Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

[HickoryDickory]

I love the drool on her lower lip. Very elegant.

I think that's just the shine from the gloss? Either way, she definitely needs a crew to make her look half-way passable.

 

[Batman VS Tony Danza]

Ver archivo adjunto 61447

Jesus christ, it's like she's trying to eye rape everything.

 

[Ruin]

Ironically, this is actually one of John's best looking photos. I mean, the man jaw/facial structure, male pattern baldness that is badly hidden, and broad shoulders are a dead giveaway it's a guy in girlface, but Wu isn't making a mirror crackingly ugly facial expression or otherwise looking like a spastic.

If Wu CONSISTENTLY looked liked this, he'd still be a homely looking, obvious MtFer, but he sure as hell wouldn't look half as batshit as most of his other photos.

I don't know man. Crazy eyes kind of cancel everything else out.

 

[AnOminous]

I think that's just the shine from the gloss? Either way, she definitely needs a crew to make her look half-way passable.

I've seen embalmed corpses that look more lifelike.

I'm not exaggerating or engaging in hyperbole. I actually have.

 

[Cynical]

Naturally, Wu, you wrote pretty much all of them:


http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/672652656918274048

Also, Wu is STILL spewing salt about Bielefield. Asshole just can't handle anyone stealing his act or copying it, can he?

 

[Jaimas]

Naturally, Wu, you wrote pretty much all of them:

[MEDIA=twitter]672652656918274048[/MEDIA]
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/672652656918274048

Also, Wu is STILL spewing salt about Bielefield. Asshole just can't handle anyone stealing his act or copying it, can he?

Can we call her Liquid Wu?

 

[zedkissed60]

Naturally, Wu, you wrote pretty much all of them:

[MEDIA=twitter]672652656918274048[/MEDIA]
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/672652656918274048

Also, Wu is STILL spewing salt about Bielefield. Asshole just can't handle anyone stealing his act or copying it, can he?

This has been an impressive display of self-congratulatory circle jerking for what amounts to a hilariously hypocritical ad hominem argument. They're actually proving this person's point about them.

Bonus points for a bunch of morons believing they're masters of deductive reasoning. Searching your email for a specific IP address isn't rocket science.

 

[Sable]

This has been an impressive display of self-congratulatory circle jerking for what amounts to a hilariously hypocritical ad hominem argument. They're actually proving this person's point about them.

Bonus points for a bunch of morons believing they're masters of deductive reasoning. Searching your email for a specific IP address isn't rocket science.

Well yeah, but it's barely harder than doing nothing at all, meaning it's a challenge to be lauded!

 

[zedkissed60]

Damn, Johnny, you're going to burn out the bulb in your projector if you keep running it this hard.
https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/672657605391736832

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

Damn, Johnny, you're going to burn out the bulb in your projector if you keep running it this hard.
[MEDIA=twitter]672657605391736832[/MEDIA]https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/672657605391736832

So much for not talking about her, huh Wu?

 

[Accel_Rider]

Man, Wu is a real tsundere for this Samantha

 

[Chan the Wizard]

When is it going to be revealed that Flynt has been yelling at a mirror the whole time?
So salty that someone has stolen his act.

 

[AnOminous]

When is it going to be revealed that Flynt has been yelling at a mirror the whole time?
So salty that someone has stolen his act.

This is the Liquid Wu saga of John Walker Flynt.

 

[A Random]

So who's Solidus?

 

[Spectator]

For those interested I suggest you listen to this podcast Wu and crew spewed out about SB. Despite claims that it was not going to directly be about SB that is the furthest thing from the truth. I could care less about SB...male, trans, whatever. Don't like what she says? It is very easy not listen. Except for this bunch. The pod comes off like a clique of popular high school girls mercilessly teasing someone less popular in order to deflect the glaring nature of their own flaws. Given the nature of SB's "crime against women in tech" this group of malcontents goes way over board. It is a 90 minute hit piece about a MAN who, by their own admission, didn't fool them at all. They knew all along that SB was not who she said she was. Did they ignore her? No. They engaged until proof could be found, if it can really be called that. They detail every aspect of SB's timeline. Bringing her normal level of professionalism Wu comes off particularly snarky, when she is allowed to speak, which is thankfully not often.

SB declaring herself as trans after this was recorded made the pod all the more catty.
https://www.relay.fm/rocket/47

 

[Jaimas]

And speaking of the Online War on Women, that particular narrative just took another few rounds to the chest:

https://archive.is/Jwl1w

This just goes to show how the Moral Panic about online harassment and especially the online treatment of women has no basis in reality, and is the result of double standards and agenda-pushing. Funny thing is that the newspaper I read this in has been pushing that very same Moral Panic itself (it even linked to some of those very articles in its coverage of this study).

Archive of the untranslated article covering this study:

https://archive.is/G47xr

The study itself:

http://www.statusytringsfrihet.no//userfiles/Ytringsfrihet Hovedrapport DIG2 (2)11.12.14.pdf

The part about mean online messages begins on page 173

About the study:

• Carried out between 2013 and 2014
• Sample size of 2000
• Method-wise, it's a survey of a representative sample of the ethnic majority population, as well as a separate survey of non-western immigrants and their descendants (page 169 & 170).

Findings:

• Only 31% of people commenting on social media reported having received unpleasant or demeaning comments (men reported slightly more of this, 33% compared to 29% of women)
  
  
• Men were far more likely than women to report having received concrete threats (21% VS 11%).
  
  
• However, women get more comments about their appearance and gender (the horror!).
  

The finding that men get treated worse than women online is consistent with other studies on the matter:

http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/...pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/

http://www.demos.co.uk/press-releas...s-receive-more-abuse-on-twitter-than-women-2/

I know it's self-reported, but if anything that probably only serves to further undermine the Narrative, given how men in general seem far more inclined to write off rough language and playful insults as banter, not "harassment". Anyway, whatever issues you have with the methodology, these are actual studies on the subject. Do they bear ANY resemblance to the Media Narrative we've been fed for the past few years, and which the UN has been pushing?

Another day, another bit of data openly disproving the narrative. That fucking thing's got to bleed out at some point.

 

[AnOminous]

And speaking of the Online War on Women, that particular narrative just took another few rounds to the chest:

It's basically bullshit. Not that there isn't misogyny and harassment online, but men are no more guilty of it than anyone else. Tumblr has shown that women are, if anything, even more vicious online harassers, deliberately trying to drive people to suicide for the most trivial (or even outright imaginary) of offenses.

Then there are harassers like Wu. Would we count Wu among the male or female harassers? That's a tricky one, considering his latest choice of targets being other trannies.

 

[Furina]

And speaking of the Online War on Women, that particular narrative just took another few rounds to the chest:



Another day, another bit of data openly disproving the narrative. That fucking thing's got to bleed out at some point.

You're assuming that Brianna and her ilk have to, at any point, accept reality. This is wrong. They don't and won't listen to anything that doesn't conform to the world view they have decided is the "correct" one.
It doesn't matter how many studies or polls you show them that prove they are wrong, all Brianna, Zoe or Anita have to do is ignore it and continue the narrative and millions will suck it up as truth.

 

[DragoonSierra]

And speaking of the Online War on Women, that particular narrative just took another few rounds to the chest:



Another day, another bit of data openly disproving the narrative. That fucking thing's got to bleed out at some point.

That sample size is rather small though.

 

[Jaimas]

You're assuming that Brianna and her ilk have to, at any point, accept reality. This is wrong. They don't and won't listen to anything that doesn't conform to the world view they have decided is the "correct" one.
It doesn't matter how many studies or polls you show them that prove they are wrong, all Brianna, Zoe or Anita have to do is ignore it and continue the narrative and millions will suck it up as truth.

BriBri's Patreon suggests otherwise. As does responses to Anita's fundraising attempts. Victimhood has a shelf-life.