📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

:null: Friendly reminder that a thread being featured is not an excuse to shit it up.

They're particularly angry about this article:




Tranny Protest today at the BBC without deaf trans-lators
Ver archivo adjunto 2870806

Look at their faces they'll be gutted when people stop wearing masks can't hide their jaws

Ver archivo adjunto 2870816

God awful attempts at memes

Ver archivo adjunto 2870820
Crazy Idea why not pay an interpreter? I’m sure they could throw some money together and wait till next month to buy a new catboy body pillow.
 
If physical sexual characteristics aren't important then why do trannies take exogenous hormones and disfigure their bodies to try and become female? And what do "intersex" people, who have physical sexual characteristics that define their condition, have to do with autogynephiles whose primary motivation is fetishism?
 
If physical sexual characteristics aren't important then why do trannies take exogenous hormones and disfigure their bodies to try and become female? And what do "intersex" people, who have physical sexual characteristics that define their condition, have to do with autogynephiles whose primary motivation is fetishism?

To hear many troons speak, there's no connection between genotype and phenotype at all — there simply can't be if you're dismissing the importance of genes in determining sex. But material reality has never been particularly important to ultrarationalist critical theorists who not only erect cities in the clouds but actually try to live in them.
 
Why do these people always use intersex people as proof that sexual dimorphism is invalid? Most intersex people only have minor differences outside of the binary. It's like using the fact that people are sometimes without a leg as proof that humans aren't bipedal.

All sorts of crazy shit can happen whilst a baby is being developed from growing tails to having multiple functioning eyelids yet these do not change what we know to be the standard biology of humans.
 
"Here's the thing. Nobody, not even cis people, pass 100 percent. There will always be 1 thing about someone that looks a different gender or androgynous. Passing is BS."


I think that this quote is very interesting because it really encapsulates a lot of their modus operandi: they start from an objective reality, which is to say that some people actually look more like the opposite gender or have an androgynous vibe, and then completely twist it into a blatant lie and a generalisation.
It’s a sort of ideological gaslighting if you will: most people won’t fall for it but teenagers or vulnerable people may, once you hammer stuff like this into their heads again and again.
It does really encapsulate their entire modus operandi, but they don't even start from objective reality, that's the thing.

No, in fact no person ever in history has ever had one single thing about them that looked like a different gender, because if they possess a trait, then that is a trait that looks like it belongs to their gender because they are their gender and they possess that trait. Having features that differs to some arbitrary extent from the average that is stereotypically associated with one's sex doesn't mean those features "belong" to the opposite sex, they're just uncommon traits.
It's legitimately absurd, the idea of being transgender isn't an idea one can even critically examine because it's totally incoherent.

I notice a lot of these stories are roughly "I wish I could express affection towards the opposite gender the way they express affection" or similar lines of reasoning with the common theme being some hangup about the way they think the opposite gender understands and expresses love and affection.

I can't help but feel like this is one of the consequences of people not having healthy outlets to express their anxieties to people who have experience with and know how to manage these insecurities. How many stories have we seen of "I've been married x number of years and I just now discovered I'm poly" or "after # of years of marriage my partner says they're trans." Either community defends these "coming out" stories by saying that marriage gives them the peace and security necessary to both admit some greater truth to themselves and their loved ones, but I just don't see how whether years into a marriage or stuck in high school trying to navigate your sexual development, that being trapped in a certain social environment while deeply unhappy and uncomfortable in your own skin would somehow give anyone the presence of mind to discover some profound and hidden truths about themselves.

I remember years ago when it was starting to get popular to make fun of white Americans for being bland and uninteresting, that a lot of young white people started defending themselves by identifying more closely with whatever country their great grandmother immigrated from. I saw one time someone make a joke towards some girl who exploded and went on and on about how she's proudly Portuguese and she's gone to Portugal twice in her life and loves everything about Portugal and its people and etc etc etc. It was such a ridiculous tirade but it made me think about how young people have become so hyper-aware of and anxious about their identities that being made to feel like they're not especially interesting or attractive can have such an enormous impact on their self-esteem that they would melt down in front of people like that.

Maybe I'm wrong but if this is all really self-loathing and insecurity then there's no way this is gonna last forever. There's only so much crying wolf you can do before people notice that you're just lashing out instead of dealing with your issues like a normal person, and given the strange amount of opportunity given to greedy narcissists who use trans identity to shield themselves (like reddit jannies who delete cis-only lesbian subs, that one MtF MMA fighter punching women, etc) people are noticing faster than they normally would have.

I think you're right about inability to express affection, and I'd guess that that plays into why autism and trannyism winds up being so heavily associated.

When a normal emotionally developed person feels affectionate towards someone or something, they have a lot of fairly well refined verbal and nonverbal tools through which to create a connection and elicit a desired sympathetic response.
Those who are socially or emotionally stunted don't have that. They feel drawn in the same way but lack the mechanisms to channel that.

As a result their attempts to be close with others are usually blunt and frustrated. They mimick extremely obtuse features and behaviors, they become overtly controlling, they substitute sex for emotional connection...they clearly know other people are able to connect with others but can't grasp the nuances of how to do it in anything but the most primitive ways.

Unfortunately as you pointed out the socially alienating landscape of modern society is a major cause in all this, so until something major shifts identity politics are probably heret o stay.
 
Stay out of my fucking fandom, you degenerates.

images (11).jpeg
 
"It's likely that there are more cis women with male pattern baldness than there are trans people"
Trannies coming out with a strong contender for 2022 Cope of the Year and it's only January.

"Nobody, not even Cis people, pass 100 percent"
"I cannot look at trans passing subs tbh. how am I supposed to know if you "pass"? Why would you assume "man" based on someone having a big chin or some shit? It's like selective blindness for some people I stg"

Hmm yes very compelling as a completely unrelated aside I wonder what this totally real woman looks like.

nullcat.jpg
I can't believe she's not Cis!
 
Super Hard Challenge: count the number of non-obese people in the BBC protest picture. Tranny Sideshows/Deathfats crossover goooooo!
I know Danger Hairs have been a meme for a while, but seeing that photo really cemented the stereotype for me. It’s a sea of shitty dye jobs.
Imagine if the entire gist of MLK and 1960’s civil rights wasn’t equality and opportunity, but forcing white people to find black people sexually desirable and any whitey saying otherwise was a hate crime.
Really apt analogy. But I’m sure someone would think it’s racist to bring up because…I dunno, Black tans people? They love reaching.

Honestly, give me all your ratings: But as a bisexual, I’m glad I married a man right before the whole “very online troon” shit exploded. I can’t imagine how fucking exhausting and disgusting trying to date other women would be.
 
Why do these people always use intersex people as proof that sexual dimorphism is invalid? Most intersex people only have minor differences outside of the binary. It's like using the fact that people are sometimes without a leg as proof that humans aren't bipedal.

All sorts of crazy shit can happen whilst a baby is being developed from growing tails to having multiple functioning eyelids yet these do not change what we know to be the standard biology of humans.
Do any of these people who talk about intersex individuals actually know anything about the condition? They're not unicorns - it's a physical disorder that can bring a lot of suffering if it's severe.

Imagine having genitalia that appear 'ambiguous' - how demoralizing that would be for a sane, rational person. You can do the Google image searches yourself. The disorder can also render you impotent or infertile. So not only do you have to suffer with abnormal genitalia, but you also can lose the prospect of having children or a sex life. To treat these people that are suffering as some sort of ace card to support your ideology is infuriating. They're not living the dream.
 
This is "Bishop",
@PlagueOfClowns

identifies as a "funky 'lil gayboy".

Ver archivo adjunto 2871604



Ver archivo adjunto 2871681


Cis gays have got to stahp invalidating the feelings of these not-at-all moronic little girls - 100% FAG BOYS.

Ver archivo adjunto 2871694

Ver archivo adjunto 2871697

Ver archivo adjunto 2871746
Bishop is of course, proudly autistic.


Ver archivo adjunto 2871723
Exhibit #630 showing that it’s a social contagion: all Aydens do the annoying thing that started on tumblr where you make a declarative sentence a question?

"I am literally a gay man? Yes all of my friends also write like this because we all caught imaginary gender dysphoria from each other and now we are men? It’s not a phase mom? I’m a gay dude who likes dudes? There is nothing manlier than softening your sentences by making them questions? Actual men talk like this all the time?"

I am convinced that none of these people actually know what “chromosomes” are, given that they continuously repeat the talking point that they are “not important in daily life.”

They truly seem to think that your genes just sit there in your body waiting for TERFS to bring them up to win an argument and nothing else. Rather than being you know, the blueprint for your physical self.
 
To hear many troons speak, there's no connection between genotype and phenotype at all — there simply can't be if you're dismissing the importance of genes in determining sex. But material reality has never been particularly important to ultrarationalist critical theorists who not only erect cities in the clouds but actually try to live in them.
What astonishes me the most about their choice of rhetoric is that there is for them an insoluble connection between phenotype and language. A trait is "femme" or "masc" and they cannot wrap their heads around the fact that to be a man or a woman is a kind of gestalt thing, it is referring to a totality, the real thing in itself.

Seeing 'trans philosophers' frustrates me at a deep level. What ontology do they have, what theory of language and mind could they have, where your body is to you a set of linguistic symbols? Even an idealist wouldn't have this kind of confusion if they were being serious.

There's an insane level of map-territory confusion amongst them. A word is supposed to be a referent pointing at an object, but at some point in their education they became mystified utterly by the magic of language, and began confusing it for reality. Thus, "woman" is the total of abstract concepts and ideas that refer typically to "being a woman" and can be easily separated from the reality of "you are or are not a woman." They get to have the most insane set of beliefs possible, that language can absorb reality, detach from it, then reattach to and transform another object. It's like if they looked at Victorian furniture and saw the elegant curves, bulbous shapes, and floral embossings and carvings and went "Ah yes, this chair is a woman" and demand the abolition of "it" from the language to accommodate the feelings of the chair.
 
I'm always happy when transgender people freak out and call huge protests and demand apologies and try to get their 'enemies' fired. The more their insanity encroaches into the mainstream, the more people will realize that they're lunatics.

I'm a troon-accelerationist, the sooner we reach peak troon the sooner there will be a backlash against troonery.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo