- Registrado
- 25 de Dic, 2017
You too can be cucked by Dominicans for the low low lice of 2999.99!
Call now and we’ll throw in a free Crunchyroll subscriptions
💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.
- Iniciador del tema Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Call now and we’ll throw in a free Crunchyroll subscriptions
- Registrado
- 23 de Mar, 2022
- Registrado
- 8 de Jul, 2020
Can you put that on layaway?
- Registrado
- 5 de Sep, 2019
Thank you, these refreshed my memory. It looks like she had an upper blepharoplasty to remove saggy skin from her upper eyelids — the eyes are remarkably more open, and that doesn’t come naturally. Perhaps also buccal fat removal, a trendy but extremely ill-advised treatment. But the dead eyes are giving heroin chic. Those trouble me, not so much the weight loss.
A Cardboard Box
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 8 de Oct, 2019
Don't forget sucking little boy cocks. I have it on good authority that Nick sucks little boy cocks. To be perfectly clear: Nick Rakieta sexually abuses prepubescent male children by sucking on their penises.
- Registrado
- 5 de Sep, 2019
I’ve always said that if you want to see self-righteous people acting like absolute pieces of shit, look no further than nonprofits. But unlike elected officials and other political hangers-on, there are also a fair amount of decent people working for charities and doing meaningful work (often for pennies — gotta keep those overvalued Guidestar efficiency ratings ludicrously high!). James O’Keefe is in general on the side of the angels, but I’ve heard enough from trustworthy people close to the situation to lend a lot of credence to the fraud accusations.
Most people can justify falsification of expenses to themselves, whether they are sociopaths are not. O’Keefe isn’t special in this regard. But he’s also not such a rock star that anyone with a conscience could hand-wave away the diversion of donor money to his cushy lifestyle. There’s no fraud and embezzlement pass for people just because we share enemies.
Speaking of politics, I’ve long wondered when Nick will start pursuing elected office. He’s exactly the type to do so: Can’t even run his fucking home (WITH the benefit of unlimited free money) or maintain a decent marriage, but thinks he knows how to everyone else should be allowed to live their lives. It’s only a matter of time.
- Registrado
- 8 de Jul, 2020
He claimed years ago to have been approached by the Libertarian party to run for attorney general if memory serves. Pretty much said then and there that's not happening with the black face picture out there and now we know that there's tons of other skeletons in his closet as well.
- Registrado
- 29 de Ene, 2021
I don't believe even in his brain rotted state he thinks he would have a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected. Ignoring the blackface photo, his entire life is an opposition researcher's wet dream.
Edit: DICKtion
- Registrado
- 13 de Jul, 2017
I got a bit nostalgic for "old Nick" and "pre-Cancer Jim," so I just had the WH40k stream playing in the background while doing work.
I feel even more confident now saying no way he hasn't read the books. His breath of knowledge is (or at least was) too deep. Especially compared to Jim, who seemed mainly there to troll people about how Horus did nothing wrong.
Nick's retarded, but I think some of you are barking up the wrong tree on the idea he's posing as a WH40k fan and hasn't read any of the material. Also, if his WH40k knowledge seems less now, I'm gonna attribute that to the alcohol causing brain damage and memory loss.
Incidentally, at one point in the stream he says that it's actually his wife that says they look good on the shelf and that's the only reason she lets him drop the coin. He also went into how he's read WH40k wiki articles for hours at a time.
Even if he didn't have any of those social credit handicaps, Libertarians don't win shit in Minnesota (no, Jessie Ventura didn't win on the LP ticket). The state is blue AF. It would be a bigger waste of money than the checks he's writing Randazza.
- Registrado
- 6 de Jun, 2013
But has he always done it? And do you consider that to be "weird"?
Geared Chris
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 29 de Ago, 2023
Nick on Elijah Schaffer/Slightly Offensive's Show:
Highlights Sept 27 RIOTS & LOOTING in Philly! Fried Chicken and iPhones STOLEN
Mostly bro locker room talk one expects from Elijah. Last third of show is worth a watch for those who study Nick's rationalizations and porn justifications.- Nick's expression when Elijah brought up swinging being common now (he clearly had no context for Nick):
- Nick repeated that he wants porn star Adriana Chechik (the one who broke her back) on his show.
- Nick took a shot at Elissa (without her name) for clipping him "out of context" re how OnlyFans girls justify their job to their kids.
- Elijah pushed back referencing kids of OF parents who are being bullied and have committed suicide. Nick rationalized and I'm paraphrasing :'Culture is shifting to degeneracy and we need to accept that'
- Elijah's very anti-porn. Nick told him to "back the fuck off" (amicably) on the topic.
- Nick continued to peddle the blatant lie that all OF girls are making hundreds of thousand/mo.
- Registrado
- 22 de Ene, 2023
He's basically about average for a libertarian party candidate, so that makes sense. Elissa will make the attack ads.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
None of these fags who incessantly whine about "out of context" ever provide a context that makes the degenerate shit they say any less degenerate.
What a dumb drunk fucking retard. This is just factually wrong.
200MB
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 27 de Ene, 2023
Drink harder Nick. I want to see you ranting from a podium about the incel haters.
"Look I love my opponent, but they can't stand people having fun, and they've just been really weird lately."
He could give a bunch of toasts at his campaign rallies.
- Registrado
- 13 de Jul, 2017
Which is bullshit. There is no other context to what he said other than what he said.
I hope she clips his bullshit cope too.
Jesus wept.
Or what? He'll throw a Balldo at him? Great debate tactics, Nick.
- Registrado
- 25 de Dic, 2017
He can’t be worse at it than Sargon was. But politician Nick would also be significantly less funny than big boy in a suit Sargon
- Registrado
- 9 de Ene, 2023
YouTube autoplay led me to an interesting bit of information from Knight's Watch. I've archived below but it would seem they are in general agreement with much of our Rumble speculation on the thread based on the numbers they are seeing on their own channel. I looked at the videos they have posted and it looks like Rumble displays whatever they consider "Unique Views" as the number you see on the video. Whereas "Real Views" are around 3-3.5x smaller than that if you agree with KW that "Ad Eligible Views" are what equate to "Real Views".
Here's my speculation:
Raw Views count every single impression that hits the video. Any time it appears on your screen even as an option it's counted.
Unique Views are just the Raw Views but only one per person.
Ad Eligible views are people who actually click the video and ACTUALLY watch the video for any period of time.
And as was said in the video "Filled" are videos where people actually watched long enough to generate an ad.
Here's my speculation:
Raw Views count every single impression that hits the video. Any time it appears on your screen even as an option it's counted.
Unique Views are just the Raw Views but only one per person.
Ad Eligible views are people who actually click the video and ACTUALLY watch the video for any period of time.
And as was said in the video "Filled" are videos where people actually watched long enough to generate an ad.
A Cardboard Box
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 8 de Oct, 2019
To my knowledge, yes. Nick has always sucked little boy cock, and he's a weirdo.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
One of the most insufferable things about current year Nick is when he pretends to be absolutely baffled by criticism about him even though he obviously knows exactly what people are actually complaining about. He should go fuck himself with that playing dumb faggotry.
- Registrado
- 29 de Mayo, 2021
He keeps saying that everyone of a certain age considers sex work completely normal and that conservatives are missing the boat by not understanding that.
Nick said at one point that kids wouldn't bully each other over mothers doing porn, that the kids would high-five the child of the onlyfans mom.
But then Nick turned around and said onlyfans was "ruse" (1:16:50) and society is showing women a means to self-destruction through it. He also admits after all that nonsense about kids not being bullied that kids are being bullied to suicide.
Then Nick explained that conservatives are having the wrong conversation by trying to discourage women from doing porn. According to Nick, the republicans can't be convincing because all the girls are making seven figures. Republicans shouldn't engage in a "conversation rooted in shame" because the money is so great that women will not listen.
Reading between the lines, conservatives are I guess supposed to support women doing porn and find some other way to discourage the women other than shaming them. Nick doesn't say what that would be.
He talks about everyone doing performer work in porn retires at 37 owning several businesses. Nick then inexplicably admits that people like that are very few. But he says because people model themselves after the successful, that all other women will go into porn for the chance to be one of those few. It doesn't make any sense at all. But he said it.
He says we need to stop speaking morality at places that don't accept our moral point of view. He continues to hint that something else should be done but doesn't say what it is.
This is typical current Nick. He got pushback for an unpopular opinion on onlyfans and then appeared on a stream with someone not sympathetic to his take on the subject.
So he gaslights the guy by suddenly saying that rather than being a coom brained idiot promoting women doing onlyfans, he a reasoned conservative seeking a new method to discourage women from taking a destructive but financially lucrative path.
Its not much different than what he was trying to do with Null on his midnight shower call. Its no different than when overnight Mr. Drexel's porny stories went from muh dick bragging by Drexel to Nick explaining that was Drexel warning other men to avoid the wrong degenerate path he took years ago through his porny stories.
And that is what Nick means by context. If you don't like what Nick has said, the best way to deal with it is to talk to Nick one on one in private and let him gaslight you.