US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Watching boomers try to still keep this "groyper" thing up that they learned about yesterday is hilarious. "No you don't understand, these video game groypers use these terms ironically, if you understood the youth culture you'd understand this," say 65 year old grannies on Facebook.
Speaking of which, I encountered a groyper when playing Call of Duty. It was about as creepy and unsettling as you'd think. If people think Nick Fuetenes will be the next Charlie Kirk, then I guess a lot of people are just lost.
 
Funny thing about the stinker is it only stuck in theaters; it is actually a pretty good pocket fantasy story that isn't Lord of the Rings, ie it is approachable.
Oh totally. It was complete schlock, but very enjoyable schlock. Very comfy 80's fantasy, to be sure. Just don't go in expecting it to be a "masterpiece" and you'll have fun with it. And that was my opinion even before RLM reviewed it :story:
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7913204
Not a huge fan of that dress but she makes a convincing argument for it

Hope she wins
Why is she wearing a Mexican rug as a dress?

They are some of the most iconic faces of this place. They are always here. I was gone for months and when I came back they were all still here.
It just feels weird without them. Feels like a different place. Something's missing.

It's like coming home but all of a sudden most of your furniture got changed. It's not the same place.
You should be doing everything in your power to not become an iconic poster. You should want to be a literal nobody who happens to have an opinion or happens to make a thread you find interesting.
There’s really only two types of people who become known on this site. Site staff, and those who shit up threads.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Oh totally. It was complete schlock, but very enjoyable schlock. Very comfy 80's fantasy, to be sure. Just don't go in expecting it to be a "masterpiece" and you'll have fun with it. And that was my opinion even before RLM reviewed it :story:
I didn't know RLM did a review, will have to look it up and dodge Jack's political takes if he's featured in it. Why are all the Jacks in this world such soyboy cucks, all two of them Jack Patillo and RLM Jack are raging lefty lunatics and are all directly associated with gaming. Makes one :thinking:
 
Since I haven’t seen anyone else push forward a theory as to why they are trying so hard to cover up the political nature of the Shooter, I’ll start

>inb4 it’s because they don’t want to take blame

Yes, that’s one of the reasons, but I think there’s a far more sinister reason that I can’t quite put my finger on. Maybe it’s some kind of “Proof of concept” for future cover ups? To see how much discord and chaos they can sow?
 
Watching boomers try to still keep this "groyper" thing up that they learned about yesterday is hilarious. "No you don't understand, these video game groypers use these terms ironically, if you understood the youth culture you'd understand this," say 65 year old grannies on Facebook.
Since the troon-mate news hit, I've only seen one of those posts in the wild (not somebody here or at 4chan lying to shit up the place).

It was a college-age pronouns type girl complaining that "older millennials" who think the shooter's a left-tranny because he said left-tranny things have never encountered the sophisticated ironic zoomer esoterica of the 764 groypers.

She received many updoots.
 
Since I haven’t seen anyone else push forward a theory as to why they are trying so hard to cover up the political nature of the Shooter, I’ll start

>inb4 it’s because they don’t want to take blame

Yes, that’s one of the reasons, but I think there’s a far more sinister reason that I can’t quite put my finger on. Maybe it’s some kind of “Proof of concept” for future cover ups? To see how much discord and chaos they can sow?
I know this might be late, but I haven’t noticed a lot of people asking the why of this, and I don’t really believe in Occhams Razor when it comes to the media
 
For all your "hurrrrr the WSJ and New York Post and Sun stories are from right-wing tabloids, there's no evidence of a trans relationship" idiots, here's Axios reporting. (archive)

They have talked to six separate sources and all confirmed the romantic relationship between the shooter and the tranny.


1757821014610.webp
 
Patel might be getting fired over how he handled this shooting:
Ver archivo adjunto 7913682
NINK
LIGGER
please

For all your "hurrrrr the WSJ and New York Post and Sun stories are from right-wing tabloids, there's no evidence of a trans relationship" idiots, here's Axios reporting. (archive)

They have talked to six separate sources and all confirmed the romantic relationship between the shooter and the tranny.


Ver archivo adjunto 7913687
Oh no
Wikibros I'm not feeling so good.
 
Patel might be getting fired over how he handled this shooting:
Ver archivo adjunto 7913682
Good, he's fucking worthless. That Joe Rogan interview alone probably killed any chance of a jeet holding a high position in any intelligence agencies for the next ten years, which is a benefit to everyone except those who would like to get away with crimes.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo