This claim is nonsensical, legally irrelevant, and fundamentally misleading. Because:
- Emails ≠ Contracts
- Even if the email exchange happened exactly as Brian describes, it still doesn't help him for this reason:
- An email exchange about a proposed deal that never materialized into a signed contract is not binding.
- Courts look at formal agreements, actions taken, and performance, not casual or preliminary negotiations.
- The fact that Keating said a lawyer would draw up a contract later shows it was at most an early negotiation, not a finalized agreement.
- Even if the “Three-Way Deal” Existed, It Doesn’t Clear Brian
- Let’s say Brian really did offer a deal: "I’ll give up 10% of profits if we go this route.". That doesn’t matter, because:
- The $18.6 million federal judgment against him (from 2016) was based on prior conduct — fraudulent concealment, manipulation of ownership, and improper transfer of assets.
- The lawsuit in Texas (2020–2022) was about fraudulent transfers afterthat judgment, including:
- Moving IP and monetized videos to other shell entities (WildCraft, WildMC Ltd).
- Using his wife and mother to hide assets (e.g., Frisco house).
- Redirecting YouTube income through opaque networks.
- Keating’s Role Is Legally Separate
- Brian’s claim that “Brandon was trying to defraud his partner Moss” is irrelevant for several reasons:
- Keating was not the plaintiff alone — he had already assigned his judgment interest to Fidelissimus, LLC, co-owned with Moss.
- The lawsuit was filed by the judgment creditors as a whole, not just Keating individually.
- Even if Keating’s motives were impure, that would only be relevant in a separate case, not a defense to fraudulent transfer under TUFTA.
- Brian Misrepresents the Legal Reason for the Judgment
- Brian keeps repeating that: “There is no contract with me, so I shouldn’t be liable.”. But that’s not how TUFTA or post-judgment enforcement works:
- Brian was already liable under a valid federal judgment.
This is whole entry is total bullshit and I'll explain as follows why Relinquish is a total fucking faggot here.
1. The Email exchange is Brian saying that he would have given Brandon the original 30% that he wanted. The email at the bottom clearly shows Brandon agreeing to Brian's proposal because Brian didn't take anything from him. Brian and Marko signed a 50-50 contract where Marko did not tell Brian anything about Brandon or the other guy. Since Brandon was negotiating with Brian a way to stay in the agreement Brian and Brandon made a joint agreement where Marko lost his shares and Brian lost 10% of his 50% so Brandon was covered under the original 2012 30% deal Brandon signed with Marko.
And this is just number 1 of Relinquish being a total fucking faggot here and not knowing how to read which doesn't surprise me cause most of you faggots in here can't read.
2. (The
$18.6 million federal judgment against him (from 2016) was based on prior conduct) Again OP is a faggot here because the email between Brandon and Brian appears to be before the 2016 judgment existed so there was no actual creditor-debtor relationship. The lawsuit in 2020-2022 was appealed and the creditors themselves said that there was insufficient damages to win the lawsuit and their claims. OP continues to fag up himself and we are not even on number 3.
3. Keatings role in the email exchanges with Brian and Marko in 2014 clearly show that Brandon was leaving his partner Moss out of the three way deal that they were striking. OP is being a complete fuckwit here once again reading between lines and not knowing english. Read the fucking bottom of the screenshot OP the faggot who knows fuck all about the law
4. Brian represents truthfully there is legal reason for him and Holly to have won the cases. OP again just fags his way through everything.
In his Rule 60(d) motion and appeal, Brian Martin alleges:
- He was unaware of the lawsuit filed against him in 2014.
- He never authorized attorney Robert Wilson to represent him.
- Wilson acted without his knowledge, filing pleadings, engaging in settlement talks, and representing him at trial.
- He only learned after judgment that he had been a named defendant and represented at trial.
These claims are bullshit because:
- Brian Did Participate in the Trial
- He appeared in court, was present during proceedings, and testified as a party, not just as a witness.
- He acknowledged during the trial that he was involved in the ownership of assets central to the case (e.g., YouTube channels and IP).
- The Judgment Was Not Based on His Representation Alone
- The federal court judgment (April 15, 2016) against him and Marko Princip was based on concrete findings of liability, including fraud and conversion of business assets.
- The award of $18.6 million was grounded in factual determinations and testimony, not solely based on Wilson’s filings.
- Martin received 20% ownership of a YouTube business worth millions, which he then fraudulently transferred to avoid paying plaintiffs, a major part of the damages.
- The Alleged Lack of Consent to Representation Is NotFraud on the Court
- Even ifRobert Wilson lacked formal engagement from Martin:
- Courts consistently hold that unauthorized representation, without more, is not “fraud on the court” under Rule 60(d).
- Martin would have needed to act immediately upon discovering the issue, yet he waited over 7 years (from 2016 to 2023) to raise this.
- He failed to appeal the original judgment in a timely manner.
- He also benefited from the litigation, receiving partial ownership and later trying to shield those assets.
In this, OP the faggot continues to think he knows the law when the law is written in front of him. Lazy fucktard OP can't do simple Google search and find that in order for Fraud on the Court to be valid the top pick is (Withholding a summons from entitled Party). In Brian's case, he was the entitled party when the lawsuit was served past him and to the lawyer that pretended to represent him. In the actual court filing, Martin's lawyer does a great job explaining why OP is a faggot and reads at a 1st grade reading level.
Brian participating in trial is irrelevant for one main reason. Fraud on the Court extends to the day the lawsuit was filed.
OP knows he is a lazy faggot and can't do a simple search on the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution which reads
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ensures that state governments must respect all legal rights owed to a person according to the law. This clause has two primary interpretations:
- Procedural due process mandates that the government must follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property, including the rights to a fair trial, notice of legal proceedings, and an opportunity to be heard.
- Substantive due process protects certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if procedural protections are present, and has been instrumental in landmark rulings on issues such as reproductive rights and marriage equality.
OP demonstrates his faggotry in this by stating that Martin had due process when Martin only became aware of the proceedings a week before Trial in 2016 when the case was filed in 2014. This is clearly against Martin's 14th amendment and why a Fraud on the Court has occurred and why the 2016 Judgment will be vacated. Citation >
https://www.usconstitution.net/constitutional-protection-of-rights/
Perhaps the worst thing about this toward OP's nonsense is Rule 60(d) 3 has no statute limitations. It doesn't matter if it took 20 years, 10 years, whatever, Brian was given the evidence of Fraud on the Court in 2022 and filed his claim to vacate the judgment in 2023. The appeal is ongoing and OP is too much of a faggot to understand complex law. OP Saying that Brian
- He failed to appeal the original judgment in a timely manner. << Total faggotry read below about time limits where it says Fraud on the Court is on of the ONLY remedies in law that does not have a time limit to set aside the judgment that was obtained by the fraud on the court. So OP saying Brian didn't do it on time is OP being a faggot as always not knowing the law.
CITATION>>
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/fraud-on-the-court.html
Martin received in 2016 20% of the VG channel but was never paid anything as I saw it in the filings. Brandon Keating and David Tyler Moss scammed Brian after June 2016 by not giving Brian anything from the 20% that he was given. Perhaps the worst thing is if the 20% of Martins was actually worth Millions why didn't that get used to satisfy the judgment? Its because Brandon Keating and David Tyler moss are fucking faggots who also don't know shit and know the channel was worthless as it is today. They lied to the courts and the jury to inflate a judgment amount which is going to be vacated by Brian in the court of appeals anyways and the faggots will have to repay everything back once the court orders it.
OP thinks he knows everything but he's just a faggot who plays lawyer without actual citing resources. Hey OP citation is always needed you fucking faggot. Kill yourself next time you wannabe Russian spytard.
