- Registrado
- 16 de Nov, 2021
I will never understand the argument that “genital preferences” are perfectly fine when dealing with pre-ops; however, you become “transphobic” if you refuse to consider dating post-ops because they have the genitalia you “prefer”.
1) All you did was butcher your genitals. It is nothing more than an abomination.
2) You are still built like a fucking linebacker. Essentially, you have all the secondary male sexual characteristics that straight men and lesbians aren’t attracted too.
2b) Don’t give me that shit about “Oh, but some women have broad shoulders and aren’t very curvy”. Yeah, unlike you, they are women and still look like women. The differences between male and female bodies are very noticeable.
It's a superposition of two contradictory arguments, which is why it makes no sense. Part of it is the idea that Trans women are women, regardless of looks or genitals, and that attraction functions primarily on the mystic category of "gender" and not actual physical features. The other half of the argument is that you can't say you exclude all trans women, because some pass so well you can't tell. It's the old double think of transition again, where passing is both extremely important and irrelevant at the same time.
They can't allow the argument to collapse one way or the other, because you instantly alienate a whole bunch of troons if you do. Passing has to be super important for the dysmorphic obessives, and irrelevant for the huge hulking he-beasts who will never resemble anything close to women.











