Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

What is with the left and their lack of opsec?

I'm sure it's been asked before in this thread, but it's maddening.
this is not even just a left issue but it is more common on the left. essentially it boils down to a lack of fear and a lack of preparedness lets call it. in the old days you kept shit as private as possible because you were either afraid some psycho was going to hunt you down and murder you because the news or your parents told you the internet was filled with bad people and you cant let them know where you live or what your real name is because they are waiting to strike any second.

that fear was burned into many kids when they were young and they held on to those safety measures ever since. there are also people mainly on the right that understand being prepared is a good idea.

you do not want to let the government or any random website or person have too much of your info especially in todays world where they WILL use it against you if the chance arises. the people now that are lacking or have zero opsec as a result of people from past generations going "oh things were fine for us growing up online our parents were clearly too strict with us so lets be less strict with our kids"

this way of thinking continued until now we have kids casually telling everyone their whole fucking name and where they live like its nothing. these kids have now grown up into adults and are now learning what happens when you spend your entire life online using one single name and casually telling people everything about yourself over the course of years. they think things go away when they stop using a website and act shocked when people are able to dig up their past info.

long story short the answer to your question is that people are more retarded and less afraid than they used to be. the left is especially subject to this due to the lack of consequences for their actions.
 
I hate the way that they are trying to frame a 30-06 round staying in his neck the first miracle he needs towards sainthood, because it takes away from the truth. The truth is it is possible to tank that kind of round if you are a 6'5 brick shit house, a young man who is physically fit and has the appropriate nutrition so his bones would be dense. Now you throw the distance of the shot into the mix and the physics of the energy of the bullet being dispersed at the spine.
Ver archivo adjunto 7945664
It wasn't a miracle. It was just something improbable that happened that they are trying to make sound impossible. They shouldn't be using the fact that the bullet stayed in him as some kind of televangelist religious miracle, they should be talking shit to the left about how not even JFK could keep a high-powered rifle round in him and Charlie was out here tanking fucking 30-06 rounds from 200 yards.
Ver archivo adjunto 7945667
And JFK was a Catholic from the start too.
 
What is with the left and their lack of opsec?

I'm sure it's been asked before in this thread, but it's maddening.
The left's strongest opsec warrior:
>gives away entire life story
Screenshot_20250921-102838.webp
It's because they're not afraid of being found out. They've been protected.
 
I just wasted 7 minutes figuring out what the fuck a pink octopus is and of course it ended up being about some fucking anime.
And JFK was a Catholic from the start too.
Exactly you would think that the Catholic baptism JFK got would make him more bulletproof if you are going by their logic. Kind of like how Achilles mom dunked everything but his heel in the river.
 
What is with the left and their lack of opsec?

I'm sure it's been asked before in this thread, but it's maddening.
Lmao are you retarded? They were told they were on the "right side of history." They didn't just think they were right, they thought they'd be getting medals and shit for saying absolutely retarded bullshit about how they wanted to murder everyone who disagreed with them.

So of course they had no "opsec." They knew they were right, obviously, their insane murderous opinions about how they wanted to go full murder monkey on everyone who disagreed with them would make them look like saints and heroes. They WANTED to be known for their "right side of history" opinions.

I mean who could question them? Those wrong side of history people? Lmao no.

They are now eating the naked lunch they cooked.
 
Lmao are you retarded? They were told they were on the "right side of history." They didn't just think they were right, they thought they'd be getting medals and shit for saying absolutely retarded bullshit about how they wanted to murder everyone who disagreed with them.

So of course they had no "opsec." They knew they were right, obviously, their insane murderous opinions about how they wanted to go full murder monkey on everyone who disagreed with them would make them look like saints and heroes. They WANTED to be known for their "right side of history" opinions.

I mean who could question them? Those wrong side of history people? Lmao no.

They are now eating the naked lunch they cooked.
Yeah they completely showed their ass because they thought they were going to be protected. Now the piper wants his paycheck, and they are fucked.

Unrelated but naked lunch was a great book and movie by the way.
 
What about all of the women and children that died in WW2? Are hitler jokes now off-limits too? Genuinely curious, not even trying to be funny here.
I think if you would mock a grieving wife and mother only days after her husband was murdered in open public view, you would be a bad person regardless of the surrounding context.

And if you can’t tell the difference between people openly saying that Kirk’s children will somehow benefit from their father’s assassination in contrast with cracking jokes about events that were long over by the time you were born, you lack the nuance required for your opinion to be considered with any weight.
 
I think if you would mock a grieving wife and mother only days after her husband was murdered in open public view, you would be a bad person regardless of the surrounding context.

And if you can’t tell the difference between people openly saying that Kirk’s children will somehow benefit from their father’s assassination in contrast with cracking jokes about events that were long over by the time you were born, you lack the nuance required for your opinion to be considered with any weight.
Huge difference between making jokes about something that happened 80 years ago and making jokes about a man who was murdered before his body is even in the ground.
I mean now that it's 20 years later it's seen as acceptable to make jokes about 9/11 and has been for a while, but everybody waited the appropriate amount of time. It's not like people were making light of 9/11 on September 12th of that year.
Also the most important thing is that these are actual JOKES we are talking about here, not a bunch of morbid fucking nutters celebrating a man's violent demise because they are pieces of shit. I know 99% of the people who have made a dark joke were doing it for a laugh. These people aren't doing it for a laugh, they are doing it to tease and gloat.
 
Última edición:
I think if you would mock a grieving wife and mother only days after her husband was murdered in open public view, you would be a bad person regardless of the surrounding context.

And if you can’t tell the difference between people openly saying that Kirk’s children will somehow benefit from their father’s assassination in contrast with cracking jokes about events that were long over by the time you were born, you lack the nuance required for your opinion to be considered with any weight.
my edgy jokes---> heckin wholesome 100 chungus breathtaking and perfectly morally correct
your edgy jokes ---> evil and immoral wahh waahh insert moralfagging wahh wahh muh children gooberment shut it down!!!

Sooo the recency of an event decides whenever or not it's okay to joke about it? What about that one tranny (Charlotte) who jumped off that bridge a few months ago? I made some jokes about his death, so did many other thread regulars of the tranny sideshows thread once the news broke. What about the schizo who went around shooting a bunch of leftist politicians dressed as a cop? I saw some people joke about that "tragedy" so should they be held to the same standard? Are you now gonna go on a gay soapbox rant about how mocking the troons death is le evil and how everyone who did it should arrested for it? Or does this "sainthood" only apply to your favorite bing bing wahoo internet celebrities?

As Anisa's husband once put it, either ALL of it is okay, or NONE of it is okay.
 
85K watching already

Ver archivo adjunto 7945856
Not a bad turnout. Guessing like 30K? (full capacity is ~65K)
They are still filing in to seats Probably 50K later tonight
Almost up to 100k just on his YouTube channel. I am sure that at least one channel is airing this as well as other YouTube channels and platforms.
 
Libshits and leftists are way more worried about Kimmel getting dropped by ABC than they are with Kirk's assassination. They have moved on from it to the point they don't even seem to acknowledge the fucking murder anymore and are all just kvetching and moaning about government censorship when they spent the alst 10 years using it as much as possible to stop their enemies. It's fucking disgusting.
 
100K watching already

Ver archivo adjunto 7945856
Not a bad turnout. Guessing like 30K? (full capacity is ~65K)
There will likely be security restrictions that cap in-person attendance bellow the "full capacity."

When they have VIP concerns, most venues have sections of seats that are blocked due to the difficulties in actively monitoring/securing them. Bad access control, angles, backgrounds, etc.
 
my edgy jokes---> heckin wholesome 100 chungus breathtaking and perfectly morally correct
your edgy jokes ---> evil and immoral wahh waahh insert moralfagging wahh wahh muh children gooberment shut it down!!!

Sooo the recency of an event decides whenever or not it's okay to joke about it? What about that one tranny (Charlotte) who jumped off that bridge a few months ago? I made some jokes about his death, so did many other thread regulars of the tranny sideshows thread once the news broke. What about the schizo who went around shooting a bunch of leftist politicians dressed as a cop? I saw some people joke about that "tragedy" so should they be held to the same standard? Are you now gonna go on a gay soapbox rant about how mocking the troons death is le evil and how everyone who did it should arrested for it? Or does this "sainthood" only apply to your favorite bing bing wahoo internet celebrities?

As Anisa's husband once put it, either ALL of it is okay, or NONE of it is okay.
Shut up, you annoying little faggot.
If you are too much of a dunderhead to understand that JFK jokes are funny but they weren't in November of 1963, then you lack the required social skills to be in polite society. Please turn yourself in for sterilization so that you can't breed and report to your new government caseworker who will give you your medication after you have graham crackers and juice.
People who make the argument of "I don't understand why we have to let time pass before we can make fun of a morbid tragedy" really do make me believe in the autism spectrum.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo