US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Anyone calling for Erika Kirk to be the VP gives off the same energy as all of the Democrats clamoring for Michele Obama to run for president. Even putting aside her lack of qualifications, being in government at any level is incredibly demanding. It's bad enough the children lost their father, but who would want to take their mother from them as well?
Wrong, douchebag. Erika is nothing like Big Mike and you know it, even comparing the two is a huge insult. Michelle never lost anything important to her and she had no stake in the game besides being another pawn, for Erika this is deeply personal and that's exactly what we need in the White House. We need someone who knows what these freaks are capable of and have deeply personal stakes in the battle if we are to have any change in this country, the way I see it Erika is ordained by God to do his work with Charlie watching over her.

As for Erika's lack of experience I say look to Trump's whole cabinet. All of his strongest soldiers and the ones doing the best work are political outsiders that by your assessment would have no qualifications, Trump himself also falls into that category. Who's to say Erika doesn't become Vance's VP for 8 years before she becomes President? She has so much time to prepare.

We also live in a time where it's an inevitable probability that we will have a female President one day, who do you want the first female President to be? AOC? Jasmine Crockett? Keffals? No, you want it to be Erika Kirk, because she is the only woman who has earned it. The Republicans can't let the left have the honor of having the first female President as it would be in the name of a phony sense of fake progress, with Erika it's a real showing of progress and it rubs in their faces that the Republicans have always been the real party of progress. The left doesn't deserve it.
 
Última edición:
Republicans can't let the left have the honor of having the first female President as it would be in the name of a phony sense of fake progress, with Erika it's a real showing of progress and it rubs in their faces that the Republicans have always been the real party of progress. The left doesn't deserve it.
What the fuck am I reading here? What kind of retarded logic is this?
 
By forgiving them, you say that you'll forgive that moral debt and stop keeping track of it, instead entrusting the judgment of Christ, and freeing yourself to look towards the future rather than dwell on the worst parts of the past.

If she truly forgives the assassin, Erika prevents him from consuming her life and is able to stop the destruction of grief.
I don't know if forgiveness is the right word. When you forgive someone, you move past the offense against you and be willing to let them into your life again. Erika shouldn't be Christcucking out and be recommending an express meeting between her husband's assassin and fhe big man upstairs.
He'll die in prison one way or the other, sooner or later. Probably sooner. And it looks like they're keeping the co-conspiracy stuff quiet still, which is good. Have to round them up first then deal with them.
People are adaptable and they get used to their situation. Life in prison is rough for the first few years, but eventually they get into a routine, they make friends, get hobbies and what was hell is now a tolerable. Also not to mention while many people hate him many people love him for what he did and will be riding high on that hero complex for the rest of his life. A swift hanging is the only punishment he deserves.
 
Wow, would you look at that! l
Ver archivo adjunto 7947425
Fuentes is a FLAMING GAY NIGGER FAGGOT!
Being honest -- I was worried about the idea of Fuentes being the next big talking head now that Charlie has passed, being that he's a vocal and quite frankly astroturfed member of the "far right", if you even believe him. Luckily, Nick is a self sabotaging faggot and lit those chances on fire. Feels good.
 
Why are so many people talking about making her President? If my mechanic dies I'm not going to ask his wife to fix my car...
I agree. There are so, so many roles one can play to have an impact on this country that don’t involve becoming the literal Commander in Chief. She can do tremendous work leading Turning Point, or whatever she chooses. I think Vance has this in the bag anyway, no need for everyone to fall over themselves declaring no actually, THIS one should be president anytime someone happens to demonstrate leadership.
 
Última edición:
When you forgive someone, you move past the offense against you and be willing to let them into your life again.
This is not true. You can forgive someone, so that you no longer suffer mental anguish.

There is no need, explicit nor implicit, that you welcome someone in your life afterwards. It can be done, but it is not a part of forgiveness.
A swift hanging is the only punishment he deserves.
He should be kept alive for advance interrogation and once he spills his guts, his guts get spilled.
 
I agree. There are so, so many roles one can play to have an impact on this country that don’t involve becoming the literal Commander in Chief. She can do tremendous work leading Turning Point, or whatever she chooses.

And yeah, I’m biased, but Vance has this in the bag, no need for everyone to fall over themselves declaring no actually, THIS one should be president anytime someone happens to demonstrate leadership.
I'll own my words, I said that Vance wasn't going to be the candidate for 2028. Can someone burger Krieger please, i'm 90% sure I was wrong here.
 
This is not true. You can forgive someone, so that you no longer suffer mental anguish.
You can do that without forgiving someone.

There is no need, explicit nor implicit, that you welcome someone in your life afterwards. It can be done, but it is not a part of forgiveness.
When God forgives you, you get welcomed into heaven and become part of his life.

When the father forgave the prodigal son, he welcomed him back onto his life.

Forgiveness is the pardon of all transgression and does involve you to be willing to let them back into your life. If you are unwilling to take them back in, then you have not forgiven them.
 
When you forgive someone, you move past the offense against you and be willing to let them into your life again.

No, forgiveness does not necessarily involve personal reconciliation with the offender. I think these misconceptions about what forgiveness really is vs. what it's not leads to a lot of people holding onto things we don't need to hold onto -- because we're afraid it means "letting them get away with it," "letting them off scot-free," "no consequences at all," when it does not mean that.
 
Because Jesus died for that sin at the same time he was dying for yours. . If you’re not Christian and don’t believe in any of that, fine. But that is basic Christian doctrine and has been believed since the beginning.
Speaking of sins, I’m going to quote and reply to myself against all customs on this site.

If it’s unclear what and who can be forgiven, Trump Jr brought up the first martyr who was named Stephen. A man named Saul of Tarsus was present for his martyrdom and even held the cloaks of the men throwing the stones. Well Saul of Tarsus went on to be known as Paul the Apostle and wrote most of the New Testament. So that is why forgiveness is key. It’s actually more powerful than anger.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo