Culture Comprehending the underwhelming performance of the GOP - because left-wingers are not the only ones who can be 🌈Optimistic




There was supposed to be a red wave that would put the corrupt, entitled, arrogant Democrats in their place. The GOP was supposed to take the House by an emphatic margin and possibly the Senate, too.

They said it was not a question of if, but when it would happen.

As someone on Twitter rightly observed, at this point, the GOP would be lucky to have Red Trickle. Even if the GOP takes the House, it will be by a slim margin.

Joe Biden, despite his catastrophic misgovernance, historic unpopularity, and rapidly declining cognitive abilities, could end up with a better mid-term record than Democrat stars such as Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.

There have been various theories on why it went so wrong.

Post-mortem analyses are always easy; you have the results, all you have to do is walk backward and provide reasons. Had the GOP won in a landslide, the very pundits who are certain why they underperformed tonight would have provided another set of reasons.

Let's examine some theories that are being put forth.

Did the narrative of the Red Wave seem like hubris?

At times rosy expectations can be the mother of all disappointments. The relentless talk of a red wave, which began in conservative media and spread like wildfire, could have had multiple consequences.

Perhaps GOP voters presumed a victory was inevitable and chose to stay home. Perhaps Democrat voters thinking that their party needs them in times of peril chose to vote.

Perhaps some voters thought of this talk of the red wave as hubris.

Voters often do not like politicians taking them for granted and second-guessing them.

Perhaps they decided to give the GOP a reality check?

The overturning of Roe v Wade?

It will never be easy to gauge what impact the overturning of Roe had on the mind of the public, especially women.

Dr. Oz said “I don’t want the federal government involved with that at all. I want women, doctors, local political leaders, letting the democracy that’s always allowed our nation to thrive to put the best ideas forward so states can decide for themselves.”

Oz was making a broader point about law-making by consulting all parties involved. Most of the mainstream media claimed Dr. Oz thinks that the decision to have an abortion must be between a woman, her doctor, and local politicians.

Perhaps women truly feared that the Republicans would be involved each time they visited the gynecologist. Perhaps women feared imprisonment for even mentioning abortion. Perhaps they believed the claim that contraception would also be restricted.

Fear tactics often work, irrespective of whether the claims are factual.

Perhaps the Democrats managed to scare people sufficiently.

Was it the media?

The mainstream media is the propaganda arm of the Democrats, while most Republicans get their news from Fox News, Breitbart, The Daily Caller, NewsMax, and various other right-leaning websites.

But what about independents? Perhaps they brought the media narrative that if the GOP wins there will never ever be elections in the US and Trump would become a dictator.

End of the Trump era?

Some experts claimed that Trump’s choice of candidates was a major reason for the GOP’s subpar performance. They cite the loss of Dr. Oz to severely cognitively impaired John Fetterman to demonstrate their point. They feel Trump incorrectly endorsed celebrity Doctor Oz; perhaps a principled conservative and a Pennsylvania local would have served better. They claim that the underperforming of the GOP is proof that Trump's era has passed. They claim he should gracefully step aside and allow Ron DeSantis to be the nominee in 2024. They claim Trump lacks discipline, has too much baggage, and polarizes people with his rhetoric.

So what has Trump’s record been so far in the race?
2022-11-09 12.25.04 nitter.namazso.eu 039de7822805.jpg

But:
2022-11-09 12.26.39 nitter.namazso.eu 396af602e8a2.jpg

Since Trump descended the escalator in 2015 to announce his Presidential campaign, there have been many who have been predicting his political demise. Yet he still remains a force to reckon with in the party. It would be a mistake to count Trump out this easily.

Beginning of the DeSantis era?

Ron DeSantis was re-elected in Florida by almost 20 points; it was an emphatic routing of his Democratic opponent.

After DeSantis’s victory speech, the crowd chanted “USA! USA! USA!” and, in a nod to an expected presidential run chanted, “Two more years!”

The DeSantis wing of the GOP claimed that DeSantis is Trump without the baggage. They say he is disciplined in his message, he is younger and has a proven track record of governance during crises such as COVID-19 and Hurricane Ian. hence is a much more viable Presidential Candidate.

They say cite winning among minorities to make the case for his broad appeal. DeSantis is the first Republican gubernatorial candidate since Jeb Bush to win Miami-Dade, the state’s largest county, which also has its largest Hispanic population and was once considered a Democrat bastion.

But does a victory in Florida make him a viable candidate all over the US?

What about the point of having no Trump baggage? The Democrats may despise DeSantis, but they haven’t gone after DeSantis the way they have targeted Trump. If he becomes the GOP nominee in 2024, they will give him the Trump treatment or perhaps worse. They could dig dirt or invent lies about DeSantis, i.e., create a great deal of baggage for him.

Even worse, President Trump just openly threatened to sling mud at him, saying, “If he did run, I will tell you things about him that won’t be very flattering. I know more about him than anybody other than perhaps his wife, who is really running his campaign.”

What about DeSantis’s endorsements?

DeSantis endorsed Colorado Senate Candidate Joe O'Dea and recorded an automated phone call for the campaign, saying "I've watched Joe from a distance. And I'm impressed." O’Dea went on to lose his race. But Colorado is a liberal state; perhaps O’Dea was going to lose anyway?

In the end, it isn’t pundits or experts who will decide the GOP nominee it is the public who will cast their vote.

What about funding?

It has to be remembered that no candidate can win without a minimum amount of funding. A MAGA victory is as troubling to establishment GOP leaders as it is for Democrats.

It has been documented that for various Senate races, the GOP leadership in Washington, i.e., Mitch McConnell, were not supporting MAGA candidates financially. Perhaps that played a factor in impeding the candidates from pushing their message and the overall narrative.

Did Biden’s meddling help?

Biden signed Executive Order 14019 back in March asking all 600 federal agencies to "consider ways to expand citizens' opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process."

The details of what was actually done remain unclear. Perhaps Democrat voters were surgically mobilized? Perhaps voter identification rules were relaxed?

We will never know because Biden refused to share details about its coordinated efforts to engage in a federal takeover of the administration of elections.

This concealment makes it very suspicious.
 
Answer: Republicans are cucks and faggots and conservatives want people like Trump and DeSantis that will not be cucks and faggots but the RNC won't run people like that because those people cannot be controlled and won't play ball with Uniparty politics which is exactly what conservatives want.

There were no surprises yesterday. Except maybe Fetterman but I am not too shocked that people will vote for an empty suit to be filled via committee insiders.
 
After the shenanigans of the 2020 election, im not sure how much faith the average person has in the value of their vote.

If you were ever going to have a real 'reactionary wave' against the establishment it would be against both the DNC and GOP though. GOP schmucks like Lindsey Graham, Dan Crenshaw, etc. are indistinguishable from Democrats in any meaningful way so what's the point?

What fundamental change would happen if GOP took the house and senate anyway?

Would the proxy-war in eurasia end? Would drag-queen story hour end? Would the jan 6 people be suddenly pardoned en mass? Would performing Sex Reassignment Surgery on minors be made illegal? Would people be allowed to spam the gamer word on twitter 24 hours a day? Would Biden be prosecuted for abusing his own daughter in the shower when she was 12? Would youtube go back to how it was pre-adapocalypse?
 
I think a lot of people underestimated the number of people that said that the politicans in charge are fucking up royally, and then reelecting them anyway because the other side is worse. I think a lot of people thought that with the economy and many other factors in the shitter that people would vote out the incumbents, but that didn't account for the fact that the people currently living there LIKE living that way.
 
Not doing dumb shit like splitting your own vote might help too.

Ver archivo adjunto 3835515

I'm all for having options but as long as there is a 2 party system running 2 vs 1 will always screw you over.
This is a big reason why the Democrats outperform...they never break ranks. Once a decision is made they support it 100% and it takes a ton to whittle away that support in any meaningful fashion.

In contrast, Republicans recently have spent most of their time fighting each other. Part of the problem I think is too many Republicans want to impose Democratic ideological discipline on their party without realizing diversity of positions is actually a big strength for the Republican Party.

A set of core principles with a lot of flexibility outside those that gives them the opportunity to target candidates a lot more effectively.
 
After the shenanigans of the 2020 election, im not sure how much faith the average person has in the value of their vote.

If you were ever going to have a real 'reactionary wave' against the establishment it would be against both the DNC and GOP though. GOP schmucks like Lindsey Graham, Dan Crenshaw, etc. are indistinguishable from Democrats in any meaningful way so what's the point?

What fundamental change would happen if GOP took the house and senate anyway?

Would the proxy-war in eurasia end? Would drag-queen story hour end? Would the jan 6 people be suddenly pardoned en mass? Would performing Sex Reassignment Surgery on minors be made illegal? Would people be allowed to spam the gamer word on twitter 24 hours a day? Would Biden be prosecuted for abusing his own daughter in the shower when she was 12? Would youtube go back to how it was pre-adapocalypse?
There cannot be a reactionary wave because there is nobody to serve as a competent leader and representatives.
Everyone in the Dissident Right sphere has incredibly deep flaws that can be exploited easily, and most lack self-control and ability to present as normal, yet far right.
 
I think a lot of people underestimated the number of people that said that the politicans in charge are fucking up royally, and then reelecting them anyway because the other side is worse. I think a lot of people thought that with the economy and many other factors in the shitter that people would vote out the incumbents, but that didn't account for the fact that the people currently living there LIKE living that way.
Yeah, except if that is true, why did the electorate vote Republicans out in 2020 though? Did they not blame them for the pandemic?
 
I just assumed the GOP would win a lot in 2022 UNTIL Roe fell.

That mobilized a lot of people and the DNC used it for fundraising (like they always have. #1 reason they never made abortion rights a law for 50 years with several actual chances to do so)
If the SCOTUS waited until after the midterms, there would be more wins by the Repubs and probably lots of stuff on fire.

FTR, I am "liberal", but won't vote for any Dem who does not support free speech or won't define "woman".
So, none really at the moment.
 
This is a big reason why the Democrats outperform...they never break ranks. Once a decision is made they support it 100% and it takes a ton to whittle away that support in any meaningful fashion.
One party has rigid dogma and punishment for anyone that questions the narrative; the other party has competition and a healthy internal debate. Weird how a lot of that flipped in recent history.

No surprise that the former are also punitively punishing their opponents for daring to oppose them and actively trying to ban them from the elections process and society at large.
 
Not doing dumb shit like splitting your own vote might help too.

Ver archivo adjunto 3835515

I'm all for having options but as long as there is a 2 party system running 2 vs 1 will always screw you over.
Alaska's system is dumb as fuck. BUT it is possible that a Republican can win if the Dem doesn't get to 50%. That whole ranked choice voting is insane, but so long as the Libertarians aren't dumbasses who have Peitola as a second choice and the same with Palin and Begich voters then Peitola may not win.

Ranked choice voting is fuking stupid.
 
You want to know why the Democrats managed to hold on?
A dead man won 85% of the vote in his election in Pennsylvania.
Most voters are uninformed and retarded, that's why the Dems held on.
 
Biden is less popular than both Obama and Clinton were at their mid-terms, and he's got record inflation. Far more people are dissatisfied with the direction the country is going in, and yet Team Biden manages to beat both of those previous mid-term performances, pulling out yet another demographic curveball, surprise electoral victory, just two years after their first one.

I'm sure it's all completely legitimate. lol.
 
Rebublicans have done that too. Nevada republicans voted in a dead Brothel owner in 2018.
Thats why I didnt say 'most democrat voters are uninformed and retarded'.
Consider this horrifying thought. A midwit, obsessed with his consoomer ways without a care in the world for the wider shitshow about him. The type that still watches late night comedy and gets all his news from MSNBC. The fool smack dab in the middle of the IQ chart, right at the tippy top of that damn bell curve.
He is somehow smarter than half the planet.
 
One party has rigid dogma and punishment for anyone that questions the narrative; the other party has competition and a healthy internal debate. Weird how a lot of that flipped in recent history.

No surprise that the former are also punitively punishing their opponents for daring to oppose them and actively trying to ban them from the elections process and society at large.
I wouldn't call it 'recent'. The dems have been like that since at least Clinton, probably longer.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo