Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

I think Candace Owens is especially weird for screaming “the Jews” over this. She’s getting sued by the French tranny chaser and had an opportunity to show how insane these people to help her case. But no, she can’t stop thinking about the Jews for more than 5 minutes. Honestly I usually like the odd video of hers that gets you thinking but Charlie’s widow should sue her over this.
It's an odd muddying of the waters. This was a prime time to call out troons for being batshit, especially for Candace. Charlie's positions leading up to his death were out of character, but largely irrelevant as compared to the waves of tranny violence we've had to endure. I get why conspiracy theorists are latching on, but it's at a detriment.
But I'm sure the naysayers will say "well they did it so sloppy because that's what they want you to think"
At this point I'm treating them the same way I'm treating the people screaming about groypers, calling them retards.
 
"Muh 1st Amendment" is such a weird copout. It only means that saying these things isn't illegal, you can say these things. That doesn't mean they're morally acceptable, or that people have no right to react to it in any way. They also can respond within the confines of law. Like letting your employer know how much of piece of shit you are.
Publicly celebrating killing of someone because of things they said is not fine, even if it's speech protected by 1st Amendment.
We see how much they respected Kirk's 1st amendment rights.
 
It's an odd muddying of the waters. This was a prime time to call out troons for being batshit, especially for Candace. Charlie's positions leading up to his death were out of character, but largely irrelevant as compared to the waves of tranny violence we've had to endure. I get why conspiracy theorists are latching on, but it's at a detriment.
Candace lost the plot after her public falling out with Ben Shapiro. She's probably missing a couple of zeros on those checks she used to get so she's trashing the kikes at every opportunity.
At this point I'm treating them the same way I'm treating the people screaming about groypers, calling them retards.
They really are retarded if they can't see that the Israelis killing Charlie Kirk would be cutting off their hook noses to spite their face. They gain absolutely NOTHING from his death, and they actually stand to LOSE a lot. People are just retarded and don't want to accept the obvious explanation staring them straight in the eyes. I don't know if it's because they want to be too cool for the room or they want to act like they have insider information, but retards have been retardin since they were unironically saying the Earth was flat or that 9/11 was a controlled demolition.
 
They have access to his computer and his troony friends computers. Conspiracy charges incoming, but I imagine they all will take a plea deal to testify against him.
Bet money that at least SOME of them knew beforehand which really bad. Utah has BRUTAL conspiracy laws. Thank God for Mormon purity lmao.
They don't need any testimony. This dumb nigger confessed to it in plain writing on Discord.
 
They don't need any testimony. This dumb nigger confessed to it in plain writing on Discord.
They don't need it but they're going to get it. In a death penalty case they aren't looking for what they need, they're looking for EVERYTHING. That kid will go in front of a firing squad, barring an act of God or a pardon from some liberal faggot president. Because I'm telling you right now, in Utah they are not going to show this kid any Mercy. There ain't going to be any Governor that grants this kid clemency. Mormons are gangster as shit like that.
 
Anyone else disturbed about how a lot of government officials and talking heads are talking about ending anonymity on the internet? Like typical Boomers, they're missing the real problem. You can make an argument that agarythms on social media intentionally pushes ragebait to fuel seething hatred. When I was in college (2006-2010) , the only stories I would see on my feed were posts from people I was friends with, and bands I followed. Almost never had news articles. But from what I hear now, people get shit they never subscribed to forced down their throat.

IMO, MySpace was the best social media site.

But the real problem is this poisonous idealogy has infiltrated our institutions, and corrupted people's minds. The individuals and organizations that push this idealogy must be ripped from the roots of these institutions, and cast out of our society; that's how you start to tackle our problem of leftist extremism.
 
Exactly. If Israel had anything to do with this, they lose because the number one guy who was waking up liberal fucktards is now dead. And everybody knows without a steady stream of Republican leaders, Israel is fucked.
The powers that be don't like anything they don't control. And they plan long-term. Nobody in the Establishment Republican leadership cares that the Democrats win a bit more or lose a bit less from year to year because it's all part of the uniparty. The Establishment politicians on both sides compete in the grift to get donors and lobbying and favours and that's why winning or losing matters to them - not a culture war. What upsets them is when something threatens their control of one of those sides. That's why despite Trump being hugely popular and bringing more people to the Republicans, you had a tonne of Never-Trumpers like Ben Shapiro and Republican leadership fighting tooth-and-nail to block him. Some of them would quite literally prefer to lose to the Democrats than win with Trump. Because the Democrats are their counterparts in the uniparty and Trump was not.

It's the same thing with Kirk. They don't need him bringing more people to one side in a rigged game. They need to make sure the game stays rigged. You also suggest that they lose out by not having him but they know the value of a good martyr. And the best martyrs are the ones that are dead and can't stop you speaking for them. TPUSA is now seeing record numbers of sign-ups and people like Ben Shapiro are rushing to capitalise on the moral hill that Charlie's body now makes for them to stand on.

Now having said all of that, I want to make clear I've seen no evidence of a greater conspiracy nor have reason to believe there is one. I'm just engaging with your case that there's no motivation for TPTB to have him killed and your argument that he's too valuable to do so. I'll say again that they don't need more numbers on one side of a rigged game, they just need it to say rigged. The big money donors donate to both the Republican and the Democrat parties. They're buying a product and most of the Establishment politicians are mainly just competing with each other to sell it to them.

I think Kirk was just killed by some stupid, nasty unbalanced kid who had been weaponised by continuous media barage and a trans-lobby echo chamber. Unless something radical emerges, I don't see a reason to believe anything more has occurred. But there's always a motive - anything TPTB don't control, is regarded as a threat.

Well obviously some of those are wrong, like the Floyd one. But as someone who never really followed Kirk bar seeing a few clips, what were his actual views on race? I tried searching and I keep getting results about "prowling blacks".
 
no information, just vibes

Screenshot_20250916-083101 (2).webp
Joined Friday. All over this thread, and only this thread, adding nothing, just PR'ing anything that anyone else adds. LURK MOAR FAGGOT.
 
The difference between the cancel culture on the Left vs. the Right.

Don’t Let Them Lie To You. Charlie Kirk’s Killer Is A Left-Wing Terrorist. ¦ Ep. 1657.webm

Send this to your conservative friend who thinks the Right is being too meanie.


Full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I026pYxfLdE
Timestamp for the clipped part: 53:21
Walsh is really on top of his game right now. Proves he is actually furious at the whole ordeal.

I do want to emphasize on the whole "freedom of speech, not consequences" thing. This has been a societal truth since the start. It's not like in America you could go in with your tranny discourse in 1934 and expect people to not call you a retarded weirdo and not wanting to associate with you. You wouldn't and shouldn't go to jail for that, but you are also not entitled to people's time or interest in your delusions. Thing is we lost a LOT as a society when we lost the concept of "shame". Shame is the collective zeitgeist of a society to enforce it's norms in an implicit way. It's what had the first furries having their drawings hidden in the bottom of a drawer instead of proudly screaming "I WANT TO FUCK A CARTOON ANIMAL!".

The loss of shame with the whole "live and let live" and "let people do whatever in their bedroom" was seen as a power void to set up a new "shame". And that "shame" is the globohomo religion. And since they had the media on their side, the academia on their side, and absolute passivity on the other, they managed to push it so hard that it became the new "shame" of our society. But the thing is, shame only works when people believe it and think it makes sense, and being "shamed" for not believing in girl penis was very far away from making sense. But turns out that doing a victory lap after killing a guy that debated certainly did fall into what the majority deem shameful.

Anyway, this is directed to all the faggtos intending to use the 1st as a cudgel to get the rightwing to stop hounding you out of your jobs due to behaving like psychopaths and to hunt you down like the dogs that you are. You deserve every single bad thing that will happen going forward and I can only hope it will get worse and more painful for you. Because if the progressive loving left taught me anything, is that you destroy your enemy in any way you can, be it mentally, socially or physically.
 
Big news in that is he said if they see they were planning it they'd probably go for fed conspiracy on anyone involved, if so they're fucked beyond belief.
This is the post 9/11 world. It does NOT end there. Did they talk about ICE? Well the cheap labor lumpenproles are in trouble. Did they knock on Christians? whelp now it's a hate crime. This is NOT the 1970s, this is 2025 and the tricks those boomers had when they were angry comie pinko leftists won't work. I suspect that there are some weathermen working behind the scenes, because of that one woman that clinton pardoned who went on to manage the funds for BLM. I suspect Epstein was why she was pardoned too.

neither MLK or Malcom x would have had a legacy if they had lingered. You either die a hero or live long enough to be a villain. had they not been shot they would have said or done something that would have turned the public on them. The left is a purity cult without salvation. It's why they are so fucking insufferable.
 
These people are fucking INSANE and they literally think that we are trying to kill them in some kind of troony holocaust because we don't want to play their fake pronoun game and we want them to stay the fuck away from our children and out of the wrong bathroom.
Our response to their suicide-baiting is, "go ahead and do it lol," and this makes us the same as Hitler, as though Auschwitz was full of Jews who threatened, "Oy vey, borrow money from me, or I'll throw myself into a gas chamber!"
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7923124
Joined Friday. All over this thread, and only this thread, adding nothing, just PR'ing anything that anyone else adds. LURK MOAR FAGGOT.
And I have like 1,500 reactions and 95% of them are positive, so I must be doing something right. And I'm not just on this thread exclusively, I've been commenting on all the community featured submissions because I figured that was a good place to start. You are just being disingenuous and dishonest by making it sound like I'm only commenting here.
I'm sorry I thought the point of a message board was to SEND MESSAGES. Obviously I'm doing it the right way if my "attaboy" score is so high, so just relax my main man. There's no need to gatekeep a fucking message board just because you've been here a couple of years and I'm new.
Nigger out here acting like he's an OG because he's been here for two measly years lol.
 
Our response to their suicide-baiting is, "go ahead and do it lol," and this makes us the same as Hitler, as though Auschwitz was full of Jews who threatened, "Oy vey, borrow money from me, or I'll throw myself into a gas chamber!"

They are basically admitting that they are mentally ill, of course not in the way that we say they are.
 
There really needs to be a menorah sticker. Some post(er)s are trying way too hard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of my cousins paid me a visit at work today. He's one of those normies that's more "in the know" and has opinions that would get him un-personed if spoken about publicly. Him and his wife found out about Charlie's assassination shortly after it happened, and to his horror, his "better half" was basically rolling in glee, replaying the shot over and over, analyzing the jet of blood frame by frame, seemingly fascinated by it and giggling as he'd slump over. I knew she wasn't quite right in the head, since she's one of those clueless "racism bad, gays good, here have this avocado & bean paste on burned toast I prepared" broads that plaster inspirational quote posters all around the house, but this makes me never want to visit them again. I don't think he voiced his disapproval out of fear. I just hope their kids caught no wind of this. In 30 years I've never seen him so perturbed.
 
On the topic of Pam Bondi's most recent retarded statement in a long history of retarded statements: I believe that this indicates her unwillingness to pursue terror charges or other charges like incitement of violence against the leftists and intends to use some creative interpretation of civil rights statutes, which will heavily limit their scope and effectiveness. I do not believe that the Administration has the political capital to pass any kind of legislation angled towards "hate speech," even if they had a Senate that could pass bills it seems unlikely that it would be found constitutional. This seems, to me, more like the Attorney General publicly signaling her unwillingness to go after the organizations under terror or RICO legislation and her unwillingness to hit the offenders online with incitement of violence or terroristic threats and instead use some civil rights statute to softball them until the news cycle (in their mind) moves somewhere else.

The question should be posed as "Why?" And I think that it's clear that the Administration is currently unfocused and lacking a clear internal narrative. You have Vance and Stephen Miller talking openly about targeting the Antifa-brand organizations and using terror and RICO laws to do it. But on the other hand you have Bondi saying what she said, you have Patel out to lunch, and other intermediaries vacillating between blaming the Internet and trying to "turn down the temperature." Trump can't seem to decide if this is more important or if the new ball room is. I get the impression that someone, whether that's Trump or Susie Wiles (as Chief of Staff), is being incredibly indecisive and unable to decide on whether they want to try to go back to business-as-normal or use this as justification to clamp down.

I genuinely don't think Trump believes that this is the Rubicon. I guess that's what happens when you're pushng 80.
 
On the topic of Pam Bondi's most recent retarded statement in a long history of retarded statements: I believe that this indicates her unwillingness to pursue terror charges or other charges like incitement of violence against the leftists and intends to use some creative interpretation of civil rights statutes, which will heavily limit their scope and effectiveness. I do not believe that the Administration has the political capital to pass any kind of legislation angled towards "hate speech," even if they had a Senate that could pass bills it seems unlikely that it would be found constitutional. This seems, to me, more like the Attorney General publicly signaling her unwillingness to go after the organizations under terror or RICO legislation and her unwillingness to hit the offenders online with incitement of violence or terroristic threats and instead use some civil rights statute to softball them until the news cycle (in their mind) moves somewhere else.

The question should be posed as "Why?" And I think that it's clear that the Administration is currently unfocused and lacking a clear internal narrative. You have Vance and Stephen Miller talking openly about targeting the Antifa-brand organizations and using terror and RICO laws to do it. But on the other hand you have Bondi saying what she said, you have Patel out to lunch, and other intermediaries vacillating between blaming the Internet and trying to "turn down the temperature." Trump can't seem to decide if this is more important or if the new ball room is. I get the impression that someone, whether that's Trump or Susie Wiles (as Chief of Staff), is being incredibly indecisive and unable to decide on whether they want to try to go back to business-as-normal or use this as justification to clamp down.

I genuinely don't think Trump believes that this is the Rubicon. I guess that's what happens when you're pushng 80.
Honestly I thought that they were going to let Utah handle this at a state level because those Mormons don't play. Being on death row takes decades with all the appeals and you never know when the pendulum is going to swing the other way and a Biden can come in and just undo your death sentence on a whim. If they leave it up to Utah there ain't going to be a governor who comes in and gives this kid clemency. That boy will be put in front of the rifles no matter how long it takes. Mormons believe in something called blood atonement, which means that they believe that this kid literally has to die to be saved by Jesus Christ. You got to remember these are the people who posthumously baptized people like Hitler so that he could get into heaven.
 
Him and his wife found out about Charlie's assassination shortly after it happened, and to his horror, his "better half" was basically rolling in glee, replaying the shot over and over, analyzing the jet of blood frame by frame, seemingly fascinated by it and giggling as he'd slump over.
I've had similar conversations with close friends about cutting such people out of their lives. This speaks to a deep psychological issue, and I have no interests in surrounding myself with people who would gleefully cheer my death because I agree with very basic conservative talking points, let alone if they knew my actual powerlevel.
 
Honestly I thought that they were going to let Utah handle this at a state level because those Mormons don't play. Being on death row takes decades with all the appeals and you never know when the pendulum is going to swing the other way and a Biden can come in and just undo your death sentence on a whim. If they leave it up to Utah there ain't going to be a governor who comes in and gives this kid clemency. That boy will be put in front of the rifles no matter how long it takes. Mormons believe in something called blood atonement, which means that they believe that this kid literally has to die to be saved by Jesus Christ. You got to remember these are the people who posthumously baptized people like Hitler so that he could get into heaven.
This goes far deeper than just the singular assassination. This guy isn't some Herostratus who did it for acclaim and notoriety. He, seemingly, was the product of a multi-state radical leftist terror cell, the most recent and by far the most violent and, to use a word, spectacular demonstration of their terrorist capabilities. It's no longer enough to let the Mormons handle it in-house, if they're even capable. I hate to be cynical but this was a perfect "moment" handed up to the Administration on a silver platter to crash down on the leftist organizations and NGOs and the Attorney General is fumbling the ball talking about hate speech while the FBI Director is busy reposting Fox News articles instead of FBI bulletins.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo