Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

I want reddit CEO and discord CEO and twitch CEO to explain why criticisms and calls to violence are allowed by one group whilst criticisms and calls to violence are not allowed by another group?

Surprised blue sky isn't involved.
I hope they play Twitchs Gooner CEO video where he wishes Hasan happy Birthday.
 
All this is mostly to say: Troons mostly infect rather than create, and they're more likely to congregate and interact on platforms which make it easy to do so.
Evil never creates, it only corrupts. Hence why it's despised. Also steam SELLS games. Politics does not sell, hence why dustborn and concord are not around anymore. The invisible hand of the free market protects steam from the efforts of Marxist troons.
 
I want the twitch CEO to have to explain why he platforms Hassan after he routinely breaks their alleged ToS with his calls for violence and terrorism, and if he tries to claim he doesn’t endorse it, make him and everyone else watch that video of him singing happy birthday to him
Or Ethan Klein when he said he wanted someone to bomb a Trump gathering.
 
Twitch does allow legitimate calls to violence by people like destiny and Hassan while permaban you over the term tranny and simp
You know, beezos got into the car business with the slate. Odds are the auto industry is pissed at him, and the dealer lobbyists are angry at him over amazon autos. In fact i am pretty sure amazon has so many enemies that twitch won't like this hearing. just a hunch i have...
 

I firmly believe this is what they WANTED out of all their calls of violence. For a right winger to take up arms and shoot one of them out of a fear of them striking first, and to them use that to push gun control and a further demonization of their enemies.

Problem is, if they had any theory of mind and interacted with the right wing on a even superficial basis anytime in the last 40 years outside of their own little echo chambers, this shit is straight up a fucking cliche for right wingers. The idea of some leftie getting killed and it being used to push gun control is a complete overplayed meme to the point it is just assumed that is the case by the right. It's why people think so many mass shootings are fake.

Now they finally got the shooting they wanted, but it was one of their own acting out.
 
ResetEra user managed to save the deleted Sea of Thieves review (I wasn't aware they were gone)
1758139040663.webp 1758139278372.webp
1758139595046.webp 1758139618055.webp

This is the next tactic right? "We can't be sure of his political affiliation." Or something.
1758139720791.webp
"Trump isn't immediately genociding us because it means people don't hate us enough!"
1758139833670.webp
"You can't call him a biological male because you don't know the structure of his her DNA!"
1758139934361.webp

Strong Deja Vu from this poster.
1758140104739.webp
1758140170630.webp
 
I firmly believe this is what they WANTED out of all their calls of violence. For a right winger to take up arms and shoot one of them out of a fear of them striking first, and to them use that to push gun control and a further demonization of their enemies.

Problem is, if they had any theory of mind and interacted with the right wing on a even superficial basis anytime in the last 40 years outside of their own little echo chambers, this shit is straight up a fucking cliche for right wingers. The idea of some leftie getting killed and it being used to push gun control is a complete overplayed meme to the point it is just assumed that is the case by the right. It's why people think so many mass shootings are fake.

Now they finally got the shooting they wanted, but it was one of their own acting out.
There is another key detail too that these retards keep missing: Why disarm the population when the other side are all "nazis". they completely miss this detail. They continue to lose supporters over this and they are oblivious to it. It's like buying a beach house when you say the coast will be underwater in a few years. people notice these things. Eventually they figure out that it's not about public safety but about corruption and control.
 
I firmly believe this is what they WANTED out of all their calls of violence. For a right winger to take up arms and shoot one of them out of a fear of them striking first, and to them use that to push gun control and a further demonization of their enemies.
I agree, this seems likely - mostly because they huffed their own farts enough to believe their narrative that right wingers were fascist nazis who just want to kill anyone who isn't cis and white and traditional. In their mind, the right was already doing that and since words = violence = words for a leftist, they thought the right would just as easily move from words to violence.

A fascinating look into the leftist mind.
 
As an update to this, their publisher chimed in (Archive)
Screenshot_1.webp
Despite the publisher basically saying they'll talk to the developers about it, the developers are tripling down by liking posts on Bluesky that condemns the publisher, which is viewable using bskyviewer.
Screenshot_7.webpScreenshot_8.webpScreenshot_9.webpScreenshot_10.webpScreenshot_11.webpScreenshot_12.webpScreenshot_13.webpScreenshot_14.webpScreenshot_15.webpScreenshot_16.webpcom.atproto.sync.getBlob.webpScreenshot_17.webp
Some more instances of them tripling down via retweets after the publisher statement.
Screenshot_2.webp Screenshot_3.webp Screenshot_4.webp Screenshot_5.webp Screenshot_6.webp
 
Atrás
Top Abajo