Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 de Sep, 2020
  • Terminated
    22 de Abr, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 de Ago, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 de Ago, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 de Mayo, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 de Abr, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 de Abr, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 de Abr, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 de Mar, 2024
  • Terminated
    10 de Jun, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 de Oct, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 de Oct, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 de Oct, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 de Jul, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 de Jun, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 de Jun, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 de Jun, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 de Jun, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 de Oct, 2021
  • Terminated
    15 de Oct, 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    4 de Jun, 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 de Oct, 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
IMG_4521.webp
‘OBJECTION! How dare you release publicly available documents to the public! Don’t you know that Mr Hardin is a big meanie poopoo head?’

Russ is getting increasingly deranged in these exchanges with Mr Hardin. How long before we get a version of ‘To All Judges?’
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7391568
‘OBJECTION! How dare you release publicly available documents to the public! Don’t you know that Mr Hardin is a big meanie poopoo head?’

Russ is getting increasingly deranged in these exchanges with Mr Hardin. How long before we get a version of ‘To All Judges?’
Man, he didn't specify which police, now our intrepid investigators will have to file still more public records requests to locate the report that almost certainly wasn't filed. Come on Russ, include a report number and jurisdiction next time.
 
US code states that the court SHALL dismiss the case -- not "may" do so, but SHALL dismiss -- if it's determined the allegation of poverty is untrue, as we've mentioned a few times in this thread previously.

I suppose dismissal is the sensible, quickest, and best remedy but I have this itching hope he manages to violate something so substantial that it enters court recommendation for criminal prosecution. I guess contempt would be the most any could hope for such a pitiful retard.

I'll keep visualizing it while rubbing magic quartz crystals and reading horoscopes in hope.
 
Let's suppose some judge or judge-like entity determined a fraud was knowingly committed upon the court for the purpose of a malicious and bad-faith nonprosecution of a case by a plaintiff in a civil case.

Which options would these entitites have to remedy the situation? Which options would a supposed defendant have to remedy the situation?

Will any stalker children enjoy prison?
IFP fraud to the extent Greer was proceeding non IFP in other Courts (to maintain his illusion of well heeled flush with cash Pimpdaddy Brothel businessman and advocate) while claiming IFP in this court should require the case be dismissed with Prejudice under the statute.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7391621
I didn't even notice this, why is Hardin using 3 different email addresses?

Who cares? Greer has used multiple email addresses too. Dipshitforlips will grasp at anything resembling a straw at this point.

On another note, I sure would love to see what this PDF attachment consists of. It might just be a PDF printout of the SilverFlume pages of the new LLC, but I wonder if Hardin managed to secure any of the backend details on the "officers" we've discussed.
1747843289931.webp
 
Council minutes for May 6th

HELLO! Look who was present! Our friend Ruth, AND Roger Baylocq, one of the owners of Lithium Investments LLC (that owns the motel Greer wants to "parcel off" for hookers!

1747843544164.webp

Greer has also apparently/allegedly attempted to purchase that part of the motel property. Hardin can add this to his growing pile of evidence that Greer is a real estate tycoon who can afford things!
1747843712622.webp

FUCKING LOL, LMAO EVEN!
1747843757484.webp
 
So the Defendants didn't specify the great prejudice they suffered and then in the next sentence you repeat the specifics of the prejudice they informed you they suffered?
Greer seems to believe that Josh's financial expenditures and time-wasting in response to Greer's frivolous legal tactics and lies don't constitute prejudice. As far as I can guess, he seems to believe there's no prejudice because the whole point of his suit is to make Josh suffer by wasting his time and money. In Greer's paralyzed mind, he can't grasp how the rightful consequences Josh is suffering can also constitute prejudice.

It's really astounding to see that Greer thought he could get away with paying over $400 to be a brothel dilettante on the same day he claimed he can't pay required filing fees. Isn't the whole basis of this lawsuit—in Greer's own words—the fact that Josh runs a website that stalks Greer's business and legal activities? Why would he think that these ~horrible stalkers~ wouldn't also find the records of his business dealings in a state that demands so much transparency?

The IFP fraud should really be the center of a motion to dismiss, pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1915(e)(2)(A):
Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that—
(A) the allegation of poverty is untrue

The statute seems pretty clear to me.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo