGAL. Thats the TOTAL figure, counting halfie pakis they made since coming here.

Ohhhh Computer, could you please praytell me what the ILLEGAL Indian Immigration count, PER YEAR IS?
1759364952959.png

fuck me just that screenshot pisses me off, the Biden years will leave scars for generations.

So look at thatm the top end number shows more law breaking Indians sneaking into the USA in a single year than over half a century of total legal Pakistani Immigration.


Sorry idk why this turned into a pro Pakistan post, I just cant overstate how fucking blown away I was personally to learn that the, in my mind, "Muslim Indians" are actually the model citizens of the subcontinent. Obviously they are still muslim and that comes with the pitfalls all muslim nations come with but I was blown away.

I guess to circle it all back around, if we could increase our relations with Pakistan (I know, I know stick with me) it would anger and frustrate these Indians in a way I dont think much else could.

BTW I want it said that in my ALLEGED HYPOTHETICAL experience like 5% of the Indians have even an inkling of technological understanding beyond basics, they simply have filled the void of cheap tech support because computers scare boomers.

Can you imagine if your grandfather had to get his typewriter serviced by a dang Indian anytime he needed help? you think typing would have gone ANYWHERE?

If I had 3 wishes 1 of them might have been for boomers to have been swapped with the ww1 generation, talk about some fun alt hist.
 
Irene and 22 others dijo:
Could you provide additional context to the statistics you're quoting. I think you're misunderstanding what they actually mean. What you're stating makes no sense and does not fit with other statistics. If you take 1,000 people about half of them cannot have a baby as they are men. Of the remaining 500 who are women, a large number are either too young or too old to have children. Of those who are of child bearing age, not all of them will have a child in a given year. Some may have recently had a child and don't want to have another right away again. Others may have already had as many children as they want in their family.

What you're missing is that this figure isn't a lifetime number, but a measure of how many children were born per 1,000 people in a particular year. Suppose that the average lifespan of a person is 75 years. If you divide 1,000 by 75, then you need on average 13.33 children born per 1,000 people per year to maintain a stable population. If the people live longer on average, then you need fewer children born per year to maintain a stable population. If the US had an average life expectancy of 83.4 years, then 11.99 births per 1,000 would maintain a stable population.
Presiona para expandir...
you 100% right in your specifics but your ignoring the context

1. is that we give china shit on a cultural level for being "about to experience a demographic collapse" when our numbers are completely comparable to theirs. This is cause for concern.

2. If the births were even dispersed over a overall homogeneous population to 2 stable loving parents then there would be NO ISSUE, this is not the case. Those few being born are being born into poor, broken, immigrant households. Notice its total births, not total mothers, most of the births are from a very small percentage of the population using the broken child support and government support system in this country.

Im not saying our population is not able to be "replaced", just look at the immigration numbers for that, its that within a single generation the bottom wont be able to support the top.
 
DumbDude43 dijo:
there's three options

#1 domestic farming gets propped up by subsidies
#2 domestic farming gets protected by extreme import tarrifs on all agricultural and food related products
#3 domestic farming dies and you rely on imports for food security

#1 is the least efficient but politically convenient
#2 is more efficient but politically hazardous (foreign countries will get angry, also causes some domestic discontent due to sharp price increases in imported goods)
#3 is most efficient but just terrible all around (you pay for that efficiency with the livelihoods of your people and put your food security at the mercy of foreign powers and international trade)
Presiona para expandir...
If we took 10% of our defense budget that we use to protect ungrateful ass countries that hate us, and put that towards food production, there would be a whole lot of people lining up to pick strawberries and spinach for the guaranteed hourly wage the government would be paying.
Stupor Mario dijo:
Ver archivo adjunto 7987222

This is from the official White House X account.
LOL!
Presiona para expandir...
The second one where temu Obama went on MSNBC and was crying about the racist meme, Donald Trump turned that into a clip of him in the sombrero again with an all Trump mariachi band playing in the background. It fucking creased me lol.
 
For The Dead Not The Not dijo:
Friendly reminder that before you all begin doomposting about birth rates, all it takes to boost birthing rates are stipends to parents for having kids.

Just keep DOGEing the government and this system works.
Presiona para expandir...
no
it's not simply a money issue, it's a culture/society issue
to return birth rates to sustainable levels you would have to
>undo sexual revolution
>roll back feminism by ~100 years
>dismantle the welfare state
>ban contraceptives
and even then it would take decades for the effects of these changes to really set in and show results (just like it took decades for these things to bring down the birth rates in the first place)
 

This cunt that's sucking off this Vaush lookalike is basically the representative of the average female leftist. She's fucking nuts, and this $90k/year making guy is enabling her.

Also notice the cow nose ring. She's a far left retard and has had a lot of "trauma" in her life. And as Caleb has pointed out, the bitch is using it as a crutch to be a worthless cunt.
 
DumbDude43 dijo:
no
it's not simply a money issue, it's a culture/society issue
to return birth rates to sustainable levels you would have to
>undo sexual revolution
>roll back feminism by ~100 years
>dismantle the welfare state
>ban contraceptives
and even then it would take decades for the effects of these changes to really set in and show results (just like it took decades for these things to bring down the birth rates in the first place)
Presiona para expandir...
I can understanding what your going for but how does "dismantling the welfare state" tie into the equation?
 
DumbDude43 dijo:
no
it's not simply a money issue, it's a culture/society issue
to return birth rates to sustainable levels you would have to
>undo sexual revolution
>roll back feminism by ~100 years
>dismantle the welfare state
>ban contraceptives
and even then it would take decades for the effects of these changes to really set in and show results (just like it took decades for these things to bring down the birth rates in the first place)
Presiona para expandir...
You don't have to go that extreme considering the birth rate was stable in the 90s it just that just 30 years ago seems so far away culturally/economically with how much things changed.
 
Can someone with a higher IQ explain to me why birth rates ALWAYS need to increase/stabilize? Why is having less people to compete with resources/time/jobs/commute-throughput/etc a bad thing in all cases? Instead of maximizing QoL for those that do exist already? Is it just a "chinese replacement" fear thing?

Between actual population growth and immigration, why is having to sit with 10x the amount of cars on my commute every decade a good thing?
 
Government shutdowns don't scare me anymore

They used to talk about it like it was a big deal, but more recently, they've just been the norm. How many times have you seen on the news "The January government shutdown was ended by a stopgap measure which took us through until the February government shutdown and then another stopgap measure ended that until the March government shutdown after which the stopgap measure lasted until the April government shutdown at which point a superduper emergency motion ended that until the May government shutdown" and never felt worse off for it?
 
Breadbassket dijo:
I can understanding what your going for but how does "dismantling the welfare state" tie into the equation?
Presiona para expandir...
enables dysfunctional behavior at the expense of productive people, and it kills one of the big incentives for having children.
"who will take care of me when i'm old" previously the only answer was family and children, today the answer is the state.

Endless Torment dijo:
You don't have to go that extreme considering the birth rate was stable in the 90s it just that just 30 years ago seems so far away culturally/economically with how much things changed.
Presiona para expandir...
these things take time for their effects to fully unfold. people don't change radically and instantaneously, they do it slowly and gradually, hence why the negative effects on birth rate took several decades to fully kick in.

OG Cryptid dijo:
Can someone with a higher IQ explain to me why birth rates ALWAYS need to increase/stabilize? Why is having less people to compete with resources/time/jobs/commute-throughput/etc a bad thing in all cases? Instead of maximizing QoL for those that do exist already? Is it just a "chinese replacement" fear thing?

Between actual population growth and immigration, why is having to sit with 10x the amount of cars on my commute every decade a good thing?
Presiona para expandir...
declining population = overaging population
fewer productive people, more senile geriatrics
everything gets shittier and declines
 
StudMccool dijo:
We are on the cusp of a demographic collapse truly unprecedented in human history
Presiona para expandir...
To be fair, a smaller population for America wouldn't be a bad thing. If you deport all illegals, we still have too many people. I will take a population cut if it means affordable housing, a stable job market and sustainable levels of replacement for our posterity. Until we can find other planets, uncontrolled growth just isnt viable.
 
moocow dijo:
Counterpoint: "extra money per baby" results in a LOT more welfare niggers than productive White people.
Presiona para expandir...
How about we take everything the libs are claiming at face value. All of the browns, niggers, chinks, and spics are UNSAFE in the United States because Trump is a litteral MEGANAZI who is also ULTRARACIST. We need to send them off to Europe, Mexico, and the middle east where they can have political asylum and be safe from the ICE GESTAPO who wants to FEED THEM TO ALLIGATORS!
 
Debbie Macomber dijo:
Government shutdowns don't scare me anymore

They used to talk about it like it was a big deal, but more recently, they've just been the norm. How many times have you seen on the news "The January government shutdown was ended by a stopgap measure which took us through until the February government shutdown and then another stopgap measure ended that until the March government shutdown after which the stopgap measure lasted until the April government shutdown at which point a superduper emergency motion ended that until the May government shutdown" and never felt worse off for it?
Presiona para expandir...
It really doesn't matter to the average person. The only groups who are actually affected are corporations grifting tax dollars, politicians enabling the grift, Bureaucrats in alphabet organizations and oxygen thieves who would rather continue to be lazy even in the "perpetual poverty" of government gibs than become a productive member of society.

All of which should have their teeth kicked in. Unfortunately, the media is controlled by two of these four groups and they have to make everyone else think the government shutting down will hurt more than just these four groups. When in reality it would probably benefit everyone else more.
Breadbassket dijo:
I can understanding what your going for but how does "dismantling the welfare state" tie into the equation?
Presiona para expandir...
The welfare state forces productive members of society to support unproductive members of society. Actually its worse, it encourages more unproductive members of society and punishes those who are productive.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo