Full Body Terfgasm
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 22 de Oct, 2021
What else can you describe this as besides pure evil?
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1485359762753548291?s=20
Mad Munchausen Mom
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
What else can you describe this as besides pure evil?
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1485359762753548291?s=20
Oh there's definitely innate differences between men and women, but we obviously don't have the resolution to find those differences. The importance is that right now, neuroanatomically anyway, claiming that a trans person has a "female brain" is totally unsubstantiated. The few studies that have been done have been extremely specious, and none has been able to prospectively use any of the apparent differences they've found to predict who is a man/trans man or woman/trans women. So troons claiming that "science" has proven their claims are lying. There's no obvious difference between a cis brain and a trans brain, because there's no obvious difference between a male brain and a female brain. Neuroanatomy on the level we can see varies more within genders than between themYeh but we still don't really understand the brain. There was this one big whitepaper linked around here somewhere claiming the brain was identical between sexes because the structures look very similar but thats really just staring at the outside trying to guess what these billions of neurons are doing based on the outer casing. Until we can actually read the code (Yes, I know the brain is not a computer) and understand what neurons do at a quantum level the male/female brain thing is just going to have to be shelved.
Archiving this retarded MAN:
tIZlkU9HEky_CCYd.mp4
Dating as a troon? Filipino manlets are degenerate enough for that, apparently. (Damn look at the kike honker on this one though.)
Ver archivo adjunto 2914102
Born Mark Christopher Trent. His mother married John Evers when Chris was a toddler; Evers adopted him and his name was changed to Christopher John Evers. He graduated from San Gorgonio High in 1999.I think she confirmed years ago in a reddit comment that she was not trans when someone asked her if she was trans, seems like she is just a very troonish looking female
Yeah that totally well-known thing where women get turned on by their own scent.“Smells just like vagina!”
Ver archivo adjunto 2914311
This is obviously not a fetish.Ver archivo adjunto 2914312
I mean that person agreed to a date in the first place, how messed up/ desperate were they?Ver archivo adjunto 2914476
Well, most people don't want a mutilated man-baby to take care offsorry
Caster doesn't even have complete CAIS, he should never have been allowed to compete with the women. Most comprehensive source here about his biography and the conditions around him that enabled this.40 years before Caster, there was a skier who was diagnosed with the same. Caster was put on a cringy PR campaign and everyone cried he was a real woman:Poor boy who could run somewhat faster than most and then gladly took the hand the SA sports officials extended to him. His whole participation in any international sports event is part of a con. He was running with the boys when he was a child, his teachers used male pronouns for him, he played like a boy and even went through an icky girls phase.
Ver archivo adjunto 2907680
The skier from 40 years ago? He was stripped of his medals, decided to undergo surgery to "pull out his buried penis", changed his name from Erika to Erik and became a ski instructor when he was prevented from participating with the men.
And even men with complete CAIS still have the advantage of male pelvis positioning, male extremities proportions, male response times, male spacial perception and male muscles, like Maria Rodriguez Patino. I really feel for these people as individuals. But they aren't women. They are men with some funky DNA. And women who have higher testosterone and have no issues from it shouldn't be made to lower it.
@Marvin And people with actual CAIS like Dalea Rundblad or other intersex conditions can be women or whatever. The mentioned athletes aren't.
I wonder what he is on![]()
CAIS is by far one of the most complex DSD because it involves both the Y and SRY gene. They all belong under the AIS umbrella. CAIS, despite the presence of the Y and SRY gene, does not lead to masculinization or Wolffian structures. If there are testes, they do not produce sperm, are undescended, and generally become tumorous. Like De La Chapelle syndrome, who can have fallopian tubes or even a uterus, those are males as they do not produce eggs and generally do not have Mullerian structures.Yes but technically all CAIS individuals are males. Let's get this clear from the start, I don't mean they shouldn't be treated as women, that's not something I'm arguing here. They did grow up as girls and naturally grow most but not all secondary female characteristics so women category makes most sense socially but biologically they are males. They have XY chromosomes, they have internal balls, balls that create sperm that can't mature and male hormone production. It's just their bodies can't react to those hormones. Reason they get so close females that the condition tends stay hidden till puberty and missing periods is that testosterone if not used turns into estrogen. This still isn't the same as female hormonal production and so CIAS don't grow completely like females but get very close. So like I said treating them as women makes sense but they are still males, males with screwed up hormones but males.
They are fully infertile; they produce neither eggs or sperm. Their undescended testes will become atrophic as they are present in a 'female' body. They must be removed or else they will become cancerous.No, they do produce sperm, it just doesn't mature beyond first stage so isn't anyway viable and just get reabsorbed. So they are sterile but that sperm production is still kinda there.
As said above, CAIS is really complicated. But from looking at the range of AIS, CAIS does seem to lead to females despite the presence of the Y and SRY. The SRY lead to those testes and AMH did not lead to fallopian tubes or other female anatomy but they have no prostate and no other male anatomy is present. They develop female bodies and do have higher-than-average testosterone.Apologies for overposting but it’s amazing how people attach the modern, fuzzy, useless concept of “gender” to what were obviously practical (if unfair and sexist) ways of dealing with property, inheritance, marriage, the running of farms, etc.
We were talking about the concept of the simulacrum in the Grace Lavery thread as it applies to trans surgeries and appearances and I think it applies here as well. No concept remains of the purpose of any of these “abnormal gender roles” and how they affected real life and contributed to the group’s survival and reproduction. Only the idea and the aesthetics of the role remain, detached from anything else.
In this conception, no one inherits land or works a farm or has children or marries or adopts relatives or performs any interconnected role in wider society as an integral part of these “gender roles.” Instead these “non-conforming” people are all just kind of floating there, alone, deracinated, waiting for trans people in the 21st century to adopt them as symbols.
The problem with this line of thinking is: if an adult male has injured testicles and they no longer produce sperm is SRY still “doing its job”? In CAIS, SRY did do its job but another gene fucked things up.
I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologically female is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
I covered this troon, he was the one holding the rifle to the mirror. As predicted, that icon is heavily Photoshopped. He looks like your average male twink in untouched photos.
"Kids aren't being transitioned"This myth is based off of the faulty assumption that transgender youth under the age of 12 get some or any form of gender confirming surgery or hormone therapy. This is simply untrue. Common headlines like “4 year old youngest sex change” are masked in false claims and conflate social transition with surgery and hormones. The standard age for hormone therapy is 16 (Endocrine Society, Family court lawyers indicate that hormone therapy is typically attained at age 16, and the NHS recommends starting at 16 years of age). Research into ages of teens that being hormone therapy indicated a median age of 17.9 and 17.3 ranging from 13.3 to 22.3 years at one clinic and another clinic in Holland had mean age of initation of 16.4-16.7, with minimum ages ranging from 13.9-14.9. The typical minimum for GCS is 18 years of age (WPATH page 60, Unicare, and the ICD-10) and the lowest reported case is Kim Petras at 16. For chest reconstructive surgery, the mean age of surgery was 17.2, and only 3 patients were under 16 years of age. Kids simply aren’t being rushed into transitioning.
One of the articles argues that puberty should outright be stopped in 'trans' kids. Because it'll 'save their lives'. Many studies contradict each other, with one arguing BMI increase to another saying it never increased. We also know Lupron is indeed dangerous and it took until 2019 for the truth to come to light.This just simply isn't supported by the evidence. They are safe and not harmful to bone growth, and don't affect greater brain function. The few negative effects of puberty blockers do not change children's minds. Puberty blockers are also easily and permanently reversible, and this has happened successfully in the past before. No clinically significant effects on physiologic parameters were noted. Both the Endocrine Society and WPATH recommend puberty suppression for transgender children.Important evidence to consider is the evidence of the efficacy and safety of puberty blockers to treat children with precocious puberty. GnRH is safe in children with precocious puberty. There is no negative impact on bone mineral density or reproductive function and the treatment did not cause or aggravate obesity. Two years after therapy, bone mineral density and BMD scores for bone age and chronological age were normal, and percentage body fat reached normative values one year after treatment. Menstrual pattern was normal, BMD was normal after treatment, and hormonal values, ovarian and uterine dimensions were normal after treatment. Long-term leuprorelin treatment had no effect on reproductive function. There is little to no evidence of long-term changes resulting from GnRH agonists. Psychosocial problems are improved with puberty blockers, as well as a reduction in loneliness and behavioral problems. Treatment has no effect on BMI. There is significant evidence that puberty blockers can improve children’s quality of life and in some cases, save children’s lives. A common argument about puberty blockers comes from TERFs and “GC” types, and sometimes from the right-wing (oh wait I already talked about them) is that puberty blockers cause infertility. There is no risk of fertility from puberty blockers. If a child goes directly from puberty blockers to hormone therapy without going through ‘normal puberty’, that’s when it causes infertility. Puberty blockers themself cannot cause infertility.
Yeah *cough* that's reassuring.Despite GnRH analogue treatment being used in precocious puberty for more than 20 years, there are no randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of GnRHa on a final height compared with untreated controls. The majority of studies compare pretreatment predicted final height data with final attained adult height. The effectiveness of GnRHa treatment can probably only be evaluated by comparing final height data in current treated cohorts with historical data from untreated patients
(...)
More than 20 years of experience with GnRHa treatment in CPP has provided important data on outcome regarding reproduction, body mass index and bone mineral density. There is reassuring evidence that gonadal function is reactivated soon after cessation of treatment. Again, the information is confined mainly to females. Mean time to menarche post-treatment is 16 months with normal pattern of menses; reproductive potential appears normal in young adulthood with healthy offspring of those who became pregnant (31, 35). There appears to be no increased risk of ovulatory dysfunction associated with factors such as hirsutism and polycystic ovary syndrome, and GnRHa treatment per se does not lead to obesity. However, fat mass is increased at the start of and during early treatment, but normalizes thereafter (36). Similarly, increased bone mineral density at the outset had normalized for both bone age and chronological age within 2 years of treatment cessation.
While there is evidence that early puberty can be associated with aberrant sexual activities and antisocial behaviour in late adolescence, there are no data on the effects of any treatment intervention on longer term outcome with respect to any psychopathologies. Embarking on treatment for the individual child with CPP is not underpinned by any comprehensive evaluation of the long-term outcome data at a population level.
That's the logical thought process. But these people aren't logical. Most of those women in those situations haven't been black. Maybe it's because theres less black women in those fields, but we know that black people as a whole do not care for the troon shit compared to white people and there hasn't been a mass "black people need to accept the girldick/boipussy" campaign but there sure has for lesbians and white gay men. TRAs love to call radfeminism "white feminism" when radfeminism is probably the most popular among countries outside of the west. They do chant black trans lives matter, but attacking black people would leave them without a huge platform to piggyback on since TRAs rely on BLM activists. I think they would only be comfortable with turning against black people when BLM becomes cancelled, and I don't see that coming anytime soon.Oh they wouldn't dare shut down rape shelters
Oh they wouldn't dare send rape threats to victims of rape
Oh they wouldn't dare post porn on JRK twitter threads where she reviews art from children
Oh they wouldn't dare get academics fired for investigating the long term effects of transgender medicine.
I'm pretty sure these people are not above sending rape and death threats to older black women. How many times have you seen a "black trans lives matter" sign at a blm rally. Sure they may support BLM, but only if they can pump their agenda into it. I really think they would dare to do this.
I also think Johnson was slow AF.Marsha P Johnson specifically identified as a transvestite, and is on the record as saying she would not surgically transition. That was firmly part of the genderfuck type of outward presentation that gay men adopted at the time, since their manhood was dismissed and criminalized by mainstream society. There has never been any evidence that Marsha or Sylvia experienced "Gender Dysphoria", and neither surgically transitioned or took hormones (except for Sylvia near the very end of her life). The fluidity of their presentation and even what they identified as (which like Rupaul was very much a "who cares what you call me" attitude) was specifically about pushing back against the strict gender roles of American society at the time.
Essentially, modern trans activists are doing the same thing as they did with the other gender role breaking figures of history, they are misinterpreting the historical context of even the recent past to argue for a conception of gender that is entirely new and alien.
“I masturbated, but couldn’t get off! I’m a real girl now! That’s a chick thing, right? I know none of the chicks i had sex with got off so… i guess it is”“Smells just like vagina!”
Ver archivo adjunto 2914311
This is obviously not a fetish.Ver archivo adjunto 2914312
Probably responded to a heavily photoshopped pfp, and didn’t dive into his social media until later.I mean that person agreed to a date in the first place, how messed up/ desperate were they?
This question just started my brain spinning:What's with the troon fixation on "existing"? Apparently not indulging in a fantasy-fetish is the same as pretending someone isn't human? In that case, do troons "exist" at all outside of preaching girldick online?
Hisentroon uncertainty principle. Alternatively troon quantum theory.This question just started my brain spinning:
For a woman, or man, gay or straight, if they were alone on an island, you could still observe them and determine what they are based on appearance and behavior (let's say there's porn available). For a troon, what they look like doesn't indicate their gender, what they act like doesn't indicate their gender, what their genitals are (or and other biological marker) doesn't indicate their gender. The only thing that seems to confirm their gender exists is the act of someone else acknowledging it. Without that, their own definition states that their gender identity is unknowable externally. In a sense, it doesn't exist until they get someone else to say it does.
I'm tired and I'm not sure I'm making sense, but like, none of the groups they compare themselves to relies on this acknowledgment by others to confirm its existence.
They are so desperate for an Alan Turing or a Oliver Sacks.Essentially, modern trans activists are doing the same thing as they did with the other gender role breaking figures of history, they are misinterpreting the historical context of even the recent past to argue for a conception of gender that is entirely new and alien.
Are there any Troons out there who actually accomplished anything historically? I know Buffalo Bill made a belt out of women's nipples.