Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Friendships and other bonds shouldn’t be formed or steeped in political views. There is so much more to life than your political affiliation. The left, again, with their propensity to be terminally online and only surround themselves with the types of information they agree with, cannot fathom the thought of enjoying the presence of someone who might have different values.
this only holds true when the different political views are at least somewhat compatible with each other.
like, i can tolerate turbo christcucks who want to live in a borderline theocracy. i can tolerate lolbertarians who essentially want total corporate rule. i can tolerate weirdo NRx people who want monarchy. i can tolerate people who prefer a democratic republic, or an oligarchic aristocracy, whatever.
but with leftoids this is not workable. the core of their worldview is so steeped in racial hatred against my own people, that's just too much. you can't be friends with someone who wants to see you dead or subjugated by hostile foreigners.
 
Some critter got herself not just arrested but expelled from Texas Tech. FAFO.


Here's the school's definition of Disciplinary Expulsion, from the Student Code of Conduct.

Disciplinary Expulsion - Disciplinary Expulsion occurs when the student is permanently withdrawn and separated from the University. This status of Disciplinary Expulsion will be shown permanently on the student’s academic record, including the transcript. Disciplinary Expulsion is noted on the student’s transcript by the phrase, “Expulsion” and the date in which the student’s expulsion became effective. In most instances, the notation of Disciplinary Expulsion will remain on the transcript permanently.


Ya, that's going to look REAL good when applying to any other university. But she should be able to get into a community college. Shouldn't keep her from being hired at McDonald's. Guess she may need to start paying those student loans real soon, too.

Have seen the incident, more than once. She did it to herself, fuck bucket's empty.
 
Última edición:
This thread moves so fast so I don't know if this has already been mentioned. Mural of Charlie Kirk defaced within like 8-12 hours of it going up with "Free Palestine" and satanic shit. Apparently
Jews and Muslims are locked in an eternal struggle to be so annoying that I have to side with the other one. This might cancel out having to see Maori argue about how my country was founded on "Juedo-christian values" or his other retarded bad faith arguments for the past 2 days straight.
 
The person who tried to seek out the sources of these anti-democratic viewpoints and fight it with rhetoric was just gunned down and now they're dancing on his grave. Don't use the words of a man you don't even believe in to pretend it's all good vibes and reconciliation now.
What the fuck are you talking about? I am trying to continue what they killed him for (rhetoric over violence). And believe in? The man was not a fucking prophet. There should be no litmus test that determines anything. I agreed with some things and disagreed with others, because I make my own viewpoints. He promoted talk over violence, and I am well trying that.
 
Nitro allows you to have server specific icons. That log they mention was of a conversation happening in a server was it not?
You can have a different icon per server with Nitro.

Also if your Discord account is deleted (whether you're banned or deliberately deleted your account), it changes it to a default profile picture like that.

If the discord icon is now a default icon after Discord said they banned his account, then that's what happened.

If they left the account alone, I'd assume he would still have an icon especially if he was super active on Discord.
 
This is so gay, Indy is a republican and voted for Eisenhower.
indy-hates-nazis-and-he-likes-ike-v0-gcywapvkeigb1.webp

>OG boy-scouts member
>WW1 vet
>Mexican Revolution vet
>Grew up in deeply religious household with both parents until his mothers death
>Puts artifacts in western museums where they belong
>Slays pussy in every adventure
>Hates reds with a passion + voted for Ike

"Erm Indiana Jones would totally agree with my shitlib 2025 politics, chud. :smug:"
 
I love all the discourse on the ethics of whether or not it's hypocritical to whistleblow on gravedancers and edgelords, but to me this is just a mass distribution of Darwin Awards.

If you're a big enough retard where on your social media you have clearly written out your full name, location, family members, employers, etc., and you're STILL fucking stupid enough to run your mouth and say retarded shit? Nah, sorry. You're an intellectual dead end. Either that or a big enough narcissistic jackass that you refuse to accept that your actions represent alot more than just yourself.

Literally just make a burner twitter. Make some ambiguous username. Anything but your fucking real name and face.

Say what you want about KF, but at least the sign up form has the decency to remind you "HEY RETARD, YOU PROBABLY DON'T WANT YOUR ACTIONS HERE CONNECTED TO OTHER ONLINE OUTLETS. CONSIDER YOUR PROFILE CAREFULLY."

Nowadays everyone just freely shows their asshole on the internet and then get mad when someone wants to shove a big thorny dildo up it. Learn some basic internet etiquette.
I believe that a 90s educational video regarding the subject of netiquette would come in quite handy here.

 
America was a Christian nation" they mean everyone in America should be their flavor of Christian.
This is a complete fabrication of a position. You are assuming that to have been the case when its been proven otherwise.
that we are not a Christian nation, and it's that rational approach that I believe established a firm foundation from the start. The general people were commonly Christian with accompanying ethic, but inherently tolerant.
That is all that matters. Christian ethics and morality dominated the times and the preceding centuries as well. That is historical fact. There was no need to declare a Christian nation as that implies an adherence to a specific creed, but the ethics, rules, and laws are mostly unmistakably Christian. You cannot just jetison millenia of Christian influence when your demographics are made of overwhelming numbers of Christians. Its entwined in everything. Many things are unstated in society when there is widespread agreement. Framers enumerating limits on explicit Christian dominance or adherence is an admission that the default culture that ruled was Christian at that time. You dont place limits on something that has no sway or prevalence.
 
Última edición:
The first statment in every post is cherry picking?

Please take your leftist world view with you and go already.
Being incapable of actually keeping context as you debate is a leftist tactic and one Charlie Kirk would not approve of. Again. You can claim you aren't a leftie all you want. Karl Marx's strategies are retarded and you're wearing them like a glove. One that oddly enough fits you all too well.

And what is cherry picking again? Oh right. Taking a single sentence of an idea and acting like that is the full idea. Grammar time. A word is a concept. A statement is a group of words representing a subject and what that subject is doing. An idea is a group of statements that leads to a paragraph of information. You have not engaged within context once Karl. And I'm going to assume very correctly that your accusations are a confession. Enjoy your New Year mr. chinny chin chin. Again, if you want to find a commie. Look for those who engage in their tactics. If I were you, I would start with the mirror.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7920168
>OG boy-scouts member
>WW1 vet
>Mexican Revolution vet
>Grew up in deeply religious household with both parents until his mothers death
>Puts artifacts in western museums where they belong
>Slays pussy in every adventure
>Hates reds with a passion + voted for Ike

"Erm Indiana Jones would totally agree with my shitlib 2025 politics, chud. :smug:"
ecd.webp

Same energy.
 
What the fuck are you talking about? I am trying to continue what they killed him for (rhetoric over violence). And believe in? The man was not a fucking prophet. There should be no litmus test that determines anything. I agreed with some things and disagreed with others, because I make my own viewpoints. He promoted talk over violence, and I am well trying that.
>"Please continue to be mildly disagree with us at college campuses so we can shoot you and leave your wife a widow next, all the while calling you Hitler 2.0."
No thanks.

Also, I'm talking about Jesus, you buffoon. The man was a prophet and the Son of God. The man was nailed to a cross unjustly and here we have the descendant of the Pharisees that put him there telling us about what he preached.
 
Perhaps it is, but we will never be able to have this dialog if we are attacking people because they didn't fly a flag at half mast or simply say "I really don't give a fuck that Kirk was killed"
Stop making shit up.
No one is getting attacked for not mourning kirk, if you didn't like him then literally just shut the fuck up and move on.
People are getting attacked for celebrating a terrorist attack or trying to justify said attack.
Imagine if someone was making videos celebrating the christchurch shooting or saying "well they kinda had it coming with their religion's hateful rhetoric" and posting it on their main. Do you really think they would say "oh he is just being critical of their faith"?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo