- Registrado
- 1 de Abr, 2019
This guy is a bit slow so he could easily end up just blurting out after being asked about what Rosenbong said "and then I found him on the sex offender registry."PLEASE GOD LET THIS FUCKING HAPPEN
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
This guy is a bit slow so he could easily end up just blurting out after being asked about what Rosenbong said "and then I found him on the sex offender registry."PLEASE GOD LET THIS FUCKING HAPPEN
I switched to PBS and it got better.. I was on the "Law something" oneDepends on the extent of their tism. A guy that age might have developed enough experience to be able to spot that. Then again, he might not.
Anyone else getting lots of buffering on all of these Rittenouse youtube streams? Shady damn youtube.
Rekieta's stream has been pretty solid for me.Anyone else getting lots of buffering on all of these Rittenouse youtube streams? Shady damn youtube.
It's better, like, than the, like oh my God, Valley girl ballistics expert, like, oh my God Becky, look at her butt, it's just so big. She looks like one of those rap guy's girlfriends from yesterday."There's also chayyyyenns in the trailer"
In what way? It's not like Rittenhouse knew he was shooting a pedophile and was doing it as some mislead vigilante action. Realizing in retrospect that the people he shot were bad people doesn't absolve him of any guilt.Here's to me hoping he said 'what' he was in jail for. Because if they can bring that in, call it right there. The trial is done.
Sober, intellectually-based reflection on law and evidence is not how juries work.In what way? It's not like Rittenhouse knew he was shooting a pedophile and was doing it as some mislead vigilante action. Realizing in retrospect that the people he shot were bad people doesn't absolve him of any guilt.
Legally, it doesn't matter. But the best way to utterly ruin a jury against Rosenbaum would be to reveal what he did. Even if it doesn't hold -legal- merit, it would make the jury very eager to give Kyle every bit of goodwill and benefit of the doubt possible.In what way? It's not like Rittenhouse knew he was shooting a pedophile and was doing it as some mislead vigilante action. Realizing in retrospect that the people he shot were bad people doesn't absolve him of any guilt.
Nah, he's even more endearing. This guy is absolutely adorable. Everyone will love him, now and forever."shoot me n-word" Aww come on, dude had the opportunity of a lifetime to say it and he fucked it up
The star war pin didn't lie, he's an absolute scumbag
Who would have guessed from the stellar witnesses he called.
Objection! This testimony is devastating to my case!!Binger is desperately trying to not admit he is objecting over nothing.
Jesus, Binger might seriously be in trouble.
I wouldn't be surprised if they already know. I think it's pretty well known information.. but maybe not all of them knowHere's to me hoping he said 'what' he was in jail for. Because if they can bring that in, call it right there. The trial is done.
Because jurors are human, and a shoddy murder prosecution where one of the deceased is a literal child rapist would sway at least a few jurors if they were on the fence.In what way? It's not like Rittenhouse knew he was shooting a pedophile and was doing it as some mislead vigilante action. Realizing in retrospect that the people he shot were bad people doesn't absolve him of any guilt.