Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
15 de Sep, 2020
Terminated
22 de Abr, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
6 de Ago, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 127)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
6 de Ago, 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
15 de Mayo, 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
28 de Abr, 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
25 de Abr, 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
19 de Mar, 2024
Terminated
10 de Jun, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
16 de Oct, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 155)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
16 de Oct, 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
15 de Oct, 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
Greer v. Moon
2:24-cv-00421— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:24-cv-00421
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
10 de Jun, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Plaintiff
Last Filing
21 de Jun, 2026
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 525)
#
Date
Description
Filing
486
21 de Jun, 2026
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
26 de Oct, 2021
Terminated
15 de Oct, 2023
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
15 de Jun, 2026
Recent Filings
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010756599
19 de Oct, 2022
[10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Russ's motion to reconsider and Hardin's response to that motion look like they were removed because they were both filed on a case that no longer existed, so neither docket entry technically existed. They were probably just cleaned up recently to reflect that.
tl;dr the Clerk probably deleted it after it was automatically added either by the electronic filing system or some lower level employee in the Clerk's department.
the docket that i posted previously is from florida. i didn't realize that the dockets would differ between the courts.
both greer's motion [#98] and hardin's opposition to his motion [#101] still appear on the utah docket:
i think that one of the most critical and important things Hardin may be trying to emphasize in his filings is not just that russ is a pro-se retard, but more that russ lacks respect for the court and the court system at all. russ has NEVER demonstrated a lick of respect for all of the general expectations and people involved in court proceedings. the court is nothing to him but an avenue get money or clout he consistently fails to get through the entertainment industry. it’s kind of amazing that russ has such high expectations of this institution to serve him and also has so little respect for all involved, including and especially judges. he may not be able to be declared a vexatious litigant, but Hardin is certainly working hard to lay down the groundwork for russ to be taken less and less seriously.
Couldn't help noticing that Hardin is bringing up the prostitution stuff harder now. Maybe he wants to prejudice the Christian female judge against shitlips.
Couldn't help noticing that Hardin is bringing up the prostitution stuff harder now. Maybe he wants to prejudice the Christian female judge against shitlips.
Russ accused the forum of all sorts of shitty and salacious stuff it hasn't done in his filings. Bringing up the shitty and salacious stuff Greer has ACTUALLY done is more then fair play. People in glasses houses and all that.
And phv is generally a formality unless opposed or the lawyer in question is specifically persona non grata in that jurisdiction, a very rare situation, and is generally granted nunc pro tunc (back to the time of the application), so when it is granted, the motions filed before it is granted are retroactively properly filed.
maybe Hardin is trying to head off the bad reputation of le ebil kiwi farms that seems to have made the 10th circuit retarded by pointing out that this guy is also a retard and is some creepy dude
I thought the venue motion was somewhat weak considering it was a case with years of history in that specific district to the point it had a remand on appeal, but Hardin has had a good sense of which battles to pick and even though arguably he should have lost this motion to even a marginally on-point response by Russhole, Russhole's utter failure to respond sealed the deal.
I believe he has a good sense for the case and the behavior of the parties.
Now the case is in a venue where not only isn't it bound by the idiotic Tenth Circuit precedent, the persuasive authority of which has been seriously undermined by legal scholars, but it is after a documented history of shenanigans by the vexatious litigant.
I'm really impressed with Hardin. After seeing the Melinda Scott thing, I read her thread and was really impressed with his skill and how he writes. I continue to be impressed with him in this case. He was a truly good find.
I'll even go so far as to say that Matthew Hardin is not fat, but I still won't have sex with him.
More importantly, Judge Cutie Patootie trad-MILF is in charge and I can't wait for her to crack the whip.
Hardin jumped on the chance to summarize and colour the views with that latest submission. Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield at its finest. Really, the more I read the more I like this guy. Hopefully he is enjoying the work, as there's gonna be a ton more.
Careful Kiwibros. Don't heap too much praise on Hardin at this point. Lolsuits have a disturbing habit of becoming major disappointments on this forum. As many of you here can attest.
As a Proud Supporter of the Legal Fund, I’m perfectly happy to have this case be eternally handed off as a hot potato between districts for the extraordinary cause of shitlips.
And not just back and forth, this thing needs to visit all 50 states and most of the territories.
Careful Kiwibros. Don't heap too much praise on Hardin at this point. Lolsuits have a disturbing habit of becoming major disappointments on this forum. As many of you here can attest.
Careful Kiwibros. Don't heap too much praise on Hardin at this point. Lolsuits have a disturbing habit of becoming major disappointments on this forum. As many of you here can attest.
Technically it says they can in extraordinary circumstances and what could be more extraordinary than some well oiled evil lawyer bullying a poor, disabled, legal prostitution enthusiast by doing their literal job in fighting the case forcing him to take part in the lawsuit he filed. *taps malformed head*
Response due April 3rd. He's probably going to wait until the last minute, then encounter a technical issue or unfamiliar process that means it takes longer to submit a response then he thought.
I'm hoping we see a repeat of the Utah case where Russ files a motion to stay instead of a proper response, causing based negro justice Clarice Thomas's nostrils to flare to so violently that the resulting sonic boom shatters windows as far as Union Station.
Careful Kiwibros. Don't heap too much praise on Hardin at this point. Lolsuits have a disturbing habit of becoming major disappointments on this forum. As many of you here can attest.
So far, Hardin has the distinct advantage that he is not screwing around like he is on some crusade or goofing around with us here. He's just representing his client and keeping it professional. If we start seeing Hardin T-shirts with some dumb-ass logo on them, I'll begin to worry.