- Registrado
- 7 de Feb, 2013
A quadruple amputee could count on his existing digits the number of times someone has referred to "millennials" and meant Dobson
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Today's a twofer. First, a new drawing video from Dobson.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=HTZvu3TVQWA
And then the completed picture itself.
Ver archivo adjunto 78541
Today's a twofer. First, a new drawing video from Dobson.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=HTZvu3TVQWA
And then the completed picture itself.
Ver archivo adjunto 78541
Today's a twofer. First, a new drawing video from Dobson.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=HTZvu3TVQWA
And then the completed picture itself
Ver archivo adjunto 78541
According to Wikipedia, 1982 is the earliest date at which a person had to be born to be considered as such. If he is 34 now (?) he could call himself that but in extremis.Dobson thinks he's a Millennial.
[MEDIA=twitter]711214809371381760[/MEDIA]
According to Wikipedia, 1982 is the earliest date at which a person had to be born to be considered as such. If he is 34 now (?) he could call himself that but in extremis.
It's certainly better than his usual fare, I'll give him that much. Especially considering that he has been on an innactive rut as of late. Other than that, it is a pretty average drawing.
According to Wikipedia, 1982 is the earliest date at which a person had to be born to be considered as such. If he is 34 now (?) he could call himself that but in extremis.
It's certainly better than his usual fare, I'll give him that much. Especially considering that he has been on an innactive rut as of late. Other than that, it is a pretty average drawing.
According to Wikipedia, 1982 is the earliest date at which a person had to be born to be considered as such. If he is 34 now (?) he could call himself that but in extremis.
Too bad that the length of that bunny girl's limbs is all over the place, the arms in particular look apishly long.
That is also true, yes.I'm just amazed the lazy shit actually managed to draw something.
Now that you mention it, she does look like something Stretch Armstrong would own.
ftfyIn all honesty though, he really needs to step the fuck away from twitter.
Apart from the fact that her left arm is half a mile long, while Clawhauser looks more or less then in the movie, the rabbit looks nothing like Hopps.Today's a twofer. First, a new drawing video from Dobson.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=HTZvu3TVQWA
And then the completed picture itself.
Ver archivo adjunto 78541
don't worry dibbsyDobson thinks he's a Millennial.
[MEDIA=twitter]711214809371381760[/MEDIA]
Apart from the fact that her left arm is half a mile long, while Clawhauser looks more or less then in the movie, the rabbit looks nothing like Hopps.
I've noticed that too. I always thought it was just because he almost exclusively draws female characters, but this made me realize that he always goes off model somehow when he draws female characters. Part of me has this creepy feeling that it might just be him "modifying" the girls so they suit his tastes...Apart from the fact that her left arm is half a mile long, while Clawhauser looks more or less then in the movie, the rabbit looks nothing like Hopps.
It also makes his work fall into the uncanny valley.It's probably more of an accident if one of the characters looks on model.
He doesn't use references at all. All of his fan art is horribly off model.
I've noticed that too. I always thought it was just because he almost exclusively draws female characters, but this made me realize that he always goes off model somehow when he draws female characters. Part of me has this creepy feeling that it might just be him "modifying" the girls so they suit his tastes...