💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Procrastinhater]

Maybe he could bring her mother on as well while he's at it.

I'd be much more interested in hearing what the mother thinks of this lying faggot who knew her daughter since she was a child and then got her into a load of sick fucking sadist shit.
I don't care if he never looked wrong at her till she was an adult, its fucking vile, and only a porn brained bullshit nigger like Drex would think it isn't. If that was my kid I'd put two rounds through him and tell the Judge why with a smile, it's a total breach of trust and more than that a lack of respect.
Uncle fucking Bully here knew the kid since she was 13, that's a power imbalance right there, I don't care if she came onto him, anyone that's not a nasty diseased coom brained nigger would have told her she was fucking nuts.
Theres no excusing it, and having someone he calls his "sub" to come on and parrot whatever excuse he has in his mind for being a dirty fucking bastard isn't gonna change a thing.
Maybe I'm being harsh, but I despise people that abuse positions of power.

 

[Active User]

This Drexel thing being found only recently when the thread's flipped on Nick does raise the question of what other things may have been overlooked or whitewashed back when the thread was pretty much a fan discussion section. Wonder what would be found with even just a more critical reading of this thread that was missed.

 

[Whistlin' Crustacean]

I'd put two rounds through him and tell the Judge why with a smile

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

Personally, I'm looking forward to the show with Drex and his sub on. I'm sure most people here won't be convinced one way or the other, but statements like "I consented, I was fine with it, it was my idea" from the alleged victim seem to generally work really rather well when it comes to silencing allegations. Him willing to, unlike anonymous trolls, put it all on camera is rather admirable as well.

do it faggot

 

[Potatoherder]

This Drexel thing being found only recently when the thread's flipped on Nick does raise the question of what other things may have been overlooked or whitewashed back when the thread was pretty much a fan discussion section. Wonder what would be found with even just a more critical reading of this thread that was missed.

His boring facade gave him so much protection and by extension his friends. "Nick seems like a good guy so he obviously wouldn't be friends with bad people." At some point he may regret giving that up to be a perv on the internet.

 

[Nol 2]

You know, I don't pretend to know much about grooming, but doesn't a large part of it have to deal with the fact that the child doesn't think there's anything wrong with it?

 

[Procrastinhater]

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

Personally, I'm looking forward to the show with Drex and his sub on. I'm sure most people here won't be convinced one way or the other, but statements like "I consented, I was fine with it, it was my idea" from the alleged victim seem to generally work really rather well when it comes to silencing allegations. Him willing to, unlike anonymous trolls, put it all on camera is rather admirable as well.

do it faggot

Yeah I'm just shitposting really. Still think he's a fucking dirty bastard though. Fucking your daughters friend is bad enough, knowing her since she was a child just adds to the skeezyness.
And i'm sure if he's got her brain warped into being a niggers "sub" she's pretty much say anything he wanted her to.
That's if I believe him to start with, think he talks shit tbh. Guy stinks of try hard poser.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

So listening to Nick tearing the Crowder contract apart and he said ‘i suck at merch’ and it made my realise - why isn’t he selling giant Rackets Law branded noses?

This Drexel thing being found only recently when the thread's flipped on Nick does raise the question of what other things may have been overlooked or whitewashed back when the thread was pretty much a fan discussion section. Wonder what would be found with even just a more critical reading of this thread that was missed.

Oh, absolute tons of shit.

They’ve said some outragous shit.

 

[Swole McPole]

You said you were married to lawyer, who was a "him" and that he stayed with you because he was a catholic. Or was that someone else? It doesn't really matter either way.

My (female) wife was a divorce lawyer. She's not a him at all. I suspect her being in that business was another factor in why we stayed married.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

I stopped caring like two, maybe three pages ago.

My (female) wife was a divorce lawyer. She's not a him at all. I suspect her being in that business was another factor in why we stayed married.

 

[Swole McPole]

I stopped caring like two, maybe three pages ago.

You might want to try my strategy then. When I don't care, I don't bother posting. Works great for me.

 

[mailfrawd]

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

Personally, I'm looking forward to the show with Drex and his sub on. I'm sure most people here won't be convinced one way or the other, but statements like "I consented, I was fine with it, it was my idea" from the alleged victim seem to generally work really rather well when it comes to silencing allegations. Him willing to, unlike anonymous trolls, put it all on camera is rather admirable as well.

do it faggot

You know, I don't pretend to know much about grooming, but doesn't a large part of it have to deal with the fact that the child doesn't think there's anything wrong with it?

Unless someone is there advocating for the potential victim and digging into the substantative parts of the story, this girl will just parrot all the weird groomer stuff Drex has conditioned her to believe.

Anyone capable of critical thought process will see right through that charade. He won’t bring on a neutral 3rd party either because he knows how that will play out.

 

[Guyspleasedontfight]

Drexel is so gross, I was a huge Rekieta fan before he got really big, and back in those days about half of the fanbase hated him and asked Nick to stop bringing him on and Nick would just say "Hurr but a lot of people like him and so do I." I think a lot of the people either left the channel or grudgingly accepted Nick's faggot friend but I always found Drexel completely opposite to everything else Nick tries to portray about himself. I also find about half of his stories both fake and gay but I do believe he does find sluts to bang. Granted these women are mentally ill coal burners and children that he grooms. I was always disgusted by drexel and found him to be pathetic, and now I feel vindicated. As Nick himself would say "Face the wall."

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

Personally, I'm looking forward to the show with Drex and his sub on. I'm sure most people here won't be convinced one way or the other, but statements like "I consented, I was fine with it, it was my idea" from the alleged victim seem to generally work really rather well when it comes to silencing allegations. Him willing to, unlike anonymous trolls, put it all on camera is rather admirable as well.

You post like a faggot, Drexel is disgusting and I can't imagine being pathetic enough to simp for him like you. Calling people anonymous trolls is butthurt behavior

 

[Talisa_Kite]

Drex's best move at this stage would be to issue a neutral statement vetted by a lawyer (good thing he knows one) denying any allegations of grooming. The facts are out there on video so there's no ignoring them. It's not that I think he's at any risk of legal prosecution but its the logical move to stop his reputation getting dragged through the mud. If he so wished and if his lawyer approves he could also release a carefully worded version of events that occurred. His behaviour is still highly sussy baka and gross but reacting in a calm, logical manner will go some way to convincing people that he was just a degenerate with low impulse control instead of a groomer.

What he should not do is have an episode dedicated exclusively to exonerating himself and his behaviour loudly, dragging the woman involved into it as well. It reeks of desperate damage control and denial in a bad way, on top of being highly embarassing and drawing more attention to the situation. Other posters have already pointed out why she's likely to support him and make it look more, not less, like she was groomed. I wouldn't be surprised if she came on and talked about how she pursued an "extremely reluctant" Drex, how they had a good relationship when she was a kid, how she looked up to him and trusted him and he never ever made a move on her before she asked... blech.

If I were Nick I would seriously advise him to keep his mouth shut. And also keep him away from my family.

 

[sneedem&feedem]

More detractor content.

 

[Wilhelm Bittrich]

What was Nick's wife's excuse for going back for that second massage again? She didn't want to waste coupons right? Why would she care? The Rekieta household isn't hurting for money so why couldn't she just leave the coupons and pay for a massage where she doesn't get groped.

There's one fucking easy answer to these questions and I assume we all know what that answer is!

 

[Potatoherder]

There's one fucking easy answer to these questions and I assume we all know what that answer is!

I recall the claim being she was in college and may or may not have been dating Nick at the time.

 

[Wilhelm Bittrich]

I recall the claim being she was in college and may or may not have been dating Nick at the time.

Maybe, but I'm quite sure she went back there not because of the coupons but because that masseur had the fingers of god, if you catch my gist.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

[SNIP]

Can someone give me the full definition of "trad"? I'm seeing it held up in this thread as a moral good. My knee-jerk reaction to terms like that, based on how it's floated around and by whom sometimes, is to dismiss it as shad low and reactionary. But I'm interested in perspectives, and terms often get bastardized (heh), so I'd like to know which morals rate, and how/how much.

To me, 'trad' means: low body count, will not step out while in a relationship, wants kids, willing to work out a fair division of the responsibilities of working/providing and taking care of domestic issues, and willing to trust and let the man have the final say when there is a disagreement.

I DON'T mean stay-at-home woman, virgin, cook, totally submissive, full traditional gender roles, or sex on demand.

There is a lot of variation allowed, but I am an essentialist. The distinctives are required though because those are indicative of character that will work with a partner to build a long-term stable relationship.

Let the woman have a job or be the one who works--as long as it is agreed who does what. Low body count means you are not a garden implement, have self-control, and are able to keep it out of your pants. Kids are a sign that you are capable of caring for and prioritising someone else above yourself. Letting the man lead is something that is just natural that has worked for a really long time. Rad-Fems ruined the argument for 'equality' so maybe I am just self-hating, but I will not give women control. It also shows that you are loyal.

 

[Not Who You Think]

Meanwhile in Drex hugbox...

We have one of Drex fans concern about what Drex has been posting on Nick's discord about the grooming allegations. Drex jumps in and says that it's BS and also confirms that he is still in contact with the girl in question (talked to her last night). Drex puts it out that he might do a show about this whole situation with the girl in question to "put an END to the BS".

After a back and forth of posts, he pulls the Drex fan (and everyone) into voice chat, which I assume was a struggle session.

Spoiler: Discord Receipts

Ver archivo adjunto 4358424
Ver archivo adjunto 4358428
Ver archivo adjunto 4358431
Ver archivo adjunto 4358436
Ver archivo adjunto 4358444
Ver archivo adjunto 4358449

So Drexel's relationship(?) with T the sub is still active. I am considering holding off on my Drexel post to see how he handles this. Although I've had more than enough of his stories by now, more information/content may be useful.

Odd tactic to bring on someone who he had previously gone through such lengths to protect the identity of. Drexel seems to think that protecting himself comes first (reminiscent of him hiding the relationship from his "friend", T's mom). Good thing T is comfortable with Drexel humiliating her, I guess. Though I suspect things could be different when she is humiliated by Drexel on the internet and not a private room. I can only imagine how the mother will feel knowing that her daughter is going to such lengths. As I've said before, I would prefer to hear the mother's take on things over the daughter.

Also, as a few have mentioned already, there is no reason to trust the story of someone who is actively sexually submitting to their alleged groomer. He's welcome to try though. I sincerely hope that someone posts a link to the video if/when it comes out.

 

[Spaded Dave]

To Drexel: All you had to do was say nothing and this would have all blown over. This is Nick's thread, not yours, and we would quickly lose focus on you if you just kept your mouth shut. This conversation keeps getting rebooted every time you sperg out in Discord, desperately thrashing to defend yourself. We haven't put any words in your mouth and everything we are saying, save for maybe one or two people using the P word, is based on what came from your mouth and the words you said and continue to own. The only way you could change that is by changing your story and thus making yourself less believable than you already are.

That being said, keep doing it because it's pretty funny. Having a stream where you trot out the girl you groomed to perform on command will totally work. Talk as long as you want. I promise by the end of it you'll have all of us posting age of consent maps in your defense.

---

@Not Who You Think On the one hand, if you post it now it gives him a chance to respond to a detailed account of the information we have and would provide the maximum amount of information coming from his stream. On the other hand, if you hold off it gives him an opportunity to state provable lies and contradictions and prevents him from planning and manufacturing misinformation from the stream. Whatever you choose will work out well, just for different reasons.