- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2022
The government (local police) literally didn't watch Nick's video, they only watched Backwards Internet's re-upload of Nicks video! It's a travesty!
My God he thinks his fans are stupid.
💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.
- Iniciador del tema Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
My God he thinks his fans are stupid.
- Registrado
- 26 de Nov, 2016
Well, well, well, Skelly.
Looks like you got caught in yet another lie.
Lying liar that lies.
I made this.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 12 de Dic, 2022
The first screenshot of the alleged Rekieta tweet was posted at 5:01 AM UTC.I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:
Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive
Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though. And it seems no one had time to properly archive the original nuked tweet.
EDIT:
• Another user ("sneeddaywilliam") showing the tweet with his phone UI | Archive
The second screenshot was posted at 4:59 AM UTC and has a "edited at" time for Rekieta's tweet of 12:51 AM (likely EDT, as this would mean Rekieta last edited it at 4:51 AM UTC, or 11:51 PM local time).
The user who posted the first screenshot also posted a reply to a Rekieta tweet at 4:54 AM UTC. However, the tweet from Rekieta he was responding to has been deleted. There is also a similar reply to a deleted Rekieta tweet with a time of 4:51 AM UTC which likely corresponds to the 1 reply visible in the first screenshot.
This satisfies me that the screenshots are legitimate.
- Registrado
- 19 de Jun, 2024
I can confirm saw this notification for this tweet too.
I thought I was going mad as soon as I clicked on it.
What a fucking idiot.
200MB
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 27 de Ene, 2023
Something about her face looks wrong no matter what angle you view it from. Makes me think of the way HP Lovecraft would describe unnatural alien geometry in some of his stories.
- Registrado
- 31 de Jul, 2021
Nick thinks everyone but him is a retard that he can play this game of vagueness with and just rewrite his statement. He seems to think that he can just use implications to create complete plausible deniability that people are compelled to fall for. But he needs to realize something, life isn't a courtroom, this kind of stuff works a lot worse irl than in court.
- Registrado
- 28 de Mayo, 2024
If this is Nick holding back I can't wait to see him unshackled either
This has potential to surpass the coke stream
Melty Butter
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
No idea, Nick. Why would anyone have the audacity to ask this question? How did your own daughter test positive? WTAF with this man.
Really bad makeup. It makes her look older.
BigPeanut
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 10 de Ago, 2024
Wow this is next level pathetic and that’s saying a lot coming from cucked balldo. This is one hundred percent proof he’s drinking and doing drugs again. He was feeling confident as fuck saying all that shit under 24 hours ago, and now he’s so fucking scared about it that he’s blaming it on Iranian super hackers. PATHETIC!
- Registrado
- 22 de Sep, 2021
Nick would never do Galaxy Gas, he understands it’s too potent for the likes of him and he would not be able to handle it. Plus, his parents would disapprove, and the more sober commentators here and in the lawtube realm would be shocked and scandalized if he did. And he’s a cuck, ergo, he would never.
- Registrado
- 12 de Dic, 2022
So what you're really saying is that it's perfect for Nick.
- Registrado
- 13 de Jul, 2017
One of the theories concerning the Cokestream is that he only deleted it from Youtube and Rumble hours later because April or Kayla (most likely Kayla, since April was in the room "participating") threw an absolute fit (and for good reason). Some people think that's also how he got the black eye inbetween the time of the Cokestream, and when his mugshot was taken.
I like to believe somebody clocked him for fucking up epically.
Yeah, I agree with this. He's gonna plead, and we have his parents to thank for that.
But I also think...
...we're in for years of him crying that he only plead because of that damn dirty government.
He's gonna frame himself forever as the victim here. He's not sorry for what he did. He doesn't even think what he did should be illegal. He's only technically guilty, and the government screwed him.
They are.
Unfortunately for him, there's not many of them left.
Nick lied.
Sean died...
...of laughter.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 10 de Oct, 2014
Nick should have used the Iranian super hacker defense, that explains the checkmark away.
- Registrado
- 7 de Oct, 2020
- Registrado
- 30 de Dic, 2019
Is this motherfucker still trying to claim that because they watched a reupload by Cog, with no commentary and editing, they "didn't watch my video?"
- Registrado
- 6 de Feb, 2023
Now, of course the simplest explanation is that Nick is a lying liar who lies, but I have a theory. Since Nick clearly seems to be on something, it’s possible he was also intoxicated when he was in that chat of Melton’s stream. It is then possible that he forgot he commented in the chat, so when he sees on either here or Xitter that people are posting about his chat comments he has a bout of crack paranoia and thinks someone hacked him, and attributes that to Sean because he’s fat and evil in Rekieta’s mind. April or Quayla then informs him he actually made those comments so he realizes he fucked up and deletes the xeet.People may disagree with me, but this crazy twitter spree seems like a thing someone does when fueled by cocaine paranoia.
Ver archivo adjunto 6550046
- Registrado
- 20 de Dic, 2019
Emily will never speak of Nick publicly. She actually knows what she's doing as an entertainer and knows her audience. She won't expose that to them, lest she raise any doubts about herself.
- Registrado
- 31 de Jul, 2021
He seems to be saying both "I never said I'd win the Franks motion" and "I totally should've won that Franks motion" at once. The brain holes have reached a point he's just back to back making incongruous statements. Pretty soon it'll be terminal and he'll be stuck saying things that don't make sense.
- Registrado
- 5 de Ago, 2020
To add on to this, assuming he is being gagged by some party; I think it is likely that this party does not monitor Crackets through the use of this thread. One, because his comments on different YouTube streams have been extensively documented here and, two, it seems his tweet was deleted before anyone here was able to archive it
Is it possible the monitoring party has unfettered access to his social media accounts and so can delete anything he posts at will? If so that would require organised and extensive monitoring which would lead me to think it’s the lawyers (though I have no idea what the legality of ‘controlling’ someone else’s social media would be, it seems like it’d be a bit be too sketchy to be legal)
In any case, I’m sure it would ruin Cracket’s day if his wrangler found out the ass he’s making of himself in YouTube Live chat comments, which I imagine would specifically be difficult for a wrangler to actively monitor