💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
well now that KC started we will see and maybe be able to fact check or correlate to dates whatever Aaron says
 
What the fuck? Is Barnes on a narrative that this is all a retaliation against Nicks big advocacy against government corruption?
This is locals levels of retardness.
If the corrupt government wants to take out Nick for speaking out against them, they should have just let Nick drink and overdose himself to death or just possibly die in a domestic dispute. Taking away his guns and drugs just protects Nick.
 
The DOJ might have been involved? Lmao their audience makes Q Anon seem sane
Had Nick actually lived up to his potential as this promised RW legal media titan, then and only then, would the DoJ probably want to ruin him. The feds don't even care about zooted-out spergs walking around in renowned cities in the US.

Barnes's last recollection of Nick has to be from Depp, and he's on his populist grind thinking the feds must've sabotaged Nick and his wife with drugs as if they're the black community in the 80s, just to screw this right-wing legend from taking flight.
 
I think Aaron is someone who can provoke Nick so it's a great choice imo. I don't like any of them and won't be watching, but I will be waiting for a reaction.
Aaron is one of the few people who can remove Nick's defense of "you don't have the full story". Even though Aaron is an absolutely retarded cuckhold, Nick's at his mercy.
Oh, JFC! They're gonna make this a Q-Anon type thing, aren't they?

LOL.
TBH, it's the only rational explanation if Nick isn't a drunken, swingin' coke fiend.
 
I think I can for about 90-95% of it.
You must have some sort of special form of autism attuned to decoding skitzo. None of Nick's "jokes" make it through my bullshit filter.
I'll take my fucking tophats. I'll die on this hill. You fuck with kids, you get the bullet. You defend that behavior, you get the bullet. Do not pass go, do not collect $200, do not go to jail, you get a bullet and a shallow, unmarked grave.
You're a good cardboard box, box. Would hide in and pounce on people when they walk by/10
Her saving those Elissa Clips videos in her playlist? Maybe they upset her a lot more than we'd realized and she was beating on him for the embarrassing shit he was saying. This is really grim.
Interesting. I wonder if Nick can be observed on stream with facial injuries around the times of some of those clips.
 
That really shouldnt come in to play. I get that judges are people and that hearing Nick denigrate her on a live stream drunk would affect her personal view on Nick the person, but would it actually affect her decisions in court? That would be very fucked up.
As I've pointed out, this particular judge has in fact made some remarkably intemperate and imo outright improper comments about people like one of Nick's own clients. I generally have a higher regard for judges than a lot of people here, but they're human beings. If someone has viciously hurled vile slurs against you in public, you may try not to be prejudiced by it, or believe you aren't prejudiced by it, but unless you're some kind of inhuman robot, it will have an effect on how you think about and react to that person in the future.
 
As I've pointed out, this particular judge has in fact made some remarkably intemperate and imo outright improper comments about people like one of Nick's own clients. I generally have a higher regard for judges than a lot of people here, but they're human beings. If someone has viciously hurled vile slurs against you in public, you may try not to be prejudiced by it, or believe you aren't prejudiced by it, but unless you're some kind of inhuman robot, it will have an effect on how you think about and react to that person in the future.
yes exactly
she probably won't consciously think "hm this guy insulted me, i'll give him an extra year to get back at him, hehe!"
but it is unavoidable that his behavior will influence her impression of him, which in turn influences her decision making in the case, no doubt about it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo