David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC. Case: 2:24-CV-00140, Southern District of West Virginia. - Acerthorn sues the Farms

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Stebbins v. Moon 2:24-cv-00140 — District Court, S.D. West Virginia

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00140
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. West Virginia
  • Filed
    20 de Mar, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    26 de Mayo, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Lolcow LLC, David Stebbins

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 54)

# Date Description Filing
51 26 de Mayo, 2026 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT as to 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA filed by David Stebbins in 4CCA Case Number 26-1398. (msa) PDF
50 26 de Mayo, 2026 4CCA JUDGMENT re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1398. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. (msa) PDF
49 26 de Mayo, 2026 4CCA OPINION re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1398. (msa) PDF
48 6 de Mayo, 2026 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL TRANSMITTED TO 4CCA re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case Number 26-1556. (ts) PDF
47 6 de Mayo, 2026 ORDER OF 4CCA as to 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1556. The court grants leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (cmb) PDF

In re: David Stebbins 26-1398 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-1398
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Filed
    6 de Abr, 2026
  • Terminated
    26 de Mayo, 2026
  • Last Filing
    9 de Jun, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 20)

# Date Description Filing
20 9 de Jun, 2026 BILL OF COSTS by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon. Date and method of service: 06/10/2026 ecf. [1001995048] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:04 PM] PDF
19 26 de Mayo, 2026 JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Petition denied. Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. Entered on Docket Date: 05/27/2026. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001985492] [26-1398] CH [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:11 AM] 1 2
18 26 de Mayo, 2026 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to dismiss appeal [15]; denying Motion to strike [14]; denying Motion to reconsider [10]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus [2] Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001985489] [26-1398] CH [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:09 AM] PDF
17 4 de Mayo, 2026 RESPONSE/ANSWER by David A. Stebbins to Motion to dismiss appeal [15]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001972939] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:58 AM] 1 2
16 29 de Abr, 2026 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to Motion to strike [14]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001971074] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:12 PM] PDF

David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon 26-1556 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-1556
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Filed
    4 de Mayo, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    7 de Jun, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, JOSHUA MOON, DAVID A. STEBBINS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 24)

# Date Description Filing
24 7 de Jun, 2026 SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon. [1001993253] . [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:03 PM] PDF
23 5 de Jun, 2026 INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by David A. Stebbins. [1001992183] [26-1556] David Stebbins [Entered: 06/06/2026 12:04 AM] PDF
22 28 de Mayo, 2026 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon. [1001987336] [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 05/29/2026 11:09 AM] PDF
21 28 de Mayo, 2026 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joshua Moon. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001987301] [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 05/29/2026 10:52 AM] PDF
20 28 de Mayo, 2026 RULE 46 NOTICE issued to Matthew Hardin for Joshua Moon for filing of disclosure form. Requested document due 06/15/2026. [1001987249] [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/29/2026 10:19 AM] PDF
Just for lulz of it have Hardin file for costs. Impossible to collect in any meaningful way. But would act as a discouragement Acerthornes ongoing rampant abuse of the courts.
"without prejudice"
That was regarding the ifp dismissal. But read the reast of it. If he pays up he quickly ends up dismissed because of his bullshit. That one will be with prejudice.

The really interesting thing here is the Judge was looking at not just the history of Acerthorne's bad faith bullshit that Hardin gave him up to April. But of all of the ongoing bullshit since then. This Judge is pissed.

The flaming Acerthorne response is going to be spectacular.
 
Última edición:
the judge even corrected stabbys wrong spelling of "doxXXxXXing" :story:
1738019430027.png
 
Minor typo from the judge here. I recommend Acerthorn make this the centerpiece of his upcoming appeal.

1738023583057.png

Otherwise, great ruling. Section 1A reads like a proper thread OP. This judge put in the work. :semperfidelis:
 
The really interesting thing here is the Judge was looking at not just the history of Acerthorne's bad faith bullshit that Hardin gave him up to April. But of all of the ongoing bullshit since then. This Judge is pissed.

One of Mr Stabby's biggest flaws is his lack of self, he's the smartest man in the world so his plans are obvious genius. He thinks all the judges will be just as lazy as he is so it never, ever even enters his mind that a judge (or clerk or likely) would actually do their job and check out the "facts" Stabby is laying in front of them.

We've seen in the past how he blatantly misquotes previous rulings to make his case look better when a full reading of the ruling is the exact opposite of what he wants to say. David just thinks the judges are too stupid to look up these things and just take everything he says at face value and boom insta win!

Really we know David has assburgers but damn....he sure has assburgers!
 
The flaming Acerthorne response is going to be spectacular.
The judge already went into 2 full pages arguing against what he knows comes next: a garbage complaint about biased judges.

1738025511871.png

The next judge up can just take this section and copy/paste it in his order denying the motion to remove. Very considerate of this judge to conserve judicial resources like that, and spare his colleagues some wasted time.
 
The judge already went into 2 full pages arguing against what he knows comes next: a garbage complaint about biased judges.

Ver archivo adjunto 6912014

The next judge up can just take this section and copy/paste it in his order denying the motion to remove. Very considerate of this judge to conserve judicial resources like that, and spare his colleagues some wasted time.
Stebbins has become so predictable in his lolsuits that this was bound to happen. I hope this gets accepted and can be used against him constantly
 
As much as the lull in the case had many people wondering when we might get action again, the wait was worth it to see the latest documents. These decisions were crafted in a way to minimize the likelihood they will be overturned on appeal.

I certainly hope this means the end of this case is near; Godbear knows Dear Leader deserves this one to be dismissed quickly given how slowly the Greer case has proceeded.
 
Última edición:
Put a fork in this Turkey, he's cooked. 30 fucking pages with the Judge bringing up all of Stebbins' greatest hits. Stabby really pissed off the magistrate. Never mind IFP, he all but said if Stebbins proceeds after paying the fees he's just going to dismiss the case anyway.

Must be some intense gobbling down in Arkansas tonight.
 
Imagine if this judge was presiding over the Greer case, it would have been over years ago.
 
Not saying I called it, but when the judge told both Stabby and Hardin off for "inflammatory language" I had a strong suspicion that this was the kind of case where you sit back and let Acerthorn dig his own grave. Judge will be happy to play undertaker if you let him.

Also, I feel like it has to be a notable event when the court files something that's more pages than the thread on the lawsuit. Do we pop a cork for this, or is something else more appropriate?
 
That was a nice read. Any chance of getting him declared vexatious while we're at it?

That's up to Jersh, if he wants to pay Hardin the extra kiwi bucks to file it and fight whatever objections Mr Stabby throws up.

Also we have to wait for the real judge to rule on this, right now this is just the magistrates recommendations and not a final ruling. For all we know the judge could pull a Greer and rule that Jersh is the devil himself and owes Acerthorn 1 gazillion dollars..

Hopefully once the judge rubber stamps this recommendation then Jersh will allow Hardin to go after Stabby as a example to other retards thinking of wasting his time with stupid lawsuits.

Do it Jersh...you know you wanna.
 
I love how, even if Stabby pays to keep the case going, Hardin can quote the Magistrate himself saying that this is an abuse of copyright and clearly being done to silence critics. Even if someone like Dong Gone throws some bucks at him to get the case started, the Magistrate already decided that this case is bullshit.
I don't know how the day to day of judges goes. What could have happened for the Magistrate who initially thought there was no need to look into Stabby's past litigation to suddenly go "actually I changed my mind, I was wrong, and now I AM PISSED."? I just imagine that when judges decide some procedural issue they don't waste time looking it over again next time they open the case files, so I assume something must have casually caught his attention that made him reconsider.
After this gets thrown out I really recommend paying Hardin to get a vex lit slapped on Mr Stabby.
I recall Null explicitly saying on MATI that they will do exactly that. So, unless he changed his mind, expect it.
You could read the document, I know that's not fun though.
Yes, it is. I for one enjoyed every page.
 
It's an impressive feat for the majority of the citations in a ruling to be for cases in which you were involved which are not the present case.

The judge already went into 2 full pages arguing against what he knows comes next: a garbage complaint about biased judges.

Ver archivo adjunto 6912014

The next judge up can just take this section and copy/paste it in his order denying the motion to remove. Very considerate of this judge to conserve judicial resources like that, and spare his colleagues some wasted time.
That's the amazing thing. The Magistrate laid it all out there. Citing Stabbins prior cases and the rulings from them. It's Beautiful. I think the District Judge will read this and understand exactly what he is looking at. The appeals court aint never touching this trashfire.

Acerthorne's response by lunchtime tomorrow will be Thermonuclear. I think we may see his best work yet. Pure Flaming Incandescent Rage visible from space.
 
I don't know how the day to day of judges goes. What could have happened for the Magistrate who initially thought there was no need to look into Stabby's past litigation to suddenly go "actually I changed my mind, I was wrong, and now I AM PISSED."? I just imagine that when judges decide some procedural issue they don't waste time looking it over again next time they open the case files, so I assume something must have casually caught his attention that made him reconsider.
the judge went into that, stabby got impatient when the case was stayed and began bothering his clerk and as we know ultimately filed for mandamus. perfect way to get in a judges good graces if you ask me i cant see how that would backfire at all
 
What could have happened for the Magistrate who initially thought there was no need to look into Stabby's past litigation to suddenly go "actually I changed my mind, I was wrong, and now I AM PISSED."? I just imagine that when judges decide some procedural issue they don't waste time looking it over again next time they open the case files, so I assume something must have casually caught his attention that made him reconsider.
Stebbins started threatening the District Judge's clerk and the Magistrate Judge, while also complaining to everyone in the court system including in the appellate courts. He also recorded his threats, which the court didn't like for multiple reasons. Frankly, the Magistrate's response is tame considering that.
Screenshot 2025-01-28 151604.png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 151736.png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 151853.png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 151919.png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 152004.png
 
Atrás
Top Abajo