📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[AssignedEva]

Just noticed that the tranny symbol in the front page feature isn't an in line image but rather the autistic troons in tech have made it into a unicode symbol. it's been there since 2005/Unicode 4.1 ‍️ God help us all. Also I've just noticed that the top left arrow is for "man who had his dick cut off." hence the slash through the arrow.

Ver archivo adjunto 2728321

It is, but the reason you can see it is because the trans flag emoji, , is broken. Most flag emojis work as standalone flags, but this one is the white flag emoji + a merge symbol + the trans sign. The trans flag was added in the last emoji update (along with the trans logo as an emoji rather than just unicode) so it doesn't work on all platforms, but if you're phone posting you'd see it as

and .

The only other ones that work like this are the rainbow flag and the pirate flag (and the unofficial "refugee nation" flag that only works on Whatsapp: 🏳‍‍‍

). The merge symbols are how they do skin tone and gender variants on all emojis like (that last one is a gender neutral Mx Claus and is also new so probably won't display on PC).

Also those merge symbols went viral because someone used them to make an anti-LGBT symbol⃠ that renders correctly on iOS:

I can't believe I'm discussing Dumbledore being gay in Current Year, but fuck it. I think one thing about this "retcon" in particular is that it gets unfairly lumped in with all the other stupid additions Rowling made to HP canon over the years, but this is actually just as much of a revision of history as troons now trying to rewrite her past as sexist/racist/etc in light of her transphobia. The Dumbledore-being-gay revelation is not part of Rowling's woke twitter retcons, it just got lumped into them in retrospect. This particular tidbit got added to canon in 2007, only 3 months after the last book was released and before the last few movies were. It absolutely was part of canon - it's normal for authors to have detailed backstories about certain characters that never make it into the books, and the Dumbledore revelation was part of a larger set of background details about various characters that she talked about at fan conventions in an effort to promote the 7th book. So this wasn't woke pandering, "woke" was in its infancy in 2007. To put it into perspective, California of all places banned gay marriage a year later. It was just a very different cultural time.

Another thing to keep in mind is Section 28. Section 28 was a UK law that essentially forbade the positive portrayal of gay characters in children's media. This law was only repealed in 2003 - and Harry Potter started being published 1997. That's right, when Rowling started writing the series, her publisher would not have allowed her to make Dumbledore openly gay. Which isn't to say people didn't write gay characters under section 28. They did, and they used some recognizable tropes to signal a character's homosexuality in the subtext. And Rowling was signaling hard with Dumbledore - older man, never married, no children despite being good with children, flamboyant clothing and personality, and an extremely close "friendship" with another man who's also a confirmed bachelor.

I hate to disagree with this excellent post but Section 28 only applied to local authorities, forbidding them from promoting homosexuality to children or the "acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship". As this was never clearly defined the response was for local authorities to just refuse to talk about homosexuality to children, which obviously included all state schools.

Spoiler: Section 28 sperg

It largely happened because a school in London had bought a copy of this book:

("Jenny Lives With Eric And Martin") and put it in a school library. I've actually seen a copy of the book and it's basically a picture book for little kids, wherein Jenny goes to the laundrette with Daddy and Eric, Mummy (divorced but amicable) and Daddy plan a surprise birthday party for Eric, and then a nasty lady says something mean to Daddy and Eric and they have to explain to Jenny that sometimes people don't like people like Daddy and Eric:

Spoiler: Pics

and although the book is pretty harmless, it was made by the Danes so there's some pictures that are a bit jarring (they're basically of Jenny in bed with the two dads and the dads are in their underwear). The whole thing got labelled homosexual propaganda and lead to Thatcher criticising the belief that anyone should think they have an "inalienable right to be gay"

So it would have been legal to publish a book with Dumbledore being openly gay, although now I've sperged all about Section 28 I realise your point is more that a publisher wouldn't have greenlit a book aimed at children with an openly gay character because it would have been illegal for schools and libraries to stock it. And Harry Potter ended up being pretty controversial as is with book burnings because it "promoted witchcraft" so I can only imagine what would have happened if it also had Dumbledore openly chatting about his ex-bf being a genocidal dictator or whatever

 

[celebrityskin]

Imagine going from Chad grandpa to whatever the fuck this is.

WTF? He was in excellent shape for a 73 year old guy. Could have easily passed for 15 years younger.

Shirley Phelps Roper lookin ass

 

[Sexual Chocolate]

In other words: it was a law that determined what kind of literature was allowed in public school libraries (aka within local government's jurisdictions). The entire publishing industry of UK children's literature was built around avoiding invoking this law,

Pretty sure it wasn't. How powerful do you think school libraries were in the forgotten dark ages of the early 2000's

That's also the reason the Harry Potter "Fantastic Beasts" prequels don't dare show Dumbledore's gay relationship with Grindelwald

They definitely should show him pounding some magic ass with his Level 8 Fist Of Fucking. Stop cockteasing me, JK

 

[419]

Yet another reminder that there's no point in trying to appease the troons:
Ver archivo adjunto 2728893

/lgbt/ - >even the youngshit tranny is depicted as a twinkh - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender - 4chan

>even the youngshit tranny is depicted as a twinkhon with a long midface Every fucking time. Cisoids... - "/lgbt/ - LGBT" is 4chan's imageboard for Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Queer and sexuality discussion.

boards.4channel.org

>they want us all to be clockable
You are clockable. Without fail.

 

[Shig O'nella]

Now that you misspelled it that way I am going to call him Grindrwald from now on.

Anyway I agree, and we also have to take into account that while homosexuality and gender non-conformity was taboo in both Britain and the US until recently, neutral non-obvious depictions were not completely absent from children’s entertainment in Britain the way they were in the US. Having a somewhat obvious but not explicitly gay teacher that you clarify is gay later just doesn’t strike me as weird given that wider cultural context, but might sound more pandering to Americans. Any Britbongs feel free to step in and correct me if I’m wrong.

So fucking obvious you could see it from the moon was also OK in childrens entertainment, as long as it wasn't explicitly stated.

Evidence: This show started in 1972. Let's meet Bungle.

Top Ten: Bungle Moments

The Most Funniest and most Clumsiest Clips Of Bungle Counting down from 10

www.youtube.com

Edit to add: To be fair, Brit children's TV has always been fucking weird. The Wombles taught gentle ecoterrorism, Bagpuss was Marxism for toddlers, and the only message any kids ever got from The Magic Roundabout was "Drugs are totally fucking awesome."

 

[behindyourightnow]

So fucking obvious you could see it from the moon was also OK in childrens entertainment, as long as it wasn't explicitly stated.

Evidence: This show started in 1972. Let's meet Bungle.

Top Ten: Bungle Moments

The Most Funniest and most Clumsiest Clips Of Bungle Counting down from 10

www.youtube.com

Edit to add: To be fair, Brit children's TV has always been fucking weird. The Wombles taught gentle ecoterrorism, Bagpuss was Marxism for toddlers, and the only message any kids ever got from The Magic Roundabout was "Drugs are totally fucking awesome."

Holy shit the second to last one.

Matches my memories of all the British children’s entertainment I have seen, which is at least 80% thinly veiled faggotry (I say that with affection).

A flamboyantly gay Dumbledore fits right in, especially when you consider that the books are set in a boarding school of all places.

 

[WalMart]

My final solution for the troon problem is to deport them all to Antarctica. They can make their utopia there.

The cold temperature will keep their necrotic surgery results nice and fresh

 

[AssignedEva]

So fucking obvious you could see it from the moon was also OK in childrens entertainment, as long as it wasn't explicitly stated.

Evidence: This show started in 1972. Let's meet Bungle.

Top Ten: Bungle Moments

The Most Funniest and most Clumsiest Clips Of Bungle Counting down from 10

www.youtube.com

Edit to add: To be fair, Brit children's TV has always been fucking weird. The Wombles taught gentle ecoterrorism, Bagpuss was Marxism for toddlers, and the only message any kids ever got from The Magic Roundabout was "Drugs are totally fucking awesome."

Sorry, you're referencing gay characters off of Rainbow and you went for Bungle over George? George the hippopotamus? George the pink effeminate hippopotamus who had giant eyelashes. spoke with a lisp, was a giant softie and definitely had a thing for Zippy?

 

[Shig O'nella]

Of course. George is way too obvious. It'd be like saying whatever the little Teletubby is called is gay.

Edit to add: Plus, from a young kid's perspective George is a girl. Looks it, acts it, is pink, is never called he ... bloody hell. Troonery even back then?

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

Did Letterman threaten to troon out first or something?

 

[behindyourightnow]

Of course. George is way too obvious. It'd be like saying whatever the little Teletubby is called is gay.

Edit to add: Plus, from a young kid's perspective George is a girl. Looks it, acts it, is pink, is never called he ... bloody hell. Troonery even back then?

Speaking of British GNC characters aimed at children who are called George, does anyone remember those Enid Blyton books?

No wonder the British terves are winning; troons over there are taking over a proud ancient tradition and trying to make it dumb.

 

[Inebriated Raccoon]

Ver archivo adjunto 2728514
archive
tweet
Troids: my biology is oppressing me! Male puberty is literally the devil to me!
Also Troids: You think males can share experiences esp going through puberty that might be uncomfortable and/or stressful? OMG the male privilege!! Men have oppression fetishes!

Slight sperging, but women also get erections too. It’s not as visible as male erections of course. The penis and the clitoris are homologous (originate from the same fetal tissue) to one another just like how ovaries and testes are homologous to wach other (the female and male gonads). Consequently, the clitoris also has erectile tissue and will swell due to increased blood flow. Here is a link to healthline explaining this but be aware that they use troonish language (“vulva owners” and “people with penises”) but the biology is fine.

Also, because the penis and clitoris are homologous, some troons will call their penis their “clitoris” and say that their “clitoris” is “just larger”. This is fucking dumb because the difference between the two doesn’t stop at size, they are structurally different organs that originate from the same fetal tissue (the clitoris does not ejaculate semen , doesn’t have a urethal opening, and is mostly internal).

Source

 

[LanceHaver]

Yet another reminder that there's no point in trying to appease the troons:
Ver archivo adjunto 2728893

/lgbt/ - >even the youngshit tranny is depicted as a twinkh - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender - 4chan

>even the youngshit tranny is depicted as a twinkhon with a long midface Every fucking time. Cisoids... - "/lgbt/ - LGBT" is 4chan's imageboard for Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Queer and sexuality discussion.

boards.4channel.org

>the majority of you think we're perverted freaks

and if you read /lgbt/ at all, or really any uncensored/unmoderated troon communication, its clear they all view each other that way as well. They even have threads dedicated to "AGPers" who have admitted to themselves and others they only take HRT to satisfy their own fetish. Outwardly they all pretend they are just like you or me, except trans, but anyone who pays an ounce of attention can see its all rooted in perversion and sexual deviancy.

Of course, if you point any of this out as a 'cis', you will be told to go back to /pol/. Similarly, if you present any kind of 'problematic' statistic, or differing view, 'KILL YOURSELF /POL/TARD'. They can only exist in their re-affirming spaces, but even in those they eat each other over minor differences. "youre not a real tranny, youre a hon/boymoder/malebrained/agper/transbian". It's just comical they think there is some hard science to it all.

Oh, and if a tranny dares to point out any of these things, they are told they have internalised transphobia, are self-hating, are repressing, etc.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

Did Letterman threaten to troon out first or something?

Forget a jackhammer. You could break pavement with that thing.

 

[Burrito]

Slight sperging, but women also get erections too. It’s not as visible as male erections of course. The penis and the clitoris are homologous (originate from the same fetal tissue) to one another just like how ovaries and testes are homologous to wach other (the female and male gonads). Consequently, the clitoris also has erectile tissue and will swell due to increased blood flow.

It’s just swelling, so calling it an “erection” is playing into their hands.

 

[thejackal]

For the love of god please embed your images.

Can't argue with this logic!

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

I can't believe I'm discussing Dumbledore being gay in Current Year, but fuck it. I think one thing about this "retcon" in particular is that it gets unfairly lumped in with all the other stupid additions Rowling made to HP canon over the years, but this is actually just as much of a revision of history as troons now trying to rewrite her past as sexist/racist/etc in light of her transphobia. The Dumbledore-being-gay revelation is not part of Rowling's woke twitter retcons, it just got lumped into them in retrospect. This particular tidbit got added to canon in 2007, only 3 months after the last book was released and before the last few movies were. It absolutely was part of canon - it's normal for authors to have detailed backstories about certain characters that never make it into the books, and the Dumbledore revelation was part of a larger set of background details about various characters that she talked about at fan conventions in an effort to promote the 7th book. So this wasn't woke pandering, "woke" was in its infancy in 2007. To put it into perspective, California of all places banned gay marriage a year later. It was just a very different cultural time.

Another thing to keep in mind is Section 28. Section 28 was a UK law that essentially forbade the positive portrayal of gay characters in children's media. This law was only repealed in 2003 - and Harry Potter started being published 1997. That's right, when Rowling started writing the series, her publisher would not have allowed her to make Dumbledore openly gay. Which isn't to say people didn't write gay characters under section 28. They did, and they used some recognizable tropes to signal a character's homosexuality in the subtext. And Rowling was signaling hard with Dumbledore - older man, never married, no children despite being good with children, flamboyant clothing and personality, and an extremely close "friendship" with another man who's also a confirmed bachelor.

I don't nessicarly disagree with you in a way, I think it's pretty obvious Dumbledore was coded gay, but I can tell you- having been there myself- woke was very much present and rapidly spreading and gaining power in places like Livejournal, The Leaky Cauldron, GT, and other online fandom places. It's not a stretch to think the Rowling, who was already left-leaning anyways, saw this political ideology that was spreading through spaces centered around her work and was very much responsive to it and instead of leaving it ambiguous or a small detail, went right into GAY DUMBLEDORE GAY PRIDE FUCK ANYONE WHO DOESN'T LOVE THE GAYS.

 

[Retired Junta Member]

For the love of god please embed your images.

Can't argue with this logic!

Ver archivo adjunto 2729332

Ah yes, the usual emotional comparison that doesn’t have any logical sense but will appeal to Reddit people

 

[A Sentient Dumpster]

For the love of god please embed your images.

Can't argue with this logic!

Ver archivo adjunto 2729332

To be fair, getting into med school is pretty taxing. Years of studying, the admissions committee irreversibly mutilating your genitals, the pressure of passing the MCAT, etc.

 

[LanceHaver]

For the love of god please embed your images.

Can't argue with this logic!

Ver archivo adjunto 2729332

People who enter medical school and dropout aren't left with permanent side effects like infertility