📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

So many of these would look decent-ish if they didn't have the neon hair. You're allowed to have natural hair colors as a genderspecial, guys.
 
The Women's March has a good one.
Archive.
This is the same women's march that banned the use of pink pussy hats because troons like Laverne Cox got upset, and decentered women from reproductive rights because Aidens got upset. There is no winning here.
Remember the Aiden who said to center Aidens and enbies into abortion rights? That tweet got 400k likes.
If you cannot define women, you cannot defend women.
Screenshot_20220721-144508.png
Alice here telling everyone he's a beautiful lady:

Screenshot_20220721-144711.png
Screenshot_20220721-145311.png
Screenshot_20220721-145326.png
Males do have breasts, Alice. They're just shaped differently and do not produce milk.

Add it to the Radich logic of "estrogen literally made me female".
Alice also uses the Shinigami Eyes app, not knowing it was made by a rapist.
Alice hands around Joss Prior, Ann Coates and the Rest. Haven't found many photos of him.
 
Última edición:
"my form is male" makes me MATI. No. It isn't. There are so many ways that even women with zero curves like Keira Knightley differ from the male form.

A woman has thinner arms, thinner legs, different fat deposits on the abdomin, even incredibly small breasts are different from male chests. Their face is shaped differently and they tend to be much shorter than men. Even women one standard deviation from normal (5'7.5) are shorter than average men (5'8/5'9).

If someone were to stand a woman like Knightley naked next to a man her height and weight and blacked out the heads to avoid that type of identification you could still tell which one is the female!

Someone who is bisexual will naturally find both male and female forms attractive, but people who have a distinct sexual preference will not. Because the attraction is to the body as a whole, not just the specific genitals.

What people find attractive in another person is hard coded into our brains at a very young age, if not birth. I don't mean things like being a straight or a homo, but hair color, body shape, eye color, etc. Our "type".

All the REEEEEEEEEEEEING in the universe cannot change our unconscious sexual attraction desires.
Don’t forget the smaller head size! That always clicks them.
 
Yeah its the most ridiculous thing. The line of logic they are attempting to build here is that because biological sex can be pretty complex (re; its honestly not actually that complex, but we'll pretend like it is for this argument) then what distinguishes males from females is fundamentally arbitrary, in fact these categories are basically nonsensical social constructs which are completely fungible and up to the varying whims of whatever society, or even individual, interacts with them!

They never quite want to just say it, but the implication is obvious, Male and Female don't actually exist and don't have any reason to be distinguished on any level. Instead everyone is on a sliding scale of 'maleness' to 'femaleness', where for some reason we will doggedly ignore the actual things that matter when it comes to male vs female across basically every species on earth capable of sexual reproduction, that is to say gamete production. But they can't even properly use this reasoning to shore up their own ideology.

If I am presented with someone who displays just about every possible feature that clearly delineates them as a male (that is to say they are on the far end of the maleness spectrum, you know, a good 49.9999999% of the population) then, logically with this in mind, I can just call them a male regardless of their self identity, extraneous hormones and/or surgery, or the fact that they want to make dress go spinny, or at least overwhelmingly more male than female. But I know that this would still be completely unacceptable for this idiots even though I am still adhering to the completely retarded parameters they have attempted to ensure that this argument exists within. Truthfully, intersex conditions have vanishingly little relevance to the trans debate because the vast, vast majority of trans people are not intersex, and the existence of some wiggle room on the fuzzy edges of the boundaries between either sex does not invalidate the overwhelming applicability of the sex distinction to the obviously overwhelming majority of not just people, but every species capable of sexual reproduction bar those that are simultaneous hermaphrodites (and even then, it doesn't really explode the binary since its merely just the ability to produce both gametes co-existing in the same entity).

Let me give a little analogy of why this annoys me, its like running into somebody who really quizzes me on whether or not a donkey and a horse are different species. If I'm defending the position that they are different species there's some things that can be pointed towards that show a certain grey area that raises some questions, like Donkey's and Horses can reproduce and make Mules, and in a very slim number of cases some of those Mules themselves can be fertile, so I can recognize that there exists a little bit of overlap in reality that makes the boundaries a bit more fuzzy than the hardline definition of species (re: the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction) would prefer. After we've talked about this ambiguity between horses and donkeys the other guy then stops me and says 'Aha, now that such an ambiguity has been established that means I am justified in identifying as a giant tube worm and not a human, how is it any different from the difference between a Donkey and a Horse!?'. Just the stupidest most ridiculous jump of reasoning based on extreme fixation on the fuzziness on the extreme edges of definitions like species or male and female that TRAs do all the time, and I'm being a generous with this analogy since the difference between the sexes is far more obvious and clearly defined than the difference between species.
Exactly, and that's the dumbest part of it all. They are simultaneously making the argument that male and female are actually meaningless terms, but also that the self-identity of these terms is so important that it drives people to suicide if they classed into the arbitrary, functionally meaningless, category. They'll also add on the claim that the social segregation between the arbitrary and meaningless categories of man and women should still be maintained, because they need protection from men. I know a few of them will actually dance up to the line of claiming to want total desegregation, but for the most part, troons will maintain the idea that there is some sort of social meaning to womanhood totally divorced from any sort of biological factors. It leads to the question though, of what exactly makes cis men so dangerous to troons that they need a space away from them? Must just be the inherent evil of identifying as cis.
 
The “dating preferences” controversy was recently discussed on r/MTF
238A9EBF-5B57-47A3-BCA6-235C4E7D1541.jpeg
Some of my favorite comments with my favorite parts highlighted. D6ECDA0C-4554-4261-BAB4-D2D3C7004350.jpeg C80AB863-E435-453B-9256-31E7F3B8F6F3.jpeg D2737536-1302-4783-8127-1FDF24097A2F.jpeg 464A16CD-A328-48C9-8899-50FB3265FB54.jpeg DCD9D75C-D35F-432E-853F-2FFACDCDD688.jpeg 7584E0AE-22C9-4C29-A80D-BD1D4D762232.jpeg
Lol, here is a picture of Zendaya with Hunter Schafer. Please tell me how this is not about physical attraction? 3D831586-5835-4E0C-8353-1364FB4A4B0B.jpeg
Are they just blind or delusional? I know many of them are autistic, which results in impaired facial processing; however, can they really not distinguish between male and female faces and bodies?
 
Última edición:
When it comes to trannies playing in women's sports, there is an actual thoughtful justification for why that should be allowed. Basically, for a man that thinks he's a woman, it would be harmful to him to force him to play with men, because you're telling him "no, you're actually a man." So instead, we should let these guys play with the women to humor him and make it so he doesn't harm himself.

Now, that's a very stupid reason. BUT, it's actually way better than the current zeitgeist from the left, which is that actually we should let them play with women because they are women. I could understand if the left was pushing the former over the latter. It shows compassion, which was typically associated with the left. But what we have now is a braindead retarded anti-scientific position that falls apart instantly, but they cannot help themselves. Because if they were to actually cede the argument that "trans women are just men who think they're women," their entire worldview collapses. Even though every single of them actually believes this. The entire ideology is built on phony lies that none of them believe
 
The Women's March has a good one.
Ver archivo adjunto 3513953
Alice here telling everyone he's a beautiful lady:Ver archivo adjunto 3513951
Ver archivo adjunto 3514005
Ver archivo adjunto 3514007
Males do have breasts, Alice. They're just shaped differently and do not produce milk.

Add it to the Radich logic of "estrogen literally made me female".
Alice also uses the Shinigami Eyes app, not knowing it was made by a rapist.
Alice hands around Joss Prior, Ann Coates and the Rest. Haven't found many photos of him.
Well, just made use of the downvote 🐸
 
The “dating preferences” controversy was recently discussed on r/MTF
Ver archivo adjunto 3514119
Some of my favorite comments with my favorite parts highlighted.Ver archivo adjunto 3514128Ver archivo adjunto 3514129Ver archivo adjunto 3514130Ver archivo adjunto 3514131Ver archivo adjunto 3514133Ver archivo adjunto 3514134
Lol, her is a picture of Zendaya with Hunter Schafer. Please tell me how this is not about physical attraction?Ver archivo adjunto 3514135
Are they just blind or delusional? I know many of them are autistic, which results in impaired facial processing; however, can they really not distinguish between male and female faces and bodies?
We talk about not dating trannies exactly because you go out of your way to tell everyone how rejecting trannies for being trannies is evil and how everyone needs to see you as potential partners. Nobody would bother with "genital preference" if it was okey to just reject trannies without drama. It's semi polite excuse to avoid you and drama.

Also getting categorically rejected is normal and something all people deal with. Some less than others but nobody is immune. Too old, to short, tiny boobs, low hanging boobs, bad skin, fat, has kids, political opinion and so on. Everyone has or will have a feature that makes them lesser on the dating market and they do hear how that's a no go. Most people don't care that much, they just go and find at least one person who is cool with it.
 
The Women's March has a good one.
Ver archivo adjunto 3513953
Alice here telling everyone he's a beautiful lady:Ver archivo adjunto 3513951
Ver archivo adjunto 3514005
Ver archivo adjunto 3514007
Males do have breasts, Alice. They're just shaped differently and do not produce milk.

Add it to the Radich logic of "estrogen literally made me female".
Alice also uses the Shinigami Eyes app, not knowing it was made by a rapist.
Alice hands around Joss Prior, Ann Coates and the Rest. Haven't found many photos of him.
D575DAE8-6C4F-4294-AE89-EFE296A0AF3A.jpeg
Reminder that Women’s March invited a self-admitted rapist, who tried to forcibly impregnate a trans man, to speak at the event. They are not a true feminist organization.
 
The “dating preferences” controversy was recently discussed on r/MTF
Ver archivo adjunto 3514119
Some of my favorite comments with my favorite parts highlighted.Ver archivo adjunto 3514128Ver archivo adjunto 3514129Ver archivo adjunto 3514130Ver archivo adjunto 3514131Ver archivo adjunto 3514133Ver archivo adjunto 3514134
Lol, here is a picture of Zendaya with Hunter Schafer. Please tell me how this is not about physical attraction?Ver archivo adjunto 3514135
Are they just blind or delusional? I know many of them are autistic, which results in impaired facial processing; however, can they really not distinguish between male and female faces and bodies?
My response to this is always: "Well if you're so heckin valid and indistinguishable, why don't you just date each other?"
Seething follows.
 
"my form is male" makes me MATI. No. It isn't. There are so many ways that even women with zero curves like Keira Knightley differ from the male form.

A woman has thinner arms, thinner legs, different fat deposits on the abdomin, even incredibly small breasts are different from male chests. Their face is shaped differently and they tend to be much shorter than men. Even women one standard deviation from normal (5'7.5) are shorter than average men (5'8/5'9).

If someone were to stand a woman like Knightley naked next to a man her height and weight and blacked out the heads to avoid that type of identification you could still tell which one is the female!

Someone who is bisexual will naturally find both male and female forms attractive, but people who have a distinct sexual preference will not. Because the attraction is to the body as a whole, not just the specific genitals.

What people find attractive in another person is hard coded into our brains at a very young age, if not birth. I don't mean things like being a straight or a homo, but hair color, body shape, eye color, etc. Our "type".

All the REEEEEEEEEEEEING in the universe cannot change our unconscious sexual attraction desires.
Keira Knightly might be skinny and have no tits but her face is iconic. I put her up there with Natalie Dormer and Katherine Zeta Jones, and those two DO have curves. Dormer's face is a muse of mine; I love basing OCs off of her. She's got such a unique, sharp beauty. And she is still different from men.
Matt Smith, a former Doctor Who, also has a strong jaw. He's not conventionally attractive but he has his own unique attraction. He has a boxy face to boot, but he's still male. There are so many variations of male and female appearances - and not just among white people, there are racial differences too (see Li Bingbing and Gong Li) - that when troons say they are 'undoubtedly' female, the first thing I want to do is look at their faces. And nearly all of them have necks like giraffes, faces like horses, or are fat. The ones who have a Chad physique all age horribly on estrogen. They look fucked up.

And you're right, it isn't JUST genitalia. It's their essence, physical and biological, of them being male or female. Forcing people to like you - and we saw this with the Superstraight thing and how they denied they were forcing ANYONE to like them - only turns them off harder.
 
This guy looks like a Batman villain who's known as 'The Fiddler' :suffering:
Ver archivo adjunto 3513344


The key thing with this guy and why he freaks me out even more than the globular heifer troons, the thin-lip grease hair troons, the anime kneesock gamer troons, the autie 5head teen troons. the middle aged saggy man turkey neck troons etc is that this guy is keeping that shiny bald male head of his on full show in a deliberate action to disconcert people.

It’s similar to the beard troons; a way of shocking people, grabbing attention and importantly, reminding women that yes, he still could do whatever he wants to you. He’s still thoroughly male. He *could* blend in with a wig, but oh no honey, making people awkward is just so much more gratifying.
 
Keira Knightly might be skinny and have no tits but her face is iconic. I put her up there with Natalie Dormer and Katherine Zeta Jones, and those two DO have curves. Dormer's face is a muse of mine; I love basing OCs off of her. She's got such a unique, sharp beauty. And she is still different from men.
Matt Smith, a former Doctor Who, also has a strong jaw. He's not conventionally attractive but he has his own unique attraction. He has a boxy face to boot, but he's still male. There are so many variations of male and female appearances - and not just among white people, there are racial differences too (see Li Bingbing and Gong Li) - that when troons say they are 'undoubtedly' female, the first thing I want to do is look at their faces. And nearly all of them have necks like giraffes, faces like horses, or are fat. The ones who have a Chad physique all age horribly on estrogen. They look fucked up.

And you're right, it isn't JUST genitalia. It's their essence, physical and biological, of them being male or female. Forcing people to like you - and we saw this with the Superstraight thing and how they denied they were forcing ANYONE to like them - only turns them off harder.

I wasn't trying to say she's unattractive or anything; she's stunning. I love her. She was just the first woman I could think of that's known for not having curves.

See @Inebriated Raccoon's post up there for how these trannies really feel about sexual orientations. Seething and coping because most people they find attractive don't find them attractive and How Very Dare They?! Don't they know I'm Stunning AND Brave? It's a very narcissistic view on human sexuality and interpersonal relationships. If you're not attracted to me you are literally being violent. It's unhin from reality.

I would say that they cannot tell the difference between an axe wound and a vagina - yet somehow all the trolls who would post real vaginas in those surgery results communities on reddit would get deleted for trolling. If women's vaginas are really indistinguishable from axe wounds, why do the real vaginas always get recognized? It's almost like it's a cope, and they know it. Hmm. Thunkful, indeed.

One of them asked how we would feel if everyone kept saying "I don't want to have sex with someone like you"? It makes us sad, but most of us don't dwell on it and make it a cornerstone of our personality. Most of us eventually find someone who likes us for who we are, fat/ugly/dumb/poor/disabled/whatever our flaws might be included.

Only Incels and angry men get this worked up about not getting laid.
 
We talk about not dating trannies exactly because you go out of your way to tell everyone how rejecting trannies for being trannies is evil and how everyone needs to see you as potential partners. Nobody would bother with "genital preference" if it was okey to just reject trannies without drama. It's semi polite excuse to avoid you and drama.

Also getting categorically rejected is normal and something all people deal with. Some less than others but nobody is immune. Too old, to short, tiny boobs, low hanging boobs, bad skin, fat, has kids, political opinion and so on. Everyone has or will have a feature that makes them lesser on the dating market and they do hear how that's a no go. Most people don't care that much, they just go and find at least one person who is cool with it.
I mean, when it comes to someone telling you they are a tranny you're naturally put off to them. You don't go thinking about "this is another person" you are naturally disgusted and mistrustful of them because they are constantly lying to themselves about reality to the point they indulge into a delusion and mutilating their own bodies. Much like you knowing someone that sawed off their own arm and telling you how happy they are about it.

And on top of all of that, you gotta remember that they are most likely a degenerate sex weirdo that was sexually abused in the past and has a lot of baggage and might potentially be abusive towards you. Here we know it but people that haven't been exposed to trannies enough will be in the dark about the psychology of the troon. But for most, their initial disgusted reaction to trannies will be enough.

Also, it's laughable when they say "it's bad when people essentially tell you you're unfuckable". All people are unfuckable as well because others have preferences. Like you say there are a million different reasons someone will not allow you to get in their pants, but trannies make it one of the core of their problems just because they think it would be the maximum expression of their gender. Not any of the other characteristics, but to have sex as the opposite sex.

Thankfully, people still aren't into genderblobs with mangled bodies, so they will seethe even more about it.
Keira Knightly might be skinny and have no tits but her face is iconic. I put her up there with Natalie Dormer and Katherine Zeta Jones, and those two DO have curves. Dormer's face is a muse of mine; I love basing OCs off of her. She's got such a unique, sharp beauty. And she is still different from men.
There are many ways you can tell apart a woman from a man just by looking at their bodies. It's not arbitrary like trannies say, there are many key differences that when you look, you will start to notice. But the most important is the face. Like you say, it's the essence of the person. You look at someone in the face and you will know. Unlike trannies like to do and put pictures of women to go for low hanging TERFs, most people will be able to tell a woman from a man no matter how sharp her features are.
 
There are many ways you can tell apart a woman from a man just by looking at their bodies. It's not arbitrary like trannies say, there are many key differences that when you look, you will start to notice. But the most important is the face. Like you say, it's the essence of the person. You look at someone in the face and you will know. Unlike trannies like to do and put pictures of women to go for low hanging TERFs, most people will be able to tell a woman from a man no matter how sharp her features are.

Lizzie Velasquez has been called the ugliest woman in the world. She has no adipose - fat - tissue on her body, leading to a variety of other health issues. I do not bring her up to mock her in any way. I bring her up because, though she may be uncomfortable to look at, you can still instantly tell she is a natal woman:

lizzie.jpeg
 
Atrás
Top Abajo