UK NHS to test all ‘trans’ children for autism


Every child referred to a gender clinic will be screened under new guidance following Cass Review

The NHS will test all children who believe they are transgender for autism under new plans seen by The Telegraph.

Every child referred to a gender clinic will be “screened for neurodevelopmental conditions” such as autism and ADHD under new guidance, to be introduced in the wake of the Cass review.

The review, by paediatrician Baroness Cass, found that the mental health conditions were disproportionately common among children and young people with gender dysphoria.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, their relationship with their family and their sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

As part of a proposal to incorporate Lady Cass’s recommendations, the health service will move away from the “medical model” operated by the controversial Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service in favour of a “holistic” approach.

The new guidance will be released for public consultation imminently before being rolled out later this year.

It will be used by established children’s gender clinics in London and Manchester, and was reviewed by Lady Cass at the start of 2025.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, relationship with their family and sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

However, some groups criticised a “serious flaw” in the policy as it leaves an open door to the use of cross-sex hormones. They also condemned its absence of recognition of the wider societal issues to which children are exposed.

Policy probes eight key areas​

The new NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service will explore eight key areas of a child’s life.

To assess “development”, doctors will take a “detailed history” of the child’s social, cognitive and physical growth, particularly because of the “substantial” changes that take place during puberty.

They will screen children for autism and learning disabilities and look into whether further “cognitive assessments” are necessary.

The specification says: “Given the high prevalence of neurodiversity identified within this population, all those attending the NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service should receive screening for neurodevelopmental conditions.”

The “multidisciplinary team” of experts, including a consultant specialising in neurodevelopmental disorders, will create a treatment plan for each individual depending on their diagnosis.

If screening “identifies the presence of neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a referral should be considered to the Paediatric Neurodevelopmental Service or Paediatric ASD Service,” the guidance states.

In such cases, the team of doctors will have to determine if the child’s symptoms are caused by autism or whether they also need separate treatment for gender dysphoria.

They could also be kept under review every six months while getting help for their autism or discharged from the service.

Cases of both conditions have risen sharply in recent years. Recorded rates of gender confusion in under 18s have risen from 0.14 per 10,000 people in 2011 to 4.4 per 10,000 in 2021, driven largely by girls entering adolescence.

At the same time, autism has gone from being diagnosed in about one in 2,500 children, to one in 34 children aged 10-14 as of estimates for 2018.

Prof Michael Craig, clinical lead for the NHS National Autism Unit from 2007 until 2023, previously estimated half of patients seen by the Tavistock’s clinic had autism after observing sessions.

In her review, Baroness Cass linked the rise in teenage girls “struggling with gender identity, suicidal ideation and self-harm” with cases of “undiagnosed autism, which is often missed in adolescent girls”.

She said it was the “common denominator” with one study finding transgender people were three to six times more likely to be autistic than those who are not.

Patients at the new service will also undergo a thorough mental health assessment because of the “higher rates of mental health difficulties” among gender-questioning children.

The NHS guidance described a previous “reluctance to explore or address” mental health conditions because gender dysphoria was not classified as one, but said that “identifying and treating” any mental illness should be an “integrated part” of their care.

It added that they should undergo a “mental state examination” and be questioned about “mood, anxiety, emotional regulation, beliefs around weight, potential somatic symptoms, concentration, sleep and appetite, self-harm, and suicidal thoughts and behaviours”.

‘Family context’​

Another key area is dubbed “family context”, with medics being tasked to paint a picture of each child’s upbringing and familial relationships.

The specification noted that “there is evidence of an increased frequency of family parental physical and/or mental ill health and other family stressors in this group”.

Under the section titled sexual development, knowledge and sexual orientation, it said “clinicians should seek to understand the child/young person’s emerging sexuality and sexual orientation”.

If this has been a previous issue, doctors should consider whether the child was exposed to “adversity and trauma”.

They will also examine the children’s physical health needs and the impact of any long-term conditions, along with their broader well-being, school relationships and educational attainment.

Medical teams will “undertake an in-depth assessment” of how the gender dysphoria “manifested”, how it has been managed by the family, if any “social transition” has taken place and the impact of any distress caused.

They have been told to look out for “safeguarding issues” such as “transphobic bullying”, “online grooming” and a “breakdown in relationships with families”.

The Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender welcomed the “proposed holistic approach and prioritisation of psychological interventions”.

NHS wait times ‘very long’​

Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and the group’s co-chairman, said: “The new service recognises that many also experience mental health, neurodevelopmental and/or personal, family or social complexities in their lives.

“The challenge will be to ensure NHS services can provide prompt access to appropriate service for any identified needs as waiting lists are currently very long.”

But she went on to say a “serious flaw” in the policy was that it “leaves the door open for referral of children and young people under 18 for cross-sex hormones”.

She described the guidance’s reference to a drug policy that is “seriously out of date, was published before the Cass Review and does not take on board the scientific reviews which showed lack of evidence of benefit of hormones in this group” as “irresponsible”.

A spokesman for Bayswater Support Group, which advocates for evidence-based care on behalf of 600 families with trans-identifying children, said: “The more careful and holistic assessment by the NHS is welcome, however, there is still scant recognition of the environmental factors influencing children’s understanding of gender issues.

“Schools continue to teach gender identity as fact and socially transition children without parental consent. Young social media influencers monetise content claiming the health benefits of controversial medical treatments.

“And authority figures, including politicians, cast doubt on the findings of the Cass Review and falsely associate evidence-based findings with far-Right narratives.”

They added: “Within this context, it is very difficult indeed for professionals to make accurate diagnoses or to determine the most effective support for a patient experiencing distress.”

An NHS spokesman said: “We will soon be going to full public consultation on this draft specification which sets out the new holistic assessment framework that was described by Dr Cass in her report.

“NHS England has recently changed the referral pathway so child patients can only access gender services that we commission if they’re referred by a paediatrician or a child and adolescent mental health worker.”
 
I wouldn't trust my kid to use a power tool; but I'm supposed to listen to them and seriously consider changing their sex if they're a little confused as a child?

Nah, thanks, and pass.
 
Before we get to the meme replies, 41%, etc; I'm actually interested in the data. Truly. How much of this is perversion and how much is actually autism? I want pie charts and bar graphs breaking this shit down.
Those proportions are going to depend on age and sex. If female then almost never "perversion", just either an attempt to desexualise oneself, often due to trauma, or else someone convinced that because she doesn't fit some female stereotype she's not a girl. Rarely would it be porn addiction and fetishisation. If a boy, could be fetishisation but the younger they get the more likely it is to be some other reason. Any adult male going FtM, overwhelmingly fetishisation.
 
I'm admittedly uninformed on this topic, so do forgive me if the answer to me question is a little too obvious:

What makes autistic kids more likely to identify as trans? Is it something specific about what it means in an identitarian sense, or is it just autistic fixation being popularised?

Autistic fixations in my experience don't tend to be specific enough between different people for it to exist on this scale purely out of fascination.
Gender confuses them because gender is a social construct and autism impacts social comprehension and reasoning.
 
I would suggest tranies to actually agree on some sort of lore around what "transgender" is because currently it doesn't really have a definition except self-referencing one. Depending on who they're arguing with, transgender is a mental disorder, an arbitrary artificially created social construct or metaphysical magical concept of souls being displaced in wrong bodies by god. They really need to commit to one version or people will do it for them (mental disorder).
They avoid committing to one version because it would be too easy to refute. Gender ideology functions more effectively through confusion, as many of them experience confusion themselves. Some trannies argue in ways that distort language, because they have to distort reality to make sense of the ideology.
ie: 'woman' no longer means 'adult human female,' 'man' no longer means 'adult human male,' and 'biological sex' becomes a fluid concept. I've seen some MTF trannies argue that they are biologically female due to the effects of hormone therapy, which they claim alters their biology, and thus biological sex now doesn't mean anything to them.

They thrive in confusion, the more tolerant/compassionate someone they argue with is, the more they'll be able to destroy language and every concept in their face just to make sense of the ideology.
 
I'm admittedly uninformed on this topic, so do forgive me if the answer to me question is a little too obvious:

What makes autistic kids more likely to identify as trans? Is it something specific about what it means in an identitarian sense, or is it just autistic fixation being popularised?

Autistic fixations in my experience don't tend to be specific enough between different people for it to exist on this scale purely out of fascination.
1. Pedophiles are cowards, who like to go for the easiest, most vulnerable targets.
2. Anyone who wants to troon out a child is a pedophile.
 
I would suggest tranies to actually agree on some sort of lore around what "transgender" is because currently it doesn't really have a definition except self-referencing one. Depending on who they're arguing with, transgender is a mental disorder, an arbitrary artificially created social construct or metaphysical magical concept of souls being displaced in wrong bodies by god. They really need to commit to one version or people will do it for them (mental disorder).
The problem is that all of this stuff works on mean-girls-consistency-theory where they have been able to get so far only because they were all in agreement and completely undefined so any attempt to dissect their argument could be met with a smuckle and a “well actually”.

This is how basically every post modern concept functions.
 
Screen them for Down's as well since all trannies are retarded.

Jokes aside this feels like a positive step in the right direction, and I can already tell exactly which prominent troons will be positively seething about the fact this happened based on the "totally deboonked" Cass Review.
 
Where are all the extra staff coming from to deal with the autism and ADHD referrals? The mental and neurological health systems in England & Wales are already choked with waiting lists that patients will never get to the top of, simply because such diagnoses are fashionable and everyone wants to see if they have it (and parade the diagnosis around like a badge of honour). There’s no treatment for autism anyway, and no gender blob kid is going to take any advice on dealing with symptoms of autism, because all they want is tit chop scars and bumfluff on their faces to show off online.

This is at least a start, but it needs to be a lot stricter. No kid should be given puberty blockers (unless they’re hitting puberty at 6), and no child should ever, ever be given wrong sex hormones or put on waiting lists for pointless cosmetic surgeries.

All this gender shit is a complete waste of government (NHS) money. None of it should be funded in any way. If you’re sad that you’re not the opposite sex, counselling to learn to live with your own body should be the limit of what is available. You want to cut off your tits or get a dick inversion? Pay for that shit yourself - and it should be done abroad, because genital mutilation should be illegal in the U.K.

We’ve become so open-minded our brains have fallen out. ‘Accept and love everyone’ is bullshit. Society needs limits, humans need limits. Neither can function properly without them. Patting every retard on the head and going along with what they say doesn’t work. Genderwank is retarded bullshit. Neither kids nor adults should be humoured by government-funded bodies when they come out with this bollocks.

I have a nasty feeling that all this new waffle over how genderwank should be dealt with for kids is a way to justify going back to how things were (or worse). The Labour government claims to have a huge black hole in funding, so they’re cutting money for pensioners and disabled people, but chucking money at public consultations for this shit? Just stop already. You can say no. It’s not wrong or illegal or Nazi or genocidal to say no. Of all the institutions that should be the adult in the room, it’s government ffs.
 
AccurateMolasses2748 75 points 5 hours ago

They also will investigate family life to look for trauma and identify the child's orientation. So we are at the stage where children can't be trans they must have cognitive issues suggesting they aren't competent (because apparently that's where we are heading for autistic people), you were traumatised by your family, or you are actually gay. This is a terrifying world.
I actually dated someone who claimed to be trans - in reality she is a very cute and very autistic tomboy.

All I'll say on the matter is that before I dated her I believed most trannies were people that were raped as children and, instead of getting proper therapy, got further abused and corrupted by an ideologically captured mental health profession.
After I dated her, I was certain of it.
 
will be “screened for neurodevelopmental conditions”
, doctors should consider whether the child was exposed to “adversity and trauma”.
1745841301891.webp
 
Those proportions are going to depend on age and sex. If female then almost never "perversion", just either an attempt to desexualise oneself, often due to trauma, or else someone convinced that because she doesn't fit some female stereotype she's not a girl. Rarely would it be porn addiction and fetishisation. If a boy, could be fetishisation but the younger they get the more likely it is to be some other reason. Any adult male going FtM, overwhelmingly fetishisation.
Ray Blanchard's work indicated that all non homosexual transgender women (non homosexual as in they're attracted to women) had significantly higher levels of autogynephilic fantasies than homosexual group. AKA all those "lesbian, poly, bi" MTFs are generally just AGPs. However at the time of his work society hadn't degraded into making children trans. I imagine a"trans" girl (aka boy) who hasn't gone through puberty or is just entering it wouldn't have the paraphilic sexual interest that older men have. They're more likely victims of autism, social contagion, grooming, or a parent only one step away from Munchausen's. More than likely a combination of several of these things.
 
I wish this could be made retroactive. The amount of young people who have already been sucked into this trans bullshit through eternally online circles, and further encouraged by school councillors and doctors is staggering.
But still, Terf Island getting extremely rare Ws on this one topic
 
Holy Shit.
Maybe now we might be able to allocate some actual funding and resources to clear the enormous backlog for autism diagnosis and support for those who genuinely need It.. :optimistic:

Incidentally, any idea if the rate of people given a BPD diagnosis has changed at all? I'd put money on that being the case.
 
This is blatantly untrue. Pop over to the Pooner Zoo thread. Many, many of these women want to become their uwu soft anime boys.
I would think that "uwu soft anime boys" are a form of de-sexualisation. At least for a woman wanting to be one. Not male, hardly masculine, a kind of infantalised state. But that said, I stay out of that thread because it horrifies me. So if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo