US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I'm debating between living in one of five places:
- Minneapolis City (downtown), Minnesota
- Seattle City (downtown), Washington
- Urbana, Illinois
- Bloomington, Indiana
- Morgantown, West Virginia
Which would you all choose? I'm leaning towards Illinois, not too urban but not too rural
Why not Florida at all? or the south?
 
Getting rid of CPB won't do anything to larger city PBS and NPR affiliates, but it will likely result in a bunch of tiny rural stations going dark.
It will if it takes all the small stations offline, because PBS and NPR get paid membership fees and payments for syndicated content, so there's less money to pay for PBS and NPR generally and syndicated content specifically.
 
The order doesn’t direct NPR or PBS to do anything. The order is asserting control over the board of the CPB. Given that the CPB board is appointed by the president, the argument will be that the CPB is under the Executive Branch and thus can be made subject to an executive order.
The problem is that Trump’s order is based on 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3), which states that the CPB can’t contribute or support any political party or candidate for office.

Where the hell is any proof that PBS or NPR are part of a political party?

Is NPR biased? Yes, their journalists are left-wing and their articles are critical of conservatives. But the law does not say that the CPB can’t fund a biased news organization, only that it can’t support a political party or candidate.
 
The problem is that Trump’s order is based on 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3), which states that the CPB can’t contribute or support any political party or candidate for office.

Where the hell is any proof that PBS or NPR are part of a political party?

Is NPR biased? Yes, their journalists are left-wing and their articles are critical of conservatives. But the law does not say that the CPB can’t fund a biased news organization, only that it can’t support a political party or candidate.
A curious point Trump made in the EO was pointing out that the services PBS and NPR were created for are kinda now covered by things such as YouTube
 
A curious point Trump made in the EO was pointing out that the services PBS and NPR were created for are kinda now covered by things such as YouTube
your not wrong there, I'd say make PBS non political, period. don't even report on news outside of like, world changing shit like elections and what not. I will admit, my older parents do love Americans test kitchen on PBS though..
 
Way too hot - I could add Tallahassee or Blacksburg VA to the list but I cba relative to the others
iirc Tallahassee (and most of the panhandle) is the worst of Florida bog?
down in the dick of the state you get pretty solid breezes from the ocean on both sides keeping things manageable
 
Dear God, only a Jew pretending to be a lawyer could turn around and pretend that clearly being biased in such a way that it always benefits a particular political party and its candidates somehow doesn't count as supporting that party.
 
Dude, you can feel this article's author seething through the damn screen. The Finance Minister was asked a question, gave a response, and this dipfuck is acting like he just threatened to shoot Trump in the head.
Ver archivo adjunto 7307740
Source | Archive
The option to unload those treasuries exist as a bluff. They're not going to fuck over their main deterrent(the USA) against the Chinks. It really is shitty how badly financial articles have been for the past years.
 
The problem is that Trump’s order is based on 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3), which states that the CPB can’t contribute or support any political party or candidate for office.

Where the hell is any proof that PBS or NPR are part of a political party?

Is NPR biased? Yes, their journalists are left-wing and their articles are critical of conservatives. But the law does not say that the CPB can’t fund a biased news organization, only that it can’t support a political party or candidate.
That’s not true. The order is based on the fact that the CPB board is appointed by the Executive Branch, thus controlled by the Executive Branch. The reason why the CPB board would withhold funds doesn’t actually matter because the president has sole authority over the executive branch and directing the CPB board to withhold funds from NPR and PBS is not otherwise unlawful.

The argument to be made against the order is either:

1. The CPB board is not a part of the Executive Branch

OR

2. The order to withhold funding from NPR and PBS stations is unlawful.
 
Way too hot - I could add Tallahassee or Blacksburg VA to the list but I cba relative to the others

iirc Tallahassee (and most of the panhandle) is the worst of Florida bog?
Actual Floridian here - state is currently in the worst drought in eight years. It's been obscenely hot outside for some time now, we're not even close to summer yet. Most of the state is like this right now, and in general I'm not too fond of Florida anymore despite me living here most of my life. I'm in agreement it's too hot/humid, also I don't think it's very pleasant to look at given how flat it is and how dull a lot of it is starting to look.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo