Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Destacado

"There is no unity with people who scream at children over their parent's politics.
There is no unity with someone who lies about what Charlie Kirk said, in order to excuse his murder.
There is no unity with someone who harasses a family the day after the father of that family lost a dear friend.
There is no unity with the people who celebrate Charlie Kirk's assassination.
And there is no unity with the people who fund these articles, who pay the salaries of these terrorist sympathizers, who argue that Charlie Kirk, a loving husband and father, deserved a shot to the neck, because he spoke words with which they disagreed."
 
Maori Kiwifruit Growers dijo:
People we hate have rights too, and for Americans, that means the right of free expression and voting.
Presiona para expandir...
This is a point I've made myself many times whenever people say things that are offensive to, for example, my religion. If we push for censoring people we hate, the people who hate us will censor us.

Nevertheless, the left didn't mind and they only pushed for their right to free speech while shutting down us.

Also, none of their rights is been infringed right now. There is not such a thing as right to be kept in a job after making myself a fool in public. They can't fire you for having opinions against gays, but they can fire you if you scream "kill all fags!" if your employees think this will harm their branding.

Maybe this is a good time to start talking about how much the state is meddling in jobs. Companies being forced to keep racial or gender quotas ain't right. And I should have the right to keep a right-only work environment if I want to.
 
Kitty Cat Man dijo:
Discord and reddit explicitly facilitate it though. There are longstanding and well-documented issues with trannies and nihilist faggots grooming people into violence and sexual degeneracy on those platforms and said platforms doing nothing about it.

most imageboards and forums weren't facilitating it to the degree that discord and reddit do
Presiona para expandir...
doing something about it isn't supposed to be the platforms job in the first place, it's the cops job.
this shit is like getting mad at apple when some terrorists use iphones to coordinate their activities. it's the wrong angle. apple just provides technology and tools, it is not and should not be responsible for what random people do with these tools.
 
FatalTater dijo:
The woketards are gravedancing because after 2020 they have felt invincible.
Consequences for acting like an asshole are getting shocked reactions because they genuinely thought no one would call them out.

There are certain obituaries I would love to read, and will quietly celebrate when the time comes. Not in public though.

I will never stop praying for the deaths of those who elevated criminals and burned our cities in their names.

🕯️
Presiona para expandir...
43;“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44; But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, 45;that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.
Matthew 5:43-45

If you want a concise opinion from a great Bishop of the Church Metropolitan Anthony Khrapovitsky on the Christian position on war and fighting read The Christian Faith and War. This guy was in Russia during the time of the Bolshevik revolution. He didn't tell the White army to stop fighting.

What I am criticizing isn't fighting back against a violent oppressor. But we should pray for our enemies. We should hope that they lay down arms and want to talk out our problems. To seek the Truth.
 
Última edición:
I love all the discourse on the ethics of whether or not it's hypocritical to whistleblow on gravedancers and edgelords, but to me this is just a mass distribution of Darwin Awards.

If you're a big enough retard where on your social media you have clearly written out your full name, location, family members, employers, etc., and you're STILL fucking stupid enough to run your mouth and say retarded shit? Nah, sorry. You're an intellectual dead end. Either that or a big enough narcissistic jackass that you refuse to accept that your actions represent alot more than just yourself.

Literally just make a burner twitter. Make some ambiguous username. Anything but your fucking real name and face.

Say what you want about KF, but at least the sign up form has the decency to remind you "HEY RETARD, YOU PROBABLY DON'T WANT YOUR ACTIONS HERE CONNECTED TO OTHER ONLINE OUTLETS. CONSIDER YOUR PROFILE CAREFULLY."

Nowadays everyone just freely shows their asshole on the internet and then get mad when someone wants to shove a big thorny dildo up it. Learn some basic internet etiquette.
 
Tasty Tatty dijo:
Actually, Charlie Kirk's assassination is the death leftists claim Floyd's was. Floyd died accidentally during an arrest, Charlie was targeted and murdered by the current system that's taken over universities and a big chunk of politics.

If we have any right to chimp out, this would be the moment. We should have already chimped when they tried to murder Trump.
Presiona para expandir...
Hard disagree optically. As a right? Sure. As a smart decision? Absolutely not. Is the right more civil? Yes. That means we are best to keep it that way. Eliminating through legal measures is smarter and better. Trolling them with the idea we might do it to get some to weed themselves out? Smart. Actually going ape? Retarded. A society of retards run by the right just becomes Pakistan. Much like a society of retards run by the left just becomes Cuba. And being the retard who lives or the retard who dies doesn't matter, you're still just a retard. If we are to accept that we have the power of the state, which we do. Then we use the systems we have to the advantages we do in order to weed them out civilly. Keeping the moral high horse without lowering ourselves to their extra chromos having levels. If they get violent, respond with authority and defense. Never go on offense as a vigilante. That will only make things worse and hasten our fall from intelligence and civility to that of monkeys.

Remember, this is the enemy within, not the enemy without. Resorting to civil war when it is not necessary only weakens the nation. And considering our status as a superpower is already dwindling. It would not be a bright idea to accept it. No matter how pleasant the vice may seem.
 
legendaryloppie@gmail dijo:
A religion is an ideology.
Presiona para expandir...
It's more than just an idea...

Religion forms the hub of the community. There are physical places such as temples, churches, and monasteries.

Members aren't isolated individuals, they are shaped by the community that reside in those spaces. Followers are held accountable by each other are encouraged to contribute to the cause, and practice what is preached.

Attendance to these places is an obligation, these places even act as total replacements for social safety nets offered through the state.

There's a difference in believing in Jesus and belonging to a religion.

You hit on one good point accidently and a lot of problems to stim from a lack of community. People are trapped in their houses, youre right its not the 1980s anymore.

Neighbors used to talk, we used to say the pledge of allegiance together, we used to go to church together. Men and women had seperate spaces where they could talk about their problems with one another. The left has done a great job of eroding at it.

I'd reply more to what you had to write, but it's just communist gobble gook, I don't want to hear about how great you think the CCP's boot tastes and I dont think it would do you any good. Just having to explain to you what a fucking religion is I can tell im talking to some redditor.
 
Tasty Tatty dijo:
This is a point I've made myself many times whenever people say things that are offensive to, for example, my religion. If we push for censoring people we hate, the people who hate us will censor us.

Nevertheless, the left didn't mind and they only pushed for their right to free speech while shutting down us.

Also, none of their rights is been infringed right now. There is not such a thing as right to be kept in a job after making myself a fool in public. They can't fire you for having opinions against gays, but they can fire you if you scream "kill all fags!" if your employees think this will harm their branding.

Maybe this is a good time to start talking about how much the state is meddling in jobs. Companies being forced to keep racial or gender quotas ain't right. And I should have the right to keep a right-only work environment if I want to.
Presiona para expandir...
Perhaps it is, but we will never be able to have this dialog if we are attacking people because they didn't fly a flag at half mast or simply say "I really don't give a fuck that Kirk was killed" or "the main was just a man". I mean, look at the reactions my comments are getting just because I am saying that maybe in some places people are getting a bit hysterical.
 
Duke-Diggler dijo:
Charlie Kirk has now become the George Floyd, but on the Right at this point. People are getting fucking retarded, praising him as some sort of "hero" even though he just is a dime-a-dozen right wing commentator at this point. He literally did nothing too different than Ben Shapiro or Stephen Crowder.

Now people wanna have people they disagree with banned on the internet. Like I said, it only takes a tragedy to get people fucking retarded and abandon all principals to "own the libs".

Ver archivo adjunto 7919822
Presiona para expandir...
Whether you like people like Charlie Kirk or not, this seems to be a consistent theme, political retards of all stripes abandoning everything they preach if it "owns" the "other team."

I can't say I have any sympathy for people losing their jobs over their comments mocking Charlie Kirk, because this is what they wanted for anyone who doesn't share their views.

They're acting like a child trying to change the rules because he's losing a game.
Would dijo:
Homogenous Sith? Where? They were arguably more species-diverse than the Jedi themselves. They can’t even capeshit right.
Presiona para expandir...
It doesn't help that the Jedi were enormous hypocrites, they kidnapped children to brainwash into their weird space cult and always talked about peace while in reality being some kind of warrior culture that was dishonest about itself and consumed by their own egos and short-sighted behaviors.
 
DumbDude43 dijo:
doing something about it isn't supposed to be the platforms job in the first place, it's the cops job.
this shit is like getting mad at apple when some terrorists use iphones to coordinate their activities. it's the wrong angle. apple just provides technology and tools, it is not and should not be responsible for what random people do with these tools.
Presiona para expandir...
not really, some platforms are pretty proactive about reporting that kind of content. it's also the cops job to be on the ball and go after the crimes committed on said platforms as well as ensuring said platforms cooperate with cops.

this time, it actually seems like everyone's playing nice with eachother and the feds aren't discounting the fact that the killer had a network that needs some looking into.
 
gernig dijo:
Holy shit can you retards stop feeding the trolls and get back to posting more news about the aftermath of the shooting! For the X'TH TIME, STOP FUCKING REPLYING TO THEM ALREADY! JUST IGNORE THEIR PROFILE!!!
There were 5 NFL teams that declined to honor Charlie Kirk on Sunday xitter
Ver archivo adjunto 7919958
Presiona para expandir...
Per the Daily Mail:
"On Friday, the NFL released a statement that said they would leave tributes to Kirk up to teams moving forward after Thursday's was mandated by the league. 'Last night's moment was the league's decision. It's up to the clubs [individual teams] for this Sunday's games,' the statement read.

Daily Mail contacted all five teams to ask why they did not honor Kirk. Indianapolis explained that the team instead held a moment of silence for Forrest Lucas - founder of Lucas Oil, the namesake of their stadium - which was always planned after he passed away last month. The Lions, Bengals, Ravens and Vikings did not initially respond.

The decision comes after the Ravens held a moment of silence when George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin in 2020, and players from both franchises took a knee during the National Anthem in protest months later.

'In just this calendar year: Lift Every Voice and Sing has been performed at league events since 2020 following the murder of George Floyd and the events of the summer of 2020, including last Thursday during the Kickoff game in Philadelphia. It is also performed before the Super Bowl."

I would say document these niggers, but with bad spending habits and CTE they'll probably fade into obscurity. I miss when football was a White man's sport a la Norman Rockwell illustrations :(
 
Maori Kiwifruit Growers dijo:
Yeah but America was founded by Christians who all hated each other and their own flavor of Christianity
Presiona para expandir...
Actually the Founders' religions and interaction because of it was complex, from orthodox Christianity to Deism and others. What WAS common among the various religions was that they were all forms of religious rationalism. It was this mix that gave for such lively perspective in debate. Arguably the system would not have lasted as long as it has were it more homogenously "christian".

Interestingly, according to article 6 of the Constitution, treaties entered are laws of the land. Treaties that are ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, itself at the time the body that represented the States as political entities and not as representing the general people. Soon upon forming the Union, we proceeded to enter treaties in trade and defense. One of the first was the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, signed at Tripoli on 4 November 1796. You might find Article 11 interesting:

ARTICLE 11.​

As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
Presiona para expandir...

At a time when the country was a new presence on the world stage, when revolutionary sentiment was high and memories of the conflict fresh, we immediately made it law of the land, as declared by treaty, that we are not a Christian nation, and it's that rational approach that I believe established a firm foundation from the start. The general people were commonly Christian with accompanying ethic, but inherently tolerant.

These lefties today undermine the very foundations of this society with their intolerant kaleidescopic orthodoxy.

Treaty text.
 
Última edición:
Clip from The Charlie Kirk Show.
"You have the crazies on the far left who are saying 'Oh, Steven Miller and JD Vance, they're going to go after constitutionally protected speech,' no, we're going to go after the NGO network that foments, facilitates, and engages in violence."
"We are going to channel all the anger that we have over the organized campaign that led to this assassination to uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks."
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo