Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
I think the defense still has 3 more witnesses
Yes. They intend to bring in a weapons expert to prove Rittenhouse did not rack his gun. (Spoiler!) If he had racked the weapon due to a malfunction a round with the bullet still in the casing would have been found. A primary function of Armalite Rifles is pulling the charging handle physically clears the arming chamber. If the gun misfires or jams and you do this, the unfired round is released onto the ground and a new round is chambered from the magazine.

This is actually a major technical innovation in firearms that I won't spaz out on here, but it is a critical one. No live round, no charge pull, Bye-cep boy lied.

They also intend to call a use of force expert. Good call. Kyle explained what he did, and NOW the defense expert will explain why it was justified. No idea on the third guy.
 
Binger is an another Kamala but instead white and gay.
Probably sucked just like Kamala though
Ver archivo adjunto 2706064
If one reads Molon Labe their is a nice section in the book that describes what happens to a political faggot that is killed for their efforts in gun control. I have a feeling that if this DA was a fictional character in that book, the fictional character representing Binger would meet a much worse end.

Its on pages 190-195.
 
Can someone answer my fucking question about what Legal Eagle is? I didn’t see a thread about on this site. Sorry for being exceptional.
LegalEagle does in fact have a thread. Just to add on to what everyone else has said about him, as well as being an insufferable liberal he's also an obvious grifter, running a website that offers advice for law school exams at an exorbitant price that you can easily find for free elsewhere. There's also been some drama about him doing shady things like not spending donation money on what he said he would.
 
Oh it absolutely is the site in question. Fuck yeah. Look at our little sped http://kenoshacountyeye.com/2021/10...ot-angry-when-witness-didnt-change-his-story/
After listening to his testimony again and listening to the questioning today, I'm almost positive Binger's original plan for the Rittenhouse trial was to get enough of a solid case using a tampered account from DeBruin, going to Ziminski with that threat of an arson conviction and forcing him to testify at the Rittenhouse trial that Kyle pointed a gun at him first.
Pedobaum would have been some brave hero trying to save his friend Ziminski from the terrorist ZoomerShooter in this narrative.

But Binger didn't know to many high functioning autists, lying and deception is crossing a major moral line and they will completely resist someone who tries to fuck with them like that.
 
>(6) FBI Special Agents
>(43) Kenosha Police Officers
>(14) Police Officers from other nearby departments
>(2) ATF Agents

The courthouse would glow so fucking hard it would leave everyone blind
1636595057940.jpeg
 
If one reads Molon Labe their is a nice section in the book that describes what happens to a political faggot that is killed for their efforts in gun control. I have a feeling that if this DA was a fictional character in that book, the fictional character representing Binger would meet a much worse end.

Its on pages 190-195.
Nice job plugging your book there :lit:
 
And this is the Dr. Black who is testifying tomorrow. The one who at the end stood up behind defence and the judge asked how long the direct would take. Tomorrow might be fun.
 
But seriously, why are leftists so butthurt about this trial? They do know if he gets off, it's key case for them to bring up if they ever get swarmed by the fascists, right? Like, it's the scenario they always get a boner dreaming about - If anything, they should be in glee at a innocent verdict.
They don't want neutral rules that sometimes help them, they want kangaroo courts with them in control of the outcome.
 
Do people not realize that high functioning autists don't take kindly to someone telling them they're wrong or to change what they saw? They can be the most stubbornness of people when they're already uncomfortable.
 
Binger calls self-defense “common sense” and says the jury doesn’t need an expert to tell them what it is.
:story: :story: :story:
I'm honestly very impressed with the gall he has to say that and then launch into the most intense bullshit session I've ever seen today trying to convince everybody that 2+2=5.
 
They don't want neutral rules that sometimes help them, they want kangaroo courts with them in control of the outcome.
They also don't like the idea of someone taking action. A person who will fight fires( and bad guys) and not just call 911 and wait for a responder is someone who will think for themselves.
 
:story: :story: :story:
I'm honestly very impressed with the gall he has to say that and then launch into the most intense bullshit session I've ever seen today trying to convince everybody that 2+2=5.
Same guy who said to the judge that it was common knowledge on how to enhance on apple and that it was like a magnifying glass, but also not so common that the defence had no basis in saying that using the zoom feature altered the picture, and that somewhere in there an expert should testify, but that it needed to be the defence who called the expert, not the prosecution, even though it was his exhibit.
 
And this is the Dr. Black who is testifying tomorrow. The one who at the end stood up behind defence and the judge asked how long the direct would take. Tomorrow might be fun.
Dr. Black should be a good witness. Binger was questioning him in a pretrial hearing (Dobair?Daubert) and he was clearly a hostile witness but did so politely and professionally.

He just needs to remind the jury that the shots that greased Rosenbaum happened in less than a second, and the encounter from him getting knocked down to walking back towards the police lines was less than 10. This all happened insanely fast. Kid was running on pure instinct and somehow didn't just spray wildly into the crowd.
 
Última edición:
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo