Farm Hand
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 21 de Ene, 2025
I just watched Destiny's part on Piers Morgan's show to make sure that I'm caught up on Destiny's line of thinking being discussed:"YOU NEED Republicans to feel fear to be able to turn off the temperature" is a clear-cut justification of political violence coming from him; he is rationalizing a justification for it. If Republicans are too abrasive, then it's ok to commit direct acts of violence against them until they turn it off. Dems can call them Nazis or extremists, a threat to democracy, people who want to destroy America, traitors for Russia, Biden saying they are agents of chaos and darkness—and it isn't supposedly held to the same basic standard as Trump's rhetoric to "incite violence"?
His argument is then: if they can, I can—without even basic questioning of should I? and for what? His argument is completely retarded; he thinks violence will beat violence from the right? It will just give justification for Trump to install more authoritarian rule, it will embolden the right because by being targeted they know they have a direct effect on a system that tries to suppress them and shows insecurity and vulnerability, so it is legit the contrary that will happen, that fucking moron who just focus on pointless optic. Doing political violence is 100% fucking bad if you are a liberal. Destiny and his gang of morons have difficulty conceptualizing that their ideology is the dominant one on most levels of society. Less than 20 years ago people were questioning if gay marriage should be legal or not; now a few years ago we were questioning if you should be fired or put into jail for not using someone's preferred pronoun correctly. You, as the dominant ideology, doing political violence signals to others your vulnerability and legitimizes the non-dominant ideology; for the non-dominant ideology who hang on institutional distrust, political violence boosts them. Political violence from liberals won't boost liberalism; it threatens it. Especially if you kill someone like Charlie Kirk, who is basically just a speaker that can be replaced, that doesn't disorganize the power structure one bit.
10 white nationalists doing political violence and 10 liberals doing political violence isn't the same thing. One is clearly more unhinged, useless, and retarded because at least one seeks power (understandably, because they don't have it) and the other already has it culturally, socially, etc... its like a pro-ukranian doing terrorist act because ukraine dont receive enought money in europe. So if a liberal commits political violence, it is because he has great fear that his ideology will lose power. Their retardation is still treating liberalism as some form of equal in power or an underdog not just in optic now but in rationalisation thats why Destiny isnt smart, ruining his reputation agin for political violence that have no benefit to the ideology you push or your logic is being edgy( the insecurity because you suck cock) and somewhat it shape your argument while being retarded. presentaton vs substance.
When I previously looked at the stream Destiny's "you need conservatives to be afraid" remark comes from, my assessment was that it was tamer with the fuller context than what the short clip provides. With even more exposure to Destiny's thinking, however, I take that back. I think Destiny actually does desire and proselytize for more violence against conservatives.
Ultimately, what Destiny wants is for Trump to be gone by any means, and if an assassin's bullet is unable to fulfill his obsession (which sent Destiny off his rocker last year), then he'll look for alternatives. Given the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the alternative Destiny is ruminating over right now is to essentially treat Republicans like Imperial Japan in WW2. Like how the US defeated the Japanese by killing them until their spirit broke, the idea is to kill Republicans (be it politicians, advocates, or firefighters) until they beg Trump to surrender and give in to whatever the Left wants.
One of the big sticking points from Morgan's show is that Destiny claims the assassins who killed Kirk and tried to kill Trump all come from the Right. I do not think he is ignorant or delusional enough to honestly believe this to be true. He very well knows how the Left has been creating violent radicals through propogandists like his sworn enemy Hasan that even want Destiny himself dead. But that concern takes a backseat to Destiny's TDS, and because he's of such low moral character, he's willing to lie about Leftwing radicalization when situationally arguing with those to his Right. It's just as much of a valid "debate tactic" to Destiny as blatantly lying to Andrew Wilson in this show about the personal delight he has with Kirk's assassination, and what he would've had with Trump's.
One part that stuck with me was one of Ana Kasparian's rants towards Destiny:
"If someone assassinated my husband, I would not be able to have the level of composure [Erika Kirk] had during that speech. I would be out for blood. I understand why she's angry and why she said the things that she said. Okay? You need to understand what being a human is. What it's like to actually lose someone that you love, that you chose to spend your life with, that you chose to raise children with. A person who was violently and viciously assassinated like that. This is why I've moved away from identifying as a Democrat because people like you are so embarrassing on the Left."
Ana is absolutely right. But of course it simply bounces off of Destiny because he doesn't understand what being a human is. He has the empathic capacity of a robot. I can't think of anyone as callous in every single relationship with another person as Destiny is.
Sides notes: I'm humored by the image of Destiny ranting like a lunatic while Andrew Wilson quietly smokes a cigarette with the saddest eyes. And poor Jack Posobiec was catatonic as a personal friend of Kirk.