🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[Nothing Worth]

ugh

Don't doomer.

She gave that update a week and a half? ago that she was consulting with attorneys and examining her options. This is nothing new. You can file a police report even if you don't intend to press charges. The police would have to investigate the claims of your police report before they bring you any options. It feels like an eternity but if she filed that was only a month ago. It is not an urgent sex crime to investigate and sex crimes are notoriously slow to be investigated. With shake-ups in federal funding there could also be the case that sex crimes and cold cases get grants to go through their backlogs and that could have been interrupted.

She is also not a stable person but she's been the strongest and most clear headed up until now. Of course she is going to crumple and doubt throughout this process. This is not indicative of the status of what she's filed; that just seems to be who she is. There's all this pressure for her to come through because her charges are criminal in nature and yes, we are using her in the hopes that Destiny faces criminal consequences. Then there's the mining of her situation for content, well intentioned or not. Destiny's stance towards her is malicious versus desperate like he is for Pxie and people are already primed to hate Chaeiry. His foot soldiers easily bought into Pxie being a slut from just a few suggestive screenshots, they need even less to come for Chaeiry and the validity of her story.

So TL;DR: Chill, have faith, have reasonable doubt, but wait.

 

[cloudy1]

I don't think anyone's posted the entirety of Tiny's chat logs after he started sperging out last night. Seeing it all in one image really gets across the desperation.

This nigga had caps lock on for 49 consecutive minutes in his offline chat at 1am last night.

>me when i’m definitely not spiralling

The fact that he typed, without a drop of irony, “MOST don’t want it, SOME are okay recording me sucking them off”

We’re so close guys.

 

[Null]

I am handing out direct weeklong bans to anyone who derails this thread, especially for infighting.

I do agree that making fun of someone for being raped as a little boy is entirely classless and advise that, if you want people to be sympathetic to your narrative, you should show more common sense. There are a lot of eyes on the thread. Some restraint will go a long way.

 

[Lord of the Pajeets]

From this log (thank you):

Ver archivo adjunto 7016720
Ver archivo adjunto 7016717
...Brother. Not only doesn't he understand that yes, if someone can access information that is public on a website it is "public link" but he simultaneously understands that if you do not want sexual material to be public then you must make efforts to prevent people from accessing it (a paywall, for instance). If I click on the profile of an OF model and they have lewds on their profile, that's a public link on a public website. If I want more explicit content I have to deliberately sign up for an OF account, give them my credit card, agree to TOS, and so on before I get access to material that the OF model has consented to exchanging for money.

A very important detail that tiny doesn't realize through his stim addled brain is that if he had set the permission of the "publicly accessible" links (that he manually and deliberately set the to public permissions as the default is restricted on Google Drive) to restricted access then guess what? When Solo accessed those links to download the material he would have had to request permission from Destiny with one of his own Google accounts to view them, something that only an absolute mongoloid would grant.

If Solo hacked Rose's Discord account (unlikely, no evidence) he'd hit a wall if Destiny just kept the links to restricted access by default unless he also hacked her Google Drive account or Destiny was retarded enough to grant Solo's random Google account request access. If Rose granted him access to Discord and they were restricted, he'd also have to access to her Google Drive account if Tiny just kept the links to their default restricted access.

Another example of the utter lack of concern and negligence that the Goonclown was exercising with the distribution of this material (which facially the sharing of is already fucked), which leads me to further believe (including an earlier message post-leak where he said you're a retard if you defend something without explicit consent and his initial "apologetic" approach and admission of guilt early on) that his "implicit consent" stance is an utterly fabricated ad hoc cope defense.

 

[mooted]

Reminder that this is DGG, this is the high level analysis they do.

"Vindicated" lmao

 

[do ut des]

I do agree that making fun of someone for being raped as a little boy is entirely classless and advise that, if you want people to be sympathetic to your narrative, you should show more common sense. There are a lot of eyes on the thread. Some restraint will go a long way.

I completly agree but if we wanted to be rethorically more effective towards the normies, we also shouldnt use words like faggot, make fun of dicksucking, racial slurs,... (you get the point), but this lsnguage is part of kiwifarms. I personally wont use the "destiny got abused" talking point anymore, since you are right, but if blav wants to continue using it i cant blame him, since that appears to be the only insult that truely annoys destiny.


Edit: @Null, btw what counts as infighting, if someone asks us if we genuinly want to murder destiny bc someone used a metapher, is making fun of him already infighting?

 

[FarmEnjoyer]

I am handing out direct weeklong bans to anyone who derails this thread, especially for infighting.

I do agree that making fun of someone for being raped as a little boy is entirely classless and advise that, if you want people to be sympathetic to your narrative, you should show more common sense. There are a lot of eyes on the thread. Some restraint will go a long way.

It's quite annoying to wake up to 10 new pages of this thread... and 9 of them are infighting.

It only hurts the visibility of this thread, especially to new outsiders who may be looking at the thread for the first time.

 

[Flamin Park]

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/uJ4zf

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/0noP8

@Nothing Worth Archive your links. It's NOT hard. Use ghostarchive.org / x.com or archive.is / nitter.space.


https://ghostarchive.org/archive/dx7XN , https://archive.fo/wip/9OAN4

Ver archivo adjunto 7000953
Ver archivo adjunto 7000954
Ver archivo adjunto 7000955
Ver archivo adjunto 7000956
Ver archivo adjunto 7000957
Ver archivo adjunto 7000958
Ver archivo adjunto 7000963
Ver archivo adjunto 7000973
Ver archivo adjunto 7000981
Ver archivo adjunto 7000988
Ver archivo adjunto 7000990
Ver archivo adjunto 7000991
Ver archivo adjunto 7000992

>Get fucked on camera
>People watch the recording of you getting fucked on a device literally built to record what happens in front of it
>Halp how could anyone see my vagina


The fact this is in court proves we hit the deepest level of retard decades ago and broke our the jackhammer

People have seen my dick on the internet? Do you know why? Because I recorded it
This is basically "I really wanted to touch the pretty pretty flames but I didn't expect them to be HOT" the article

If you don't want people to see you getting fucked on camera maybe just ...don't get fucked in front of a camera

I know it's a real brain teaser

 

[Greasy Goblin]

I completly agree but if we wanted to be rethorically more effective towards the normies, we also shouldnt use words like faggot, make fun of dicksucking, racial slurs,... (you get the point), but this lsnguage is part of kiwifarms. I personally wont use the "destiny got abused" talking point anymore, since you are right, but if blav wants to continue using it i cant blame him, since that appears to be the only insult that truely annoys destiny.

For me, while I think that mocking him for the event itself is classless, there's just something off about the timing of it all. I actually agree with his sentiment that it shouldn't be a personality trait to be a victim and that moving on is important, and it doesn't define him, I think it's very respectable. But I think people innately find this totally at odds with his addition of the word "brutally", something so over-the-top that I doubt most victims would use that term to describe it, unless explicitly attempting to solicit sympathy. A victim that doesn't want to be a victim... yet plays up the severity of their victimization? I seldom see people mocking lolcows over similar circumstances, and think the ridicule comes from this contradiction - in short, people feel like there's a manipulation attempt and are lashing out.

 

[The best and greatest]

I completly agree but if we wanted to be rethorically more effective towards the normies, we also shouldnt use words like faggot, make fun of dicksucking, racial slurs,... (you get the point), but this lsnguage is part of kiwifarms. I personally wont use the "destiny got abused" talking point anymore, since you are right, but if blav wants to continue using it i cant blame him, since that appears to be the only insult that truely annoys destiny.


Edit: @Null, btw what counts as infighting, if someone asks us if we genuinly want to murder destiny bc someone used a metapher, is making fun of him already infighting?

If you're getting into discourses that span multiple posts/pages on something beside the point of the thread you're doing it wrong. Just tell them "Kill yourself faggot" and move on. Being able to agree to disagree with others is a valuable life skill that people like Tiny lack which is why they burn bridges constantly and make so many enemies, because they have a pathological, insatiable need to be right.. Don't be like tiny.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

Ver archivo adjunto 7016716
I have never been and I will never be polyamorous but isn't the spirit of polyamory that you don't strictly "own" your romantic and sexual partner? That they can negotiate sexual and romantic ties with other people as well as you, their main partner? Which is why open relationships so often fail because people can't let go of that ownership mentality.

Someone pointed it out the other day, and please claim it if it was you, that Destiny is obsessed with cuckoldry. It is because he does believe in the concept of "ownership" and he likes the power of cucking other men but doesn't like when the reverse happens to him. Lav and her fiance, Zoe and Jakob, Lonerbox and Pxie, and so on. He must always bring up how he's cucked the man at some point. He's also angriest about women who didn't choose him in the end (so...all women all the time)

Theres a book by a couple of old lesbians called The Ethical Slut and they go over some of these pitfalls in polyamory. Its meant to be a 'free love' situation, because each person has 'a lot' of love to give. They explicitly warn about having too obtuse a ruleset when engaging in 'slutdom', as its not in the spirit of free love.

Destiny bemoaned this exact thing when Melina did it to him. But this was likely due not to him being a truly free loving man, but more a sexually compulsive retard who got mad that he was being given guardrails.

This possessive shit is just his immature ego manifesting into pettiness.

Reminder that this is DGG, this is the high level analysis they do.

"Vindicated" lmao

The implied consent argument is fucking stupid, not just from a legal angle.

If you share a video between you and your wife, that would qualify as her sharing sexual content with you. And its normal between you two.

If you add another person into the mix and you all consent, then its normal between all three of you.

If you bring a fourth person into the mix, and someone in the previous dynamic does not know who that is, then its not normal. It becomes a privacy violation, full stop.

Thats why explicit consent is needed in these situations.

 

[Cynical-Carnivore-88]

For me, while I think that mocking him for the event itself is classless, there's just something off about the timing of it all. I actually agree with his sentiment that it shouldn't be a personality trait to be a victim and that moving on is important, and it doesn't define him, I think it's very respectable. But I think people innately find this totally at odds with his addition of the word "brutally", something so over-the-top that I doubt most victims would use that term to describe it, unless explicitly attempting to solicit sympathy. I seldom see people mocking lolcows over similar circumstances, and think the ridicule comes from this contradiction - in short, people feel like there's a manipulation attempt and are lashing out.

That actually makes it even more interesting. Destiny didn’t throw “brutally molested” into some debate as a rhetorical nuke, he used it in his own self-description when he was trying to explain how he processes trauma. That makes it worse because it means it wasn’t just some throwaway debate tactic, it was how he wanted to frame his own experience when he was in a rare moment of self-reflection.

And yet, despite using that phrasing himself, he now acts like bringing it up is some bizarre, conspiratorial psychoanalysis from his haters. But why? He could have just said “I was molested.” Instead, he deliberately emphasized brutal. That’s not an accident. That means he wanted the weight of that word there. He wanted the severity of it to be clear.

So why does he recoil now when people repeat it? If that was his own framing, shouldn’t he stand by it? Or does it only serve a purpose when he’s the one using it?

This is exactly why people call it manipulative. He plays both sides. When he needs it for a post about how he’s different from other people and how he detaches from trauma? He emphasizes how severe it was. But when people use his own words against him, suddenly it’s “unfair, it’s insane, it’s deranged”. He doesn’t actually want to process what happened, he wants full control over how and when it gets acknowledged.

That’s why people here keep hammering it. He’s never actually dealt with it, and he only allows it to exist on his terms. And when it gets brought up outside of those terms? Suddenly, it’s a moral outrage.

 

[ztarouk]

Reminder that this is DGG, this is the high level analysis they do.

Ver archivo adjunto 7016832
"Vindicated" lmao


Ver archivo adjunto 7016834

"well initially people were saying he might have raped a woman, but now that we know she was wearing matching underwear and a short skirt, we can tell there was implied consent for him to do whatever, it's just their dynamic

totally vindicated"

 

[cloudy1]

Not to be a pedant but he never said “brutally molested”. He said something to the effect of “something pretty brutal happened to me… physical/sexual abuse when I was >10.”

 

[Cynical-Carnivore-88]

Not to be a pedant but he never said “brutally molested”. He said something to the effect of “something pretty brutal happened to me… physical/sexual abuse when I was >10.”

Fair enough, he didn’t use the word specifically, but if he specified “physical/sexual” then it doesn’t really leave much other options then “molestation” on the table as what he was referring to. But you are right.

 

[dick tha master]

Nicholas Deorio privated his latest stream, here is archive.

 

[Tom Malvoro Riddle]

I was about to post this too. It's weird. But to be fair, it's just one person spamming. And judging by their level of fixation on the topic, it honestly sounds like @StrangerMe got molested themselves and is coping by taking out on Stevie.

2 warriors raped at birth with shared destinies

 

[Kid Named Rocket]

Depending on how this goes and how badly he gets fucked in court do you think Tiny has a chance at winning LOTY this year?

 

[Saguenay]

 

[mooted]

The implied consent argument is fucking stupid, not just from a legal angle.

If you share a video between you and your wife, that would qualify as her sharing sexual content with you. And its normal between you two.

If you add another person into the mix and you all consent, then its normal between all three of you.

If you bring a fourth person into the mix, and someone in the previous dynamic does not know who that is, then its not normal. It becomes a privacy violation, full stop.

Thats why explicit consent is needed in these situations.

Not only that, under the retarded arguments of "Implied consent" marital rape would be allowed.
I know that in India is kinda allowed, didnt know DGG and Destiny were into that.

Ver archivo adjunto 7016949

oh god, why.
Thats probably the dumbest thing I read today