2024 U.S. Presidential and State election thread - I'm gonna... I'm gonna... VOOT!!! I'm VOOOOOTING!!!

Who are you voting for?


  • Total de votantes
    3,694
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
If Kamala had shown the public this side of her on the campaign trail, she would have gotten a ton more votes. Even the wine glass is a normie thing. Thank god she acted like a maniacal robot instead.
You're fooled by propaganda. This is not a candid photo. Her nieces are all braided and one of them has a Harris-Walz shirt. Kamala has a face plastered with makeup, even though it's meant to be a "look, we just woke up," and is wearing her hoodie from her DEI alma mater. The game is brand new and they're not even properly playing.

It's all fake—Kamala will always be a fake person because the only real personality she has is being a drunkard and a whore.
 
In washed-up bitch news, Kamala’s sister uploaded these pictures of Kamala playing games after losing. They didn’t hide the wine glass properly, though.

Ver archivo adjunto 6634210Ver archivo adjunto 6634212
Want to see reddits response to that. BTW that account, seems to only post Kamala posts. Will try to remember to check at the end of the month if they're still posting.
https://old.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1gnqhx1/vice_president_kamala_harris_plays_connect_four/ | https://archive.ph/Hl21h
even horny posting (gross)
Screenshot_20241111_123005.jpeg

this cannot be real, nearly 70K upvotes and approx 30k downvotes, 5.7k readers on /r/pics
Screenshot_20241111_123643-1.jpeg
 
If Trump was serious he would fully nationalize the Federal Reserve
Trump thinks the economy is doing good if the stock market goes up. He's not going to prioritize deep cuts on monetary policy and structural credit markets, because he doesn't know how important it is.

The good news is he has more Fed-haters on board this time around, hopefully more if Elon does manage to drag Ron Paul on board.
 
The pick for UN Ambassador was always going to be pozzed. You can't expect Trump to put Alex Jones or something there. It's a globohomo institution.
If I was president, I would intentionally pick someone like Jersh as UN Ambassador to show them how little I care. Fidel Castro was a filthy communist, but I have serious respect for the way he showed open contempt for the UN.
 
Kamala and other SJWs have already supported a President who was a convicted felon. And bombing schools is a little more serious than recording a lawyer's fees as legal expenses.

Ver archivo adjunto 6634163
Look up "Necklacing" if you want to be supremely annoyed for the rest of your life whenever the left tries to use Mandela and his family as example of "le good negro fighting le good fite."
 
Nothing will change, all political parties are sides of the same non-euclidean shekel. Never have I seen an attractive man wasting his time with politics.
In the name of Jesus Christ, I rebuke thee fedposter. Son of Fatpacks, shame of his mother, Meatoid is cast into the crystal. Begone from me, and attempt to demoralize no more. I renounce you, and in the name of the Mother, I command thee to hang thyself with your Langley nametag lanyard.
 
I wish someone would explain to me why "tariffs aren't going to work" besides using the canard that "that's not how tariffs work".
You'd have to ask someone who does know they'll work to play devil's advocate and explain the other side's position. Unfortunately all the talking points going out to the left about why Tariffs are horribad for the US Economy are written in Mandarin.
 
Necklacing is a proud tradition to make thiefs respect your stuff and to keep withes from trying to make your british broadcast channel from dissapearing.
 
The Uniparty and globalist bankers will sabotage it is why, to make Trump look bad and remain in control.
This is the real answer. Someone must have pointed out to Elon, Vivek, and Trump that the UK Government was taken down not too long ago by their version of the fed intentionally crashing the economy in response to the government disobeying their unelected banker masters.

E: They will absolutely 100% do the same thing to them in the US in 2025. They're SALAVATING at the idea of doing so, because they can pin every economic sin since 2008 on him and walk away claiming to be financial experts that absolutely must be obeyed during the reconstruction in 2030. You will own nothing and be happy.
 
How are everyone's old people faring?

My old person has been an MSNBC addict for years, and especially this election season. He fully believed that Trump was going to be paraded off in chains to go to prison forever any day now, and obviously Kamala Harris is the most loved canidate ever. He was shocked after the election because he thought Harris had it in the bag- the TV people said so.

I heard him talking today about how he feels betrayed by MSNBC because obviously their reporting wasn't very accurate- but he doesn't know what other news channel he could watch instead. FOX is the devil incarnate, obviously, and he similarly thinks CNN just isn't very reliable. And obviously, "Don't watch 6 hours of TV news daily" just isn't on the table.
 
I wish someone would explain to me why "tariffs aren't going to work" besides using the canard that "that's not how tariffs work".
It's received wisdom from about 50 years of studying the Great Depression and the decades before it. TL;DR the free-trade guys make plausible, mathematical claims that tariffs just make things more expensive for consumers, or cause outright recession/depression.

There's 2 problems with this idea. First, the free marketeers get a lot of the cost reduction in their data from one-time production shifts, like outsourcing to China. Second, they don't model such structural changes or constraints. Leading to conclusions such as:

You can't put a tariff on something that isn't made in the US and hasn't had the supply chain to be made in the US in 40 years and expect it to do anything other than raise prices.

In a static model, this is true. But the point this time around is to change this structure outright. Trump wants to force production back into the US, something he ran on in 2016, and doubled down on after 2020's Covid supply chain problems.

I won't do a whole rant on globalization, but the 60s-80s globalization wave wasn't just driven by cheap overseas labor. It was driven by the standardized shipping revolution, cheap oil (after the 70s crunch), and other innovations that made transportation dirt cheap. Decades later, oil isn't cheap, the labor costs shot up, and transportation now has security and quarantine risks. We may be at the point where overseas advantages can't overcome the costs of tariffs, because all its profit boosters have been normalized out.

Of course production won't move back to the US if we can't ramp it up any more. Building new factories is stupidly expensive and regulated, new power plants even more so. The population has been sending half its kids to college for decades, telling them they're too good for blue collar work. Real estate and land prices are still sky high, thanks to QE and inflation. Internal transportation networks are OK, but need upgrading if any serious volume is to be pushed through them. All of that has to be overcome at the same time, and cheaply enough that the simple math of it all winds up cheaper than whatever tariff Trump slaps on overseas products.

It's a huge task, with a lot of complicated regulatory fixes and logistics upgrades needed. I don't know that Trump can pull all that off, but he can at least get things moving in that direction. The real danger will be in 4 years, if someone else removes tariffs and kneecaps the whole process during its multi-year ramp up.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo