Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Destacado

Archivos adjuntos

  • Screenshot 2025-09-14 025814.webp
    Screenshot 2025-09-14 025814.webp
    25.2 KB · Vistas: 26
gay dijo:
from the talk page on Charlie Kirk's assassination Wikipedia entry and oh boy, i cannot fucking begin to express my contempt for both journalists and slacktivist Wiki jannies doing everything in their power to retroactively will it into existence that slav squatting was ackshually a Groyper coded meme all along, they are getting desperate.
Ver archivo adjunto 7914166

the CNN/Elle Reeve clip in question:
ssstwitter.com_1757830447431.mp4
Presiona para expandir...
They're really floundering now, it's pathetic.
 
TrainWreckWatcher dijo:
We're what? Coming up on 96 hours since the assassination?
We know it was a troony toon and their gay lover.
Probably acting in a group now for sure.

IF they don't act in the next 3 days I'd say they wont act at all. Trump should be sending storm troopers into the homes of each trooner involved and black bagging them off to gitmo then announcing it.
Directive 51 exists. Use it.
Presiona para expandir...
We figured out who this guy was, what, yesterday? Let's give it a minute. I want them to figure who the fuck was involved, who knew about it before and after and I want the Feds to burn them down and bag their ashes. These faggots took a prominent voice from us and I want them to pay. I'm not just talking about the folks who were directly involved, I'm talking about the pieces of shit who radicalized them. Every politician, radio host, streamer who called their political opponents 'fascists' or 'Nazi's' for having a different political opinion... Keep Charlie's name on their lips.

Catching all of them quick makes the story vanish. Get the easy ones and then spend the time building a case on the ones that are a little harder then drag them to the forefront. I want this to drag on.

They combatted words with violence. They broke the social contract and now the gloves are off. Don't let this story vanish in 2 weeks, let's do it right.

Total Norman Death dijo:
Gee whiz why is this traumatized woman acting traumatized and ready to fuck shit up after watching her husband die and seeing an army of freaks celebrate his death? Faggot
Presiona para expandir...

Monday morning this woman woke up and had a husband. On Saturday night she's burying him. As far as I'm concerned she can do whatever the fuck she wants.
 
Julie Borowski decided to post the full quotes that people are quoting out of context to smear Charlie Kirk.

Yeah. Charlie Kirk did say, "I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."

Here's the full quote:

“Yeah, it's a great question. Thank you. So, I'm a big Second Amendment fan but I think most politicians are cowards when it comes to defending why we have a Second Amendment. This is why I would not be a good politician, or maybe I would, I don't know, because I actually speak my mind.The Second Amendment is not about hunting. I love hunting. The Second Amendment is not even about personal defense. That is important. The Second Amendment is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government. And if that talk scares you — "wow, that's radical, Charlie, I don't know about that" — well then, you have not really read any of the literature of our Founding Fathers. Number two, you've not read any 20th-century history. You're just living in Narnia. By the way, if you're actually living in Narnia, you would be wiser than wherever you're living, because C.S. Lewis was really smart. So I don't know what alternative universe you're living in. You just don't want to face reality that governments tend to get tyrannical and that if people need an ability to protect themselves and their communities and their families.

Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.

You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.

So then, how do you reduce? Very simple. People say, oh, Charlie, how do you stop school shootings? I don't know. How did we stop shootings at baseball games? Because we have armed guards outside of baseball games. That's why. How did we stop all the shootings at airports? We have armed guards outside of airports. How do we stop all the shootings at banks? We have armed guards outside of banks. How did we stop all the shootings at gun shows? Notice there's not a lot of mass shootings at gun shows, there's all these guns. Because everyone's armed. If our money and our sporting events and our airplanes have armed guards, why don't our children?”
Presiona para expandir...

Yes. Charlie Kirk did say, "I can't stand the word empathy."

Here is the full quote:

"I can't stand the word empathy, I think empathy is a made up new age term and it does a lot of damage. Sympathy is a better word, because empathy means you are actually feeling what another person felt, and no one can feel what another person feels."
Presiona para expandir...

Yes. Charlie Kirk said, "I'm sorry. If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like, "Boy, I hope he's qualified."

Here's the full quote where he is discussing DEI/affirmative action: Kirk: "I'm sorry. If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like, "Boy, I hope he's qualified."

KOLVET: "But you wouldn't have done that before!"

KIRK: "That's not an immediate … that's not who I am. That's not what I believe...It also creates unhealthy thinking patterns. I don't wanna think that way. And no one should, right?"

He later explained what he meant on @megynkelly's show:"

I was trying to be, you know, very vulnerable with the audience is that DEI invites unwholesome thinking. … I was saying in the clip, "That's not who I am, that's not what I believe." But what it does is it makes us worse versions of ourselves, Megyn. That's the whole point of what I was saying is that I now look at everything through a hyper-racialized diversity-quota lens because of their massive insistence to try to hit these ridiculous racial hiring quotas. Of course I believe anybody of any skin color can become a qualified pilot."
Presiona para expandir...

Yes. Charlie Kirk did say, "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s."

He also said:

"The Civil Rights Act, yeah, let's be clear. Created a beast and that beast has now turned into an anti-white weapon...if you have unapologetic feracious anti-white racism then young whites are going to find some very radical positions and I don't want that actually...that's where a lot of young white men that we speak to on campus are at (end of their rope). I sometimes have to bring them back in to free society like let's calm down because they say everyone is against us and we need to create our own identity politics group. I actually don't think that's a good idea. I don't think more tribalism is the answer to tribalism."
Presiona para expandir...
 
gay dijo:
from the talk page on Charlie Kirk's assassination Wikipedia entry and oh boy, i cannot fucking begin to express my contempt for both journalists and slacktivist Wiki jannies doing everything in their power to retroactively will it into existence that slav squatting was ackshually a Groyper coded meme all along, they are getting desperate.
Ver archivo adjunto 7914166

the CNN/Elle Reeve clip in question:
ssstwitter.com_1757830447431.mp4
Presiona para expandir...
Elon Musk should be rubbing the Wikipidia CEOs nose in this obvious case of bias and leftist damage control. I bet as soon as he did then the admins will step in and fix the page up and mention the leftist shit before the press picks up the story.
 
gay dijo:
from the talk page on Charlie Kirk's assassination Wikipedia entry and oh boy, i cannot fucking begin to express my contempt for both journalists and slacktivist Wiki jannies doing everything in their power to retroactively will it into existence that slav squatting was ackshually a Groyper coded meme all along, they are getting desperate.
Ver archivo adjunto 7914166

the CNN/Elle Reeve clip in question:
ssstwitter.com_1757830447431.mp4
Presiona para expandir...
The subhuman wikifaggot is a furry, by the way. He always does this.

Wikifur
Deviantart
1000066803.webp
Edit: oops someone else drew this for him for getting certain digits on the guy's pageview counter
 
Última edición:
strange creature dijo:
So the statement by Discord saying there wasn't any traces of Tyler was a lie. Also, aren't group chats limited to 10 people? It'd have to be a server. Or the groupchats were spread out (?) (nitpicking, just thought it bothered me.)
Presiona para expandir...
The only reason I have a Discord account is to keep in touch with a few friends (and lurk a few game mod servers because sadly no one just posts patch notes or even links to mods anywhere else any more for some fucking reason) that don't use any more normal social media platforms. We call it a group chat, despite it being a server, because it has more than 10 people and therefore can't just be a group chat.

So it could be journotards being journalists and retards, but I can vouch for calling servers group chats if that's all they're being used for in practice.
 
0713 dijo:
A lot of them are saying they are going to do exactly that. Go into colleges even more now. Just not outside.
They say they won't be intimidated and will carry on Charlie's mission even harder.
Presiona para expandir...
I'll be waiting to see who will keep their word then, and more importantly what "even harder" means in the future. I really, truly hope it doesn't just mean more debate me bro culture. After this tragedy, I think most normie cons finally have an open desire for actionable change. Fingers crossed whoever fills Kirk's massive shoes can make it happen.
 
Stupor Mario dijo:
Not even close. This is just the beginning.

All the simmering tensions between left and right, pro-MAGA/anti-MAGA have just come to an explosive head. After a decade of the left calling everyone even slightly to the right of them a fascist and Nazi, a tranny-chasing furfag who hated conservatives and Christians just killed one of the most popular rising stars of the right all in the name of fighting fascism. This is the inevitable worst case scenario the right has been worried about for years.

The consequences of what just happened are going to be long-lasting and far-reaching. Kirk has already become a world-wide political martyr. People in Europe and South Korea are already carrying his picture and celebrating his name for their political causes. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that Kirk's assassination is going to be as powerful an event as the assassinations of people like JFK or MLK. It's going to affect the mid term elections, it's going to motivate Trump to enact legislation, it's going to affect political movements in Europe and all over the world in the upcoming years.
Presiona para expandir...
Even here in Canada people who aren't left-wing extremists are floored by how NDP (our "third party" but effectively a major party even if they can never get enough seats to form government, and basically the DSA on steroids) and more radical Liberal Party voters are acting. Even politicians up here are cheering for the assassin, but thankfully, these people are losing their jobs, even some of the politicians.

In Canada, it's legal to discriminate for political reasons. You can tell someone you didn't hire them because of who they voted for. If you own a business, you can straight up ask them what they think of Charlie Kirk's death and tell them to enjoy being jobless with zero pushback. Food for thought!
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo