💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Here's Nick saying he has a letter from the district attorney saying there is no victims in this crime. He hopes to use that letter to get the neglect charges dropped.
He goes on to say people conspired to tell lies to the preacher to have him relay those lies to the cops. Says he 'has recordings of the people conspiring to tell the lies to the preacher' from discovery and he gets to use them to defend himself not just in court but also in public.
Framed.mp4
I don't see why he wouldn't release these now that he has disclosed this evidence short of releasing the original material. He knows the witness list (including the people the preacher mentioned) and the accusations they told the preacher are out there.

Would these witnesses get called at trial?
I get that the muppet is that one fat faggot's pfp on X... but can I get a tldr on wtf he's doing here? He looks like a retarded psycho. Pic related.
Kanye-Alex-Jones-Benjamin.jpg
 
Última edición por un moderador:
[referencing April Imholt] Some Fag: "She has two little cupholders at home."

Melton and his freak friends should all be crucified or burned alive or something.
It becomes abundantly clear the more this guy speaks that Nick's interest in this guy revolves around the way in which he sexually harasses children. I find it harder and harder to set out a reasoning as to why Nick is buddy buddy with this guy, that isn't "Nick is glad there's someone to sexually harass Aaron's kids on his behalf, saving Nick the liability."

Nick, Melton and his little posse all belong behind bars. If they're not I believe there's a chance there will be a victim of physical sexual abuse if there is not already. Where's the line on what they won't do? If they're willing say sexually harassing things about kids, how long before it's sexually harassing actions.
 
I'm gonna guess they'll claim that the Safe Belonged to Aaron and that he left without giving over the passcode, the coke in the safe and the coke being used outside the safe were completely unrelated and completely coincidental. It's desperate but it's a way of kicking down the amount seized substantially. Of course this won't work if Nick purchased it and it's in his bank records.
Nah, I'm betting the safe was open.
Here's Nick saying he has a letter from the district attorney saying there is no victims in this crime
That is from the request to stream the omnibus. Nick claimed there were pedos from KF farms trying to see his kids. The prosecutor said there were no victims and the children were unlikely to testify. The prosecutor is correct.
 
Here's Nick saying he has a letter from the district attorney saying there is no victims in this crime. He hopes to use that letter to get the neglect charges dropped.
He goes on to say people conspired to tell lies to the preacher to have him relay those lies to the cops. Says he 'has recordings of the people conspiring to tell the lies to the preacher' from discovery and he gets to use them to defend himself not just in court but also in public.
Framed.mp4
I don't see why he wouldn't release these now that he has disclosed this evidence short of releasing the original material. He knows the witness list (including the people the preacher mentioned) and the accusations they told the preacher are out there.

Would these witnesses get called at trial?
Just a wild guess: The witnesses “conspiring” is an email from someone sharing their concerns about the kids, with someone else and discussing whether they should bring it up with the priest first, or call children’s services directly.
 
Nah, I'm betting the safe was open.
It obviously was. Nick is not the kind of cokehead who wants to type in a passkey or spin a combination any time he wants to do a line.

You may wonder why someone like Nick would even bother to have a safe to protect his valuables but then his valuables are something he needs to snort every couple minutes.
 
That is from the request to stream the omnibus. Nick claimed there were pedos from KF farms trying to see his kids. The prosecutor said there were no victims and the children were unlikely to testify. The prosecutor is correct.
Does that mean they're dropping the endangerment charge or he is misreading the 'no victims' part.
 
>”anyone have any other questions for Nick?”
>”wait I don’t want to leave, I want to stay and diss on Aaron with my friends!”

Nick, you pathetic retard, they aren’t your friends. They’re using you for content against Aaron.
Imagine being farmed for content by retarded pedos while under the influence. How embarrassing.
 
Does that mean they're dropping the endangerment charge or he is misreading the 'no victims' part.
The particular charge against Nick is not a crime that has actual victims. The complainant is the state itself. So in standard Technikieta style, there are no actual victims. He hasn't been charged with a crime that requires a victim. So since actually having a victim isn't an element of any criminal count against him, he can claim not to have any victims of his crimes, even though people of normal intelligence obviously can understand that he actually does have victims. His entire family.
 
Does that mean they're dropping the endangerment charge or he is misreading the 'no victims' part.

It just means this retarded non-practicing lawyer didn't have enough firing synapses left to read that letter in the context for which it was intended, namely to point out in response to @Null's motion that there was no personal "victim" likely to testify in livestreamed proceedings because the specific statute under which he was charged is one of strict liability, whereby the mere fact of drugs being in the vicinity of children is itself a criminal act even if none of them were harmed, i.e. even if there exists no personal "victim":

NoPersonalVictim.jpg


IIRC he crowed on xitter that day too about how that letter was one of two pieces of great news for him that day, when in reality the state admitted nothing new and merely acknowledged the nature of the offense charged at the time. But nobody tell him that, because watching his big-brained motions waving around that letter all getting DENIED DENIED DENIED would be too funny.

Edit: ninja'd, oh well
 
Última edición:
It becomes abundantly clear the more this guy speaks that Nick's interest in this guy revolves around the way in which he sexually harasses children. I find it harder and harder to set out a reasoning as to why Nick is buddy buddy with this guy, that isn't "Nick is glad there's someone to sexually harass Aaron's kids on his behalf, saving Nick the liability."

Nick, Melton and his little posse all belong behind bars. If they're not I believe there's a chance there will be a victim of physical sexual abuse if there is not already. Where's the line on what they won't do? If they're willing say sexually harassing things about kids, how long before it's sexually harassing actions.
The way he very clearly got giddy about the prospect of the kids finding out what he was saying about them when the mom and stepdad were in contact with him is disgusting. He clearly gets off on the idea of the child knowing he's saying this shit about her. I can only hope he's stupid enough to say something in the future that gets his computers seized and searched.
 
I will say one of the most impressive things Nick has ever done was making Aaron imholte look like the good guy. Like he has inadvertently confirmed a dozen crazy things I thought Aaron was lying about to begin with and he found a guy who hates Aaron more than him who also won't stop thirst posting about how much he wants to molest his daughters.

Aaron imholte is a swinging gay cuckold and he's somehow the most sympathetic and trustworthy guy In this entire fiasco? I have no clue how you pull that off, it's genuinely mesmerizing.
The thing with Aaron is that he has this entire universe of the gayest retard faggot a-logs who make him out to be the worst guy ever, when he’s like a pathetic cuckold at worst, and by far the most likable in the “Qover”. Like they are legit obsessed with him and it’s part of this entire little gay ecosystem that the Farms had no idea existed until the metaphorical rock was flipped over when Rekieta got involved.
 
You forgot to add the official seal of approval that renders all of this admissible evidence against him pursuant to established Minnesota court precedent:

Ver archivo adjunto 6624128

I thought it was only admissible if it wasn't edited, but here it is for the lols:


Also, here's a clip with April Law claiming April Anderson is fake (this isn't the case):



At this point any account associated with April is suspect in terms of information they provide which so far has been just a mix of pity parties, self-affirmation, attention whoring, and confirming a lot of what is already known. If April does go live it will be interesting to see her try and articulate her thoughts in real time.

There is at least some evidence pertaining to what Aaron has said (snow angel pics, a revenge porn arrest, and the entire case against April and the Rekietas). So far there's just a promise that Nick has recordings proving his innocence, that he has been hoarding recordings against Aaron, and waaaaay too much fixation on Aaron's penis because apparently that is what is most important to Nick. I would be interested to know how involved Kayla was in Nick obtaining whatever recordings he has pertaining to Aaron though.

While April and Nick confirming parts of Aaron's story is interesting, they will need to provide receipts for whatever it is they have to say to the contrary or spin it in their favor. Until that happens, any April account is just kind of noisy and Nick isn't much better.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo