💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Some memes from that shitshow.

1. Maybe


2. Rekieta Eye Roll


3. Not an alcoholic BTW


1. Fucking with Someone's Business.
CoomKieta says he doen't like people fucking with other people's business and Eric latches on that talking point.



2. Eric BUCK BREAKS COOMkieta. Eric says that Nick is lying and he's not objective and Nick goes full force. Nick tried so mimic Eric's accent at one point. Nick says July wants Nick to callout JuJuTheCow.


3. Nick makes it clear that he is being objective.


4. Nick tries to gotcha Eric on the Charity fraud. He plays dumb by failing to acknowledge that Eric gives discount to people who bulk buy. But Eric makes it pretty clear by the end.

Some comments I gathered that I found interesting:
1. I think this was made before the stream started or soon after the stream started.
Screenshot_40.jpeg

2. Don't know if this is a serious comment or a troll
Screenshot_41.jpeg

3. Some more banter in the comments.
Screenshot_42.jpeg

4. LOL
Screenshot_43.jpegScreenshot_44.jpeg


5. Most of the comments were pro Nick. But some were reasonable.
Screenshot_45.jpeg

6. Woman HATE
Screenshot_46.jpeg

7. I love Josh
ss1.jpeg

8. Vito wall all over the comments again.
ss2.jpeg

9. Average sentiment about Eric July:
ss4.jpeg

10: My favorite:
ss3.jpeg
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • maybe.mp4
    3.9 MB
Rackets vs. Eric July got a mention on the Council on Future Conflicts
Synopsis:
Just mentioned it happened, Scott tries to play the middle road, Sean probably knowing he would interact with Nick today on Hunley declines to comment, Joe Dolio takes a snipe by saying he likes how Nick tried to quash the drama by doing everything to extend the drama.
 
Última edición:
Rekieta also says showing up outside the business isn't trespassing if he didn't enter it.
So this "lawyer" is apparently unaware of the existence of property lines? And too retarded to know you aren't allowed to deface other people's property?
:story: Man you're right. I was only listening. He is rolling his eyes in absurdly comical ways while pretending to give him a fair hearing. Does he assume July doesn't realize that?
He's a gaslighting drunk fucking retard.
I can't stand that smarmy look on Rekieta's face when he thinks he's being clever with responses like "I don't know, did I?" when asked questions directly.
God what a punchable face. This "man" is such an absolutely insufferable faggot.
 
Man, I hate I went to bed early last night. I haven’t watched one of Nick’s streams in toto since… November? December? I don’t know how Nick will manage to look good coming out of this. He was either coming across as flamboyantly condescending or as some NPC.

Also, from now on, can we call Riley a “stank motherfucker”?

edit: I spell bad
 
Última edición:
This was truly embarrassing for Nick. I honestly felt a little bad for him. His drink-addled brain was moving at its maximum speed to try and generate a reasonable cope, but he completely failed. He was literally shaking and at points seemed to want to scream.
Lmao this faggot alky literally has the shakes like Nicolas Cage at the beginning of Leaving Las Vegas.
 
I'm finally getting caught up on the drama and I'm at the part where Nick seems entirely confused by the concept of a building having more than two sides to it. If this is a portent of things to come, this should be a funny watch.
 
Última edición:
Starts off with Nick explaining defamation (lol). Then proceeds into a semantics throwing fest about how it "isn't ruining someone's business if it's justified". Feat. shooting kids in the head.
rekietajuly (1).mp4
Nick is a massive weasel.

I'm not completely aware of the context, but I'm assuming they're talking about Dick going after Eric July in regards to the ISOM thing? If that's the case, way to be as retarded as Vaush Nick, because you're equating someone shooting kids in the head and gassing dogs to some guy who may have infringed on some random companies copy right. I'm sure most people can agree that violation of copy right, unless done exceptionally egregiously, is worthy of ruining a business over. What I mean by that is if you go into a small shop and they're selling knock off Sonic backpacks, most people won't care, but if some mega corp rips off a small business people will usually care more, though even in the latter it's usually about making it right to the small business that originally holds the copy right and not ruining the mega corp.

This clip just reminds me of this with how retarded Nick is being while an inarticulate black man is constantly catching him on his retardation:
 
I have to disagree. Between his twitchy eye and ongoing mid-life crisis I think he's doing a lot more than just too much booze.
Yeah, no way this is just too much booze for a few years. Alcohol will fuck you up over long periods of time, but even serious abusers can function normally for decades sometimes (until, well, they can’t). What else is going on here is anyone’s guess really.

Also, lmfao. Is Nick saying that if someone were to go walk around his property without permission it wouldn’t be trespassing because they didn’t go inside his house? I’ll be sure to let the US government know next time people feel like waltzing around Area 51.
 
Also, lmfao. Is Nick saying that if someone were to go walk around his property without permission it wouldn’t be trespassing because they didn’t go inside his house? I’ll be sure to let the US government know next time people feel like waltzing around Area 51.
It's like when a kid hovers his hand in another kids face and goes, "Neener-neener I'm not touching yoooou".
 
I'm halfway through and this reminds me so much of Patrick speaking with Man Ray in that Spongebob meme;
Rekieta is agreeing with virtually everything Eric is saying about Dick/Vito/Riley yet is still being confrontational and weaselly about it.

And yes absolutely, real friends will absolutely stop to tell me what I'm doing is gay and retarded and that should not only be welcomed but cherished in both friendships and relationships.
 
And yes absolutely, real friends will absolutely stop to tell me what I'm doing is gay and retarded and that should not only be welcomed but cherished in both friendships and relationships.
That's literally what real friends are for. Friends don't let friends go full retard.

Somehow, though, that's what "friends" like Diddler Dax do.
 
I'm not completely aware of the context, but I'm assuming they're talking about Dick going after Eric July in regards to the ISOM thing? If that's the case, way to be as retarded as Vaush Nick, because you're equating someone shooting kids in the head and gassing dogs to some guy who may have infringed on some random companies copy right.
I'm not up on the Eric July drama. Part of what they were talking about last night was Eric selling some of his comics where buy one, one gets sent to charity. This appears to be what the supposed 'fraud' was about.
 
I don't know if I can make it through the Rekieta/July VOD because the way Rekietas is handling this is so goddam infuriating. He keeps reverting back into a legal mindset (but he's never been a law channel, guys!) even after they both agree that Eric July isn't talking in that sense. Lame little weasel arguments like "well, technically there's a way he could get in without having to climb a fence!" or "you keep saying he didn't have any reason to be there in the middle of the night and I'm trying to understand why that's relevant!" At BEST they cast the tiniest sliver of doubt that these could be criminally prosecuted (plea deal Nick doing what he allegedly does best).

If your role is to suck on the udders of Juju the lolcow and protect him by throwing out faggy legal arguments, then own it. That's fine, you're a helicopter parent to your proverbial star child Dick and will guard him and his gaggle of retards, but stop playing this "I'm just trying to understand because the legal complexities of Texas criminal trespassing laws involved here are oh-so-fascinating to me and I want to help the audience understand (with my non-Law channel) how criminal courts would look at this special circumstance!"

Your friend is a piece of shit and you're siding with him because he's your friend. Say it with your chest, faggot.

EDIT: Holy shit, I unpaused after posting this and the first thing Nick asks is "do you need a reason to be somewhere in the US?" Go loiter at any place of business, especially one without any form of storefront and find out, you stupid sack of shit. What a dumb motherfucker.
 
Lame little weasel arguments like "well, technically there's a way he could get in without having to climb a fence!" or "you keep saying he didn't have any reason to be there in the middle of the night and I'm trying to understand why that's relevant!"
Incidentally the original common law definition of burglary included that it was at night. It isn't strictly speaking relevant where common law has been explicitly abrogated by statute, but it's definitely relevant to a jury. If someone is intruding on your property at night and you shoot them, you're much more likely to have a self-defense argument or even not be charged with anything.

Nick is just being deliberately obtuse because of what an absolute faggot he is.
 
I don't know if I can make it through the Rekieta/July VOD because the way Rekietas is handling this is so goddam infuriating. He keeps reverting back into a legal mindset (but he's never been a law channel, guys!) even after they both agree that Eric July isn't talking in that sense. Lame little weasel arguments like "well, technically there's a way he could get in without having to climb a fence!" or "you keep saying he didn't have any reason to be there in the middle of the night and I'm trying to understand why that's relevant!" At BEST they cast the tiniest sliver of doubt that these could be criminally prosecuted (plea deal Nick doing what he allegedly does best).

If your role is to suck on the udders of Juju the lolcow and protect him by throwing out faggy legal arguments, then own it. That's fine, you're a helicopter parent to your proverbial star child Dick and will guard him and his gaggle of retards, but stop playing this "I'm just trying to understand because the legal complexities of Texas criminal trespassing laws involved here are oh-so-fascinating to me and I want to help the audience understand (with my non-Law channel) how criminal courts would look at this special circumstance!"

Your friend is a piece of shit and you're siding with him because he's your friend. Say it with your chest, faggot.

EDIT: Holy shit, I unpaused after posting this and the first thing Nick asks is "do you need a reason to be somewhere in the US?" Go loiter at any place of business, especially one without any form of storefront and find out, you stupid sack of shit. What a dumb motherfucker.
This is exactly why I might not be able to make it through the whole thing. Eric is trying to have a conversation in the real world, and Nick is trying to have the conversation in the courtroom despite CONSTANT reaffirmations that the discussion is not meant to be in regards to the strict legality of the behavior. It's frustrating and while I don't know much about Eric I will say he has the patience of a saint because I'd have lost my cool by this point.

Same energy:
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo