📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

For real. Diane Ehrensaft, a gender affirming therapist who thinks babies can be trans, was well into the satanic ritual abuse thing at the time.

Then:

Now:
Of course. On the flip side I discovered Dr Paul McHugh, the psych professor who help removed SRS from the Johns Hopkins menu, was a contemporary critic of recovered memories and SRA.
 
Looks like the Biden Administration just released an official statement about Texas’ new policies:


This sentence in the statement is interesting

From my understanding, the results on whether or not “gender-affirming” care is effective seems to be mixed. Additionally, numerous studies have small sample size, bias, or terrible methodology. How far are they willing to go? If they aren’t already, will the Biden administration advocate for making gender reassignment surgery accessible to children? Then we will have children who experience the permanent medical difficulties that many adults who had the surgery face? Don’t puberty blockers and HRT negatively affect brain development, bone development, etc?
I saw this on Twitter yesterday and I remember being so fucking mad and frustrated. I really want WW3 to happen, now.
 
This is the most horrifying sentence in that statement:

These monsters want to expand their business. How come they never want to explain what gender affirming care is? No one is saying these kids can't dress up or use different pronouns. It's about irreversible hormones/surgery. They know this.

Also, I find the entire statement worrying because it sounds like they're gearing up to be more like Canada, where parents who don't believe this nonsense are the actual abusers and risk losing their children.
Child Protective Services already define / want to define believing in biological reality as child abuse. They started the fight. No one is backing down until they are dust.

For real. Diane Ehrensaft, a gender affirming therapist who thinks babies can be trans, was well into the satanic ritual abuse thing at the time.

Then:

Now:
While researching satanic ritual abuse, I learned that no one was ever held accountable for any of it. The psychiatrists went back to their jobs. The police still insist there was something there. The politicians make noises about believing victims. People were in jail for decades and never got apologies. Reading about it will truly crater your respect for people in power. They are all sheep, if not wolves, who will do this all over again if given the chance. They are doing it now!
 
is america different cos here its illegal to take both hands off the wheel when driving. especially for ages and ages.
but then, its illegal to use your phone driving here, and obviously it isnt there, so idk.

not that i want his life as a lxdy driver to be ruined or anything

It’s illegal but American cops don’t give a shit, most “traffic cops” here are fatties who sit on their asses behind a speed camera drinking sodas all day and occasionally pulling over minorities.

Also, Americans are skilled at driving without using their hands much because a) Americans all drive cars with automatic transmission and b) Americans are used to eating while driving because they can’t get from point A to point B without consuming food.

What I’m saying is that Americans are fat


Holy shit that’s some amazing yaoi poisoning right there.

I don’t think I know a greater than average amount of gay men, but pretty much everything I know about gay male relationships comes from gay men complaining about them. Like for example about how it’s difficult for men who want any kind of sustained relationship to find partners who don't just want semi-anonymous sex, that kind of thing.

And these girls are pining for that shit?

How do these idiots not realize that yaoi is a fantasy genre aimed at women? How the hell do they start thinking it’s realistic?

Put all AGPs in a rocket and launch it into the sun.

You can be an autogynephile without being a troon #notallagps

Seriously I don’t care either way if men like cross-dressing in private, I only start having a problem when they expect others to validate the fetish.
 
Saw this on Twitter. There's a bit of a thread there that's good, but I don't want to bombard you with images.
Screenshot_20220303-180823_Twitter.png

Seems like a familiar phenomenon... Can't quite put my cut off appendage on it though.

Article: link & archive
 
I don’t think I know a greater than average amount of gay men, but pretty much everything I know about gay male relationships comes from gay men complaining about them. Like for example about how it’s difficult for men who want any kind of sustained relationship to find partners who don't just want semi-anonymous sex, that kind of thing.
Really? being a gay men sounds fucking awful like you can't have any connection on compromise and btw it also true that they are extremely sexually aggressive and have fucked up fetishes? or its just my homophobia speaking louder?
You can be an autogynephile without being a troon #notallagps

Seriously I don’t care either way if men like cross-dressing in private, I only start having a problem when they expect others to validate the fetish.
Still a very creepy and immoral fetish, still harmful even if they keep that stuff between four walls its harmful for their partners and for themselves and they should seek help about that. Like some sexual practices should be shunned and keep it as a secret or even treated in some cases, thats one of the reasons that i dislike this sex positive movement its incentivizes people to show their disguising fetishes to the world and you can't criticizes them! This is the reasons why things like bdsm are becoming mainstream and that is problematic.
 
You can be an autogynephile without being a troon #notallagps

Seriously I don’t care either way if men like cross-dressing in private, I only start having a problem when they expect others to validate the fetish.
When they expect their fetish to come with legal privileges, or they try to have me thrown out of, say, a restaurant for having a chuckle at the dude in a dress, that's where I check out.
Still a very creepy and immoral fetish, still harmful even if they keep that stuff between four walls its harmful for their partners and for themselves and they should seek help about that. Like some sexual practices should be shunned and keep it as a secret or even treated in some cases, thats one of the reasons that i dislike this sex positive movement its incentivizes people to show their disguising fetishes to the world and you can't criticizes them! This is the reasons why things like bdsm are becoming mainstream and that is problematic.
Ultimately I think a good metric is, "can you still function socially?" If you've got a private kink, but can pay your bills, pay your taxes, and not chimp out when someone has a laugh at your weird kink, then that should be fine. If you break down in tears at "misgendering" because you like to beat off in ladies underwear, then you have a problem. And the problem isn't the people doing the misgendering.
 
So is she straight? assuming that op is a women ,how can someone have a taste this bad? like i never seen a stooning and brave and want to keep things that way, but imagine the smell like op said they are usually a bunch of depressed nerds that like underground games, so no bathing and a lot of acne or maybe op is just a perv man that got frustrated how women don't dress all " UwU anime gurl!" and aren't interested in their stupid games and animes so he prefer to stay with other autistic faggots that have the same niche interests and lack of personal hygiene.

What i want to ask is, does any kiwis had contact with a stoning and brave out in the wild? how did they act? how did they smelled? what type of language they used?

When they expect their fetish to come with legal privileges, or they try to have me thrown out of, say, a restaurant for having a chuckle at the dude in a dress, that's where I check out.

Ultimately I think a good metric is, "can you still function socially?" If you've got a private kink, but can pay your bills, pay your taxes, and not chimp out when someone has a laugh at your weird kink, then that should be fine. If you break down in tears at "misgendering" because you like to beat off in ladies underwear, then you have a problem. And the problem isn't the people doing the misgendering.
I also agree but like what if their partner don't approve that? Does really worth destroying your relationship over a fetish? If a partner of mine had some kink like agp or something i would dump them without thinking twice and this things can lead to another more extreme stuff and so on and on... Plus they are a sign of a sick mind. Idk, i used to think like that too but then i got bitter and stuff and i hate bdsm and this stuff now instead of just thinking that its weird, like i used to.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I also agree but like what if their partner don't approve that? Does really worth destroying your relationship over a fetish? If a partner of mine had some kink like agp or something i would dump them without thinking twice and this things can lead to another more extreme stuff and so on and on... Plus they are a sign of a sick mind. Idk, i used to think like that too but then i got bitter and stuff and i hate bdsm and this stuff now instead of just thinking that its weird, like i used to.
I'd file that under "functioning socially". If you've got a weird kink that your partner isn't cool with, and you essentially have to choose between the two, and you choose your kink, then you're not really functional. Although I think some partners, usually women, are too compliant with gross or abusive fetish nonsense. They should be more assertive and tell him he's being gross, if they're not into it.
 
I'd file that under "functioning socially". If you've got a weird kink that your partner isn't cool with, and you essentially have to choose between the two, and you choose your kink, then you're not really functional. Although I think some partners, usually women, are too compliant with gross or abusive fetish nonsense. They should be more assertive and tell him he's being gross, if they're not into it.
Yes, its because of female socialization i guess and how some people tend to forgive and forget about their partners defects and unethical behaviours its the old saying "she/he must be X but i like her/him" i assume that this type of thing is more common with women but i also saw some men displaying this behaviour so i don't know how gendered is this, i don't have much life experience in this aspect.
 
So is she straight? assuming that op is a women ,how can someone have a taste this bad? like i never seen a stooning and brave and want to keep things that way, but imagine the smell like op said they are usually a bunch of depressed nerds that like underground games, so no bathing and a lot of acne or maybe op is just a perv man that got frustrated how women don't dress all " UwU anime gurl!" and aren't interested in their stupid games and animes so he prefer to stay with other autistic faggots that have the same niche interests and lack of personal hygiene.

What i want to ask is, does any kiwis had contact with a stoning and brave out in the wild? how did they act? how did they smelled? what type of language they used?
Pretty sure that's a tranny.

'"obviously, if i don't know whether someone is trans or cis, i don't ask and it doesn't affect me in any way. but if they tell me "hey, i'm trans", it's like an "aha" moment - like "so that's why you're so cool" - Only trannies are delusional enough to think they pass.
" i also think many have a cooler/cuter fashion sense than cis girls" - Trannies can't help but claim they're hotter than real women. I doubt a woman would say this.
"trans women are inherently magical imho." - This is a very tranny thing to say.
"if there's a girl with an adam's apple and a choker i just die. it's so powerful my gay heart just explodes" - Lesbians just love adam's apples.
" the rules say if you're a girl gamer you're awesome all day everyday!" - SO TRUE

Also check out this winner in the comments "AKSHUALLY trans women are more women than real women"
cope sneed dilate.jpg
 
How do these idiots not realize that yaoi is a fantasy genre aimed at women? How the hell do they start thinking it’s realistic?
From my experience, they don't so much think it's real as much as they go out their way not to think about what's real. They have absolutely no realistic idea of gay men, because they are in self denial about gay men being, well men.

Most of these girls are absolutely terrified of straigh men. Reasons can be many but most commonly these girls are social outcasts with anxiety issues that can barely handle friendships, dating is just absolutely not on the table. That doesn't delete hormones or desire for love, so quite naturally they escape to fantasy. This could be perfectly harmless way to cope but instead of treating it as brake from reality to recuperate, they start to resent reality not being like the fantasy. They don't want to be ones who need to get comfortable and learn to handle life in all of its imperfections. Why couldn't they be born better, like the cute hot boys in their yaoi books? That's just the best, they are the better men than these icky straight boys they have in their class. It would be so easy if I was a gay guy too.... It would also make them a someone else witch can be so appealing to someone with selfhate issues.

Try to point out that gays are pretty exactly like the straight boys and you see them internally putting hands over their ears. They don't want their unrealistic ideas of gays be broken because that means there is no hope. If all males are icky, that means she can't have love and that's just not a fun idea. They can't see that boys grow up and so will she, and suddenly those issues that made her scared will be smaller and manageable.
 
How do these idiots not realize that yaoi is a fantasy genre aimed at women? How the hell do they start thinking it’s realistic?
You'd be surprise that some people can't separate fiction from reality in this day and age, especially in the internet age where delusions are reinforced, not inhibited or outright destroyed.
 
Again I must stress that the governor's letter was specifically about gender affirming surgery (chop shop) and NOT puberty blockers - which WPATH considers a non reversible surgery and is basically contraindicated. Like straight up the letter is basically calling out something WPATH says shouldn't be done to minors (besides the teet yeet in very specific circumstances) so if "it never happens" then there's no cause for concern about medical malpractice or child abuse.
I thought it covered puberty blockers too? (which honestly it rightfully should)

 
I get where you're coming from, but...I don't know.

Part of me thinks it's a bit tacky, but it's honestly so nuts I can't help but like it. I can't stop scrolling up and looking at it.
I'm not even American and I think it's glorious. Never seen a passport with a pair of nuts like that.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo