The gayness comes not in the idea, but in the execution. Making fun of bad streams and podcasts is one thing, but turning into a cargo cult to Aaron Imholte?
💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.
- Iniciador del tema Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 13 de Nov, 2018
This is being way over thought.
Nick admitted access and posted screens. Case closed.
Feds aren’t interested because why the fuck would they be? It’s a couple of Minnesota retards slap fighting, there are bigger fish.
Kipersonapiscesotter
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 26 de Ago, 2024
Potentially. If it was only two Minnesotan retards and as you say admitted access and posted screenshot, case closed.
Supposedly Nick was sharing it far and wide and creating witness trails nationally. Timeline wise, by October the Feds will either charge or refer it back to the state prosecutor. Minnesota has a statute to cover it at a base level.
Nothing ever happens in the timeline people want, is more likely the best wording.
- Registrado
- 24 de Mayo, 2023
If they're just gonna bury the epstein list, the least they could do is fuck over a minnesotan cuck for us as compensation
- Registrado
- 9 de Abr, 2022
It's not beyond the realm of possibilities that Nick would start harboring illegal immigrants so he can feel like the god of his own gross little piglet sex cult. then maybe ICE and the FBI might pay attention. "OFFICER THESE 30 MEXICANS ARE MY NANNYS. GET OFF MY PROPERTY."
Horrified Bystander
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 16 de Ago, 2024
Didn’t they show off that application presentation Aaron made for some radio job? I could have sworn that it came up sometime ITT. If he has an affidavit from the station saying they didn’t leak it and he swears he didn’t leak it to MAPton then I would assume that’s pretty good proof Crackets has/had access to his drive or email?
- Registrado
- 13 de Jul, 2017
Here:
It'll probably end up in Community Watch when it leaves PG. Then, depending on how that goes, you can determine if any of the people in the Diddleverse are deserving of their own threads.
My guess is few of them are actually worth the effort.
- Registrado
- 25 de Oct, 2024
Link? AFAICS the only thing even close was one time on Saturday and one time a few months back where he consistently only acknowledged the fact that the mere passive ability to access the account sat there lying dormant, by virtue of Aaron having foisted unwanted accessibility onto him by having logged in and not having logged out. This was still coupled with an explicit denial of having ever actually "used" that passive accessibility by actively clicking on Aaron's account so as to view anything at all, as opposed to just continuing to use Nick's own "default" account as normal. Or to put it another way, his usual wannabe-lawyer pilpul acknowledges only the non-crime of "access" as a noun but denies the crime that it would have been to "access" as a verb. Where is the clip of him admitting to the latter?
Even assuming for the sake of argument that those screenshots were not the obvious parody shoops that would perfectly explain the wholly unnecessary redaction of the google account logo in the upper right and would perfectly explain the browser history itself being too good to be true (speed-reading straight from KF page to KF page to cuck fetish porn in mere minutes - really, Aaron?), where's the clip or tweet of Nick having even so much as insinuated having personally screencapped them, as opposed to having been sent them by some random dabblenigger for the lulz?
Great, and even though MAPton has since responded to Aaron's claim by proving that several of those "incomplete page snips" actually were not from that document, for the sake of argument let's assume that MAPton's statements elsewhere about having the document anyway weren't "just jokes" and assume that at least one or two of the "incomplete page snips" even were from the document.
Even then, where is the clip or tweet where anyone states that Nick's google access was the source in the first place, as opposed to any given random Leighton employee who thought Aaron enough of a joke to respond to his a-logs' emails by sending what Aaron claimed were only "physical copies" that could have simply been scanned with high enough DPI to look digital in an "incomplete page snip," or as opposed to April simply having sent to MAPton (or to MAPton through Nick) something that she had already obtained within her authorized scope of employment at Steel Toe Media Inc. at some point long before she was terminated? The latter is already the Balldoguard's "official story" that any prosecutor would be in the unenviable position of needing to disprove in April's perpetual silence:
Being that Aaron has already indicated that the involvement of the feds is not for purposes of a CFAA prosecution by DOJ and is instead to temporarily make use of their expertise to obtain more evidence for use in eventual prosecution by Stearns County if they move forward or by Kandiyohi County as a backup plan if Stearns takes a pass, it's that much less likely that a grand jury subpoena will be used to smash through any NDA that April likely signed and force her to say whether MAPton is lying in the above clip. Meanwhile any state-level LEOs' request to interview her will surely be met with her flipping them a middle finger sporting a new "Fifth Amendment" tattoo, and state prosecutors would have to commit to charges in the first place before acquiring the ability to compel her testimony at evidentiary hearings or trial, so unfortunately MAPton's "official story" still stands for the foreseeable future.
One very funny way to break this stalemate could be if whatever HRO lawyer Aaron retains (if any) actually has the balls to subpoena April's testimony at the July 15th hearing about this sourcing question that the HRO petition's unauthorized access allegations and Nick's denials of them have made squarely relevant to what Judge Pearson has to decide that day, but I'm guessing Aaron wouldn't want to poke that bear when there's only so much that direct examination and objections on cross could do to limit whatever other shit she might try to talk about that day. Just add that one to the growing list of this bungled HRO case's tragically wasted opportunities.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2021
I feel like Nick’s main strategy both in court and in life is to throw so much bullshit in hopes that whoever is watching/ listening that they don’t catch him being a retard.
Aaron’s best bet is to just lay out a timeline with events and then do what anyone in a self-defense scenario should do cry and piss their pants and say they were afraid and that’s why they blasted the bad man with a 12ga 18 times. In this case defending his HRO.
Aaron’s best bet is to just lay out a timeline with events and then do what anyone in a self-defense scenario should do cry and piss their pants and say they were afraid and that’s why they blasted the bad man with a 12ga 18 times. In this case defending his HRO.
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
NDA does not prohibit talking about a crime.
If April accessed Aaron's emails and forwarded it, then she committed the crime as well.
If predicted that they would try shifting the blame onto April months ago and they already did small attempts at it by insinuating that April might have known the passwords as far back as November? of 2024.
She is the perfect fall guy, she already admitted to doing the exact thing with Aaron's mobile phone records for the revenge porn case, which she should also no longer have had a right to access due to the divorce proceedings going on. Perfect patsy.
- Registrado
- 25 de Oct, 2024
Of course, which is great in theory, but in practice getting her to circumvent it would take compulsory process, which in a pre-indictment posture would only be available through A) a grand jury subpoena that won't be happening because the feds (according to Aaron) are only providing investigative resources for potential state prosecution and Minnesota doesn't require grand juries other than for capital offenses, or B) Aaron using the HRO hearing's brief window of opportunity for a civil subpoena. In a post-indictment posture there are more opportunities to subpoena her, but that presupposes that prosecutors would commit to charges without knowing in advance what she has to say, which is tantamount to a sanctionable fishing expedition unless the investigation already found enough to not even need her in the first place.
Barring those possibilities, all that state-level LEOs could do is politely request an interview and be unpolitely told to fuck off, since any NDA's exception allowing disclosure of a crime doesn't change the fact that, at least in Minnesota, there is no free-standing obligation to report a crime. Not only would she keep her yap shut to protect herself from any criminal exposure, moreover everything we know about her is enough to expect her slavish adherence to whatever "legal advice" she elicits from a certain unlicensed crackhead with a conflict of interest.
If that's how she got it, but MAPton only said that she sent it, without saying (or necessarily even knowing) how she got it. The possibility that she obtained it from the company's google drive while an employee or potentially even was emailed versions of it by Aaron for her input on the drafting process is still out there, and arguably a likely enough possibility that MAPton's naming her as the source, without more, shouldn't be enough for probable cause to get a warrant to explore how it made its way to her.
dustnight
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Dic, 2022
I'm responding to a frivolous legal action against me! (That says I need to let go...) you can't just let go!!!
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Minnesota has the most concern in handling it since it involves interference with Minnesota cases.
If it falls between the cracks, that's it. To the feds, it's a triviality, but Minnesota may be too incompetent and stupid to prosecute it especially against their Very Special Retard Nick Rekieta.
Desktop User2
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2020
The screencap of the Internet history was clearly a joke about the Naked Twister controversy - the one Nick admitted fawning over Aaron´s hard cock.
Nana_Feeder
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2022
This is why I diverge from the Kino Casino position of "Let's just stand back and watch Nick and Aaron destroy each other." Talentless losers like Melton, Karl, and if you can imagine it, the people who somehow ride their shitty coattails, have made a cottage industry out of shitting on a middling podcaster who's marginally better than all of them. I don't want to see Aaron lose. I want to see him shut the fuck up, because whenever he does, his detractors find a way to completely self-destruct out of boredom and lack of original content.
I'm OK with Aaron going to jail on the condition that Nick and all the balldowashers do just as much, if not more time.
- Registrado
- 21 de Ago, 2018
It actually takes less energy to do that than trying to yeet something into the sun.
Imagining that Minnesota cares about anything beyond melinated dick. What a grand and intoxifying innocence.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
I'm talking about concern in a legal sense, as to what venue is appropriate.
- Registrado
- 21 de Ago, 2018
Minnesota has no concerns about any legal senses because it is de facto an islamic dictatorship.
So I guess that answers my question from a few days ago on if Mohammed (PBUH) looks kindly on dosing 9 year old girls with cocaine.
- Registrado
- 6 de Jun, 2013
One of the understated cons of being your own lawyer is that law tactics frequently come off as slimy and juries don't like slimy people. If you're a lawyer you can be slimy and still win as long as they like your client because then it's "well we like Client, and he likes the Lawyer so clearly the Lawyer is atleast /our_reptile/". When you're by your self there isn't t anyone to play off of so you just look like a smarmy piece of shit.
- Registrado
- 8 de Jul, 2019
FYI Faran is back in the news saddle and took a call from The Steel Toe today:
Edit to add: Here's a screen cap:
Última edición: