Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Has this slap fight between (ACP) and Fuentes been reported yet? He's claiming Haz/Hinkle might have had connections to the shooter. They're going after him hard, accusing him of being CIA, Neocon et cetera
Ver archivo adjunto 7927553Ver archivo adjunto 7927558
infrared/hinkle are some of the most vile and toxic people on the entire internet
they're kind of the left wing version of the groypers, except they take themselves extremely seriously
 
infrared/hinkle are some of the most vile and toxic people on the entire internet
they're kind of the left wing version of the groypers, except they take themselves extremely seriously
I just find them really goofy tbh, like infrared is a unironic Lysenkoist

It just comes across as this weird cargo culting of a long gone pseudo religion
 
1758075727622.webp
 
1758075462571.webp

Found alot of vitriol and snark in here today lads, been genuinely depressing if I can keep it a buck but it gave me a powerful revelation

The center of both the left and right and incredibly SAD about this event, they are grieving and lost, unsure of what this means for the future of our nation

The far left is snarky and full of vitriol for their own reasons but what is being actively ignored, especially on this thread is the overt glee and joy that permeates the thread about the bad things that should or will happen to the alleged shooter and his boyfriend.

this is not moralfagging, IDGAF if you people wanna post up against the wall memes and winner sticker them until your thumbs bleed this is about how from a birds eye view this issue has successfully polarized EVERY single major group from looking at the objective evidence with any level of rational thinking, all the "facts" about this case are taken at face value as each group see its as reinforcing their own belief structure.

Then when a fucking retard like me DARES to enter ANY of these spaces, being it left, right, left normie, right normie, left internet fag, right internet fag will be like "look at this asshole question the official narrative, way to be a fucking jackass while we all try and use this to our own political positions personal problems."
 
Off topic but in the wake of this, I think tucker Carlson and nick fuentes(despite what your thoughts on them are) should be extra cautious, I’ve got a feeling other unhinged individuals may be emboldened by this assassination, and those two figures are ones I would at least put towards the top of the influential totem pole. Oh and joe Rogan too, even though I don’t class him as a right winger.
Personally, I worry the most about RFK Jr. for the obvious reasons considering his family, but also because of what he represents to the right. RFK was a hardcore Democrat like the rest of his family but RFK actually stood up to the party when he felt they were going down a dark path. They refused to listen to him so he talked to the Republicans leading to him joining the party. The great thing is that RFK never actually changed his views or intentions, the Democrat party is what changed.

You see how violently mad they get about RFK when he's in those hearings and it's unhinged. It's hard to understand how they can be so mad over such simple shit like being cautious about what vaccines you take, and then you see Charlie Kirk get murdered simply for going into enemy territory and extending an olive branch. RFK is a living olive branch to Republicans.

I worry about Tulsi Gabbard in this regard too, but I haven't seen any unhinged rage directed at her from the left like I have RFK. But that might be because she hasn't given them an opportunity to be unhinged at her yet.
 
The far left is snarky and full of vitriol for their own reasons but what is being actively ignored, especially on this thread is the overt glee and joy that permeates the thread about the bad things that should or will happen to the alleged shooter and his boyfriend.
1758076238217.webp

Asserting an alternative narrative in the absence of any corroborating info is why there's snark to the replies.
If you're going to posit there's a 3rd party involved you can't hinge on tenuous connections, you need something solid.
Otherwise you just look schizophrenic, especially when the combative hypothesis is based on a subjective interpretation of the facts involved.
 
Personally, I worry the most about RFK Jr. for the obvious reasons considering his family, but also because of what he represents to the right. RFK was a hardcore Democrat like the rest of his family but RFK actually stood up to the party when he felt they were going down a dark path. They refused to listen to him so he talked to the Republicans leading to him joining the party. The great thing is that RFK never actually changed his views or intentions, the Democrat party is what changed.

You see how violently mad they get about RFK when he's in those hearings and it's unhinged. It's hard to understand how they can be so mad over such simple shit like being cautious about what vaccines you take, and then you see Charlie Kirk get murdered simply for going into enemy territory and extending an olive branch. RFK is a living olive branch to Republicans.

I worry about Tulsi Gabbard in this regard too, but I haven't seen any unhinged rage directed at her from the left like I have RFK. But that might be because she hasn't given them an opportunity to be unhinged at her yet.
I could see RFK Jr easily. They'd do it just for the memes alone. There'd probably be tons of snarky compilations of the earlier assassinations cut with the modern one before they'd even caught a suspect, trying to make some gay point about social justice and how black furry transwxmen with vitiligo in wheelchairs for Palestine hold the upper hand in morality or something.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo