💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
I don't find this new matter of public record very interesting. In fact, it's quite annoying that Rekieta is this much of a faggot and is desperately trying to get anyone and everyone to believe his junkie lies and correct the record on everything. From his enabling parents, to already having been living in junkie LaLa Land for the past two years, he literally cannot cope with the fact that he is fucked. His alcy brain literally can't take it, and it would be funny if he wasn't such a cunt about it.
It's the cocaine. Do so much of that drug and eventually you will believe your own hype.
 
So the whole motion is based on the claim that "those people want to video tape my kids and will completely ignore the law that prohibits recording or broadcasting children testimony". (Kiwi Pedos want to see muh children :(:( :( :( )

And it took them 9 pages to make that argument.

It is perfectly clear that a remedy exists.
Allow recording and broadcasting only while no children are in the court room.

Like they did in the Karen Read trial.
 
Um, Nick? Now, I'm not some big shit fancy man lawyer, but "yur keedz" aren't witnesses in your criminal case. Unless you plan to call them, in which case I am developing new words to describe your utter uselessness as a human being. Toodles!
 
Is there any more information about the random pedo he referenced in his exhibit that supposedly claimed to be a member of the forum? Or is it more "I made it the fuck up".
He's basically hinging his entire argument off this fucking imbecile who I will crucify if I find out his username -- assuming he even has one or the person in this even sent this mail.

1723738206901-297fe9c9-72d7-4782-a37a-b0df6311d771_1.jpg 1723738206901-297fe9c9-72d7-4782-a37a-b0df6311d771_2.jpg
 
Why couldnt they just broadcast/record the court proceedings and censor/pause the recording if a child witness is called???

The court (AFAIK, not an expert) has broad power to mandate whatever they want with regard to how footage of the trial is recorded/streamed/released.
For example, in the case of the hearings related to the the Brian Kohberger case, the judge specifically instructed the cameras to not focus on the defendant for extended periods of time.

They absolutely could do something like what you suggest, Rackets and/or his lawyer are just being obtuse and not proffering that as a solution because he's a cockroach that has no principles. This motion isn't about the kids, it's about preserving Nicky's """"dignity"""" and ego.

edit: clarity
 
You can't make this up.

Nick Rekieta's lawyer argues that the live streaming of court proceedings that made Nick Rekieta hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars violates defendants' rights.

Ver archivo adjunto 6310599

This is next level hypocrisy.
Nick is just an opportunistic sociopath that will have whatever morals benefits him the most in that moment
 
He's basically hinging his entire argument off this fucking imbecile who I will crucify if I find out his username -- assuming he even has one or the person in this even sent this mail.

Ver archivo adjunto 6310594Ver archivo adjunto 6310595
I wouldnt't be shocked if a balldo guard or even Nick himself looked up random pedos in their states sex offender registry and impersonated the pedo in question to frame KF to actually make this argument.

But pedos are generally extremely low IQ so it's not out of the question some attention seeking ween retard would go out of their way to do this.
 
He's basically hinging his entire argument off this fucking imbecile who I will crucify if I find out his username -- assuming he even has one or the person in this even sent this mail.

Ver archivo adjunto 6310594Ver archivo adjunto 6310595
Boy that’s awfully legally articulate for a random DC pedo.

Very nice of him to put his full address in the header.

I’m not saying it’s 100% fake but I’d be way more convinced if they had DC postmarked mail to corroborate and not a random email.
 
Última edición:
I fully expect that Nick Rekieta will use Josh's most recent stream where he outlined his intent as proof why Josh should be ignored.

I hope this comes true because that would be funny.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo