US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Posting what this guy put.


The CIA assassinated JFK, the sitting President of the United States.

“The day after the assassination, Gary Underhill left Washington. A small clique within the CIA was responsible, he confided. Less than six months later Underhill was found shot to death. Ruled a suicide.”

Ver archivo adjunto 7108746


Ver archivo adjunto 7108885
I know its been posted but I wanted to include link to the source of underhill, its on page 38 just fyi I found it by pure luck

Link to underhill page
These were publicly available since at least 2022, just as an FYI.
 
Imagine someone old and creepy like Biden but extremely smart and built like a Texan shithouse, who liked to press up against people to pressure them for support, and played with his dick in front of friendly reporters who annoyed him. LBJ gave us the civil rights act under the premise that he'd have niggers voting D for the next two centuries. He also gave us a little thing called the Vietnam War which was just as fake and gay as operation iraqi freedom but with a higher death toll, higher cost and more.

He easily ranks among the most damaging presidents the United States has ever had, and he probably would never have been president if Kennedy hadn't been shot. Johnson's entire purpose for most of his life was to climb the Washington power ladder and he absolutely hated JFK because he just waltzed into the presidency instead based on his name, wealth and looks.

I don't doubt the CIA could be involved either but LBJ was like a more imposing male Hillary Clinton so it's not like they're mutually exclusive theories.
LBJ was quite the character.


Here is him and J. Edgar Hoover (Director of the FBI) talking only a few days after JFK was assassinated.

 
Ok i love digging but how the fuck am i supposed to read this ?
Ver archivo adjunto 7108840
"Memo of (illeg) Jul 1964

Info obtained from (illeg) to State's letter of 29 June 1964 seems inconsistent with with comments made in Para 6 of (illeg) memorandum of 6 Apr 1964."

So I guess if you've got some bad handwriting issues I can sometimes make it out due to previous experience with handwritten records. If it's a copying issue I can't help though; too light is too light.
 
There will be American-Russian hockey games after the war is over:
Ver archivo adjunto 7108503
Source (Archive)
English Translation
Are we gonna kick their ass so hard they try to quit but come back to get their asses kicked some more after they learn there is no money if they quit? People always act like the Miracle on Ice was the first time the US beat the USSR at hockey. But the Flyers beat the fuck out of them (literally) and the soviets started crying and tried to quit.
 
he absolutely hated JFK because he just waltzed into the presidency instead based on his name, wealth and looks.
There's an interesting technological revolution that took off around the time Kennedy became the president: https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/The_First_Televised_Presidential_Debate.htm

Though Kennedy's election wasn't the first televised presidential debate, TV was still in its infancy. I watched some shit on YouTube that said when Abraham Lincoln did speeches/rallies/debates they would be like 4 fucking hours long and go into things with depth and complexity when Kennedy came around they dumbed down things to fit into like 4 minutes.

So I guess I would just add "television/1960s TikTok" to you saying he got elected "based on his name, wealth and looks". I haven't seen the presidential debate from Kennedy's era that got him elected but I can guess he probably worked extremely well in front of a camera and his charisma shined through the TV set.

edit: this is the video that covered the change in debates - it's a 12 minute long video so very watchable and very interesting:

 
Última edición:
There's an interesting technological revolution that took off around the time Kennedy became the president: https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/The_First_Televised_Presidential_Debate.htm

Though Kennedy's election wasn't the first televised presidential debate, TV was still in its infancy. I watched some shit on YouTube that said when Abraham Lincoln did speeches/rallies/debates they would be like 4 fucking hours long and go into things with depth and complexity when Kennedy came around they dumbed down things to fit into like 4 minutes.

So I guess I would just add "television/1960s TikTok" to you saying he got elected "based on his name, wealth and looks". I haven't seen the presidential debate from Kennedy's era that got him elected but I can guess he probably worked extremely well in front of a camera and his charisma shined through the TV set.
The debate between him and Nixon had a different Winn depending if you watched or listen, Nixon won if you only listen on radio, Kennedy won if you watched
 

Federal judge blocks Trump's ban on transgender people serving in military​

A federal judge has granted an injunction that temporarily blocks the US military from enforcing Donald Trump’s executive order barring transgender people from military service while a lawsuit by 20 current and would-be service members challenging the measure goes forward.

Judge Ana Reyes stayed her order from going into effect until Friday morning to give the government to seek an emergency appeal.



Ver archivo adjunto 7108696

Archive of the Injunction is attached to the post.
What is the path forward to correct this clear abuse of power?

Does the SC have to do something generally to prevent this from repeating, or must they look at each of these on a case by case basis?

Also, trannies are far and away the most one sided political question: they are universally reviled, because most humans have eyes, and trannies are clearly deranged perverted freaks.

Seriously, this has to stop. I need this to stop before Trump just decides to ignore them totally. That would be crossing the Rubicon and we can't go back from that. Maybe that's the deep states intention?
 
So I guess I would just add "television/1960s TikTok" to you saying he got elected "based on his name, wealth and looks". I haven't seen the presidential debate from Kennedy's era that got him elected but I can guess he probably worked extremely well in front of a camera and his charisma shined through the TV set.
It didn't help that Nixon was sweaty and looked like a flabby old man in comparison. JFK had some other positive qualities but in terms of political acumen at the time I'd say Nixon would have won if it was based on peoples purely objective opinions and not influenced by that. There's a reason FDR hid his wheelchair, people pay attention to that kind of shit and did a lot moreso back then.
 
Team Nothing Ever Happens are this round’s losers. Congrats to Team Total Jewish Cabal Death.
I look forward to the next round.
No one doubted they’d come out, they just will have ZERO new information, and the cia and Jews aren’t gonna write down “lol by the way we shot him and lee harvey oswald was a patsy, hehe don’t tell the goyim”
 
Atrás
Top Abajo