Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Iniciador del tema trannyfucker
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 15 de Nov, 2016
I suspect the LGB staff are far more likely to be breathing a sigh of relief than they are to be "super scared."
- Registrado
- 22 de Feb, 2017
Even then, if they're scared of their coworkers or whoever, why do they think that some charity is real protection? Oh yeah, because they're not rational. They're lunatics.
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 12 de Sep, 2019
they're not scared for their personal safety, they're scared about potentially losing their grasp on propaganda power
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2021
Hunte wants people to believe the BBC is about to launch an LGBT holocaust. Wokists are always making up scare stories.
mister butafuco
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 22 de Ene, 2020
Exactly. They will feel 'unsafe', which in wokespeak means 'not affirmed constantly'. To normal people 'unsafe' is fearing attack, assault or robbery when walking in a dodgy area or on public transport late at night. 'Unsafe' is not the word I'd use if an NB has to have a meeting without a pronoun ritual or deal with a colleague who is not wearing a rainbow lanyard.
If trans people genuinely only feel safe at a Stonewall-approved employer, then Stonewall have failed in their mission of making trans lives better. Stonewall should be pointing out to trans people how safe they are in the UK and that they have no reason to be fearful. Obviously, this is not what Stonewall is about: if trans people feel safe then the grift will stop...
On an entirely unrelated note, I thought I'd post this podcast where Dr. James Cantor talks about the current problems in gender medicine. It's pretty fascinating as he's got no skin in the game and rips apart the notion that trans kids are subjected to 'conversion therapy' if a therapist does not affirm the kid's assumed gender. He talks about his theory that for many 'trans' people, social media, cluster B disorders, ASD or simply being gay is a better explantion of their symptoms than genuine transgenderism:
Upstream: The Trans Craze Is Scientific Malpractice - Dr. James Cantor
Shane welcomes clinical psychologist James Cantor, expert witness in a key lawsuit by Alliance Defending Freedom, to explain how gender activism distorts science and hurts patients, especially children.
upstreamcc.libsyn.com
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
That "unsafe" shit doesn't mean anything more than a dog barking and whining. They figured out just saying that made people back down from whatever was contradicting their bullshit, because people tend to act as if someone making such a claim is acting in good faith.
People have figured out it's bullshit and the crybullies are just saying whatever crying pussy bullshit can get people to do what they want them to.
squirreltail
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 21 de Ene, 2021
Recurring guest star in this thread, Jennifer Boylan, has a piece in today's NYT claiming that the belief "only cis women are real women" is some kind of new fringe idea.
Rather than the belief of 99% of humans since the beginning of time.
nyti.ms
While shamelessly trying to claim the right to sex change surgery is the same as the right to abortion.
And of course the Times don't allow comments on Boylan's pieces. They know their servers would explode.
Rather than the belief of 99% of humans since the beginning of time.
Opinion | Abortion Rights and Trans Rights Are Two Sides of the Same Coin
Bodily integrity matters — for all people.
While shamelessly trying to claim the right to sex change surgery is the same as the right to abortion.
And of course the Times don't allow comments on Boylan's pieces. They know their servers would explode.
- Registrado
- 15 de Nov, 2016
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2021
To be fair, nobody has ever believed "only cis women are real women", because, apart from a few contemporary nutjobs, nobody has ever believed there's such a thing as "cis".Recurring guest star in this thread, Jennifer Boylan, has a piece in today's NYT claiming that the belief "only cis women are real women" is some kind of new fringe idea.
Rather than the belief of 99% of humans since the beginning of time.
Opinion | Abortion Rights and Trans Rights Are Two Sides of the Same Coin
Bodily integrity matters — for all people.
While shamelessly trying to claim the right to sex change surgery is the same as the right to abortion.
And of course the Times don't allow comments on Boylan's pieces. They know their servers would explode.
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
There are humans with XX genotypes, recognizable physical characteristics, the ability to gestate and give birth, and these are called "women," while people without these characteristics are called "men." There is no "cis," there is just "normal."
- Registrado
- 19 de Ago, 2020
DoTheDrew
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 8 de Feb, 2020
More Stock stuff
Union being shitbags
Goddamn I hope this backfires on the union but they have form for this shit.
Punitive Castration
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 26 de Mar, 2018
BBC rejects own podcast’s questions about Stonewall links
Corporation denied Freedom of Information requests from a series about gender and Britain’s leading LGBT charity
The Nolan Investigates podcast explores how the BBC’s internal language on gender has changed
The Nolan Investigates podcast explores how the BBC’s internal language on gender has changed BBC SOUNDS
Jake Kanter, Media Correspondent
Thursday October 14 2021, 5.00pm BST, The Times
Share
The BBC has refused to answer questions from one of its own presenters about its relationship with the LGBT rights group Stonewall.
Stephen Nolan, the 5 Live presenter, asked the BBC, Ofcom and other public bodies about their relationship with Stonewall and its Diversity Champions scheme for his podcast Nolan Investigates.
The ten-part series was released yesterday after reports that the broadcaster was preparing to quit the Diversity Champions initiative, which advises hundreds of employers on LGBT inclusion for a fee. Channel 4 and Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, have already left the scheme on impartiality grounds.
Opposition to the scheme centres on its transgender advice, such as the use of trans-inclusive language over terms such as “mother”.
Advertisement
Two episodes of Nolan Investigates were dedicated to the BBC. They cited information on the BBC staff website showing how the corporation had changed policies to move up Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index, a ranking of organisations based on their inclusivity. Changes made by the BBC included adopting the LGBTQ+ acronym and raising awareness of gender pronouns among employees.
Nolan Investigates revealed that the BBC had used old Stonewall materials to inform an internal allyship programme, in which straight employees could speak out on behalf of LGBT people.
BBC equality training has also used a diagram based on a “genderbread person” to explain gender identity, the podcast reported. The graphic depicts sex as a spectrum and defines gender identity as “how you think about yourself”.
Stonewall and the BBC have used this graphic, which was made independently
Stonewall and the BBC have used this graphic, which was made independently
The podcast described the BBC as the least transparent of the public bodies approached for information. The corporation refused to release internal documents relating to Stonewall under the Freedom of Infomation Act and declined to put an executive forward for interview.
It also refused to answer questions on matters including whether Stonewall had influenced language in BBC News’s style guide. Critics have pointed out that the BBC’s definition of “homosexual” mirrors language used by Stonewall in describing someone “attracted to people of their own gender”.
The Times has previously heard concerns from senior members of BBC staff, who have raised questions about the broadcaster being financially linked to Stonewall, as well as about how the charity’s advice could affect reporting. One source said it was “obviously right” for the BBC to withdraw from Diversity Champions.
The BBC has declined to comment on its membership of the scheme. A spokesperson said: “We are not a member of Stonewall, we do not take legal advice from Stonewall and we do not subscribe to Stonewall’s campaigning. The charity simply provides advice that we are able to consider. As a broadcaster, we have our own values and editorial standards.”
Nolan Investigates also examined Ofcom’s links to Stonewall. During the making of the podcast, the media regulator withdrew from Diversity Champions, saying it could create a “risk of perceived bias” and that “our responsibility is to ensure we remain impartial and independent at all times”. Ofcom will, however, continue to submit to the Workplace Equality Index.
Stephen Nolan’s series tackles gender identity and critics of the concept
Stephen Nolan’s series tackles gender identity and critics of the concept
BBC
Advertisement
Nolan Investigates obtained documents revealing how Ofcom highlighted broadcasting standards rulings related to gender issues to help it move up Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index. It also reported that Stonewall representatives provided workshops for Ofcom staff on equality issues.
Ofcom said: “Stonewall’s advice, and our membership of its Equality Index, have never had any impact on our regulatory decisions. We recognise that our membership of the Diversity Champions programme risked a perceived conflict of interest, and we have stepped back from the scheme.”
Stonewall said: “Our work with the BBC focuses on helping to build an LGBTQ+ inclusive workplace for its employees, and in no way affects their impartiality. Supporting LGBTQ+ people in the workplace should not be seen as a political or controversial act.”
Corporation denied Freedom of Information requests from a series about gender and Britain’s leading LGBT charity
The Nolan Investigates podcast explores how the BBC’s internal language on gender has changed
The Nolan Investigates podcast explores how the BBC’s internal language on gender has changed BBC SOUNDS
Jake Kanter, Media Correspondent
Thursday October 14 2021, 5.00pm BST, The Times
Share
The BBC has refused to answer questions from one of its own presenters about its relationship with the LGBT rights group Stonewall.
Stephen Nolan, the 5 Live presenter, asked the BBC, Ofcom and other public bodies about their relationship with Stonewall and its Diversity Champions scheme for his podcast Nolan Investigates.
The ten-part series was released yesterday after reports that the broadcaster was preparing to quit the Diversity Champions initiative, which advises hundreds of employers on LGBT inclusion for a fee. Channel 4 and Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, have already left the scheme on impartiality grounds.
Opposition to the scheme centres on its transgender advice, such as the use of trans-inclusive language over terms such as “mother”.
Advertisement
Two episodes of Nolan Investigates were dedicated to the BBC. They cited information on the BBC staff website showing how the corporation had changed policies to move up Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index, a ranking of organisations based on their inclusivity. Changes made by the BBC included adopting the LGBTQ+ acronym and raising awareness of gender pronouns among employees.
Nolan Investigates revealed that the BBC had used old Stonewall materials to inform an internal allyship programme, in which straight employees could speak out on behalf of LGBT people.
BBC equality training has also used a diagram based on a “genderbread person” to explain gender identity, the podcast reported. The graphic depicts sex as a spectrum and defines gender identity as “how you think about yourself”.
Stonewall and the BBC have used this graphic, which was made independently
Stonewall and the BBC have used this graphic, which was made independently
The podcast described the BBC as the least transparent of the public bodies approached for information. The corporation refused to release internal documents relating to Stonewall under the Freedom of Infomation Act and declined to put an executive forward for interview.
It also refused to answer questions on matters including whether Stonewall had influenced language in BBC News’s style guide. Critics have pointed out that the BBC’s definition of “homosexual” mirrors language used by Stonewall in describing someone “attracted to people of their own gender”.
The Times has previously heard concerns from senior members of BBC staff, who have raised questions about the broadcaster being financially linked to Stonewall, as well as about how the charity’s advice could affect reporting. One source said it was “obviously right” for the BBC to withdraw from Diversity Champions.
The BBC has declined to comment on its membership of the scheme. A spokesperson said: “We are not a member of Stonewall, we do not take legal advice from Stonewall and we do not subscribe to Stonewall’s campaigning. The charity simply provides advice that we are able to consider. As a broadcaster, we have our own values and editorial standards.”
Nolan Investigates also examined Ofcom’s links to Stonewall. During the making of the podcast, the media regulator withdrew from Diversity Champions, saying it could create a “risk of perceived bias” and that “our responsibility is to ensure we remain impartial and independent at all times”. Ofcom will, however, continue to submit to the Workplace Equality Index.
Stephen Nolan’s series tackles gender identity and critics of the concept
Stephen Nolan’s series tackles gender identity and critics of the concept
BBC
Advertisement
Nolan Investigates obtained documents revealing how Ofcom highlighted broadcasting standards rulings related to gender issues to help it move up Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index. It also reported that Stonewall representatives provided workshops for Ofcom staff on equality issues.
Ofcom said: “Stonewall’s advice, and our membership of its Equality Index, have never had any impact on our regulatory decisions. We recognise that our membership of the Diversity Champions programme risked a perceived conflict of interest, and we have stepped back from the scheme.”
Stonewall said: “Our work with the BBC focuses on helping to build an LGBTQ+ inclusive workplace for its employees, and in no way affects their impartiality. Supporting LGBTQ+ people in the workplace should not be seen as a political or controversial act.”
- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2014
Twix, the chocolate candy bar, sponsored a horrific "trans kid" clip. A boy who perpetually wears a tattered Disney princess dress got told by a neighborhood boy that "Boys don't wear dresses". Princess-Boy's squared-jawed, board-shouldered nanny (likely a cross-dressing male) goes on to physically abuse the "transphobe":
mister butafuco
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 22 de Ene, 2020
Thanks, I'm currently listening to the podcasts after reading this. How Stonewall has captured UK institutions in their grift is astonishing: a protection racket in another name.
BBC rejects own podcast’s questions about Stonewall links
Corporation denied Freedom of Information requests from a series about gender and Britain’s leading LGBT charity
The Nolan Investigates podcast explores how the BBC’s internal language on gender has changed
The Nolan Investigates podcast explores how the BBC’s internal language on gender has changed BBC SOUNDS
Jake Kanter, Media Correspondent
Thursday October 14 2021, 5.00pm BST, The Times
Share
The BBC has refused to answer questions from one of its own presenters about its relationship with the LGBT rights group Stonewall.
Stephen Nolan, the 5 Live presenter, asked the BBC, Ofcom and other public bodies about their relationship with Stonewall and its Diversity Champions scheme for his podcast Nolan Investigates.
The ten-part series was released yesterday after reports that the broadcaster was preparing to quit the Diversity Champions initiative, which advises hundreds of employers on LGBT inclusion for a fee. Channel 4 and Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, have already left the scheme on impartiality grounds.
Opposition to the scheme centres on its transgender advice, such as the use of trans-inclusive language over terms such as “mother”.
Advertisement
Two episodes of Nolan Investigates were dedicated to the BBC. They cited information on the BBC staff website showing how the corporation had changed policies to move up Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index, a ranking of organisations based on their inclusivity. Changes made by the BBC included adopting the LGBTQ+ acronym and raising awareness of gender pronouns among employees.
Nolan Investigates revealed that the BBC had used old Stonewall materials to inform an internal allyship programme, in which straight employees could speak out on behalf of LGBT people.
BBC equality training has also used a diagram based on a “genderbread person” to explain gender identity, the podcast reported. The graphic depicts sex as a spectrum and defines gender identity as “how you think about yourself”.
Stonewall and the BBC have used this graphic, which was made independently
Stonewall and the BBC have used this graphic, which was made independently
The podcast described the BBC as the least transparent of the public bodies approached for information. The corporation refused to release internal documents relating to Stonewall under the Freedom of Infomation Act and declined to put an executive forward for interview.
It also refused to answer questions on matters including whether Stonewall had influenced language in BBC News’s style guide. Critics have pointed out that the BBC’s definition of “homosexual” mirrors language used by Stonewall in describing someone “attracted to people of their own gender”.
The Times has previously heard concerns from senior members of BBC staff, who have raised questions about the broadcaster being financially linked to Stonewall, as well as about how the charity’s advice could affect reporting. One source said it was “obviously right” for the BBC to withdraw from Diversity Champions.
The BBC has declined to comment on its membership of the scheme. A spokesperson said: “We are not a member of Stonewall, we do not take legal advice from Stonewall and we do not subscribe to Stonewall’s campaigning. The charity simply provides advice that we are able to consider. As a broadcaster, we have our own values and editorial standards.”
Nolan Investigates also examined Ofcom’s links to Stonewall. During the making of the podcast, the media regulator withdrew from Diversity Champions, saying it could create a “risk of perceived bias” and that “our responsibility is to ensure we remain impartial and independent at all times”. Ofcom will, however, continue to submit to the Workplace Equality Index.
Stephen Nolan’s series tackles gender identity and critics of the concept
Stephen Nolan’s series tackles gender identity and critics of the concept
BBC
Advertisement
Nolan Investigates obtained documents revealing how Ofcom highlighted broadcasting standards rulings related to gender issues to help it move up Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index. It also reported that Stonewall representatives provided workshops for Ofcom staff on equality issues.
Ofcom said: “Stonewall’s advice, and our membership of its Equality Index, have never had any impact on our regulatory decisions. We recognise that our membership of the Diversity Champions programme risked a perceived conflict of interest, and we have stepped back from the scheme.”
Stonewall said: “Our work with the BBC focuses on helping to build an LGBTQ+ inclusive workplace for its employees, and in no way affects their impartiality. Supporting LGBTQ+ people in the workplace should not be seen as a political or controversial act.”
The podcasts can be found here, but I don't know if people outside the UK can access them.
BBC Sounds - Nolan Investigates - Available Episodes
Listen to the latest episodes of Nolan Investigates on BBC Sounds
www.bbc.co.uk
- Registrado
- 10 de Sep, 2021
I've uploaded the Podcast about Stonewall on Google Drive if you're geoblocked or want to download it
drive.google.com
BBC Nolan Investigates - Stonewall - Google Drive
- Registrado
- 20 de Mayo, 2021
Oh huh. Its just like with the MTF where you imagine them balding to see how poorly they pass, except with the FTM you don't have to imagine.
Yuck
Art Kassul
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 22 de Sep, 2021
Texas is forcing trannies to exercise. Every trans thinner in Texas.
Art Kassul
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 22 de Sep, 2021