- Registrado
- 27 de Nov, 2019
he considered the hellenic race different from the germanic ones lolAnd then his student conquered all of what he's referring to as Asia.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
he considered the hellenic race different from the germanic ones lolAnd then his student conquered all of what he's referring to as Asia.
Because they are different races, but they're obviously more immediately related to each other than what niggers are if that's what you're arguing.he considered the hellenic race different from the germanic ones lol
Yeah, and Greece went from being the birthplace of western civilization to a complete shithole through centuries of muttification.turks and greeks are more closely related than any northern euro group is to the greeks
Ver archivo adjunto 2994365
lol sureYeah, and Greece went from being the birthplace of western civilization to a complete shithole through centuries of muttification.
Some people take the Greeks as an example of white/European superiority, but Greeks didn't see themselves as white.I do. Meds and North Africans are white.
Ver archivo adjunto 2994150
Oh thanks that's close to the one I had in mind.just leaving a real aristotle quote here
Ver archivo adjunto 2994311
It's biological fact. I don't idolize my ancestors I'm just pointing out that there is a biological precedent for why generally speaking Indo-Europeans have much more advanced societies than anyone but South and East Asians.Some people take the Greeks as an example of white/European superiority, but Greeks didn't see themselves as white.
Socrates even though that Meds were superior thanks to the sea (which is funny because now people say Meds are lazy).
I think this idea of an ingenious white heritage is a bit wrong, but I respect your opinion.
The Ottoman Turks brought in people from all over the world to assist in their conquest of the Byzantine empire this isn't even some obscure fact.lol sure
gedmatch has multiple calculators that can basically group modern ethnicities with stone age, ancient ones. here's a greek sampleThe Ottoman Turks brought in people from all over the world to assist in their conquest of the Byzantine empire this isn't even some obscure fact.
Are you OK bro? You seem stressed.Thank god. I hope it drives a fucking slug through my skull.
They objectively did not get it just as bad lmfao. Not to mention the benefits of being an island. I know words mean nothing to you people but when did 10 million Japanese die whilst simultaneously being colonized? But yes bro context doesnt matter. Its the exact sameIn the case of Japan they got it just as bad, or would have if not for their ingenuity. In 1853 The Commodore Perry exposition broke the Sakoku treaty. The United States and England wanted to "trade" with the Japanese and took advantage of its social and technological outdatedness to essentially loot it. The Japanese realized their options were either to industrialize and catch up to the western powers, or be colonalized. They chose the former and by 1863 they had advanced to such a degree that they were able to kick Europeans out of Japan.
Why didn't any African nation do this?
I don't know what you're smoking bro but will ya share? Besides pic related is the average Greek maleYeah, and Greece went from being the birthplace of western civilization to a complete shithole through centuries of muttification.
They objectively did not get it just as bad lmfao. Not to mention the benefits of being an island. I know words mean nothing to you people but when did 10 million Japanese die whilst simultaneously being colonized? But yes bro context doesnt matter. Its the exact sameIn the case of Japan they got it just as bad, or would have if not for their ingenuity. In 1853 The Commodore Perry exposition broke the Sakoku treaty. The United States and England wanted to "trade" with the Japanese and took advantage of its social and technological outdatedness to essentially loot it. The Japanese realized their options were either to industrialize and catch up to the western powers, or be colonalized. They chose the former and by 1863 they had advanced to such a degree that they were able to kick Europeans out of Japan.
Why didn't any African nation do this?
Did you have a stroke?They objectively did not get it just as bad lmfao. Not to mention the benefits of being an island. I know words mean nothing to you people but when did 10 million Japanese die whilst simultaneously being colonized? But yes bro context doesnt matter. Its the exact same
Edit: Either way. Three hundred years of technological advancement in just ten. They prevented ten million Japanese being killed by westerners by being smart and cunning.They objectively did not get it just as bad lmfao. Not to mention the benefits of being an island. I know words mean nothing to you people but when did 10 million Japanese die whilst simultaneously being colonized? But yes bro context doesnt matter. Its the exact same
Yes because the country wasn't half ainu half jap forced together for years of colonization. Japan, because it's an island, was, at the point of contact, basically one ethnicity. That never happened in Africa, intentionally, because allowing it to happen would have seen very similar resultsDid you have a stroke?
Edit: Either way. Three hundred years of technological advancement in just ten.
Are you kidding? Just a hundred years prior the Japanese had been brutally murdering each other. They only stopped because of Shogun rule and even then it was a very tenuous peace. Also, you're admitting that part of Japan's success was due in part to being a homogeneous civilization when western powers showed up. Maybe, just maybe homogeneous civilizations are the way to go and produce the best results.Yes because the country wasn't half ainu half jap forced together for years of colonization. Japan, because it's an island, was, at the point of contact, basically one ethnicity. That never happened in Africa, intentionally, because allowing it to happen would have seen very similar results
Do you actually believe that africa would be on the same level of civilization as other continents if it hadn't been colonized?The "aid" received relative to the punishment dished out is miniscule.
When youre threatened by an outward force that intentionally uses your differing ethnicities and beliefs to turn you on each other because you're unaligned being homogeneous is an extreme benefit lol. I never said non homogeneous society was the way to go.Are you kidding? Just a hundred years prior the Japanese had been brutally murdering each other. They only stopped because of Shogun rule and even then it was a very tenuous peace. Also, you're admitting that part of Japan's success was due in part to being a homogeneous civilization when western powers showed up. Maybe, just maybe homogeneous civilizations are the way to go and produce the best results.
Is not what I said. What i said was we'd have seen them perform much better. Just like literally other non colonized group of peopleDo you actually believe that africa would be on the same level of civilization as other continents if it hadn't been colonized?