Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
"When I got to the woods the guy who was waiting for me didn't know who I was because my mom told him to wait for her son." Buddy, dressed like that, the guy probably figured you came to the woods to dispose of a body.Grumpy grandpa YouTuber is on a roll today:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=QouS9nQmUqY
Don’t forget the smaller head size! That always clicks them."my form is male" makes me MATI. No. It isn't. There are so many ways that even women with zero curves like Keira Knightley differ from the male form.
A woman has thinner arms, thinner legs, different fat deposits on the abdomin, even incredibly small breasts are different from male chests. Their face is shaped differently and they tend to be much shorter than men. Even women one standard deviation from normal (5'7.5) are shorter than average men (5'8/5'9).
If someone were to stand a woman like Knightley naked next to a man her height and weight and blacked out the heads to avoid that type of identification you could still tell which one is the female!
Someone who is bisexual will naturally find both male and female forms attractive, but people who have a distinct sexual preference will not. Because the attraction is to the body as a whole, not just the specific genitals.
What people find attractive in another person is hard coded into our brains at a very young age, if not birth. I don't mean things like being a straight or a homo, but hair color, body shape, eye color, etc. Our "type".
All the REEEEEEEEEEEEING in the universe cannot change our unconscious sexual attraction desires.
NO HIDEKI NOOOVer archivo adjunto 3512560
If any of you guys want to see horrible pictures look down In the replies.
Like it's weird how troons always use tweets like this to post absolutely horrifying pictures of themselves.
Exactly, and that's the dumbest part of it all. They are simultaneously making the argument that male and female are actually meaningless terms, but also that the self-identity of these terms is so important that it drives people to suicide if they classed into the arbitrary, functionally meaningless, category. They'll also add on the claim that the social segregation between the arbitrary and meaningless categories of man and women should still be maintained, because they need protection from men. I know a few of them will actually dance up to the line of claiming to want total desegregation, but for the most part, troons will maintain the idea that there is some sort of social meaning to womanhood totally divorced from any sort of biological factors. It leads to the question though, of what exactly makes cis men so dangerous to troons that they need a space away from them? Must just be the inherent evil of identifying as cis.Yeah its the most ridiculous thing. The line of logic they are attempting to build here is that because biological sex can be pretty complex (re; its honestly not actually that complex, but we'll pretend like it is for this argument) then what distinguishes males from females is fundamentally arbitrary, in fact these categories are basically nonsensical social constructs which are completely fungible and up to the varying whims of whatever society, or even individual, interacts with them!
They never quite want to just say it, but the implication is obvious, Male and Female don't actually exist and don't have any reason to be distinguished on any level. Instead everyone is on a sliding scale of 'maleness' to 'femaleness', where for some reason we will doggedly ignore the actual things that matter when it comes to male vs female across basically every species on earth capable of sexual reproduction, that is to say gamete production. But they can't even properly use this reasoning to shore up their own ideology.
If I am presented with someone who displays just about every possible feature that clearly delineates them as a male (that is to say they are on the far end of the maleness spectrum, you know, a good 49.9999999% of the population) then, logically with this in mind, I can just call them a male regardless of their self identity, extraneous hormones and/or surgery, or the fact that they want to make dress go spinny, or at least overwhelmingly more male than female. But I know that this would still be completely unacceptable for this idiots even though I am still adhering to the completely retarded parameters they have attempted to ensure that this argument exists within. Truthfully, intersex conditions have vanishingly little relevance to the trans debate because the vast, vast majority of trans people are not intersex, and the existence of some wiggle room on the fuzzy edges of the boundaries between either sex does not invalidate the overwhelming applicability of the sex distinction to the obviously overwhelming majority of not just people, but every species capable of sexual reproduction bar those that are simultaneous hermaphrodites (and even then, it doesn't really explode the binary since its merely just the ability to produce both gametes co-existing in the same entity).
Let me give a little analogy of why this annoys me, its like running into somebody who really quizzes me on whether or not a donkey and a horse are different species. If I'm defending the position that they are different species there's some things that can be pointed towards that show a certain grey area that raises some questions, like Donkey's and Horses can reproduce and make Mules, and in a very slim number of cases some of those Mules themselves can be fertile, so I can recognize that there exists a little bit of overlap in reality that makes the boundaries a bit more fuzzy than the hardline definition of species (re: the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction) would prefer. After we've talked about this ambiguity between horses and donkeys the other guy then stops me and says 'Aha, now that such an ambiguity has been established that means I am justified in identifying as a giant tube worm and not a human, how is it any different from the difference between a Donkey and a Horse!?'. Just the stupidest most ridiculous jump of reasoning based on extreme fixation on the fuzziness on the extreme edges of definitions like species or male and female that TRAs do all the time, and I'm being a generous with this analogy since the difference between the sexes is far more obvious and clearly defined than the difference between species.
Well, just made use of the downvoteThe Women's March has a good one.
Ver archivo adjunto 3513953
Alice here telling everyone he's a beautiful lady:Ver archivo adjunto 3513951
Ver archivo adjunto 3514005
Ver archivo adjunto 3514007
Males do have breasts, Alice. They're just shaped differently and do not produce milk.
Add it to the Radich logic of "estrogen literally made me female".
Alice also uses the Shinigami Eyes app, not knowing it was made by a rapist.
Alice hands around Joss Prior, Ann Coates and the Rest. Haven't found many photos of him.
We talk about not dating trannies exactly because you go out of your way to tell everyone how rejecting trannies for being trannies is evil and how everyone needs to see you as potential partners. Nobody would bother with "genital preference" if it was okey to just reject trannies without drama. It's semi polite excuse to avoid you and drama.The “dating preferences” controversy was recently discussed on r/MTF
Ver archivo adjunto 3514119
Some of my favorite comments with my favorite parts highlighted.Ver archivo adjunto 3514128Ver archivo adjunto 3514129Ver archivo adjunto 3514130Ver archivo adjunto 3514131Ver archivo adjunto 3514133Ver archivo adjunto 3514134
Lol, her is a picture of Zendaya with Hunter Schafer. Please tell me how this is not about physical attraction?Ver archivo adjunto 3514135
Are they just blind or delusional? I know many of them are autistic, which results in impaired facial processing; however, can they really not distinguish between male and female faces and bodies?
The Women's March has a good one.
Ver archivo adjunto 3513953
Alice here telling everyone he's a beautiful lady:Ver archivo adjunto 3513951
Ver archivo adjunto 3514005
Ver archivo adjunto 3514007
Males do have breasts, Alice. They're just shaped differently and do not produce milk.
Add it to the Radich logic of "estrogen literally made me female".
Alice also uses the Shinigami Eyes app, not knowing it was made by a rapist.
Alice hands around Joss Prior, Ann Coates and the Rest. Haven't found many photos of him.
Best cosplay of Zippy the Pinhead I've ever seen. Down to the five o'clock shadow. (I can't be the only oldfag who remembers this cartoon, can I?)They accidentally set the machine to 'Uncle Chester'
Ver archivo adjunto 3513820
My response to this is always: "Well if you're so heckin valid and indistinguishable, why don't you just date each other?"The “dating preferences” controversy was recently discussed on r/MTF
Ver archivo adjunto 3514119
Some of my favorite comments with my favorite parts highlighted.Ver archivo adjunto 3514128Ver archivo adjunto 3514129Ver archivo adjunto 3514130Ver archivo adjunto 3514131Ver archivo adjunto 3514133Ver archivo adjunto 3514134
Lol, here is a picture of Zendaya with Hunter Schafer. Please tell me how this is not about physical attraction?Ver archivo adjunto 3514135
Are they just blind or delusional? I know many of them are autistic, which results in impaired facial processing; however, can they really not distinguish between male and female faces and bodies?
Keira Knightly might be skinny and have no tits but her face is iconic. I put her up there with Natalie Dormer and Katherine Zeta Jones, and those two DO have curves. Dormer's face is a muse of mine; I love basing OCs off of her. She's got such a unique, sharp beauty. And she is still different from men."my form is male" makes me MATI. No. It isn't. There are so many ways that even women with zero curves like Keira Knightley differ from the male form.
A woman has thinner arms, thinner legs, different fat deposits on the abdomin, even incredibly small breasts are different from male chests. Their face is shaped differently and they tend to be much shorter than men. Even women one standard deviation from normal (5'7.5) are shorter than average men (5'8/5'9).
If someone were to stand a woman like Knightley naked next to a man her height and weight and blacked out the heads to avoid that type of identification you could still tell which one is the female!
Someone who is bisexual will naturally find both male and female forms attractive, but people who have a distinct sexual preference will not. Because the attraction is to the body as a whole, not just the specific genitals.
What people find attractive in another person is hard coded into our brains at a very young age, if not birth. I don't mean things like being a straight or a homo, but hair color, body shape, eye color, etc. Our "type".
All the REEEEEEEEEEEEING in the universe cannot change our unconscious sexual attraction desires.
Holy fuck, not even the Filipinos are safe.
Keira Knightly might be skinny and have no tits but her face is iconic. I put her up there with Natalie Dormer and Katherine Zeta Jones, and those two DO have curves. Dormer's face is a muse of mine; I love basing OCs off of her. She's got such a unique, sharp beauty. And she is still different from men.
Matt Smith, a former Doctor Who, also has a strong jaw. He's not conventionally attractive but he has his own unique attraction. He has a boxy face to boot, but he's still male. There are so many variations of male and female appearances - and not just among white people, there are racial differences too (see Li Bingbing and Gong Li) - that when troons say they are 'undoubtedly' female, the first thing I want to do is look at their faces. And nearly all of them have necks like giraffes, faces like horses, or are fat. The ones who have a Chad physique all age horribly on estrogen. They look fucked up.
And you're right, it isn't JUST genitalia. It's their essence, physical and biological, of them being male or female. Forcing people to like you - and we saw this with the Superstraight thing and how they denied they were forcing ANYONE to like them - only turns them off harder.
I mean, when it comes to someone telling you they are a tranny you're naturally put off to them. You don't go thinking about "this is another person" you are naturally disgusted and mistrustful of them because they are constantly lying to themselves about reality to the point they indulge into a delusion and mutilating their own bodies. Much like you knowing someone that sawed off their own arm and telling you how happy they are about it.We talk about not dating trannies exactly because you go out of your way to tell everyone how rejecting trannies for being trannies is evil and how everyone needs to see you as potential partners. Nobody would bother with "genital preference" if it was okey to just reject trannies without drama. It's semi polite excuse to avoid you and drama.
Also getting categorically rejected is normal and something all people deal with. Some less than others but nobody is immune. Too old, to short, tiny boobs, low hanging boobs, bad skin, fat, has kids, political opinion and so on. Everyone has or will have a feature that makes them lesser on the dating market and they do hear how that's a no go. Most people don't care that much, they just go and find at least one person who is cool with it.
There are many ways you can tell apart a woman from a man just by looking at their bodies. It's not arbitrary like trannies say, there are many key differences that when you look, you will start to notice. But the most important is the face. Like you say, it's the essence of the person. You look at someone in the face and you will know. Unlike trannies like to do and put pictures of women to go for low hanging TERFs, most people will be able to tell a woman from a man no matter how sharp her features are.Keira Knightly might be skinny and have no tits but her face is iconic. I put her up there with Natalie Dormer and Katherine Zeta Jones, and those two DO have curves. Dormer's face is a muse of mine; I love basing OCs off of her. She's got such a unique, sharp beauty. And she is still different from men.
There are many ways you can tell apart a woman from a man just by looking at their bodies. It's not arbitrary like trannies say, there are many key differences that when you look, you will start to notice. But the most important is the face. Like you say, it's the essence of the person. You look at someone in the face and you will know. Unlike trannies like to do and put pictures of women to go for low hanging TERFs, most people will be able to tell a woman from a man no matter how sharp her features are.