Regulators close New York’s Signature Bank, citing systemic risk - Just saw some cyptobros on here..

Article | Archive

U.S. regulators on Sunday shut down New York-based Signature Bank in a bid to prevent the spreading banking crisis.

“We are also announcing a similar systemic risk exception for Signature Bank, New York, New York, which was closed today by its state chartering authority,” Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC said in a joint statement Sunday evening.

The banking regulators said depositors at Signature Bank will have full access to their deposits, a similar move to ensure depositors at the failed Silicon Valley Bank will get their money back.

“All depositors of this institution will be made whole. As with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer,” the regulators said.

The regulators shuttered Silicon Valley Bank on Friday and seized its deposits in the largest U.S. banking failure since the 2008 financial crisis — and the second-largest ever. The dramatic moves come just days after the tech-focused institution reported that it was struggling, triggering a run on the bank’s deposits.

Signature is one of the main banks to the cryptocurrency industry. It had a market value of $4.4 billion as of Friday, according to FactSet. The stock had fallen nearly 40% this year after its crypto banking peer Silvergate Capital liquidated its bank.

As of Dec. 31, Signature had $110.4 billion in total assets and $88.6 billion in total deposits, according to a securities filing.

To stem the damage and stave off a bigger crisis, the Fed and Treasury created an emergency program to backstop deposits at both Signature Bank and Silicon Valley Bank using the Fed’s emergency lending authority.

While depositors will have access to their money, equity and bondholders at both banks are being wiped out, a senior Treasury official said.
 
Última edición:
Oh boy, another Great Depression where all the banks fail. I guess grandpa was smart to just keep all his money in cash under his mattress.
Hopefully the government doesn't fuck up the recovery so badly (by doing literally anything other than just letting it run its course, which sadly all odds say won't happen) that another WW2 will be needed to save the economy...I don't think we would survive WW3.
 
Oh boy, another Great Depression where all the banks fail. I guess grandpa was smart to just keep all his money in cash under his mattress.
I'm seeing another Global Financial Crisis, where (((they))) get bailed out by the money printer that goes brrrrr.
Hopefully the government doesn't fuck up the recovery so badly (by doing literally anything other than just letting it run its course, which sadly all odds say won't happen) that another WW2 will be needed to save the economy...I don't think we would survive WW3.
Russia-Ukraine is probably the warmup act. Whether WWIII would be enough to turn the economy around is debatable; most of the skills and infrastructure needed to support wide scale manufacturing have been offshored to those with whom America is most likely to have beef in the event of WWIII.
 
I'm glad I got out of the crypto scam. Unfortunately I lost some money on it but didn't let it get too bad.
As most people do with get rich quick type stuff. The only people who benefit from Crypto are those who have actual dollars backed by an established national government to back the crypto. Otherwise any asshole with a laptop could theoretically start his own shit-coin spinoff.
Can someone explain to me why these (((bankers))) weren't dragged out of their mansions and into the streets back in 2008?
Because they dismantled Occupy Wall Street and put on a faux social justice face to deflect criticism? The same people who were about "eating the rich" are now loyal consoomers, I hate to say it but it really was a stroke of genius.
 
Can someone explain to me why these (((bankers))) weren't dragged out of their mansions and into the streets back in 2008?
Things were still alright for the common man. The world still turned. There still was enough of a economy to get back rolling. Not now. You can't cut costs any more than they have.
 
“All depositors of this institution will be made whole. As with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer,” the regulators said.
this is impossible.
if the bank is in danger, that means it does not have the liquidity needed to make whole all depositors.
so if the bank can't pay them, and the taxpayer won't pay them either, then who will? makes no sense. either the taxpayer pays, or some depositors will be left empty handed.
 
So what are we running with? Are bank closures a good thing actually or is this all Durmpf's fault?
On Democraticunderground:

Screenshot 2023-03-12 180937.png
 
I just hope we world is burning on Monday so I don't have to go to work. Sadly, this didn't happen when Covid happen. Lazy assholes.
 
Can someone explain to me why these (((bankers))) weren't dragged out of their mansions and into the streets back in 2008?
Because they dismantled Occupy Wall Street and put on a faux social justice face to deflect criticism? The same people who were about "eating the rich" are now loyal consoomers, I hate to say it but it really was a stroke of genius.
Literally this:
1678663829830.png
1678663991434.png
 
Atrás
Top Abajo