/pol/ Bratislava gay bar shooting - Pol sperg shoots up a gay bar and makes a cringe manifesto

Speaking as someone who used to frequent /pol/ and /k/ the reactions to shootings in recent years are so dishonest and cowardly.
I respected pol more when posters took straight up massacres and bombings related to their board and either uncaringly memed it or had the balls to take the mask off and own/praise the killers. Now following every happening after christcurch, the newfags spend days disavowing with "violence is le bad, board of peace" shit to keep cops/journos from talking to their parents.

If they genuinely believe their own shit why are they so quick to disavow whenever a radicalized teenager does something besides sit around and bitch all day? "We hate niggers, but the nigger killer is a FED! We hate faggots, but the faggot killer is a FED! The election was stolen but the people who tried to save it were FEDS!" Everything that upsets normalfags is apparently a convenient fed op.
Even worse, if they cant do that they try to save face by virtue signalling and insulting the culprit who's pretty much just a carbon copy of themselves.
They make so many calls to action on that board, daily, and yet nobody has the balls to own it.

If I hate commies (I do) I don't disavow Breivik (I don't), but your modern day 2020s poltard would spend days disavowing because le glowies and optics. Because modern poltards are psyopped to be gutless. That said, this particular murder was extraordinarily retarded, but I'm not just pretending to feel that way like polniggers.
 
Speaking as someone who used to frequent /pol/ and /k/ the reactions to shootings in recent years are so dishonest and cowardly.
I respected pol more when posters took straight up massacres and bombings related to their board and either uncaringly memed it or had the balls to take the mask off and own/praise the killers. Now following every happening after christcurch, the newfags spend days disavowing with "violence is le bad, board of peace" shit to keep cops/journos from talking to their parents.

If they genuinely believe their own shit why are they so quick to disavow whenever a radicalized teenager does something besides sit around and bitch all day? "We hate niggers, but the nigger killer is a FED! We hate faggots, but the faggot killer is a FED! The election was stolen but the people who tried to save it were FEDS!" Everything that upsets normalfags is apparently a convenient fed op.
Even worse, if they cant do that they try to save face by virtue signalling and insulting the culprit who's pretty much just a carbon copy of themselves.
They make so many calls to action on that board, daily, and yet nobody has the balls to own it.

If I hate commies (I do) I don't disavow Breivik (I don't), but your modern day 2020s poltard would spend days disavowing because le glowies and optics. Because modern poltards are psyopped to be gutless.
So what you are saying is expect a rainbow fursuit wearing mass shooter soon.
 
So some fags got killed and a lunatic killed himself, all in all society is better off
 
Speaking as someone who used to frequent /pol/ and /k/ the reactions to shootings in recent years are so dishonest and cowardly.
I respected pol more when posters took straight up massacres and bombings related to their board and either uncaringly memed it or had the balls to take the mask off and own/praise the killers. Now following every happening after christcurch, the newfags spend days disavowing with "violence is le bad, board of peace" shit to keep cops/journos from talking to their parents.

If they genuinely believe their own shit why are they so quick to disavow whenever a radicalized teenager does something besides sit around and bitch all day? "We hate niggers, but the nigger killer is a FED! We hate faggots, but the faggot killer is a FED! The election was stolen but the people who tried to save it were FEDS!" Everything that upsets normalfags is apparently a convenient fed op.
Even worse, if they cant do that they try to save face by virtue signalling and insulting the culprit who's pretty much just a carbon copy of themselves.
They make so many calls to action on that board, daily, and yet nobody has the balls to own it.

If I hate commies (I do) I don't disavow Breivik (I don't), but your modern day 2020s poltard would spend days disavowing because le glowies and optics. Because modern poltards are psyopped to be gutless. That said, this particular murder was extraordinarily retarded, but I'm not just pretending to feel that way like polniggers.
I hate wasps and bees but I am not walking around with a flamethrower setting fire to every hive and nest I see
 
As much as I value freedom of expression, if the troons turned their sights on 4chan and got it taken down for a while I'd get some level of satisfaction from that. It's a rats nest of feds, leftist shills and the worst kinds of coomers. Maybe it'd serve as a wake up call to the sites administration. A lack of quality control has seen the site deteriorate so dramatically since it's conception that it's barely recognisable. This isn't the first bowl-cut incel manifesto retard to have drawn inspiration from 4chan either. 4chan appeals to the zeal of the newly converted. Dysfunctional loners who think they're about to solve all the worlds problems because they read some crime statistics meme or saw a webm of twerking drag kids.

Nothing of value would be lost if 4chan went down. If WE were to go down, zoosadists and monkeyfuckers would feel a lot safer back out in the open, and some real monsters would be wiped from the public eye. What does 4chan offer the world at this point? I say this as somebody who posted on 4chan for years. It's only redeeming features now are the paranormal board and maybe fit, and they could be relocated elsewhere.

Edit: I'm not saying I want trannies to shut down 4chan, I'm saying if they were targeted the way we were the site might get it's shit together and be a better place as a result.
 
Última edición:
For those wondering why he didn't go for a more significant target. here's an excerpt from “Why didn’t you pick some other target?”

This is both true and false. It is true that high-value targets have inherently more value than a corner store in middle of Niggerville. The deaths of politicians and bureaucrats are more likely to send ZOG into overdrive, thus making it overplay its hand and force fence sitters to pick a side. Attacks on these people can disrupt their plans by killing important figures or people who are even irreplaceable due to their unique status. The more of these people die, the better, and people should be informed about where the enemies live, where their families live.

Yet people underestimate what seemingly “random” violence can achieve.

Just by attacking a nigger ghetto grocery store, Payton Gendron managed to damage the cohesiveness and safety of an entire community. Enough attacks like this, or individual attacks on a large enough scale against a small enough group, can easily uproot an entire community. Despite it being niggerville central, Buffalo isn’t particularly known for its gang culture. A community like that is harmed when its figureheads and elders die. Think that old negress who cooked food at the local part. She was well known, and now she is dead. It spreads fear and doubt and uncertainty about the future in a community when a random outsider comes up and starts killing locals. It doesn’t help when you have no idea if or when it will happen again, because it isn’t centralized. This contributes to the uprooting of a formerly safe community.

This kind of thinking reminds me of Abu Musab Al Zarqawi's, the leader of Al-Qaida of Iraq and the proto founder of ISIS, thinking where they would intentionally target Shias or other ethnic groups in order to cause sectarian strife and weaken the American backed Iraqi government.
 
if you can't tldr your shooting manifesto into "gibs me attention" then you are both lying abut your reasons and terrible at summaries
 
how could kiwifarms do this
1665679515157.png
In the words of Catboy Supreme: AND THERE IT IS
 
What a retard.

"Why not target the leaders causing the problems?"

"Uhhh... Because! Just don't okay!?"

Total dentbrain as usual. Just another fedgroomed fartsniffer.
 
As much as I value freedom of expression, if the troons turned their sights on 4chan and got it taken down for a while I'd get some level of satisfaction from that. It's a rats nest of feds, leftist shills and the worst kinds of coomers. Maybe it'd serve as a wake up call to the sites administration. A lack of quality control has seen the site deteriorate so dramatically since it's conception that it's barely recognisable. This isn't the first bowl-cut incel manifesto retard to have drawn inspiration from 4chan either. 4chan appeals to the zeal of the newly converted. Dysfunctional loners who think they're about to solve all the worlds problems because they read some crime statistics meme or saw a webm of twerking drag kids.

Nothing of value would be lost if 4chan went down. If WE were to go down, zoosadists and monkeyfuckers would feel a lot safer back out in the open, and some real monsters would be wiped from the public eye. What does 4chan offer the world at this point? I say this as somebody who posted on 4chan for years. It's only redeeming features now are the paranormal board and maybe fit, and they could be relocated elsewhere.
Your screed reads like a millenial leftist faggot who developed an unwarranted sense of internet elitism. Which is why you felt comfortable morally justifying censorship on Kiwifarms of all places because ReAl channers are woke trannies like you.
Fuck off back to your blue board.
READ A BOOK - Martha.PNG
 
You should do. He was a freemason, a patsy used by them. Also his manifesto was unoriginal, plagiarized, too long, and gay.
of all the recent mass murderers, breivik is the only one who came somewhat close to having a reasonable target selection. people will cry "he killed children" but that's not all there is to it.

first, he car bombed a large government building in the capital mcveigh style, killing six and injuring hundreds.
second, he attacked the attendants of a leftist political party youth organisation event. party youth organisations are where future politicians and party cadres are trained - or, would have been trained, if breivik hadn't killed them.
bonus: he targeted this event in particular because a high ranking national politician (ex president or something like that) was supposed to show up there, and breivik wanted him dead. but something came up and the big guy didn't show up, so breivik just started murdering the other people there at random.

my point is, unlike the fag killer of bratislava, breivik actually did real damage to his enemies.
 
Última edición:
For those wondering why he didn't go for a more significant target. here's an excerpt from “Why didn’t you pick some other target?”



This kind of thinking reminds me of Abu Musab Al Zarqawi's, the leader of Al-Qaida of Iraq and the proto founder of ISIS, thinking where they would intentionally target Shias or other ethnic groups in order to cause sectarian strife and weaken the American backed Iraqi government.
His idea is a retard tier cope. What he's talking about is essentially trying to cause spontaneous terrorism movements. If he actually intended for there to be some movement, and genuinely believed that it was a practical way of doing things, then he's have been trying to make cells of likeminded retards to follow after him. It's just cope because he knows he's a dipshit that can't into target priorities.
 
Your screed reads like a millenial leftist faggot who developed an unwarranted sense of internet elitism. Which is why you felt comfortable morally justifying censorship on Kiwifarms of all places because ReAl channers are woke trannies like you.
Fuck off back to your blue board.
Ver archivo adjunto 3735703

4chan feels objectively shittier than it used to. I might be wrong, or it might be nostalgia or something, but I feel like there was a time we would have got support from 4chan during our downtime. Yeah, I guess wishing tranny DDoS attacks on a site isn't a proportionate response to not particuarly liking a place as much as I used to, it was a throwaway comment rather than something I ardently believe. Which is why I said 'for a while', to emphasise the fact I'd like to see the site better off than it was before the downtime.

I don't think the millennial leftist faggots who were trying to take us down were hoping we'd come back new and improved, but what do I know.
 
His idea is a retard tier cope. What he's talking about is essentially trying to cause spontaneous terrorism movements. If he actually intended for there to be some movement, and genuinely believed that it was a practical way of doing things, then he's have been trying to make cells of likeminded retards to follow after him. It's just cope because he knows he's a dipshit that can't into target priorities.
Honesly this, if rightoids had anywhere near as competent organizatinal skills as leftoids one of these European countries would've had a fascist coup by now. But a lot of these young men lack any charisma whatsoever and are only good for lone wolf attacks.

Does anyone at least know the gun he used? Hedging my bet on a double barrel (lol).
 
Atrás
Top Abajo