Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

We missed a great opportunity to use covid as a way to purge society of all the worthless and useless boomers and perpetually sick people out there. Should have let it spread freely and quickly throughout the world like some kind of darwinism. Instead we all ruined our societies and economies to make sure some boomer with diabetes didn't die too early.
 
There are rumours that Biden could send a blanket pardon for fauci and others.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c23v824g4v3o / https://archive.ph/R4vi0
Remember, a pardon also means you can't refuse to testify against others, as you no longer have a 5th amendment protection against incriminating yourself - you can't be prosecuted, so you have nothing to fear.

That's not the intent here, this isn't a 4d play to take down Fauci, but accepting the pardon would open him up to being compelled in court to speak on all the shit that happened in pursuit of prosecuting others.
 
We missed a great opportunity to use covid as a way to purge society of all the worthless and useless boomers and perpetually sick people out there. Should have let it spread freely and quickly throughout the world like some kind of darwinism. Instead we all ruined our societies and economies to make sure some boomer with diabetes didn't die too early.

It wasn't that potent. I have had worse bouts of food poisoning than covid. Hell, when I first got Covid I was still able to smoke a few joints a night and I was never vaccinated.
 
It wasn't that potent. I have had worse bouts of food poisoning than covid. Hell, when I first got Covid I was still able to smoke a few joints a night and I was never vaccinated.
If you were mixing your weed with tobacco you probably did yourself a favour. France, which has one of highest rates of regular smokers also had a fairly low incident rate of coof among smokers.

In Wales,patients deemed to be "seriously ill" with coof (fucking lol) were given nicotine patches. More than anything I suspect it calmed them the fuck down as those most "seriously ill" were whipped into histrionics by the media.
 
If you were mixing your weed with tobacco you probably did yourself a favour. France, which has one of highest rates of regular smokers also had a fairly low incident rate of coof among smokers.

In Wales,patients deemed to be "seriously ill" with coof (fucking lol) were given nicotine patches. More than anything I suspect it calmed them the fuck down as those most "seriously ill" were whipped into histrionics by the media.

I beleive my snus-use kept the covid very mild in my case (aside from me being somewhat fit and healthy), it was 2 days of mild fever, followed by a three day hangover because I was also drinking heavily and smoking weed, I get bored easily if I can't work.
What is funny is that my jabbed significant other has had covid 4 times now, but I only got it once, no jabs.
 
Medical related stuff of this naure should NEVER even have an option to hide it.
Yup. Informed consent should always supercede corporate interests, regardless of reason. We have legal protections in place for disclosed information for just such a reason. If you're worried about production information or secrets being involved, should have patented that shit like everything else. All the rest is information that's both extremely important to patients and investors. Sure, dave cares that it won't kill him 99.999% of the time, but investors care a lot more that their wealth vehicle wont' crash when it fucks up 10% of the patients instead of 0.001%.

Huge failure of the Warp Speed stuff to not establish that in return for the huge handwaves and funding, shits all public.
 
Or am I horribly misreading your posts? Please for the love of almighty God tell me it's the latter.
if you search his posts in the first covid thread, his timeline for TOTAL VAX DEATH was around october of 2024, so technically if he was accurate those parents should have already been so dead by now that they're literally worm food and the kid itself shouldn't have been born.

Not only that the supposed death toll was supposed to reach double digits this year (3 years post vax) and of course has not. it hasn't even reached .1% much less 20% which means covid isn't as quick of a killer as GRIDS despite that being all the rage to say 3 years ago.
UK.gov changed the methodology to determine what counts as an excess death and suddenly the growing wave of deaths disappeared. It wouldn't surprise me if other countries did the same thing.
the fact that the number is small enough that they could do that is more telling. like if a state in the us suddenly had double the amount of people die in a year it would have been well reported despite that really only leading to a 2% of people who got vaxxed dying. over a 3 year span. hell even a 25% increased in the amount dead in the us would be hard to hide, and with trump in office the journos would have even more reason to report it in the next 4 years yet again they won't because the data isn't there.

say what you will about the feds in the us, them and the state governments and counties have enough people autistic enough to demand accurate numbers somewhere in the country that if say a small town in ohio suddenly had 5% of their people drop dead in a year it would have been found and caught by now.

i remember when i started this account people called me a troll in this very thread for pointing it out but the numbers don't even really show a .09% increase in mortality, just in general not in excess.
 
the fact that the number is small enough that they could do that is more telling.
It isn't small, though. The new method reduces the excess death rate by between 200 and 600 deaths per week, which flips most of the period of Q1 2018 to Q4 2019 from a positive to a negative rate. It diverges significantly during the post-covid period at the point where these vaccines were being introduced and again reduces the death rate by between 300 and 900 deaths per week, which once again flips the rate from positive to negative in many cases. The total excess deaths in 2023 is reduced from approximately 31,000 to just over 10,000 by these changes. 20,000 deaths redefined as "normal" by statistical magic. If they're willing to manipulate the excess death rate to that extent, there's absolutely no reliable. Redefining up to 900 deaths per week from being unexpected to being "normal" is a significant change and the fact that this new methodology was introduced just as excess deaths were ramping up after the introduction of the mRNA treatments is one hell of a coincidence.
 
Redefining up to 900 deaths per week
don't know much about the uk but sure lets assume there are 50k more people dead this year and they changed the definition so the media doesn't consider it excess but rather normal death, considering the uk probably has about a million people die every year thats only a 5% more mortality compared to what's "normal" and thats not factoring in crime skyrocketing or NHS services becoming much more shit or the muzzies entering the country with terminal illnesses. And thats if every week 890 people are "excess" deaths from the vax. You can look at the start of this thread, no one was saying the vax will kill 5% of people 3 years from now. you're off by a factor of 10, and thats if its been at the theoretical max instead of averaging 450 per week or even 180
 
It isn't small, though. The new method reduces the excess death rate by between 200 and 600 deaths per week, which flips most of the period of Q1 2018 to Q4 2019 from a positive to a negative rate. It diverges significantly during the post-covid period at the point where these vaccines were being introduced and again reduces the death rate by between 300 and 900 deaths per week, which once again flips the rate from positive to negative in many cases. The total excess deaths in 2023 is reduced from approximately 31,000 to just over 10,000 by these changes. 20,000 deaths redefined as "normal" by statistical magic. If they're willing to manipulate the excess death rate to that extent, there's absolutely no reliable. Redefining up to 900 deaths per week from being unexpected to being "normal" is a significant change and the fact that this new methodology was introduced just as excess deaths were ramping up after the introduction of the mRNA treatments is one hell of a coincidence.
Thanks for reminding me about this, I had forgotten they had to "normalize" the new death rates so people aren't informed terrified confused by misinformation. One of many gigantic cons pulled on humanity.
 
IMG_9821.jpeg
Check your crawl spaces, friends.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo