💬 Off-Topic Louis Theroux's Forbidden America

[cybertoaster]

German runes have been found in Denmark dating over 2500 years old, but Mayan temples in central America date over 3000 years, in many cases. With the Minoan alphabet known as Linear A dating back over 3500 years ago, going on to influence the proto-Greek alphabet, Linear B.

Arab mathematics were actually coming from India which they conquered and subjugated for centuries in ways the british could only dream of.

The mayans weren't that old, you're thinking of olmecs of which we unfortunately know far less. Mayans still deserve recognition for making their own writting system and inventing the number zero independently of the rest of the world which are things no european peoples ever managed to do, their writing systems being imported from the greeks and romans who got theirs from the phoenicians, and the phoenicians evolved that script from egyptian hieroglyphs.

Keep in mind there's a stark difference between minoan/mycenaean greek and the classical greeks we know now. The dorians for example weren't technically greek but invaders who took over during the bronze age collapse. The spartans were very clear on that even saying they knew their slaves (the helots) were the original inhabitants of sparta and they had to be kept under control if they wanted to keep that land.

Does it mean that white people are genetically predisposed to make such mistakes?

Is this a joke?

 

[JamusActimus]

European ingenuity.

Do you include ancient Greeks and Romans?

 

[WolfeTone]

Germanic Pagan culture is far from a community-orientated pragmatic philosophy of coming together and doing your best. It's trying to survive in extreme environments, eating so much fish your dick starts to leak fishoil, and raiding, raping, and colonizing everything on the northern seas they were so unfortunate to be stuck with. Celtic pagan culture is focused on working together, but that doesn't exist anywhere outside of Ireland, Wales and Cornwall these days.

The mediterraneans showed that working together, establishing republics with certain prescribed rights, is more of a competent victory strategy than hunkering down and minding only your own fiercely. The creatures that did that were wiped out by homo sapiens, they were strong, capable, had survived for tens of thousands of years, as a whole for over a million years. They were wiped out and assimilated and destroyed, without a shred of their culture remaining.

You have to think of the bigger picture or the bigger picture will think of you first and eat you, at best make you subservient to the natural waves that occur. We can't beat the forces that have created wars for fun for over 150 years by fighting amongst ourselves. We just get deeper in that trench the more we try.

 

[DicksOutForBurgers]

Do you include ancient Greeks and Romans?

I do. Meds and North Africans are white.
Ver archivo adjunto qDux3Vf_d.webp

 

[Chongqing]

This is a dumb late question, but is there any way I can actually watch this without a VPN?

 

[JoshPlz]

You talk about America's immense success - what about all the other white countries in history that weren't nearly as successful?

Let me turn this question around: Why are all of the nigger countries in africa complete shitholes? Why the vastly lower IQ? Don't tell me you think that's the culture.

 

[WolfeTone]

Arab mathematics were actually coming from India which they conquered and subjugated for centuries in ways the british could only dream of.

The mayans weren't that old, you're thinking of olmecs of which we unfortunately know far less. Mayans still deserve recognition for making their own writting system and inventing the number zero independently of the rest of the world which are things no european peoples ever managed to do, their writing systems being imported from the greeks and romans who got theirs from the phoenicians, and the phoenicians evolved that script from egyptian hieroglyphs.

Maybe Alexander had something to do with that, who knows. There was a large scythian population that went into the region inbetween Iran and India. Scythians being white, but since they've lived by the equator for so long their skin has adapted to the harsh UV radiation, that has likely varied and changed century-by-century. So the entire argument about white genetics being x y or z is undermined by the very people it's championed by when they self-select for more and more "pure" strains, whatever the fuck that looks like, probably some Hapsburg looking motherfucker who's jaw is too narrow to eat properly.

Check it out dude, it's speculated that the peak of Mayan mass-construction started 2300 years ago. Olmecs were just based and cornpilled. I hate the pheonetians and the canaanites, the latter of whom definitely got what they deserved, but you're right, a lot of modern writing can be attributed to those semisemetic peoples.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_civilization#Preclassic_period_(c._2000_BC_–_250_AD)

I think the oldest Mayan temple was carbon dated to around 900 BC, which is where the whole ancient aliens thing comes from. Notice it's always chunky white guys saying trust the science? It's because they're grifting off of people who refuse to believe that Mayans and Egyptians could do anything without the mighty white man. Which is very autofellatio, by my standards.

Let me turn this question around: Why are all of the nigger countries in africa complete shitholes? Why the vastly lower IQ? Don't tell me you think that's the culture.

West Africa has a rich and storied history. Perhaps you've heard of Mansa Muna the first? Who's collective wealth can dwarf 300 billion when adjusted to modern inflation. Who's very hajj to mecca created insane gold inflation everywhere he went and gave out his vast wealth. With Egypt taking 12 years to economically recover.

 

[Yautja]

Let me turn this question around: Why are all of the nigger countries in africa complete shitholes? Why the vastly lower IQ? Don't tell me you think that's the culture.

Anytime someone brings up IQ is a near perfect guarantee they have no actual leg to stand on. But then again if someone genuinely answers why so many African nations are fucked up you'll just deny it or say "That's history it doesn't affect today, niggers are just dumb!" As you people always do. Colonization embargos, foreign influence, war, artificially placed, and sometimes foreign backed, despots etc have no effects at all on development of a nation

 

[byuu]

I am convinced you are just wasting my time and I don't appreciate it.

As opposed to what? Arguing on the internet is always a waste of time.
You're aware of that as much as I am, so when you reply to an argument then I will believe you're game.
If not, my mistake.

 

[DicksOutForBurgers]

Anytime someone brings up IQ is a near perfect guarantee they have no actual leg to stand on. But then again if someone genuinely answers why so many African nations are fucked up you'll just deny it or say "That's history it doesn't affect today, niggers are just dumb!" As you people always do. Colonization embargos, foreign influence, war, artificially placed, and sometimes foreign backed, despots etc have no effects at all on development of a nation

When compared to the aid the continent has received from basically everyone, and then compare it to similar situations across the world, then you realize anyone else could have overcome those obstacles.

Edit: LOL THIS FAGGY EDIT HAS PICTURES OF NIGRESSES BEING RICED INSERTED IN

 

[Jan Ciągwa]

Die, @Null.

Niggers will stuff their BBC in your ass so far you'll be feeling it in your throat and I'll be masturbating to it.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Anytime someone brings up IQ is a near perfect guarantee they have no actual leg to stand on. But then again if someone genuinely answers why so many African nations are fucked up you'll just deny it or say "That's history it doesn't affect today, niggers are just dumb!" As you people always do. Colonization embargos, foreign influence, war, artificially placed, and sometimes foreign backed, despots etc have no effects at all on development of a nation

Yeah man, really challenging your own beliefs.

During the age of colonization, europeans didn't look at the african continent differently than the asian or american one. "How can I exploit this to defeat my enemies back in europe?"

There is a reason beyond just weapons and leadership why two contintents fell and the other maintained resistance against a (then) superior opponent. There is a reason why japanese quickly adapted and improved on the guns they got. There is a reason why the chinese thought ahead and realized their entire sovereignity was threatened by opium. And there is a reason that after decolonization african countries neglected their railways and why zimbabwe starved after expelling the white farmers.

IQ is at the heart of this.

And this while africans had a tremendous home advantage compared to the others, as they had the most deadly diseases that they themselves were mostly immune or resistant to, and a continent almost as hostile as australia in many places, but they themselves adapted to it.

Development of a nation has practically no effect on IQ. Miniscule.

 

[Spud]

This is a dumb late question, but is there any way I can actually watch this without a VPN?

There is. https://odysee.com/@Shadowman311:1/Louis-Theroux's-Forbidden-America-Extreme-and-Online:3

 

[Kingu Cinnamon]

I think that it has more to do with culture than race or ethnicity which while related are not absolutely bound to each other. I guarantee that a black and white guy from a small town in Texas would be more alike than the White Texan to a Russian or the Black Texan to a Nigerian.

Not all black people are American hood rats. I doubt that the Black farmer that towed Ethan Ralph out of a snowy grave wants to kill him and rape his children.

 

[Spud]

Let me turn this question around: Why are all of the nigger countries in africa complete shitholes? Why the vastly lower IQ? Don't tell me you think that's the culture.

Because when you mix groups of different ethnicity and cultures the end result is conflict

 

[byuu]

Let me turn this question around: Why are all of the nigger countries in africa complete shitholes? Why the vastly lower IQ? Don't tell me you think that's the culture.

A complex mix of many reasons.
For one because Africa is a shithole with a third of it being desert and most of the continent is in the tropics where it's plagued by shit like malaria.

 

[snailslime]

Yeah man, really challenging your own beliefs.

During the age of colonization, europeans didn't look at the african continent differently than the asian or american one. "How can I exploit this to defeat my enemies back in europe?"

There is a reason beyond just weapons and leadership why two contintents fell and the other maintained resistance against a (then) superior opponent. There is a reason why japanese quickly adapted and improved on the guns they got. There is a reason why the chinese thought ahead and realized their entire sovereignity was threatened by opium. And there is a reason that after decolonization african countries neglected their railways and why zimbabwe starved after expelling the white farmers.

IQ is at the heart of this.

And this while africans had a tremendous home advantage compared to the others, as they had the most deadly diseases that they themselves were mostly immune or resistant to, and a continent almost as hostile as australia in many places, but they themselves adapted to it.

Development of a nation has practically no effect on IQ. Miniscule.

just leaving a real aristotle quote here

 

[Yautja]

When compared to the aid the continent has received from basically everyone, and then compare it to similar situations across the world, then you realize anyone else could have overcome those obstacles.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=CsyHbj_SHGAEdit: LOL THIS FAGGY EDIT HAS PICTURES OF NIGRESSES BEING RICED INSERTED IN

The "aid" received relative to the punishment dished out is miniscule.

Yeah man, really challenging your own beliefs.

During the age of colonization, europeans didn't look at the african continent differently than the asian or american one. "How can I exploit this to defeat my enemies back in europe?"

There is a reason beyond just weapons and leadership why two contintents fell and the other maintained resistance against a (then) superior opponent. There is a reason why japanese quickly adapted and improved on the guns they got. There is a reason why the chinese thought ahead and realized their entire sovereignity was threatened by opium. And there is a reason that after decolonization african countries neglected their railways and why zimbabwe starved after expelling the white farmers.

IQ is at the heart of this.

And this while africans had a tremendous home advantage compared to the others, as they had the most deadly diseases that they themselves were mostly immune or resistant to, and a continent almost as hostile as australia in many places, but they themselves adapted to it.

Development of a nation has practically no effect on IQ. Miniscule.

They objectively did different things in the African continent lol. Nothing even slightly comparable to the Belgian Congo was done in Asia. And yes they did the same thing In america. Thats why Latin America and US Indians are fucked beyond belief too. Not to mention intentionally forcing natives together regardless of ethnicity and purposefully chanpioning groups to build yesrs and years of resentment that boils over like in Rwanda. "No they totally did the same thing in Asia dude. Examples? Who needs those they did it just trust me dude it was the exact same"

Also everything you typed is with your end assumption in mind. You're not open to literally any other answer, and thus don't look for them despite their being obvious ones like I listed, because "niggers dumb" is easier and makes your brain hurt less

 

[mr.moon1488]

just leaving a real aristotle quote here
Ver archivo adjunto 2994311

And then his student conquered all of what he's referring to as Asia.

 

[DicksOutForBurgers]

The "aid" received relative to the punishment dished out is miniscule.

They objectively did different things in the African continent lol. Nothing even slightly comparable to the Belgian Congo was done in Asia. And yes they did the same thing In america. Thats why Latin America and US Indians are fucked beyond belief too. Not to mention intentionally forcing natives together regardless of ethnicity and purposefully chanpioning groups to build yesrs and years of resentment that boils over like in Rwanda. "No they totally did the same thing in Asia dude. Examples? Who needs those they did it just trust me dude it was the exact same"

Also everything you typed is with your end assumption in mind. You're not open to literally any other answer, and thus don't look for them despite their being obvious ones like I listed, because "niggers dumb" is easier and makes your brain hurt less

In the case of Japan they got it just as bad, or would have if not for their ingenuity. In 1853 The Commodore Perry exposition broke the Sakoku treaty. The United States and England wanted to "trade" with the Japanese and took advantage of its social and technological outdatedness to essentially loot it. The Japanese realized their options were either to industrialize and catch up to the western powers, or be colonalized. They chose the former and by 1863 they had advanced to such a degree that they were able to kick Europeans out of Japan.

Why didn't any African nation do this?