🍗 Deathfat Margaret Pless / idlediletante / Stan - Official Kiwi Farms Advertiser and Enthusiast Who Has Proudly Eaten Ass. Now Posting Her Tits to Own the Troons!

I don't know if @m1ddl3m4rch is gay, but I do find it troublesome that @Stan is willing to use his possible sexuality against him. On the other side, @SSj_Ness clearly doesn't want an actual discussion with @Stan. He just wants to disparage all her beliefs in the hope she will tell him he's right about everything or leave.
I don't lose too much sleep over calling middlemarch out for being gay, since he's to date called me:
> a waste of my education
> an apostate of the Antichrist
> a terrible mother
> jokes about me being raped
> jokes about how I'm unfuckable (maybe to him, I suppose)
> says he'd laugh if my baby died

I mean, I guess I can be nicer to him, but I feel I'm just dishing out what I get from him.
 
The threadbans were unjust, and among other things the thread which should be documenting Marge's notable behavior and misadventures has turned to meta discussion on the feminist thread. But I suppose that meta discussion is now part of her notable behavior and misadventures.

Don’t shit up threads with your off topic bullshit
Neither my comments nor Ness's were off topic. Whether a fetus is considered life is central to the morality or immorality of abortion, which is a bedrock issue of feminism. If feminism and other excesses of liberal democracy lead a civilization to collapse within a hundred years because of the effects of anti-natalism and the demographic collapse of any people who entertain such folly, that is central and fundamental to the question of feminism. So are the adverse effects of single motherhood, another by product of feminism.
blames me for it
You have made at least two appeals to Null personally to create yet another DMZ, and have lamented this has not happened more times than one can count. The good news is that the thread has become an absolute shitshow, so I'd suggest you have been hoisted by your own petard because people are catching wind of you trying to do this.
Wait, I thought this was a marketplace of ideas, all creeds welcome. Now you're some endangered species of shitbirds whose nests I can't disturb? That's not very free speech of you.
e talking about feminism:
= NOT cool, REEE get out of our Kiwi Safespace!
This is comical. No one objects to you uttering your dumb, tiresome "comebacks," or any of other of your boilerplate arguments and contentions. I find them at once annoying and amusing, and I am pretty sure I am not alone in that. We do object to the conduct above, however, as this conduct puts you in no position to parrot talking points about a "marketplace of ideas." You have stated--countless times--that in this discussion thread about feminism, no anti-feminist position should be allowed. As @m1ddl3m4rch and others have stated, a discussion about something includes critique and even opposition to that thing. But you and a couple other notable users cannot handle it.
Am I entitled to my opinion here or not, shitbird? Because it's odd that suddenly when I start posting, you guys code-switch from "freedom of expression for everyone!" to "GTFO feminist"
See above, this is the most ridiculous characterization of what has transpired.
You don't have ideas. You brainlessly repeat whatever is socially approved in your circles, and as soon as it runs up against anything that so much smells like thinking, you have the usual woman reaction, which is to try and shame the person you're talking to into compliance, typically via asserting that your interlocuter is a bad person with a small penis.
With Marge and those of her ilk, it is not a discussion but a litany. One of her earlier posts, the one with a sub-heading "Patriarchy" is nothing other than boilerplate, repeated and regurgitated a million times over. It reminded me exactly of Chanty Binx trying to read her boilerplate of feminist, man-hating claptrap.
It is interesting that in her call to censor and threadban people she disagrees with, that she dismisses those opposed to her civilization destroying, "luxury beliefs" as "talking about their dicks" and engaging their "antifeminist hobbyhorses."
This is reflective of how bad critical thinking has deteriorated at the hands of cultural marxist indoctrination. Could you imagine someone uttering something like that in a Lincoln Douglas style debate or any serious discussion above the mentality of a teenager? As I pointed out in my last post in that thread, could you imagine race realists, instead of talking about differences among the races, or man's inherently and indelibly tribalistic nature, or any number of substantive concepts, someone simply quipped "you're just indulging your anti-racist hobbyhorses!" Or imagine a topic discussion whether Amtrak should be expanded or disbanded and someone replies to the "nay crowd" you're just "indulging in your anti-train (or pro-train) hobbyhorses.
Another users saying I fuck my dog, and also black people
Well, as a good progressive white woman you should have absolutely no compunction at all with the suggestion you fuck blacks. In the past you have certainly divulged intimate details about your sexual proclivities, despite the ethos of the Farms not to do so, and despite you have your own thread so that things like this are likely to be read by people you know or people in public. And no Marge, I take no prurient interest in that whatsoever.
 
I don't know if @m1ddl3m4rch is gay, but I do find it troublesome that @Stan is willing to use his possible sexuality against him. On the other side, @SSj_Ness clearly doesn't want an actual discussion with @Stan. He just wants to disparage all her beliefs in the hope she will tell him he's right about everything or leave.
I am gay. Like a good Christian, Marge has repeatedly ridiculed the difficulty in my having to square homosexuality with the Torah. She's no saint.
I don't lose too much sleep over calling middlemarch out for being gay, since he's to date called me:
> a waste of my education
> an apostate of the Antichrist
> a terrible mother
> jokes about me being raped
> jokes about how I'm unfuckable (maybe to him, I suppose)
> says he'd laugh if my baby died

I mean, I guess I can be nicer to him, but I feel I'm just dishing out what I get from him.
Conspicuously absent is her dishes it out column.

Are women at a superposition of "equal to men" and "special treatment"? You claim you're the equal to men when you're exchanging insults, then cry to mods for special protection because some of the insults were too far. Pathetic. Not strong enough for male discourse.
 
is nothing other than boilerplate, repeated and regurgitated a million times over. It reminded me exactly of Chanty Binx trying to read her boilerplate of feminist, man-hating claptrap.
God in Heaven your posts are way too fucking long.
I am gay. Like a good Christian, Marge has repeatedly ridiculed the difficulty in my having to square homosexuality with the Torah. She's no saint.
Yep because it's what makes you such a sad, venomous little thing.
Are women at a superposition of "equal to men" and "special treatment"? You claim you're the equal to men when you're exchanging insults, then cry to mods for special protection because some of the insults were too far. Pathetic. Not strong enough for male discourse.
Nope, I just want you out of the feminist thread because you're a tiresome faggot who doesn't understand big tent movements and keeps asking the same dumb questions.

And no Marge, I take no prurient interest in that whatsoever.
Oh please. You've only memorized anything I've ever written about my sex life, archived it here and to my profile page, and bring it up whenever you see a possible segue. Lonely old man.
 
@SSj_Ness clearly doesn't want an actual discussion with @Stan. He just wants to disparage all her beliefs in the hope she will tell him he's right about everything or leave.
If you're insinuating that I'm wrong then be my guest and step in on behalf of @Stan, it's apparent she can't do anything but make boring quips. God knows she needs the help.
 
Nope, I just want you out of the feminist thread because you're a tiresome faggot who doesn't understand big tent movements and keeps asking the same dumb questions.
Since its a big tent and such distinctions don't matter, I guess I'll support the Feminism of Erin Reed and Riley Dennis then. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
 
And you objected when I said you were arguing in bad faith. Shame on you.
I thought you were logging off, porky.
Screenshot_2023-10-20-18-16-07-1.png
Ratherd disrespectful to your supposed religion to break oaths like that.
 
could you imagine race realists, instead of talking about differences among the races, or man's inherently and indelibly tribalistic nature, or any number of substantive concepts, someone simply quipped "you're just indulging your anti-racist hobbyhorses
Don't pretend like these people don't exist too. Every movement has its hanger-ons. Just because feminism is one of the dominant ones means you more commonly run into its dumb followers, but there isn't an ideology or world view without those that are just there to drink tea and have a surrogate family or friends, for whom the ideology is purely tribal and not at all followed for its ideas or their merit.
Although this obviously isn't the case for @Stan, because she prefers to spend her time not with her own group, but with somewhere where she experiences herself as an outgroup. Which are either the actions of someone that is very experimental and non-conformist, or someone that has trouble belonging to any group at all. In that sense the name "idle dilettante" kind of makes sense because:

dilettante.png
So it's maybe not as much for a sense of belonging. I think more than anything she isn't used to getting much attention, which is also why she preferred to be doxed rather than have a new nameless/faceless account.

----

Also where is the feminism thread that @SSj_Ness got banned from?
 
Maggie has to write a novella to respond to posts because she is terrible at articulating any ideas.
You don't have ideas. You brainlessly repeat whatever is socially approved in your circles, and as soon as it runs up against anything that so much smells like thinking, you have the usual woman reaction, which is to try and shame the person you're talking to into compliance, typically via asserting that your interlocuter is a bad person with a small penis.
The twist with Maggie is that she’s been around the dissident right for years so she’ll argue like a brainlet from /pol where she’ll call you a faggot on one post and then a vinegar drinking scold with corporate approved talking points the next. It’s really weird and really funny, especially when she exhibits her /pol-tier knowledge of Judaism in the mix as well.
 
PS I believe @m1ddl3m4rch also repeatedly called me a dumb cunt during a theology discussion. So yeah. That lonely sad faggot deserves what I say to him. Something-something don't powerlevel on Kiwi Farms.

Also where is the feminism thread that @SSj_Ness got banned from?
GOD ANTON FUCK OFF
It's here. It's apparently not actually a "feminism discussion thread", and more of a "feminism hugbox".
I'll have one serving of the sour grapes please

What the fuck is this, a party of my detractors? No wonder pages and pages come up empty.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
What the fuck is this, a party of my detractors? No wonder pages and pages come up empty.
You instigate and argue in bad faith constantly but when people give you what they get from you, you sob about how it’s not fair and likely mash the report button for being meanie doodoo heads. This is not unique to Kiwi Farms, you’ve been pulling this shit for almost a decade which is why you have no choice but to slum it here, because Kiwi Farms is the internet’s refugee camp and no other place can stand you. You are the perfect blend of stupid, obnoxious, and insane.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo